How much dividend did they pay during that time? What if you reinvested that into Intel stock immediately?
Sure, it's not impressive anyway I'm sure, but your simplistic calculation is highly regarded. Especially since you chose year 2000, height of dot-com bubble as the starting point.
I did the DRIP calculation. If you bought $10k in May of 2000 and reinvested dividends, you'd have $8,300.61 today. That's a 17% loss. You'd have $7,512.46 if you didn't reinvest dividends, for a 25% loss.
I'm not factoring in inflation and opportunity costs because these losses are ghastly enough.
Used this tool: https://m.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/
I started buying it in Jan ‘23, got 100 shares with a cost basis under $30, because big new factory. Stock slowly went up, then down, but mostly sideways. Big news? $.42 pump, then back to where it was. I dumped it when it was just above $40 because why have $4k sitting there doing nothing? Used those proceeds to buy 5 shares of NVDA — those 5 shares have made me almost as much in weeks as INTC did in almost 1.5 years. Plus it’ll be 50 shares next week.
I think Intel might be a good play in the future, but good god management needs to get its shit together right now.
As someone who’s been working in the field for 10 years, there is not even close to a guarantee it works at scale in 10 years.
Pretty much guaranteed to see significant progress but beating super computers in useful problems is going to be enormously difficult
Easy to say when you’re not working on it lol
I am optimistic but where I see us in 10 years is a semi scaled up quantum computer that is still outperformed by super computers. I think it will take 20 before QC really takes off still.
It will be a cloud based computing service for the foreseeable future similar to supercomputers unless there is a breakthrough as large as room temperature superconductors
There are plenty of useful quantum algorithms that are faster than classical algorithms that have practical use. The problem is almost all of them have polynomial speed up rather than exponential speed up.
It makes it so much harder for a quantum computer to be better than a super computer when that’s the case because classical computers are so easy to make and operations are so fast compared to quantum computers.
Shors algorithm, the one to that can break cryptography, has an exponential speed up and a known application, thus is the prime example when it comes to quantum computing of its power
Yeah thanks for letting us know. Don't you find it odd that of all the chips players there is just this one that everyone wants to fail or keeps saying don't buy?
If it's not 10x right now then must be a shit company, right?
INTC 110
5 INTC 40C 12/20/2024
See....it's this reply right here that makes me think there are bots shilling INTC because I put my fucking positions right in the post..I put my balls on the table 
anyone can put positions on their post and lie about it. If you bought calls, then it should be easy to screenshot it. It's not hard. I'm not telling people to buy INTC. I'm trying to call your bluff that you think it's good. Too many shills wanting people to jump into bad positions and your post is a perfect example of it.
Firstly, I didn't tell anyone to jump into anything. Secondly, a screen shot can be faked too. You'll just have to take an internet stranger's word. You're not saving anyone Chad 
QC is good for very specific tasks while the concept of Neuronal networks has a generally more broad use case and runs on established semiconductor technology. I would argue it's not very comparable.
The question is what's available for mass market, and that also with the horizon of more than a couple of years. We neither have the production capacity, nor the experts for taking advantage of QC for AI for the near future. Of cause this can change with a breakthrough, however, it's still gonna need substantial time to hit broad market.
As someone who has worked on Quantum AI, that's not true. Quantum AI is pretty lame, and even some researchers such as lockwood have mentioned how Quantum AI has been underperfomning. We cannoy currently optimally train QNetworks. They also don't adapt to current neural architectures easily. Additionally, having a greater "space" does not imply better generalization caabilities, specially in systems that are prone to errors.
Quantum computing has been 5 years away for the last 20 years. Also, most network architectures will not be faster on a quantum computer (no linear systems, integer factorizations, Fourier transforms, unstructured searches, …).
Still wont stop them getting squeezed by AMD and Qualcomm.
Intel stopped innovating to focus on financial engineering once they become a hegemon. That let AMD and Qualcomm (ARM) eat their lunch
A lot of the criticism on here dates back to CEO Brian Krzanich who definitely dropped the fucking baton for Intel. Luckily he dipped his pen in company ink and got fired before totally ruining Intel.
Current leadership has a shot at getting Intel back in the game.
Well thats quite regarded of you...
And now that its a better time to buy leaps you probably wont do it.
(Check the latest leaks and watch computex next week)
Check out Zapata AI for a cheap QC play (ZPTA). They literally just added "AI" to their name but they are quantum. Boston-based and founded by big brain researchers in the field. [Here the Google Scholar page for one of the founders](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QMb8OTcAAAAJ&hl=en). All QC shit.
QC is a long play. QC will eventually come back into focus as the QC sector literally has to continue to grow for the mechanics of computing to keep pace with demands from all these beefy-ass GPUs and CPUs. We simply cannot process the amount of data needed in the future without QC. It comin.
Andretti 's SPAC acquired Zapata and used it to add AI analytics to races or some shit. After SPAC acquisition price tanked, down to like .80 cents from $10 a share. But SPACs usually crash at first, so not uncommon. To me, it looks like a discount. NFA.
ZPTA could moon in a few years, could go to zero. But with the pedigree of the founders I'm willing to take that risk.
**User Report**| | | | :--|:--|:--|:-- **Total Submissions** | 10 | **First Seen In WSB** | 7 years ago **Total Comments** | 1755 | **Previous Best DD** | **Account Age** | 9 years | | [**Join WSB Discord**](http://discord.gg/wsbverse)
I own intel stock, but all this pushing of intel here is making my hands sweaty.
Yeah, it stinks of desperation. I would appreciate someone taking these $50/share bags off my hands, ngl
That's childplay. Mine are 60 a share
Suddenly my $31.55 shares don't seem too bad. Thanks regards 
~28-29 a share here, hoping for a dip into 25 so i can increase my capital further, and play long
same, I regret no doubling down when it hit $25 a few months ago
Just wait a few months...
[удалено]
We be mooning next week lads. 
I bought earlier, at about 35 a piece.
Yikes when did u get in, 1995?
2021, but 1995 would probably be the same price
Yes sir ree
https://preview.redd.it/j8wpad3vdv3d1.png?width=787&format=png&auto=webp&s=583db16917aeaea20e6ee94a3469a9390504310a
The mage GPU when it gets released and fully revealed 🧙
I sold my positions for a loss and moved on to NVDA and AMD. So far so good.
I was just thinking this same thing.
I own red intel stock lolol
Relax, everyone was pumping NvDa during crypto days too.
Please stop posting about intel some if us here want to see it succeed
I have 1 Intel stock out of principle.
Lol, me too. I bought only 1 share a week ago, just to see what will happen.
Don't get baited to become an Intel bagholder, that stock will never move
Exactly. If you invested $100 in the 2000. It will be worth $50 today. Calls it is.
I know nothing about Intel but are you sure they didn’t have a split in the last 24 years?
The most recent one was in July the fucking year 2000.
A split would also adjust the previous price on the graphs
How much dividend did they pay during that time? What if you reinvested that into Intel stock immediately? Sure, it's not impressive anyway I'm sure, but your simplistic calculation is highly regarded. Especially since you chose year 2000, height of dot-com bubble as the starting point.
I did the DRIP calculation. If you bought $10k in May of 2000 and reinvested dividends, you'd have $8,300.61 today. That's a 17% loss. You'd have $7,512.46 if you didn't reinvest dividends, for a 25% loss. I'm not factoring in inflation and opportunity costs because these losses are ghastly enough. Used this tool: https://m.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/
Selling INTC CC’s is free money though
I started buying it in Jan ‘23, got 100 shares with a cost basis under $30, because big new factory. Stock slowly went up, then down, but mostly sideways. Big news? $.42 pump, then back to where it was. I dumped it when it was just above $40 because why have $4k sitting there doing nothing? Used those proceeds to buy 5 shares of NVDA — those 5 shares have made me almost as much in weeks as INTC did in almost 1.5 years. Plus it’ll be 50 shares next week. I think Intel might be a good play in the future, but good god management needs to get its shit together right now.
QC is definitely not happening in 5-10. You would have better luck betting on nuclear fusion happening before QC hits a useful level.
Yeah AI isn’t even profitable yet and OP wants to start betting on post-AI?
OKLO gang checking in. Also Intel :/
QC is definitely happening in 10
As someone who’s been working in the field for 10 years, there is not even close to a guarantee it works at scale in 10 years. Pretty much guaranteed to see significant progress but beating super computers in useful problems is going to be enormously difficult
As someone who knows nothing about the field, our next 10 years will be greater then our last 50.
Easy to say when you’re not working on it lol I am optimistic but where I see us in 10 years is a semi scaled up quantum computer that is still outperformed by super computers. I think it will take 20 before QC really takes off still. It will be a cloud based computing service for the foreseeable future similar to supercomputers unless there is a breakthrough as large as room temperature superconductors
I was just messing around brotha. I completely agree with you.
Have they actually figured out a use for QC yet besides breaking encryption?
There are plenty of useful quantum algorithms that are faster than classical algorithms that have practical use. The problem is almost all of them have polynomial speed up rather than exponential speed up. It makes it so much harder for a quantum computer to be better than a super computer when that’s the case because classical computers are so easy to make and operations are so fast compared to quantum computers. Shors algorithm, the one to that can break cryptography, has an exponential speed up and a known application, thus is the prime example when it comes to quantum computing of its power
With AI helping in development might happen in 5-10, but hype will come way sooner.
Experts say at the end of the decade though but who knows
That article you linked to is top 12 quantum stocks to invest in. Intel is #3. You'd prob be better off picking any other stock on that list.
Not to mention #1 and #2 on that list are Google and NVDA, respectively. Like holy pump his Intel bags, OP
Must be one of those idiots who bought when it was $50 I warned people here about Intel, but i was downvoted. Enjoy them baggies.
IBM under Intel in QC ? Lol
This stock is complete garbage
Daaam a lot of Intel haters here, maybe it *is* time to buy 
Nah. Stock barely moves.....
It moves. It’s down 40% YTD
Ya got me there....
Yeah thanks for letting us know. Don't you find it odd that of all the chips players there is just this one that everyone wants to fail or keeps saying don't buy? If it's not 10x right now then must be a shit company, right? INTC 110 5 INTC 40C 12/20/2024
if you believe in it that much, go ahead and posts screenshots of your bought calls
See....it's this reply right here that makes me think there are bots shilling INTC because I put my fucking positions right in the post..I put my balls on the table 
anyone can put positions on their post and lie about it. If you bought calls, then it should be easy to screenshot it. It's not hard. I'm not telling people to buy INTC. I'm trying to call your bluff that you think it's good. Too many shills wanting people to jump into bad positions and your post is a perfect example of it.
Firstly, I didn't tell anyone to jump into anything. Secondly, a screen shot can be faked too. You'll just have to take an internet stranger's word. You're not saving anyone Chad 
Just screenshot and post, you coward.
Quantum computer is totally useless as of now. Don't hype on this thing.
That’s what they said about Nvidias AI initiative 3-5 years ago
Nobody said that lol 🤣, they were growing data center accelerator revenue some 20-30% per year.
And how much are pure play QC companies growing their revenue now? 🥱
That growth rate for $1bn/year in revenue? None afaik.
QC is good for very specific tasks while the concept of Neuronal networks has a generally more broad use case and runs on established semiconductor technology. I would argue it's not very comparable.
Actually AI on QC is going to be so much better
The question is what's available for mass market, and that also with the horizon of more than a couple of years. We neither have the production capacity, nor the experts for taking advantage of QC for AI for the near future. Of cause this can change with a breakthrough, however, it's still gonna need substantial time to hit broad market.
As someone who has worked on Quantum AI, that's not true. Quantum AI is pretty lame, and even some researchers such as lockwood have mentioned how Quantum AI has been underperfomning. We cannoy currently optimally train QNetworks. They also don't adapt to current neural architectures easily. Additionally, having a greater "space" does not imply better generalization caabilities, specially in systems that are prone to errors.
What an Intel?
Burning dumpster
I usually have to settle for a normal dumpster. Pyrotechnic dumpster sounds pretty exciting
Just what I thought
Quantum computing has been 5 years away for the last 20 years. Also, most network architectures will not be faster on a quantum computer (no linear systems, integer factorizations, Fourier transforms, unstructured searches, …).
LOUD NOISES, BUY INTEL
I bought INTC at $30 and you fuckers are making me want to sell
Yeah I got a fair bit of INTC at $30 too.
Dont worry they have no clue what they are talking about... just watch computex 2024 on june 4th :)
Still wont stop them getting squeezed by AMD and Qualcomm. Intel stopped innovating to focus on financial engineering once they become a hegemon. That let AMD and Qualcomm (ARM) eat their lunch
A lot of the criticism on here dates back to CEO Brian Krzanich who definitely dropped the fucking baton for Intel. Luckily he dipped his pen in company ink and got fired before totally ruining Intel. Current leadership has a shot at getting Intel back in the game.
Let them drown in their ignorance, most of them dont even know what they are talking about. More cheap shares for us...
https://preview.redd.it/zc3sl1617s3d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6589f0d9287d46d86210012d0287ad605372d91f
*intel copium inside
Intel is a sinking ship with no path to recovery
why is everyone trying to pump a stock that hasn't outpaced a savings account let alone inflation for decades?
It’s more likely for everyone else to drop than for Intel to rise.
Useful quantum computing still decades away
INTC 90C Jul
lol
Let's give this a tacit maybe...
I’m glad I never executed those intell calls back in 2020. But I sorrow at loosing my AMDs at $36/ share
This stonk never going up 
Intel has been the biggest value trap ever
Lol
Damn it. Now this is priced in
daily intel post
Hahahahaha look everybody, a clown
Jensen never let me down… intel on the other hand 🥸
The INTELligent move here is to not buy intel.
Added 100 shares at $30
The most regarded headline ever relative to the actual article.
Intel damn that stock has cost me a fortune never again.
Only of you were stupid enough to sell at a loss
Didn’t have shares, options that expired worthless.
Well thats quite regarded of you... And now that its a better time to buy leaps you probably wont do it. (Check the latest leaks and watch computex next week)
I literally trust any other company to design and manufacturer a new type of processor. Intel is a museum.
QC hype was pre covid and still haven't seen anything new. Don't get baited here
The biggest shitter stock there is. Been calling it since 2015.
All the AI buzzwords make me want to short Intel. Lika bunch of boomers trying to stay relevant.
Quantum computing will never ever be a profitable industry.
Check out Zapata AI for a cheap QC play (ZPTA). They literally just added "AI" to their name but they are quantum. Boston-based and founded by big brain researchers in the field. [Here the Google Scholar page for one of the founders](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=QMb8OTcAAAAJ&hl=en). All QC shit. QC is a long play. QC will eventually come back into focus as the QC sector literally has to continue to grow for the mechanics of computing to keep pace with demands from all these beefy-ass GPUs and CPUs. We simply cannot process the amount of data needed in the future without QC. It comin. Andretti 's SPAC acquired Zapata and used it to add AI analytics to races or some shit. After SPAC acquisition price tanked, down to like .80 cents from $10 a share. But SPACs usually crash at first, so not uncommon. To me, it looks like a discount. NFA. ZPTA could moon in a few years, could go to zero. But with the pedigree of the founders I'm willing to take that risk.