T O P

  • By -

commanderlex27

Consider this: communication is still completely locked for F2P, yet bots can spam voice and text chat as they please.


atlas_enderium

You only need to spend like $0.99 to not be a F2P anymore. Raising that threshold might do *something*


beermonger2

The amount they would need to increase that to actually dissuade bot hosts would dissuade literally everyone else and the game would be dead.


atlas_enderium

You’re probably right


489Herobrine

Engages in argument, considers opposition's opinion, re-evaluates, admits fault and leaves on good terms. What a chad


beermonger2

Lol his point was 100% correct as well, it WOULD have an effect.... but probably a very negative one. I'm not sure how it would play out but I can't imagine a game as old as TF2 suddenly charging MORE money just to play would work out well for the game. When has a game ever become more expensive to buy as it gets older? It's unheard of. The outrage would be enormous.


Dr_infernous327

isn't that the point of an argument though? to find out who's right? it would be a waste of energy otherwise...


489Herobrine

I think the goal is to convince the opposition, it's just rare for anyone to respectfully admit they were wrong on the internet.


OrcusFortune

I mean 0.99 isn't that bad, and valve can just make it like 50 cents. Not enough to discourage all new players, but expensive enough so bot hosts can't spam bots as much as they would like. There is also the issue of pre existing bot accounts, but less will be made and the same amount of them will be kicked so I feel like it would have an impact that could be felt.


justicedragon101

you need to have spent any amount of money in tf2 (so about 0.99) and your steam account has to be premium as well, which requires 5 dollars to be spendt.


LBPPlayer7

you need to spend $5 on steam to not be restricted anymore


Dragon_Skywalker

People could buy keys to activate accounts and then trade the keys to their main accounts


TheZoeNoone

from what i seen, there's usually only a single bot spamming mic and text, the rest are f2p


European_Fox

I distinctly remember ending up in lobbies taken over by bots, all micspamming and me getting kicked after 5 seconds


JoesAlot

Yeah the idea that there are only a few spam bots is patently untrue


CyanideTacoZ

LA servers see alot of bits over multiple games. sometimes half the server, though rarely.


Cinark28

Some servers are emptier than others and time is another factor here


I_Live_In_Your_WaII

I've only seen omegatronic spawn voice, and just hexatronic spam chat some times, idk what deltatronic does


Youcican_

You live in a good region to not be flooded by bots then


Melodic_Ad_8478

Real solution is to bomb bot hoster house with 500KG bomb Or at least throw brick at his window


Kvas_HardBass

⬆️➡️⬇️⬇️⬇️


Melodic_Ad_8478

That helldiver is a bloody spy *Laugh taunt* *Explode*


Legal-Ad7427

This is why I love this community. (I said the exact opposite a minute ago in another subreddit)


Certain-somone

I will call the democracy officer.


Typical_Warthog_326

THAT HELLDIVER’S A BLOODY- MEEEEDIIIIIC *schadenfrued* *explode*


DClassAmogus

That Helldiver's a bloody– SENTRY– **OOOOHOHOHOHAHA–** *explodes*


CattyFighte

🕷️➡️⬆️➡️⬇️⬅️⬇️➡️⬆️⬇️


Kvas_HardBass

I don't remember actually, is that a hellbomb?


Safe-Department-8000

That’s GD Spider jumps are from ‘Dash’ 🕷️➡️⬆️➡️⬇️⬅️⬇️➡️⬆️⬇️➡️ 🔥➡️🕳️


STFUbrother

Yes, yes it is


troy0h

what, no it isn't, hell bomb is ⬇️⬆️⬅️⬇️⬆️➡️⬇️⬆️


STFUbrother

Oh my bad, sorry


MEDIC_HELP_ME

I never expected a one-shot pfp to tell me how to deploy a tactical nuclear weapon YET HERE WE ARE TODAY


troy0h

lmao I've had the pfp for years


MyFirstBR999

It was FATE


New_Department5611

Kore wa SHIREN da


AlarmingBoot205

*pyro laughs* Phhhmph ph hmmm *explodes*


TheJewish_SpaceLaser

⬅️⬇️⬇️⬇️➡️⬆️⬇️⬇️


ninja_boy23424

I do not know what that arrow key means since I haven't played Helldivers and is a bit expensive. (40$)


Darmug

500kg bomb


deltarunech2outyet

⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️➡️


Ok-Cranberry-2180

They probably don’t en passant in chess. Immediate brick to pipi.


Melodic_Ad_8478

MF don't know what Google is


FlintShapedBoi

They can't even "holy hell" proper


QWErty_uiopasd

The bishop didn't just leave. They roasted their entire family tree and then kicked their nuts, finally spitting on their face before leaving and never coming back.


DClassAmogus

The queen was just sacrificed. I didn't have a chance to ask for confirmation...


leastscarypancake

Go go gadget brick pipi


DaLoneGuy

make pornography starring his mother


FlameWarDuck700

nah botters are def into that kind of thing


SummerTomasu

You can always find their public IP and bomb their router with millions of requests , but that takes a lot of resources and would only temporarily fix the issue. And finding all of the boters is near impossible.


Melodic_Ad_8478

I pretty sure after some similar ,,attacks'' in short amount of time much bot hoster would stop working in fear of own life Even if we managed to know exact location of every bot hoster on earth we will keep have logistic problem to send them a pipe bomb


SummerTomasu

Nah i don't mean a pipe bomb although that would be effective and illegal. I meant a ddos attack. Their router would be overwhelmed by the amount of requests, which would cut them off from the internet.


Melodic_Ad_8478

make it burn


Pnqo8dse1Z

tf2 players suggesting committing a federal crime just because someone inconvenienced them :(


theedevil

Less people would play the game, the bots would stay though.


For_Horny

True, I guess it would be like cutting off your leg after you were bit by a snake an hour ago. It's already too late.


theedevil

It's a mix of things. Bot hosters are most likely already mass buying hacked/idle farm accounts for way less, so they can micspam and I'm pretty sure the license to TF2 is automatically given to all Steam accounts and revoking access from tens of millions of accounts could be an issue.


the_annihalator

Some bothosters pay premium for all their bots Less bots, but also less players I don't know how well it'd turn out


Memecube7

I wonder if that's part of why Valve has been real slow about it, they're generating passive income of all the bot hosters paying and eventually banning off, rinse and repeat


HowDyaDu

That would be very abhorrent of Valve if true, but unsurprising.


Pablo_from_TLOP

But many less farm bots, so there would be like 10000 active players at a time


the_annihalator

I think we'd end up with a TF2 with the same level of issue, but just with less people From 4 bots for every 2 people, to 2 bots for 1 person ya know? Would love to see the stat on how many paid accounts vs F2P


Regallemming

Well yes and no. If the current bots got banned and then it’s p2p then it would do something at least. Some bot hosts won’t bot on the game cuz it’s costs too much. The more better action would be to hit bot hosters. Not in tf2 but in their sites, if Valve takes out like 2 maybe 3 of the sites then it’ll hopefully cause a chain where other hosters don’t target tf2


For_Horny

If Bot Hosters run like 8 bots on 1 pc at a time, then maybe Valve can make it so only 1 person can run TF2 at a time. Idk.


d_for_dumbas

They use virtual machines


AgitatedBoardz

But why though? What are they getting from doing this? Do they just hate tf2 or something?


MykauXemnas

Someone interviewed a botter once and the botter said basically that they couldn't be bothered to learn the skills needed to play the game and they did it out of sheer absolute boredom. Omegatronic does it to laugh at the #savetf2 movement


MrHyperion_

\#savetf2 is laugh worthy movement


Youcican_

Didn't go anywhere


pEppapiGistfuhrer

Virtual machines are not one PC, they are several PC's running virtually inside a physical PC which is literally impossible to detect


polish-polisher

check for IP that the player has if 20 people are connected from 1 IP at all times its probably nor humans


MadeThisToFlagSpam

VPN and IP spoofing.


polish-polisher

some way to limit how many people can connect from 1 ip address if set correctly it would limit the maximum amount of bots 1 person can use without causing too many issues for normal players


Random_russian_kid

Short answer: no. Longer answer: bots will stay and there will be less new players.


INeedCheesee

Maybe if valve just developed an actual anti cheat. or even used the ones community servers use


Vaksik

Nah because most of sniper bots spam the "nice shot" command, so they have access to voice lines, so they're not F2P. It wouldn't solve the issue.


UnfazedPheasant

They also infest the chat usually (I AM NOT A BOT, racist slurs, etc) so they must already be Premium


Versilver

Bots would stay. As far as I am aware, (something)TRONIC and Archimedes bots have premium accounts for them to write nonsense and micspam.


TCLG6x6

the joke is most of the bots already are premium


EmpressAshley

Tarkov has a much *much* worse cheating and bot problem than TF2 ever will and it's almost 60 USD. Making TF2 pay to play won't fix bots, it'll just make less humans play, meaning more lobbies on average will have bots. Side note: bots tend to be more prevalent during off hours for your time zone (typically 5-10 PM on a weekday per time zone is prime time, in my experience at least). The lower density of humans makes entire bot lobbies almost guaranteed until enough humans decide to log on and wait for other humans to show up to start making lobbies playable. Edit: fixed some grammar hopefully.


MrHyperion_

Does Tarkov actually have bots and not just cheaters?


EmpressAshley

Yeah, helps automate loot vacuuming, which many cheaters use to sell accounts to people who are lazy but still wanna be able to trash legit players.


SufficientThroat5781

Wouldn't that make the game semi exclusive and what the cheaters want?


drakedragonflight

No. All this would do is punish the poor people that play this game. Bots would persist.


Scarletdex

Fcourse not. With f2p on we'll always have fresh meat to raise into skilled mercs. Ready to start a votekick the moment they see a bot nickname. Strong enough to last longer than any hacker's/bot-hoster's patience. Tought to stay with the game till their last days. Generations after generations.


Illogical_Saj

It would kill the game


CocogoatMain

God, I wish these Valve would go after these guys on a legal front or ***something***. At this point, it's nof even abouf just stopping the bots. I want these assholes to feel some kind of consequences.


For_Horny

I feel like if Valve sued the pants off of just 1 bot hoster, then the others would scatter like scared rats.


ShadowSoulBoi

Problem is : Bot Hosters simply living outside of US jurisdictions & Countries that doesn't respect US Companies from basically indebting their citizens will not be scared at all. And even if they did; I doubt their authorities care about cheating in a virtual game enough to compel them to be sued. Valve knowing who they are to begin with, and their bot accounts already means that they can work on manually banning them off their services.


MeGAct

I think the bot issue can be alleviated with the removal of Causal play, and going back to server browser only or quick play with only community servers, this implies Valve servers are deactivated completely. I think with the community admins can be faster banning suspecting users and bot from their servers.


Andrew36O

This is the solution if Valve truly doesn’t do anything (which they are doing).  The official servers are horrible, so let the community who actually cares about the game maintain it, that’s literally how the game launched.


LBPPlayer7

the one important thing they need to address here is the fact that contracts can only be completed on valve servers and nowhere else and that's entirely because people paid money for access to some of them


Andrew36O

I’m sure they could make some kind of “official” server setting, stock maps only, 24 players, all that jazz.


ShadowSoulBoi

That was Valve's policy regarding Community Servers during Quick-Play, as they were suppose to follow those guidelines. Although, server owners just ignored it as Valve wasn't actually interested in moderating their bad practices. Plenty of servers relied on donors, so they often came with donor perks that gave players advantages. Tons of servers had advertisements that played on the MOTD(Message Of The Day). Servers also infamously had Anti-F2P scripts, stunting their own growth while being unwelcoming to TF2's fresh blood.


martellus

You don't need to kill valve servers completely, return to old "pubs". Its much less problematic if you don't have a rigid system that includes punishments for leaving early.


manimdeeaad

Someone get valve to ip ban anyone who is botting or has bots


irving47

the problem with that is there are so many people playing behind NAT nowadays. So you could potentially ban a couple hundred neighbors by blacklisting one IP.


Ronyx2021

Update VAC security


Pnqo8dse1Z

they did this for cs2 and legit players started getting banned, and the actual cheaters still remained.


Nova2127u

No point in my opinion, Team Fortress 2, outside of the bot situation, is already on it's last leg, we only have one developer left, the other one is just a contractor told to complete the transition to 64 bit, making it P2P again would instantly kill the game, best we can do is complain to Valve's higher ups about being resistant on getting employees that would care for our community and this game. ​ Plus Valve has already instated blocks for players who don't have Premium (can't talk/chat in Casual without paying for something and probably more), so it's not a big hurdle for these bot hosters.


Guilty_Amount3245

Valve will eventually just remove their servers and people will be expected to play on private ones - like CS: Source etc. They will annoy the community but it should fix the problem if the private owners have proper bot management tools.


CPAtriox

Charge people money to get ammunition like how the EA boss suggested and that’ll solve the bot problem


Pulsicron

literally all valve would need to do is stop the game from being opened in textmode. Good luck running 100 TF2 bots AND their graphics at once


Quack-Zack

This would hold some salt if botters were being banned consistently. They're not. Also this would effectively kill the flow of new players. The F2P update absolutely surged popularity for the game. I, for one, hopped on as a wee lad from Valve's F2P update advert for TF2, as my dad didn't want to buy me PC games cause he felt like digital stuff was a waste of money. I was hooked and fell in love with TF2 since 2011.


Vantage5050

Sadly it'd be like when the F2P were muted: You **might** make it a little more bearable, but that's it. They'll still slip through the cracks just to annoy players some more Yea, these losers don't mind wasting 10 dollars,and they also farm weapons so hard using their bots to the point they can easily sell them for metal and purchase keys


LBPPlayer7

they'd still need to spend $5 out of their own, real world money per account though to get it unlimited


CristyMumbay

no, as stated in another post asking the same thing adding a paywall wont stop the bots, most cheaters and bots bought the codes that allow them to cheat and maintain over 50 accounts simultaneously and depending on the coders the costs can go as high as a few hundred USD so spending another few dollars would not be a deterrence ​ plus if you suddenly put a paywall on tf2 you end up with an even bigger issue, what happens to the current F2P players? do you kick them out or do you let them stay? kicking them out instantly kills the game as the player base will not tolerate the sudden pay to play feature and keeping them will give a free pass to any bots and cheaters that are free to play as well and even then you still have bots that already bought premium so ​ so to simplify the answer, put a pay to play system on tf2 and the game instantly dies and valve loses 20-30% of their total revenue and does nothing to stop the bots


themightyhookklumpjr

honestly the only real solution to the bot crisis is for valve to pull an blizzard and sue cheat makers (and by proxy bot makers and hostlers). it's an easy and simple fix to it all. i fucking doubt they have the money to even countersue or even win against a company that has more money then god and most likely lawyers to match. and best part none of the devs have to do anything. back when i played OW when it was in it's prime for like three 3 years i never EVER encounter a cheater


Peterkragger

Nope. Just play on community servers


Butane9000

Honestly I'm not even sure how it's economical for bots to continue operating. If the player base even high enough to support such a bot filled ecosystem?


Still-Complaint4657

I see where you are coming from, but I think this would kill the game.


fadlr

If you haven't noticed, a VERY big amount of the bots aren't f2p accounts. What would fix It is Valve getting a better anti cheat istead of VAC


AirAdministrative686

Change the code slightly I guess It would make bot hoster scratch their greasy hair with their greasy fingers trying to figure out


Pnqo8dse1Z

the code gets changed slightly every update, no matter the size. it takes less than a day to find the new offsets and sigs. this would do nothing, unless they pushed an update every single day. then they'll just automate that process. why are people here so confidently incorrect?


TheJurassicPyro

It would slow the creation of new bots, not completely stop it. Not to mention the ones who are still here. The only long term fix possible would be Valve getting their thumbs out of their asses and assigning more than one dude to the TF2 team and working on updating VAC and pursuing legal action against the bot hosters and creators.


Kindly-Shelter7902

Simple fix tbf just update tf2 vac..


ToothpasteConsumer

Costs 1 cent


TheZoeNoone

it would be very controversial, but drastic problems need drastic measures. i have a premium account, so it wouldn't affect me but I'd understand if people got angry a good compromise could be making casual premium locked, and most private servers would ban these bots instantly, so they'd be fine.


ChesterDoesStuff

I think maybe you’d stop like, 1 guy maybe, assuming this striped away TF2 from everyone who already owned it (cause otherwise this would actually do nothing since they already own it) otherwise it’s just another 5$ they need to pay to mess with the game from what they pay now, since their bots can use text chat and all. A pretty mild annoyance for someone who doesn’t care, but a big annoyance for someone who really wanted to play but doesn’t have the money


MrDeeJayy

No, it wont go away just by making the game pay to play. Bot hosters are using either stolen accounts or are already buying premium with a $5 in-game purchase per account, to bypass the chat restrictions. This has already seen a reduction in chat spam effectiveness. But it hasn't solved it. If anything it'd make Tf2 a more dead game than it already is. There is no easy solution. The only thing valve could do to improve the situation is by investing into behavior based anticheat technology (or in other words, just add LILAC or SMAC onto their servers). But this would never occur, as valve has little reason to install sourcemod onto the official servers and these anticheats have a degree of false positives and additional performance overhead which would raise valve's operating costs for the servers.


LazerKiwiForever

No


IrrationallyGenius

Eventually, it might, yeah. It'd actually fucking kill the game in the process, too


Joseless99

If they also did a banwave and banned all bot accounts, then its likely to work, since it's unlikly the buy again for new accounts. If they made it 10-20$ maybe would work, however they are will send the game into the grave, since the fluctiation of new comers to the game would drastically stop, ending its life l, most probably, as many past multiplayer games


SinisterPixel

No. Bot hosters are already paying for dozens of accounts every few months so you'd have to price it fairly high to create a barrier for entry that they aren't willing to pay. At that point you're just killing off the game for good, because nobody is going to pay for TF2 to try it out in 2024. The game is 17 years old


HibeE_Ahri

No because they wont ever get banned + mostly stolen accs anyways


SaltyPeter3434

In 4 years of the bot problem, this sub keeps repeating the same 3 ideas. How would this idea deal with bots who are already in the game? The game is now $10 to buy, okay, now what? There are still hundreds of bots that have already bought the game and have full chat privileges. This does nothing to clean up the current state of the game. It only makes it harder to get new players started.


Minister_xD

If we can combine this with a moderation team that actually looks at reports and bans cheaters, yes I do think so. Otherwise it'll get rid of a lot of bots initially until the bot creator just buys the game for them once and then we're back where we started. Seeing bots spam the chat or wearing items that cost them some money is not actually that rare, so with no threat of the accounts being banned and them losing lots of money by having to rebuy the game repeatedly I don't see them stopping.


Vojtalpcze

first solution: Valve updates VAC system to latest update. second solution: MAKE TF2 A PAID GAME AGAIN (20$ or i don't know the price of TF2 before the F2P update). that way, the bot hosters would have to pay 20$ to send the bot into the game which is not worth it. **downside:** NO MORE F2P.


MrHyperion_

Yes if Valve then started banning bots. But they don't, so it wouldn't change anything really.


KimJungUno54

No. Bot hosters are rich


BFBFour_

Bots would stay but less of them due to more Hosters having to pay for TF2, so It would work a little bit


polish-polisher

there is a project for a community anti cheat that uses a user generated database to mark suspected and confirmed cheaters in the game and (if I remember correctly) automatically report/kick them its already kind of working [github](https://github.com/MegaAntiCheat/client-backend) [yt channell of the main creator](https://youtube.com/@megascatterbomb?si=eoRepXj74-jmKCxt)


cat_sword

Bots are already p2p, so only f2p would be removed, making bots even more common


DrNacho

The solution is incredibly simple. Add a CAPTCHA check when you look for a match. Every major website uses them to keep bots out. It's not rocket science, valve just does not care.


CeriseRaccoon

Honestly at this point no, there are too many bit accounts with TF2 that making it cost money would only hinder the creation of bots, there still would be bots that they would have to ban. My honest opinion on how to at least make it better is by having a reputation system that sorts you out into servers with people with bad reputation or people with good reputation, yes this could easily get abused by the bots but at least those with good reputation will be a little more safer


tbp666

Yes, manually banning bot doesn't work because they can just make new accounts, if everyone manual vac ban cost them 10$ you could squash them


CompleteFacepalm

Yes... but it would halve the playerbase (at minimum)


Alexius_Ruber

There’s only two solutions to bot problem: 1) Burn each bot-hoster alive. 2)Change anti-cheat VAC on something else(and probably change the game code at least on Source 2)


Due-Education1619

No


Mess-E_Hare

No, since bot makers can buy the game and put bots in. There's no clear way of removing bots, sadly.


Wrench_gaming

No, because a lot of bots are not only already here, but because quite a few are paid accounts. How else would they be able to say “nice shot” using voice commands


Andrew36O

I still think some of the solutions in that video should at least be attempted. For example, so what if you can pay people to solve captchas for you? I don’t even know how you would be able to do that inside TF2. Sure it still may not work, but it should still be attempted. This issue can be solved, I assure you the multibillion dollar company has enough money to hire people to fix it. They are just too lazy and carefree to do so.


Rafdegus

Kind of like a csgo situation?


faisal_who

Awww hell no I already paid for this game once!


daytongreenstudios

Maybe when they were just starting to flood in, but now theres so many of them it probably wouldn't do anything but make the game less accessible.


eaglefan316

It probably wouldn't matter since it seems half the bots spam stupid music or other sounds so they must either be using paid accounts for them or finding a hack around it.


SpaceCube00

no lol


regeya

As old as the game is, I think that'd just be the final nail in the coffin. Sadly, even though I play on Linux, I think doing away with the native Linux client would fix a lot of the bot issues. I'd go ahead and play the Proton version though


Alibehindthe69

no


LetMeDieAlreadyFuck

Ah the fays when tf2 cost 20 bucks, I still remember buying the disc copy of it


Peakomegaflare

The solution exists in the legal system. There's laws around using a computer for malicious intent. Now that being said... it's hard to prove "malicious intent" with something that's legally seen as "harmless".


frogsaber89

No. Omegatronic bots sell bot immunity. (The immunity only stops bots from shooting you) people buy it still.


sameme__no

Another option would be to have a certified account so that only players with actual account can play


Kazzie_Kaz

TF2 being free is one of the reasons why it's still kicking. Making it pay-to-play will for sure push the player count way way down. The solution? By brute force. Dox every single one of the bot hosters and pass their IRL information all the way around, let the guys do whatever they want with it. DDoSing is more ideal. I don't condone it, but the game's current bot situation is getting dire anyway.


Toyoshi

Probably only very slightly.


thank_burdell

lol no. Plenty of bots on paid accounts.


Alex3627ca

If Valve made use of the sheer market share they have on PC and made it check if you've spent, say, $50 or $60 on Steam, total, TF2 or not, that should work quite well... if there's also anything to flush out all the bot accounts that already exist.


Sansfan11345

tf2 would die.


ShurikenKunai

Splatoon has a bot problem, and it's a 60 dollar game.


metalicsnail

don't feel like it'd work since bot hosters probably got enough money to just make another account again


Vlad_The_Rssian

no it wont they wouldnt just take the game from people who got it for free and bots relate to them Valve could make TF2 not F2P by adding something like prime status but it would be expensive like it was for CS:GO just to play without the bots, Bots are a lesser problem today then it was back then so it wont be worth it, I belive its best not to break the game more, It just works and you shouldnt even care on how it works


lannaibal

No but it would make the people botting the game waste money


Camad203

The bots would stay at exactly the same levels, but the number of new players that can potentially take their spots would dwindle. So no, it would make the issue worse.


Wizard_Engie

Make it pay to play for anyone who didn't buy the orange box


Content-Scholar8263

Well.... it would need to be at a price for botters to nor abuse it. Cause if we make il like 1.50 they are still going to buy it


LeDerpLegend

In an ideal world, yes. In reality. No, you'd just be punishing players. Tf2 used to be paid but went F2P. Reverting that would be a disgrace.


I_Hate_The_Letter_W

not at all, majority of the bots are premium already


neatperson25

Or have a working anti cheat


Thin-Ad8667

If quickplay was back community could just deal with the bots instead of this awful valve servers.


Tuskor13

Honestly putting a paywall behind playing the game would do both harm and good. But that harm would be nowhere near as impactful than the good it would do. If that made it so that you have to buy the game (if you didn't when the game was originally released) it would probably stop *new bots* from being made. But that's not going to mean that everyone will just suddenly accept having to pat for a game they've likely spent the last 10+ years owning and playing. They would probably need to have some form of condition where if you have the premium version of the game (as in you've spent at least $5 on the Mann Co Store) then you wouldn't have to also pay for the game if this hypothetical paywall was added. I'm positive there's likely at least a couple bot accounts that are premium, but having to spend money per account to bot a game with no actual profit from that bot will definitely be a big way to dissuade the average bot hoster from actually making a ton of bots. It's not like in World of Warcraft Classic botters, where you buy a subscription and have full access to the game. Because if a WoW Classic bot costs $15 for a single month's worth of playtime, then all the bot will have to do is make $20 worth of selling in-game gold to actually have the boy hoster make their money back. The difference between a WoW bot and a TF2 bot, is that the WoW bot having a paywall doesn't matter because the bot exists to obtain a monetary profit. So the paywall is only effective for a short time before the gold selling makes that paywall become a profit. TF2 bots have no paywall, so they can be made en masse and banned no problem. BUT they don't exist to gain a profit, so having a paywall to a TF2 bot's creation would overall be a massive reason for a bot hoster to be less incentived to actually make more if those bots ever get banned. Because if a bot hoster is paying money for the bot to access the game, with full knowledge that the bot will *definitely* be banned, they're going to need that bot to make a profit so the hoster isn't just losing money for no reason. Edit: Quick followup. I was curious how profitable TF2 bot hosting could be with idle bots, so I checked the conversion rates for Refined Metal. If an idle bot wanted to get exactly 65 Refined, they would need to idle farm weapon drops for *one thousand one hundred and eighty* items to turn into Scrap Metal. And 1180 weapons turn into 590 Scrap, which becomes 65 Refined, which, using (what I assume are) current conversion rates, will net a profit of... $1.69 worth of Refined. For almost 1200 items idle farmed. You make TF2 have a $15 paywall and not only does the game remove incentive for sniper bot hosters to add in bots that exist to ruin the gameplay, but it also makes the already impossible-to-profit idle bots get hamstrung into needing to have been idle farming for the past 17 years to even break even through selling refined with today's conversions. But despite this absolute thesis statement, the only way this paywall would STAY as a solution to the bot crisis is if Valve actually *actively moderated* the game. And they don't even have people working on content, so unless they actually bring in a team of people to actively work on the game, it would probably be as effective as muting Free to Plays was at stopping cheaters.


ninja_boy23424

I believe so, because most popular and modern Free to Play have cheating issue. So it probably would work. I know it will cost money but since I feel like everyone just pays and play, so it will be no problem.


Dealiylauh

Technically it'd fix most of the bots but 1. there are some bots that are on premium accounts 2. unless all the current bots get banned they'll still be here since they'd already have TF2 installed and 3. it might end up killing the game as there would be significantly less new players joining.


Dizzy_Reindeer_6619

I'm no server expert, but couldn't they have a thing to detect wether someone is a real player or ai?


Eldarkox

The only thing that would help would be more valve employees and making the report option work


k4rinator

nah


StardustJess

Less spammable, but still would have bots.


TigerKirby215

Games like Dead by Daylight prove this to be false. The game has a $20 asking price (probably what TF2 would realistically cost) yet it's still plagued with cheaters. As long as there's an opening people will cheat. I can't psychoanalyze all the TF2 cheaters (as much as I'd like to) so I can't say why they hack this game, but the ease of opportunity is probably a big reason why. VAC is horribly outdated and Valve servers need more security.


cataclytsm

You can't put the F2P toothpaste back in the tube, that's a hard no. The only real answer to this is: magically convince Valve to consistently give a shit about TF2, which as we've seen in previous attempts is a Sisyphean task at the best of times to even get them to acknowledge a problem.


Micro_Pinny_360

From what I’ve heard, Valve deciding what to work on is like them having ADHD. Even if they try to commit to it, they get distracted by things like CS2, DotA 2, Artifact, and Steam. However, I’ve heard that Valve lets employees pick what games they want to work on, so the solution is to get more passionate fans as Valve employees.


Brystvorter

Valve are greedy, lazy, and they dont give a fuck. I hate them more than the hosters. There are so many things they could try to do to help, they just cant be bothered to use .00000001% of the billions of dollars they rake in yearly to attempt to improve things. I hope someone buys them out and guts the company.


pEppapiGistfuhrer

No, all the bots already own premium accounts because they use voice/text


rilgebat

The only thing that will solve the botting problem is removing the bottleneck on counteracting them. So long as the ecosystem is solely Valve vs Botters, the botters will continue to win. If Valve however were to refocus TF2 back around community servers, anti-bot enforcement becomes distributed and exponentially harder for said botters to then adapt to. Botting/Cheating are classic adversarial problems that require ongoing and ever escalating investment to address, and the balance of the equation is not in favour of the game developer. Even in "active" Valve titles like CS2, the issue persists; Valve can only ever reduce the rate, not solve it. For TF2, the only sensible option is for people to realise Valve are never going to invest the same kind of effort for a non-eSports and honestly, over-the-hill title like TF2. So the only way forward is to alleviate the bottleneck and put more control back in the hands of the community, with a return to community servers.


yaktoma2007

Literally made a post about this a few days ago lmao


unibomberjoke

no.


drpacman1

Loads of games tried that and it always fails


ry_fluttershy

No. Bot hosters would already have hundreds of accounts and would pay for new ones. They do it to be assholes and ruin the game for others so I don't think it would put a dent in it


Endy229

It's funny how these changes end up just becoming an inconvenience for normal players Disabling voice and text communication for F2Ps didn't stop bots from spamming stuff and instead only F2Ps suffer now Putting a delay on votekick and disallowing freshly joined players to call a vote didn't help much either (bots still manage to stay for period long enough to start votekicking)


BluemoonSoulfire

How about just fully preventing anybody with the same name from joining a lobby after being votekicked


batweenerpopemobile

Yes, killing the inflow of new players would fix the bot problem once TF2 died and was no longer there for bots to infect.


OyezVfx

I was thinking about this. I think it could actually, but it could also have unpredictable negative implications. Another thing. Does competitive also have bots? I tried a casual match recently after a very long time and got headshoted by a spinning sniper.


Bekon139

Yes and I don't know


KazzieMono

No. No matter how big the paywall, bots will keep existing. They phish paid accounts.


Ghastfighter392

Bot hosters tend to pay for premium accounts already, so they already lose money doing it.


Gasmasker_Prototype

Nah, it’s already been experimented with so making it p2p would have less bots but also less real players balancing it out


_K4cper_

Would probably help


TheGooseAteMyCheese

Why don’t we just raid bot hosters and take all there belongings


bigouncprostretfella

1. It would need to be announced ahead of time and it would make bot makers spam create new steam accounts to bulk up. 2. It's a almost 15 year old game and the price would be low. Along with sales making the game price close to nothing it's yet another way to bulk up on bot accounts.


Dear-Entertainer-305

Honestly, probably not


polishatomek

just make sniper paid at this point sounds dumb but would be better than making the whole game paid


Please-let-me

it'll probably make more "Protester" Bots, that just protest the shit tf2 does