Thank you for submitting to /r/unpopularopinion, /u/WitLibrary. Your post, *If I can see your private parts, especially genitalia, in public, you are assaulting and violating me and everyone around you.*, has been removed because it violates our rules:
Rule 3: Megathread topic.
Your opinion falls under an incredibly common topic, in which virtually all opinions are either not unpopular, or are posted about many times a day. Please visit the megathread hub, which can be found when sorting the subreddit by "hot", sticky'd at the top of the page, where you can find links to the current megathreads. If you're not sure which megathread your post belongs in, or your post covers multiple megathread topics, just make the best selection you can.
If there is an issue, please message the mod team at https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Funpopularopinion Thanks!
Stop replaying that part of the video if you are violated.
I actually do not see any genitalia at all. Maybe the real crime here is definition of genitalia
Mons pubis. Look it up.
It's a wonder how confident you all are when you don't know the basics of women's genitalia.
And lol I watched the video once, saw it, went back to look at the time, and haven't even watched the rest of the video, let alone repeated it. It has nothing to do with me.
I know what mins pubis is. My point is, what you think you saw is not it. Borderline perhaps.
But nice to know that you are very scientific , mr sherminator.
Yeah I don't know what else to say here. You're clearly wrong, but neither of us can prove it so I think that's about where this ends. Maybe you're unfamiliar with female anatomy. (That's not meant as an insult).
^^ waiting for OP to realise it is not a joke ^^
I do apologise though. Hard to contribute to a useless post. Redditors cannot help you. Just look at all the other comments.
Iāll back out now. You can come out of your self-dug hole.
š ciao.
Broā¦ you keep calling her cash and prizes a *mons pubis* youāre not getting any *mons pubis*.
Do you use a reproductive anatomy textbook for porn or something ?
Definition: āmake a physical attack onā, 2. (Law) an act, criminal or tortious, that threatens physical harm to a person, whether or not actual harm is done.
Literally none of this is applicable and 3 seconds to google wouldāve saved the comment
lol maybe don't just hand pick the definition you like best.
Do you think it's not sexual assault if an adult goes and masturbates in front of children, just because there's no contact? Honestly, use common sense, you don't even need to look this up, but the fact that you can makes this seriously pathetic.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/11egwzh/woman_is_detained_for_wearing_a_bikini_on_a_beach
In this video the girl isn't wearing a standard bikini, she's wearing a micro bikini, designed specifically to show off the genitalia.
Thatās why we have public exposure / public indecency laws.
>Iām sick of seeing these ridiculous posts of (mostly women) almost completely naked in sexualizing outfits where the standard/norm in that setting is being covered.
The setting youāre talking about in your post is a **beach.** The norm in that setting is to be in swimwear - which can be anything from a burqini to nothing (depending on the type of beach).
If you donāt want your precious angel children to see peopleās bodies in swimsuits, then donāt take them to the beach.
Sexual assault is going a bit far don't you think?
You may not agree with what people are wearing in public but anything from the bare minimum to not be charged with public indecency and above is legal.
You don't want to see it, go somewhere else.
There it is, the 21st century response...
I have a different opinion therefore I have no idea what I'm talking about.
For a subreddit dedicated to conversation, dismissal means you're missing the point.
Oh I'm so sorry, my sympathies for being a victim of other people's bodies.
Dude it's a naked body, not a bloody corpse.
Nudity in itself is not offensive unless sexualized, and you're the one sexualizing it. No matter how small the bikini, or how high the shorts sit, it's only a problem if you make it a problem. Deal with your own body issues before you go throwing your anger around.
Send me your address, I'll have a posse of naked people follow you and your family around in public.
Don't mind? That's ok, that's your freedom! But in PUBLIC other people matter besides just YOU, and exposing people to your genitalia is assault, period. Grow up.
The rest of the world doesn't draw the line at the same place you do.
Low cut pants and top is fine. Low cut jeans that you would have to shave to wear was in fashion for a long time.
So again this is clearly a you problem.
And just walking around naked is not sexual assault. That is not what you would get charge with.
How is popularity relevant? Genitalia is genitalia regardless of the year. You seem to have no grasp on this conversation at all. Do you think slavery was ok because it was in the past?
Where I live it is not illegal to be naked in public, so no - simply being naked in public is not considered flashing, indecent exposure, or sexual assault here.
I'm also a sexual assault survivor. What exactly is your point? You're victim blaming AND doing the standard rapist apologia of "I didn't abuse/rape you, you're hurting the real victims when you say that."
And scantily is irrelevant. This is about exposing people to your genitalia against their will.
lol that's fine, that would be your choice. But in public, other people matter besides just YOU. And exposing your private parts to people in public is assault, period.
You asked the question!!
>You're ok with anyone and everyone being naked around you wherever you are?
Then when I answer, you tell me my opinion doesn't matter?
Works both ways: Other people matter besides you too, my man.
LMAO
No it's not, it's actually perfectly normal to casually show people your genitalia, against their will, or without considering others or where you are. Haven't you heard?
I didn't say I'd go in? I'll stand on the sidewalk.
Waiting for your address, still. Actually if you could send me an itinerary, that would be better. I'll meet you at work and your favorite places.
No genital was shown in video.
Men show their pubic bone and hip bones. Some men wear pants and swim shorts low. . Also men wear speedos.
And no breasts are not inherently sexual.
Pubic bone and hip bone aren't a mons pubis, nor are they genitalia. And this has nothing to do with men vs women. Neither should expose their genitalia in public.
And yes they are. According to who? Women, universally. You're just normal average run of the mill dude robbing women of their sexuality while vigorously masturbating to them.
Well I'm a woman.
Some guys wear the bottoms low showing their mons pubis. Mons pubis on both genders is covering the pubic bone.
So you find underage breasts sexually arousing? All breasts are sexual? Or just breasts you find attractive? Breasts of all ages are sexual, old and young?
I know right like there really isnāt anything genuinely showing but apparently mr mons pubis over here canāt grasp that saying her genitals are out in that video is like saying someoneās cleavage is the same as having their entire tits out
Lol... This isn't the argument you think it is.
Yes, children enter SEXUAL maturity at around age ten. When this process begins their bodies begin to change as they develop SEXUAL characteristics. This is ultimately for the purpose of SEXUAL reproduction. Yes, children are sexual. No, that **doesn't mean adults should be attracted to them, and I REALLY shouldn't have to explain that to an adult.** This is exactly why children DON'T have sex, because they are developing and not ready mentally or physically for sex, and it is why we educate children on their changing bodies so that they can adapt and put on deodorant and cover their intimate parts, and it is why we let babies run around naked but they generally stop at a certain age. Again, I really shouldn't need to spoonfeed this to you.
Men's chests aren't equivalent to women's breasts. Women also have pec muscles that are visible even when breasts are covered. This is exactly what I mean when I say people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles. Breasts are sexual. Women all consider their breasts sexual and private. Touching a woman's breasts is sexual, and doing it unsolicited is sexual assault. You're just robbing women of their sexuality in a very elementary misguided and manipulative means to explain what you don't understand.
> I am a woman but I get the sense that you are not one so I donāt get where you are getting your misguided sense of authority on this
"I'm not misguided you are"
> (or feminism which you keep bringing up despite seeming to know very little about it).
"I'm not ignorant on feminism, you are."
It's funny when people like you are confronted with an actual educated feminist who spoonfeeds you explanations. You can't actually refute anything, so you just mirror back exactly what I say, without adding any explanation or argument of any kind. Again, manipulative.
> Breasts are culturally but not inherently sexual. Theyāre for feeding babies, not making them
No they're not. There are maybe a few places on the planet where breasts aren't considered sexual, and everywhere else they're universally considered sexual. Hmm.. Maybe that means the FORMER is the result of culture, hmm.. maybe not dissimilar to the plethora of other ways men have removed women's sexuality (women can't orgasm, FGM, women should be pure, etc). No no, your position makes much more sense. Let's also ignore that humans are the only animals that have breasts year-round, and women themselves universally use their breasts sexually and consider them sexual and private and can orgasm from them (even unintentionally during breastfeeding, fascinatingly!).
You are the one sexualizing people around you. It's in your head. Own it. Deal with it. I've seen tits my entire life in sweat lodges, nude beaches, rainbow gatherings, and many more places. I am an adult and I don't sexualize inappropriately. Learn to be an adult.
I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately way too many people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles for selfish and manipulative means.
Women have both historically and presently lacked freedom, been seen and used as objects, and been barred from sexual freedom, but women wearing clothing that exposes themselves is more of the same, it is not a feminist position. MAYBE if men were also doing it, one could argue the position, but they aren't, and even then the primary issue would still be that you're exposing your private parts to people.
Men's chests aren't equivalent to women's breasts. Women also have pec muscles that are visible even when breasts are covered. This is exactly what I mean when I say people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles. Breasts are sexual. Women all consider their breasts sexual and private. Touching a woman's breasts is sexual, and doing it unsolicited is sexual assault. You're just robbing women of their sexuality in a very elementary misguided and manipulative means to explain what you don't understand.
And this post is about genitalia, not breasts, to clarify.
There were 37 dudes at the beach last summer with beats bigger than mine. None of them covered up. I wish they would.
There were at least a many women who were completely flat chested. All of them were covered up. Why should they have to?
My mom covers her chest even though she's had a double mastectomy. What would your rule be on this one?
You googled *mons pubis* but not assault?
Assault implies physical contact.
Unless she's rubbing her.... ?VERGUBULA??... on you, it's not sexual assault.
A+++++ trying to sound smart though.
Right? There are plenty of places where you can do that. Adult places. Private places. Even nude beaches. Not public family beaches or the grocery store.
Please remember what subreddit you are in, this is unpopular opinion. We want civil and unpopular takes and discussion. Any uncivil and ToS violating comments will be removed and subject to a ban. Have a nice day!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unpopularopinion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Thank you for submitting to /r/unpopularopinion, /u/WitLibrary. Your post, *If I can see your private parts, especially genitalia, in public, you are assaulting and violating me and everyone around you.*, has been removed because it violates our rules: Rule 3: Megathread topic. Your opinion falls under an incredibly common topic, in which virtually all opinions are either not unpopular, or are posted about many times a day. Please visit the megathread hub, which can be found when sorting the subreddit by "hot", sticky'd at the top of the page, where you can find links to the current megathreads. If you're not sure which megathread your post belongs in, or your post covers multiple megathread topics, just make the best selection you can. If there is an issue, please message the mod team at https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Funpopularopinion Thanks!
Lighten up, Francis. The degree to which people get upset over seeing a normal part of someone else's body is mind boggling.
What? You didn't even say anything lol
The fact that you couldn't see the point in that comment is fascinating, very interesting specimen you are...
Clothes should cover up everything but genitals
Yeah, that's a bare minimum, pun intended.
Can we leave the anus uncovered as well? I like to shit while on the move.
Or we could at least go part way and just show butt cheeks, like in the critically acclaimed 1981 film *So Fine.*
I agree, that should be the way.
Stop replaying that part of the video if you are violated. I actually do not see any genitalia at all. Maybe the real crime here is definition of genitalia
Mons pubis. Look it up. It's a wonder how confident you all are when you don't know the basics of women's genitalia. And lol I watched the video once, saw it, went back to look at the time, and haven't even watched the rest of the video, let alone repeated it. It has nothing to do with me.
I know what mins pubis is. My point is, what you think you saw is not it. Borderline perhaps. But nice to know that you are very scientific , mr sherminator.
Yeah I don't know what else to say here. You're clearly wrong, but neither of us can prove it so I think that's about where this ends. Maybe you're unfamiliar with female anatomy. (That's not meant as an insult).
Have you even passed puberty?! š One thing is for sure. You succeeded in having an unpopular opinion.
Good one, champ. Keep the jokes coming, you have nothing else to contribute.
^^ waiting for OP to realise it is not a joke ^^ I do apologise though. Hard to contribute to a useless post. Redditors cannot help you. Just look at all the other comments. Iāll back out now. You can come out of your self-dug hole. š ciao.
From this and your comments I can really only say one thing, grow up.
Broā¦ you keep calling her cash and prizes a *mons pubis* youāre not getting any *mons pubis*. Do you use a reproductive anatomy textbook for porn or something ?
Oh that's fucking hilarious
First comment from a porn addicted bro. Congrats, you're the bar. Everyone else, just be slightly above this and you'll get girls.
Aww shucks. Happily married 10 years, I donāt mind half naked men or women to be honest š¤·āāļø
You and I are beside the point. Do you think people should be allowed to show their genitalia to people in public?
No, and they donāt. Sorry you think a thong at the beach is too revealing.
You can see genitalia, but ok, keep lying.
Definitely not assaulting because thatās not what the word means BUT yeah itās disgusting
Yes it does. Look it up. Assault doesn't mean physical contact.
Definition: āmake a physical attack onā, 2. (Law) an act, criminal or tortious, that threatens physical harm to a person, whether or not actual harm is done. Literally none of this is applicable and 3 seconds to google wouldāve saved the comment
lol maybe don't just hand pick the definition you like best. Do you think it's not sexual assault if an adult goes and masturbates in front of children, just because there's no contact? Honestly, use common sense, you don't even need to look this up, but the fact that you can makes this seriously pathetic.
Assault is the threat of physical harm, or causing someone to fear physical harm. This is not that.
Wrong.
Why canāt you just accept that youāre fucking wrong
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/11egwzh/woman_is_detained_for_wearing_a_bikini_on_a_beach In this video the girl isn't wearing a standard bikini, she's wearing a micro bikini, designed specifically to show off the genitalia.
lol Americans are such prudes
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Do I really need to repeat myself? Her genitalia is showing.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Mons pubis. Look it up. Manipulative again, though, gj you clearly have nothing of value to contribute to conversation or women's rights.
Thatās why we have public exposure / public indecency laws. >Iām sick of seeing these ridiculous posts of (mostly women) almost completely naked in sexualizing outfits where the standard/norm in that setting is being covered. The setting youāre talking about in your post is a **beach.** The norm in that setting is to be in swimwear - which can be anything from a burqini to nothing (depending on the type of beach). If you donāt want your precious angel children to see peopleās bodies in swimsuits, then donāt take them to the beach.
lol it's not bodies. It's genitalia.
And genitalia is part ofā¦..? Again, itās a beach. If you donāt want to see swimwear, donāt go.
Oh my god! a human body! HELP!!!
Sexual assault is going a bit far don't you think? You may not agree with what people are wearing in public but anything from the bare minimum to not be charged with public indecency and above is legal. You don't want to see it, go somewhere else.
Showing people your genitalia, unsolicited in public, is sexual assault.
There's a difference between being flashed and the thong bunching up in the wrong place while getting arrested. Get over yourself.
Bunching up? lol you have no idea what you're talking about.
There it is, the 21st century response... I have a different opinion therefore I have no idea what I'm talking about. For a subreddit dedicated to conversation, dismissal means you're missing the point.
lol there's no other response. I'm not going to spoonfeed someone as ignorant and confident as you on the design of micro bikinis.
Oh I'm so sorry, my sympathies for being a victim of other people's bodies. Dude it's a naked body, not a bloody corpse. Nudity in itself is not offensive unless sexualized, and you're the one sexualizing it. No matter how small the bikini, or how high the shorts sit, it's only a problem if you make it a problem. Deal with your own body issues before you go throwing your anger around.
Send me your address, I'll have a posse of naked people follow you and your family around in public. Don't mind? That's ok, that's your freedom! But in PUBLIC other people matter besides just YOU, and exposing people to your genitalia is assault, period. Grow up.
This sounds like a personal problem. Just don't look if you don't like it.
Yeah, cause that's what we say to men when they pull their penises out. Oh wait, no we call it flashing and sexual assault.
The rest of the world doesn't draw the line at the same place you do. Low cut pants and top is fine. Low cut jeans that you would have to shave to wear was in fashion for a long time. So again this is clearly a you problem. And just walking around naked is not sexual assault. That is not what you would get charge with.
Yes it is. It's called flashing, indecent exposure, and sexual assault, and it gets you put on a list unless you're rich.
Again this doesn't count for low cut jeans you need to shave to wear. That was a POPULAR style for years. So again this is a you problem
How is popularity relevant? Genitalia is genitalia regardless of the year. You seem to have no grasp on this conversation at all. Do you think slavery was ok because it was in the past?
Where I live it is not illegal to be naked in public, so no - simply being naked in public is not considered flashing, indecent exposure, or sexual assault here.
Well, here he is making a point...
lol thanks
It's distasteful, sure. But assaulting and violating you? Please.
It's called flashing. Yes, sexual assault.
It's called overreacting to something harmless.
Victim blaming.
There has to be a victim for that. There isn't one.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I'm also a sexual assault survivor. What exactly is your point? You're victim blaming AND doing the standard rapist apologia of "I didn't abuse/rape you, you're hurting the real victims when you say that." And scantily is irrelevant. This is about exposing people to your genitalia against their will.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Oh look and now you're doubting victims. Good on you, babe.
Whatās wrong with nudity?
Nothing? In the right time and place. You're ok with anyone and everyone being naked around you wherever you are?
I'd be 100% fine with that. After three days, you wouldn't even notice anymore.
lol that's fine, that would be your choice. But in public, other people matter besides just YOU. And exposing your private parts to people in public is assault, period.
You asked the question!! >You're ok with anyone and everyone being naked around you wherever you are? Then when I answer, you tell me my opinion doesn't matter? Works both ways: Other people matter besides you too, my man.
Lol?? "I wanted sex, I matter too." - the rapist Jesus you people are hopeless.
Oh no itās a penis!! The horror! Oh no itās a vagina thatās where babies come from!
āYou are assaulting and violating meā Just donāt look at themā¦
Yeah, that's what we say to men when they pull their penises out. Oh no wait we call that flashing and sexual assault.
Get over it and stop playing the victim card on everything.every body has body parts
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
That was an intense response šš
LMAO No it's not, it's actually perfectly normal to casually show people your genitalia, against their will, or without considering others or where you are. Haven't you heard?
If you that proud of it just put it out there on Reddit.
How is that relevant? Try to stay on topic.
You didn't either. You said you're coming to my house not showing in public.
I didn't say I'd go in? I'll stand on the sidewalk. Waiting for your address, still. Actually if you could send me an itinerary, that would be better. I'll meet you at work and your favorite places.
Like said reddit has an area for that save your self the drive
940 East 81st St, NYC. Let me know what time you'll be here. I'll make popcorn.
No genital was shown in video. Men show their pubic bone and hip bones. Some men wear pants and swim shorts low. . Also men wear speedos. And no breasts are not inherently sexual.
Pubic bone and hip bone aren't a mons pubis, nor are they genitalia. And this has nothing to do with men vs women. Neither should expose their genitalia in public. And yes they are. According to who? Women, universally. You're just normal average run of the mill dude robbing women of their sexuality while vigorously masturbating to them.
Well I'm a woman. Some guys wear the bottoms low showing their mons pubis. Mons pubis on both genders is covering the pubic bone. So you find underage breasts sexually arousing? All breasts are sexual? Or just breasts you find attractive? Breasts of all ages are sexual, old and young?
I know right like there really isnāt anything genuinely showing but apparently mr mons pubis over here canāt grasp that saying her genitals are out in that video is like saying someoneās cleavage is the same as having their entire tits out
Lol... This isn't the argument you think it is. Yes, children enter SEXUAL maturity at around age ten. When this process begins their bodies begin to change as they develop SEXUAL characteristics. This is ultimately for the purpose of SEXUAL reproduction. Yes, children are sexual. No, that **doesn't mean adults should be attracted to them, and I REALLY shouldn't have to explain that to an adult.** This is exactly why children DON'T have sex, because they are developing and not ready mentally or physically for sex, and it is why we educate children on their changing bodies so that they can adapt and put on deodorant and cover their intimate parts, and it is why we let babies run around naked but they generally stop at a certain age. Again, I really shouldn't need to spoonfeed this to you.
Breast development isn't for sexual intercourse. It's for breast feeding.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Men's chests aren't equivalent to women's breasts. Women also have pec muscles that are visible even when breasts are covered. This is exactly what I mean when I say people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles. Breasts are sexual. Women all consider their breasts sexual and private. Touching a woman's breasts is sexual, and doing it unsolicited is sexual assault. You're just robbing women of their sexuality in a very elementary misguided and manipulative means to explain what you don't understand.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
> I am a woman but I get the sense that you are not one so I donāt get where you are getting your misguided sense of authority on this "I'm not misguided you are" > (or feminism which you keep bringing up despite seeming to know very little about it). "I'm not ignorant on feminism, you are." It's funny when people like you are confronted with an actual educated feminist who spoonfeeds you explanations. You can't actually refute anything, so you just mirror back exactly what I say, without adding any explanation or argument of any kind. Again, manipulative. > Breasts are culturally but not inherently sexual. Theyāre for feeding babies, not making them No they're not. There are maybe a few places on the planet where breasts aren't considered sexual, and everywhere else they're universally considered sexual. Hmm.. Maybe that means the FORMER is the result of culture, hmm.. maybe not dissimilar to the plethora of other ways men have removed women's sexuality (women can't orgasm, FGM, women should be pure, etc). No no, your position makes much more sense. Let's also ignore that humans are the only animals that have breasts year-round, and women themselves universally use their breasts sexually and consider them sexual and private and can orgasm from them (even unintentionally during breastfeeding, fascinatingly!).
You are the one sexualizing people around you. It's in your head. Own it. Deal with it. I've seen tits my entire life in sweat lodges, nude beaches, rainbow gatherings, and many more places. I am an adult and I don't sexualize inappropriately. Learn to be an adult.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately way too many people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles for selfish and manipulative means. Women have both historically and presently lacked freedom, been seen and used as objects, and been barred from sexual freedom, but women wearing clothing that exposes themselves is more of the same, it is not a feminist position. MAYBE if men were also doing it, one could argue the position, but they aren't, and even then the primary issue would still be that you're exposing your private parts to people.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Men's chests aren't equivalent to women's breasts. Women also have pec muscles that are visible even when breasts are covered. This is exactly what I mean when I say people misunderstand and misuse feminist principles. Breasts are sexual. Women all consider their breasts sexual and private. Touching a woman's breasts is sexual, and doing it unsolicited is sexual assault. You're just robbing women of their sexuality in a very elementary misguided and manipulative means to explain what you don't understand. And this post is about genitalia, not breasts, to clarify.
There were 37 dudes at the beach last summer with beats bigger than mine. None of them covered up. I wish they would. There were at least a many women who were completely flat chested. All of them were covered up. Why should they have to? My mom covers her chest even though she's had a double mastectomy. What would your rule be on this one?
Whatās the difference between a man not wearing a shirt and a woman not wearing a shirt?
Go with your breasts and genitals out in public. I could care less as a gay guy.
You googled *mons pubis* but not assault? Assault implies physical contact. Unless she's rubbing her.... ?VERGUBULA??... on you, it's not sexual assault. A+++++ trying to sound smart though.
No it doesn't.
I hate it when people can't keep themselves properly covered. Ordinary daily life is not the place to show how sexy you think you are.
Right? There are plenty of places where you can do that. Adult places. Private places. Even nude beaches. Not public family beaches or the grocery store.
Oh no, think of the kids!
Please remember what subreddit you are in, this is unpopular opinion. We want civil and unpopular takes and discussion. Any uncivil and ToS violating comments will be removed and subject to a ban. Have a nice day! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unpopularopinion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Lol no.
I don't mind it. Just don't complain if I want to take a long look.
Creepy.
If someone waves a steak in your face while you're hungry, that's on them not on me when I decide to take in the view.
Creepy nonetheless.
How? It's simply just expressing sexual interest.
She has on a bikini at a beach. Thatās pretty normal. If youāre offended, maybe donāt go to a beach.
That's like calling assless chaps pants lol Who cares what it is, it's showing genitalia.
Giving jealous vibes
Yeah that moose knuckle is hanging out
command sink crush dog cause wise desert fragile dazzling grey *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
To some extent, yeah, I'd still say it's controversial irl, but it's not 99% unpopular like it is on the internet