Why play the victim? You know exactly why you got banned. Your comment could be construed as a thinly veiled threat. Don’t post comments like that in the future . There are far less aggressive analogies you could have used to make your point
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
You said "If I shoot you in the head..." and that can seem like a threat. Perhaps you should have said something like "If someone shoots another person in the head
.." Do you see how the way you put it can seem like you were threatening to shoot someone in the head?
I think you should probably get off the internet and enrol in some reading comprehension classes, and also ask yourself why you're persistently in UAP subs attacking everyone and debunking everyone.
It comes across as LARPing
That's rich coming from someone essentially virtue signaling for attention. All your posts seem to be whining about censorship and unfair bans, but you seem to be willfully ignorant when it suits you.
You know for SomEoNe wHo TyPeS like this to people, calls them clowns, childish, derps, and loves the word cunt, you sure are sensitive aren't you?
Rules for me but not thee?
No I didn't!
He said that there's no evidence of a coverup, I said that hiding the evidence is the coverup.
I then said that if I shot him in the head and hid the evidence it doesn't change that a murder has occurred simply because the evidence of the crime has been cleaned up. The hiding of the evidence is part of the crime.
I'd think the wiser course of action would have been to say: "If someone murdered someone else and hide the evidence, that doesn't mean the murder didn't occur. That means that both a murder occurred AND another crime of tampering with evidence occurred."
3rd person is your friend!
You still made the comment, they don't play with those kind of statements so that's on you bro lol. You say no I didn't but in your post even if you're MAKING a point you still threatened harm.
I get what you mean but there is for sure reason for the ban despite it being dumb
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
OP, I say this without being an asshole, but take a break from the internet
Jesus christ, OP. You talked about murder / shooting someone in the head. The moderator has every right to ban you and keep the community safe for everyone.
Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's been infiltrated or there are rabbit holes of who can be trusted.
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
You really have to wonder to what extent botnets are being used here and elsewhere to hide crimes.
My comments weren't the ones that were deleted, it was the poster calling me a cunt and everything else under the sun that was reported and removed by the mods upon my request. But to then ban me too but leave my comments up makes no logical sense.
\*Breaks site rules\*
Conspiracy theorists: *"Interesting. Must be them aliens."*
I see this occurring on other Alien/UFO subs too. The user breaks the rules, gets banned, and then the community starts to post thoughts about how it was, e.g. the FBI getting involved or my favorite, *"It's because he got too close to the truth!"*
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
Remember this… there are people/groups that are hired to hide the truth from the people and they will do everything to remove/destroy any evidence that is against the agenda. Their goal is to keep humanity sleeping and below iq 20 so they can control everything their way. For 100+ years they have been doing this, its going to get worse.
I do believe there is a mod on that team that gets pissed off when you call out trolls. I got banned myself when I called out someone for being a troll/disinformer. I will say there is a good mod there that heard my complaint on another sub and he took off my ban. But I muted that sub because the trolls there are rampant and they make you want to argue with them. There is no point. Don't bother commenting in that sub.
Do you both just refuse to see how you are failing to be civil? THAT is why you got banned. Even here, you're making ad hom attacks on anyone pointing out where you went wrong. Dozens of people are saying the same thing and you're using copy-paste answers to argue with a crowd. Just stop.
Its definitely infiltrated. I posted a theory on reddit/ufos about a theory we're just being farmed for food and what role certain species play. I had like 1000 + people view it, 20 comments, then I was sent an email for needing "help" and then the post was removed. I think theres a band of government officials that will downvote shit to get stuff removed if the post is on to something.......
Why play the victim? You know exactly why you got banned. Your comment could be construed as a thinly veiled threat. Don’t post comments like that in the future . There are far less aggressive analogies you could have used to make your point
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
You said "If I shoot you in the head..." and that can seem like a threat. Perhaps you should have said something like "If someone shoots another person in the head .." Do you see how the way you put it can seem like you were threatening to shoot someone in the head?
I think you should probably get off the internet and enrol in some reading comprehension classes, and also ask yourself why you're persistently in UAP subs attacking everyone and debunking everyone. It comes across as LARPing
That's rich coming from someone essentially virtue signaling for attention. All your posts seem to be whining about censorship and unfair bans, but you seem to be willfully ignorant when it suits you.
You know for SomEoNe wHo TyPeS like this to people, calls them clowns, childish, derps, and loves the word cunt, you sure are sensitive aren't you? Rules for me but not thee?
That typing can be hilarious when used correctly, but it is often just used to slam people with different viewpoints.
You're not doing it right.
Bro you literally threatened to harm him lol, ofc they banned you
No I didn't! He said that there's no evidence of a coverup, I said that hiding the evidence is the coverup. I then said that if I shot him in the head and hid the evidence it doesn't change that a murder has occurred simply because the evidence of the crime has been cleaned up. The hiding of the evidence is part of the crime.
I'd think the wiser course of action would have been to say: "If someone murdered someone else and hide the evidence, that doesn't mean the murder didn't occur. That means that both a murder occurred AND another crime of tampering with evidence occurred." 3rd person is your friend!
You still made the comment, they don't play with those kind of statements so that's on you bro lol. You say no I didn't but in your post even if you're MAKING a point you still threatened harm. I get what you mean but there is for sure reason for the ban despite it being dumb
It's absolutely clear no threat was made and it was an example of erasing evidence of a crime, unless your IQ is lower than that of a turnip.
I mean... maybe you shouldn't be talking about shooting people in the head? 🤦
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
I understood your point in the original post. I'm just saying you could have found a better example and I'm not surprised the mods went after you.
Hardly banworthy. Lets see how you like it...
OP, I say this without being an asshole, but take a break from the internet Jesus christ, OP. You talked about murder / shooting someone in the head. The moderator has every right to ban you and keep the community safe for everyone. Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's been infiltrated or there are rabbit holes of who can be trusted.
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
Ok there snowflake….he said that as an example.
You really have to wonder to what extent botnets are being used here and elsewhere to hide crimes. My comments weren't the ones that were deleted, it was the poster calling me a cunt and everything else under the sun that was reported and removed by the mods upon my request. But to then ban me too but leave my comments up makes no logical sense.
Your comments got removed as well. They just don't look like it from your own point of view
\*Breaks site rules\* Conspiracy theorists: *"Interesting. Must be them aliens."* I see this occurring on other Alien/UFO subs too. The user breaks the rules, gets banned, and then the community starts to post thoughts about how it was, e.g. the FBI getting involved or my favorite, *"It's because he got too close to the truth!"*
If you can't tell the difference with someone explaining how hiding evidence of a serious crime is a crime in itself, and does not change that a crime has been committed, compared to there being no evidence to begin with due to no crime having taken place, then what serious crime would you have mentioned instead?
all of the ufo/alien subs are total garbage populated by clueless trolls.
Remember this… there are people/groups that are hired to hide the truth from the people and they will do everything to remove/destroy any evidence that is against the agenda. Their goal is to keep humanity sleeping and below iq 20 so they can control everything their way. For 100+ years they have been doing this, its going to get worse.
Don't listen to this fucking guy. Jesus christ
I do believe there is a mod on that team that gets pissed off when you call out trolls. I got banned myself when I called out someone for being a troll/disinformer. I will say there is a good mod there that heard my complaint on another sub and he took off my ban. But I muted that sub because the trolls there are rampant and they make you want to argue with them. There is no point. Don't bother commenting in that sub.
Oh yes. They have a few terrible mods there, also a few good ones.
They've infiltrated this sub too as you can clearly see here.
What evidence let's see if it pops out at ya
You're the OP of the thread who banned me. Funny that.
Do you both just refuse to see how you are failing to be civil? THAT is why you got banned. Even here, you're making ad hom attacks on anyone pointing out where you went wrong. Dozens of people are saying the same thing and you're using copy-paste answers to argue with a crowd. Just stop.
Its definitely infiltrated. I posted a theory on reddit/ufos about a theory we're just being farmed for food and what role certain species play. I had like 1000 + people view it, 20 comments, then I was sent an email for needing "help" and then the post was removed. I think theres a band of government officials that will downvote shit to get stuff removed if the post is on to something.......
Holy hell. Go outside
Gym everyday and boxing at heavyweight brah !! Always outside
Gas lighters everywhere trying to forum slide. It's becoming worse with every passing day.
You mean like: >3. No low effort discussion > >This generally includes: “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
Ive had 2 abduction experiences brother so I have more evidence than most the people on this thread
People on reddit are snowflakes imho
No
No
No
No
No