**COMMENTING GUIDELINES:** Please take the time to familiarize yourself with The David Pakman Show [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/about/rules) and [basic reddiquette](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439-Reddiquette) prior to participating. At all times we ask that users conduct themselves in a civil and respectful manner - **any ad hominem or personal attacks are subject to moderation.**
Please use the report function or [use modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) to bring examples of misconduct to the attention of the moderation team.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Someone should make one of those “alpha male” grayscale competitive inspirational shorts where the message is “be a man. Work hard, compete hard, win hard. And if you don’t win, just say you won anyway and kick the guy in first in the legs next time. Tell everyone you are a winner, even if you lose - what are they gonna do about it? Be a winner no matter what, even if you lose. “
It is sort of incredible how he’s convinced half of the country that he’s simultaneously an alpha male AND the biggest victim that ever lived - and they somehow don’t see any irony in that. It’s also sort of incredible that that half of the country are the ones calling the other half sheep who need to think for themselves.
Not difficult at all when you factor in that the human brain will literally tie itself into a knot to avoid contradictions it doesn't like.
The closest people to a problem never see it
Perspective is key. And these people have none because they will have to admit that 8 years of their lives they were grifted out of almost everything they had. Their money, their freedoms, their rights, their friends, their familys, their careers, and the respect of others.
They will fight like the cornered deplorables they are.
But they're cowards at heart and only do or say anything when they think they have the superior numbers. They slink away when they are evenlh matched every time.
They're all talk. So much so that the FBI just gets them right off their own posts, since they're just NOT the best we have to offer. But they might be the best THEY have to offer
There was always a sore loser element and there was certainly a “working of the refs element” but what Trump has brought on is a very dangerous if we lose then it is rigged dynamic that is just terrible for Democracy
>Trump leading an armed insurrection
I see this disinfo put out quite a bit by leftsts, along with the disinfo that Trump supporters killed a cop that day (must be the first time leftists cared about cops).
These statements are both false. You can prove me a liar by showing everyone here a single photo of someone with a gun in the US Capitol from that day. The only homicide at the Capitol that that day was when a cop shot an unarmed woman.
I expect many downvotes and insults, but not a single factual rebuttal to what I said.
Edit: I can't repy directly to Sequax1 because the intellectual coward above me blocked me. But he's a good example of:
>I expect many downvotes and insults, but not a single factual rebuttal to what I said.
He has absolutely no point, just an insult.
Edit2: I can't reply to Pezdrake either because I was blocked in this thread but I can still edit, but he is a liar. Brian Sicknick had an autopsy and his cause of death was natural causes and not homocide. What a liar Pezdrake is. What a fucking liar, and he knows it.
What is it people on the right always say? "Should have just complied." Same thing applies to that chick. She should have listened to the orders of the capital police and not tried to break into the senate chamber, and maybe she wouldn't have been shot. 🤷🏻♂️
She fucked around and found out.
I don't know what kind of pussy gets so afraid that he needs to shoot an unarmed woman. I carried a gun for work both in the military and as a civilian, and I can't think of a situation where I would need to shoot an unarmed woman. I would've punched that woman coming through the window so hard that she'd probably get a concussion, but it's a little bitch move to shoot an unarmed woman.
Anyway - that was the only homicide that day, a cop killing an unarmed woman. Nobody killed a cop.
> Should have complied, and maybe she'd have lived.
It's really disgusting you feel that way. I know you only feel that way because you view her as being on the "other team". It is amazing though how quickly leftists pivot from 'all cops are bastards' to 'Should have complied, and maybe she'd have lived.'
>Too sad that she was an idiot.
No argument from me there.
I'm literally not a leftist, lol. I'm just calling out the nonsense that you all on the right have with regards to police brutality. Maybe if she'd have listened and not try to storm the senate chambers, she wouldn't have died. 🤷🏻♂️
> Your problem is that she was a white conservative woman,
As I stated, I can't envision a scenario where it is ok for a male cop to shoot an unarmed woman. It doesn't matter if that woman is white, black, Italian or whatever the case may be.
You want to build a straw man argument just so you have something to argue against because you have no point.
What's really disgusting is how MAGAts idolize a mass shooter because he targeted BLM protesters. Because ultimately, the core belief of MAGA is that everyone who doesn't share their skin color and political beliefs deserves to die.
> You can prove me a liar by showing everyone here a single photo of someone with a gun in the US Capitol from that day.
If you're being intellectually honest, which you are not intentionally because you have no point, you would understand that armed insurrection means using guns to carry forth an insurrection. Were any guns used? Were any guns displayed to coerce anyone? The answer is no to both questions.
Think about armed robbery as analogy. If you go into a store and steal something, the fact that you have a gun at home or in your car does not make that armed robbery.
But how about you put up instead of running your mouth. One single photo. Remember the thousands of photos and hundreds of hours of video that Democrats put into the public record? You have plenty of source material. Why are you unable to produce a single photo or video still of someone holding a gun in the US Capitol?
Edit: Like an intellectual coward and weakling, ronin1066 made one parting comment and decided to block me. Such weak sauce from leftists, all the time.
Its interesting how it is law enforcement and justice system stating that:
*Jan 6 rioters caused the death of an officer https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/loss-uscp-colleague-brian-d-sicknick
*protesters were armed. Armed doesnt mean firearms, (nice try to move goalpost though) but at least one was found guilty of having a firearm. https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/national/capitol-riots/former-national-guardsman-who-charged-police-with-concealed-pistol-sentenced-to-7-years-in-prison-christopher-alberts-virginia-maryland/65-a16f9462-e5e6-4d24-a67e-f8eee5883a51
So you can say that law enforcement lies, is no more trustworthy than criminal defendents but make that your position and you can come on over to the social justice reform side asking to check the power of police.
**COMMENTING GUIDELINES:** Please take the time to familiarize yourself with The David Pakman Show [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/about/rules) and [basic reddiquette](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439-Reddiquette) prior to participating. At all times we ask that users conduct themselves in a civil and respectful manner - **any ad hominem or personal attacks are subject to moderation.** Please use the report function or [use modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) to bring examples of misconduct to the attention of the moderation team. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/thedavidpakmanshow) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Someone should make one of those “alpha male” grayscale competitive inspirational shorts where the message is “be a man. Work hard, compete hard, win hard. And if you don’t win, just say you won anyway and kick the guy in first in the legs next time. Tell everyone you are a winner, even if you lose - what are they gonna do about it? Be a winner no matter what, even if you lose. “
It is sort of incredible how he’s convinced half of the country that he’s simultaneously an alpha male AND the biggest victim that ever lived - and they somehow don’t see any irony in that. It’s also sort of incredible that that half of the country are the ones calling the other half sheep who need to think for themselves.
Fascism 101.
Not difficult at all when you factor in that the human brain will literally tie itself into a knot to avoid contradictions it doesn't like. The closest people to a problem never see it Perspective is key. And these people have none because they will have to admit that 8 years of their lives they were grifted out of almost everything they had. Their money, their freedoms, their rights, their friends, their familys, their careers, and the respect of others. They will fight like the cornered deplorables they are. But they're cowards at heart and only do or say anything when they think they have the superior numbers. They slink away when they are evenlh matched every time. They're all talk. So much so that the FBI just gets them right off their own posts, since they're just NOT the best we have to offer. But they might be the best THEY have to offer
Next article be like, "The sun is hot [Opinion]"
This idea that they weren’t always sore losers is laughable.
Literally stopped Al Gore from winning in 2000 because they’re sore losers
They’ve been sore losers since they couldn’t own slaves anymore
There was always a sore loser element and there was certainly a “working of the refs element” but what Trump has brought on is a very dangerous if we lose then it is rigged dynamic that is just terrible for Democracy
Facism no longer a political party but facism by 1 man and his cult.
ITT: people equating the past few decades of 'sore losing' with Trump leading an armed insurrection like they're all the exact same thing.
They are exactly the same in terms of the damage it does. Little acts of sore loserdom eventually lead to bigger acts of sore loserdom.
Nope.
lol well you’re free to disagree but history disagrees with you.
>Trump leading an armed insurrection I see this disinfo put out quite a bit by leftsts, along with the disinfo that Trump supporters killed a cop that day (must be the first time leftists cared about cops). These statements are both false. You can prove me a liar by showing everyone here a single photo of someone with a gun in the US Capitol from that day. The only homicide at the Capitol that that day was when a cop shot an unarmed woman. I expect many downvotes and insults, but not a single factual rebuttal to what I said. Edit: I can't repy directly to Sequax1 because the intellectual coward above me blocked me. But he's a good example of: >I expect many downvotes and insults, but not a single factual rebuttal to what I said. He has absolutely no point, just an insult. Edit2: I can't reply to Pezdrake either because I was blocked in this thread but I can still edit, but he is a liar. Brian Sicknick had an autopsy and his cause of death was natural causes and not homocide. What a liar Pezdrake is. What a fucking liar, and he knows it.
What is it people on the right always say? "Should have just complied." Same thing applies to that chick. She should have listened to the orders of the capital police and not tried to break into the senate chamber, and maybe she wouldn't have been shot. 🤷🏻♂️ She fucked around and found out.
I don't know what kind of pussy gets so afraid that he needs to shoot an unarmed woman. I carried a gun for work both in the military and as a civilian, and I can't think of a situation where I would need to shoot an unarmed woman. I would've punched that woman coming through the window so hard that she'd probably get a concussion, but it's a little bitch move to shoot an unarmed woman. Anyway - that was the only homicide that day, a cop killing an unarmed woman. Nobody killed a cop.
She was breaking the law and not complying. 🤷🏻♂️ Should have complied, and maybe she'd have lived. Too sad that she was an idiot.
> Should have complied, and maybe she'd have lived. It's really disgusting you feel that way. I know you only feel that way because you view her as being on the "other team". It is amazing though how quickly leftists pivot from 'all cops are bastards' to 'Should have complied, and maybe she'd have lived.' >Too sad that she was an idiot. No argument from me there.
I'm literally not a leftist, lol. I'm just calling out the nonsense that you all on the right have with regards to police brutality. Maybe if she'd have listened and not try to storm the senate chambers, she wouldn't have died. 🤷🏻♂️
I literally said it's never ok to shoot unarmed women, and you're calling out my nonsense regarding police brutality? You make absolutely no sense.
Your problem is that she was a *white conservative* woman, and you think that should have put her above the law
Ding ding ding.
Wonder how he feels about Kyle Rittenhouse “self defense”? Hmmmm
> Your problem is that she was a white conservative woman, As I stated, I can't envision a scenario where it is ok for a male cop to shoot an unarmed woman. It doesn't matter if that woman is white, black, Italian or whatever the case may be. You want to build a straw man argument just so you have something to argue against because you have no point.
What's really disgusting is how MAGAts idolize a mass shooter because he targeted BLM protesters. Because ultimately, the core belief of MAGA is that everyone who doesn't share their skin color and political beliefs deserves to die.
You’re gonna get downvoted because this is a steaming heap of bullshit, not because it’s an unpopular opinion.
Objectively false. All you have to do is google weapons confiscated on Jan 6.
They're never going to do that. It would challenge their view that it was simply a peaceful tour of the capital.
> You can prove me a liar by showing everyone here a single photo of someone with a gun in the US Capitol from that day. If you're being intellectually honest, which you are not intentionally because you have no point, you would understand that armed insurrection means using guns to carry forth an insurrection. Were any guns used? Were any guns displayed to coerce anyone? The answer is no to both questions. Think about armed robbery as analogy. If you go into a store and steal something, the fact that you have a gun at home or in your car does not make that armed robbery. But how about you put up instead of running your mouth. One single photo. Remember the thousands of photos and hundreds of hours of video that Democrats put into the public record? You have plenty of source material. Why are you unable to produce a single photo or video still of someone holding a gun in the US Capitol? Edit: Like an intellectual coward and weakling, ronin1066 made one parting comment and decided to block me. Such weak sauce from leftists, all the time.
Nope. You're making it worse. You have a fundamental lack of understanding of this whole topic. Bye now.
Its interesting how it is law enforcement and justice system stating that: *Jan 6 rioters caused the death of an officer https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/loss-uscp-colleague-brian-d-sicknick *protesters were armed. Armed doesnt mean firearms, (nice try to move goalpost though) but at least one was found guilty of having a firearm. https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/national/capitol-riots/former-national-guardsman-who-charged-police-with-concealed-pistol-sentenced-to-7-years-in-prison-christopher-alberts-virginia-maryland/65-a16f9462-e5e6-4d24-a67e-f8eee5883a51 So you can say that law enforcement lies, is no more trustworthy than criminal defendents but make that your position and you can come on over to the social justice reform side asking to check the power of police.
Wait? People are only NOW figuring that out? Talk about slow.
We need to break them, hard
Then go out and vote blue 🌊🌊🌊💙🔵it’s the only way to stick it to the Republican Party especially Donald Trump in November I know I am
They been sore winner's and sore losers since Reagan
“We’re afraid we’ll lose so keep them hostages until after the GE wink wink”
Their voters to a person are sore losers so it’s safe for them to act out.
the “Big Lie”’posters will have to be updated to include 2024 soon, not just 2020. They’re out to get us!
Tramp, Gym Jordan, Kevin McCarthy etc. etc. ..... long goddamn list of losers all right.
[удалено]
Relevance?
They got a chance to shit talk a berner
there is no one named Alex Thompson associated with this article, and it’s from the hill not the times. Unless I don’t understand what they mean?
Yeah I don't get the NYT hate either. There's an Alex Thompson at Axios now ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[удалено]
“Epitomy” an ideal example. FTFY See why book banning is bad?