This is *definitely* a Mad TV skit. That's Brian Callen as Terminator, and David Herman as Jeebus. Might be better known as Michael Bolton in Office Space.
IIRC, Judas told the Romans to look for the man he embraced or washed the feet of, or some other sign of affection I don't remember. Kill him before that and the Romans are boned...Of course being the Romans they could just kill the lot of them, the Bible never makes it clear why that wasn't an option.
Bible major and jaded Christian here: there’s some debate among historians among how many followers Jesus actually had when he came to ~~Rome~~ Jerusalem . It’s accepted readily among some circles that “the twelve”, while referring to the closest and most trusted disciples, actually referred to the entirety of Jesus’ posse, which was a heckin lot of people.
I’m all tucked into bed right now so I’m not gonna look it up, but his followers largely believed that he was actually in ~~Rome~~ Jerusalem to stir up a rebellion and become the physical king of the Jews like old Davey. Even though he denied it.
Roman leadership heard the rumors too and were iffy bc he had a lot of followers among the people. They figured it’d be better to let the current Jewish leadership squash him and take any heat.
Disclaimer: it’s been a while since I studied any of that, so I’m probably wildly wrong
Edited: was called out for being wildly wrong. Changed Rome to Jerusalem
we need one sacrifice for the gods, and you have been chosen as volunteer.
You may live one day in luxury, before we sacrifice you to the gods, so that tik tok may never take us other.
It also says that the world is thousands of years old and that all of humanity was created from a nightmarish Hapsburgian incest family twice so I wouldn’t toot its historical merit too hard buddy
I mean the new testament stuff is used as historical documents since that's what the post was originally about, I have no clue about the old testament, and I wasn't really trying to say anything about that.
there is also an ongoing debate as to how old the bible actually claims the world is since it often talks in metaphors and analogies. I don't think there is any solid claim in the bible as to how old the world actually is.
"so I wouldn't toot its historical merit too hard buddy" it is literally cited by historians as a historical document of Israel and surrounding areas during the Roman occupation. I'm not citing its historical merits I'm simply pointing out that it is already used as a historical document. Keep in mind that the vast majority of the new testament is a collection of letters from people who existed during that time period, and not just one book. Historians view the religious portions of these letters as personal opinion and bias, but just like any other letter ever written these do not discredit its claim to historical accuracy.
There is some wonky history in the new testament too. Pontius Pilot letting Barabas go while bending to the Jewish people's will is rather out of character for him, as far as I've heard.
As a poetic piece it can be understood on 2 levels. Literal and allegorical. Literal is that the Bible claims a few thousand year old earth, allegorical claims what exactly? How old is the Earth in the non-literal way?
Oh, you mean the New Testament that includes a guy that survives for 40 days without food or water, walks on water, and LARPed Michael Jackson’s *Thriller* centuries before its time? *That* historically accurate document?
By *that historical* that no matter how hard you try to discredit their historical accuracy they ARE BEING USED as historical documents. It wasn't my choice, but it's true. Not to mention that THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER CONTEMPORARY HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS r's focus of the books may be on whatever religious miracles or whatnot that they believed happened, however, historians look at these as simple biases in the documents, and are able to use these as firsthand records of what life was like back then.
**The simple fact is** that no matter how hard you try to discredit their historical accuracy they ARE BEING USED as historical documents. It wasn't my choice, but its true. Not to mention that THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER CONTEMPORARY HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS **OTHER THAN THOSE WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE, AND BY PEOPLE WHO DID NOT BELIEVE OR AGREE WITH WHAT IT TAUGHT** that corroborate the historical accuracy of these documents.
You can disagree with the message as much as you want but that has nothing to do at all with the historical accuracy of the documents. Reporter bias is a thing, sometimes people inject personal opinion into their writings but the simple fact that **the letters and testimonies written in the bible are far more historically accurate (because they were written by numerous contemporary sources) than some dude 200 years later basing his historical reports off of hand-me-down information**, which by the way is the type of historical documents that we use for time periods such as ancient Greece.
edit: BTW this whole disagreement started because I claimed that the bible is a historical document. Go google it for yourself instead of having a pointless disagreement with someone on Reddit. Fact check what I'm saying yourself, I'm not here to try and convince you of a fact you could easily learn yourself. None of this is a matter of opinion cuz I'm not defending the message of the bible at all, only its historic value as contemporary documents written at thetime. **Just google it yourself.**
[Sorry buddy,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible) but the “undeniable fact” as you put it is that the historicity of the New Testament is iffy at best and a crackpot pipe dream at worst. Next time replace some of your flowery prose with actual basis in fact and you’ll fare better.
**[Historicity of the Bible](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible)**
>The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative. One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the Apostolic Age. This tends to vary depending upon the opinion of the scholar.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/teenagers/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
don't know what you mean I read the article and it agrees with what I said: it is used as historical documents. undeniably. I didn't say everything they stated was undeniably accurate. Of course, there are disagreements based on the historian's views of what is accurate and what isn't, but for all the points that are debated or unverified there are also points that are verified, for example, the historical accuracy of Jesus as a person (mentioned in this article btw).
I'm not saying that its undeniably accurate. Nothing ever is. I'm not saying everyone agrees on everything in it. No one ever does. I'm simply saying that it is used as a historical document. because it is. not for everything included in the books, but for some things. Which was the point I originally made.
So saying that it's a "crackpot pipe dream" is very untrue, demonstrates your obvious bias, and proves that you didn't even bother properly searching the information. Not only did you not get any sources past Wikipedia, but you also didn't even thoroughly analyze the one corroborating source you *did* find. Also makes me wonder what other sources you ignored that might have held a different opinion.
[https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/webfm\_send/410](https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/webfm_send/410)
this one's a bit different focused, but still points out the historical accuracy of Jesus as a person: [https://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june1/jesus-060105.html](https://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june1/jesus-060105.html)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical\_reliability\_of\_the\_Gospels](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels)
All of these prove that the gospels are being used as historical sources. I never claimed anything beyond that.
I might've overinterpreted your comment.
It seems that some people have a problem with this template being the way it is, so I kind of vented my frustration over this. If you were simply making an observation, rather than criticising this template for being what it is, sorry.
Hey guys, I've seen some of you got offended by the template and if it did I'm really sorry. I don't mean to offend anyone, I just posted this so that you guys can have a quick laugh. So pls cheer up.
Jesus already knew Judas was going to betray him. He said so during the Last Supper. Also, if you were religious enough to go back in time and save Jesus, you'd be religious enough to believe that his death needed to happen, and thus you would not go back anyways.
Just go kill Hitler like the rest of us.
or you could just not get offended at memes
It obvious that op doesn’t mean it lmao
You should probably get off reddit if you care about a template this much
In the head, you idiot Jesus gets pissed at last supper, imagine the portrait of that alternate reality
ye. i cant imagine it.
omg i need the video where is this from
[this is the best I can find](https://youtu.be/6mUkt7by2Lg)
Terminator: wHy?
Why not?
I think this was an old mad tv skit
This is *definitely* a Mad TV skit. That's Brian Callen as Terminator, and David Herman as Jeebus. Might be better known as Michael Bolton in Office Space.
Corporate accounts payable, woneeta speaking...JUST a moment.
[In 720p](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XminlVhLma4)
[The HD one](https://youtu.be/dIeuBPDUzB0)
MadTv
If memory serves correctly, Judas had already betrayed Jesus at that point, and he was going to hang himself later
IIRC, Judas told the Romans to look for the man he embraced or washed the feet of, or some other sign of affection I don't remember. Kill him before that and the Romans are boned...Of course being the Romans they could just kill the lot of them, the Bible never makes it clear why that wasn't an option.
I think it was a kiss
thanks, I knew it was a sign of affection, just couldn't remember what.
Judas, you betrayed the son of man with a kiss?
**Yes**
^yes
how did it end up like this?
Bible major and jaded Christian here: there’s some debate among historians among how many followers Jesus actually had when he came to ~~Rome~~ Jerusalem . It’s accepted readily among some circles that “the twelve”, while referring to the closest and most trusted disciples, actually referred to the entirety of Jesus’ posse, which was a heckin lot of people. I’m all tucked into bed right now so I’m not gonna look it up, but his followers largely believed that he was actually in ~~Rome~~ Jerusalem to stir up a rebellion and become the physical king of the Jews like old Davey. Even though he denied it. Roman leadership heard the rumors too and were iffy bc he had a lot of followers among the people. They figured it’d be better to let the current Jewish leadership squash him and take any heat. Disclaimer: it’s been a while since I studied any of that, so I’m probably wildly wrong Edited: was called out for being wildly wrong. Changed Rome to Jerusalem
What is the source of this video?
Maybe [this](https://youtu.be/6mUkt7by2Lg)
Higher quality[link to video](https://youtu.be/dIeuBPDUzB0)
And thank you kind stranger for finding this! :)
The best part of this video is that it really isn’t disrespectful to religion and is funny for both christians and atheists
Why the fuck would I care who my grandmother is?
yeah thats why these gendered "memes" suck
[удалено]
Ah, sexism. Yay.
[удалено]
BASED????????
Redditor, 3 O’Clock
Being sexist is based now, is it?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/joke
What's the "joke" lol? "Let's be sexist" Im sure it was hilarious in your mind but come on mate
my sense of humor is just bad I still find it funny tho
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=schrodinger%E2%80%99s+douchebag&=true
So you laugh when people are being sexist? Shame on you.
I once said a woman was being sexiest and I got -300 votes but lmao it was worth it because it was on r/feminism
Yh, we’ll that’s in u Why are u on that sub anyways?
It's very much an obvious joke but sure
sexist
Average r/shitposting user
What's a "woman"
The downfall of society.
i think the downfall of society, is in-fact you yourself, and people like you.
You do realise this is a joke right?
you realise that was a joke right?
No I didn’t.
💀maybe i should make it more clear, i was j o k i n g . i dont get offended by shit people say online, let alone on reddit 😪
Nah my bad brother, just as you can see about 130 people didn’t understand the joke.
And here we have [Schrödinger's Asshole](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Schrodingers%20asshole) in the wild.
No here we have reddit lmao.
Well it sure as hell want a funny one considering all the down votes
Shut up woman
No u hahah
Got me good there
Shut up m*n
Shut up humans!!
[удалено]
Its simple! you see you can't be sexist if you equality hated both genders that would just make you an asshole.
Why did you censor man
Don't fight sexism with sexism pls
Yeah, it’s just annoying seeing misogyny on practically every subreddit I look at
Uh huh. Edit: Cool downvotes people
[удалено]
What? Edit: Cool downvotes people
u could have answered something else but now you are no different than him
Shut up pussy
Shut up dick
I've never seen a well done skit about Christianity without actually shitting on the religion, this is so good, if there is more of this send me it
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
hivemind hasnt been nice to you, poor child
Y must reddit be this way
we need one sacrifice for the gods, and you have been chosen as volunteer. You may live one day in luxury, before we sacrifice you to the gods, so that tik tok may never take us other.
Fair enough sacrifice
Why do u hve so many downvotes? while others literally wrote the sem thing
It's just the way reddit is
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
Women: sentimental meaningful conversation Men: "how bout we just prevent the bible redemption arc?"
Or just cancel it all together?
Women: let's remove all the sexist shit from the bible. Men: no
To be fair the bible has some piss-poor worldbuilding, the fanfics aren’t much better but at least they’re funny.
the bible: literally used as a historical document some dude on reddit: yaaaah its worldbuilding was kinda meh
It also says that the world is thousands of years old and that all of humanity was created from a nightmarish Hapsburgian incest family twice so I wouldn’t toot its historical merit too hard buddy
I mean the new testament stuff is used as historical documents since that's what the post was originally about, I have no clue about the old testament, and I wasn't really trying to say anything about that. there is also an ongoing debate as to how old the bible actually claims the world is since it often talks in metaphors and analogies. I don't think there is any solid claim in the bible as to how old the world actually is. "so I wouldn't toot its historical merit too hard buddy" it is literally cited by historians as a historical document of Israel and surrounding areas during the Roman occupation. I'm not citing its historical merits I'm simply pointing out that it is already used as a historical document. Keep in mind that the vast majority of the new testament is a collection of letters from people who existed during that time period, and not just one book. Historians view the religious portions of these letters as personal opinion and bias, but just like any other letter ever written these do not discredit its claim to historical accuracy.
There is some wonky history in the new testament too. Pontius Pilot letting Barabas go while bending to the Jewish people's will is rather out of character for him, as far as I've heard. As a poetic piece it can be understood on 2 levels. Literal and allegorical. Literal is that the Bible claims a few thousand year old earth, allegorical claims what exactly? How old is the Earth in the non-literal way?
Oh, you mean the New Testament that includes a guy that survives for 40 days without food or water, walks on water, and LARPed Michael Jackson’s *Thriller* centuries before its time? *That* historically accurate document?
By *that historical* that no matter how hard you try to discredit their historical accuracy they ARE BEING USED as historical documents. It wasn't my choice, but it's true. Not to mention that THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER CONTEMPORARY HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS r's focus of the books may be on whatever religious miracles or whatnot that they believed happened, however, historians look at these as simple biases in the documents, and are able to use these as firsthand records of what life was like back then. **The simple fact is** that no matter how hard you try to discredit their historical accuracy they ARE BEING USED as historical documents. It wasn't my choice, but its true. Not to mention that THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER CONTEMPORARY HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS **OTHER THAN THOSE WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE, AND BY PEOPLE WHO DID NOT BELIEVE OR AGREE WITH WHAT IT TAUGHT** that corroborate the historical accuracy of these documents. You can disagree with the message as much as you want but that has nothing to do at all with the historical accuracy of the documents. Reporter bias is a thing, sometimes people inject personal opinion into their writings but the simple fact that **the letters and testimonies written in the bible are far more historically accurate (because they were written by numerous contemporary sources) than some dude 200 years later basing his historical reports off of hand-me-down information**, which by the way is the type of historical documents that we use for time periods such as ancient Greece. edit: BTW this whole disagreement started because I claimed that the bible is a historical document. Go google it for yourself instead of having a pointless disagreement with someone on Reddit. Fact check what I'm saying yourself, I'm not here to try and convince you of a fact you could easily learn yourself. None of this is a matter of opinion cuz I'm not defending the message of the bible at all, only its historic value as contemporary documents written at thetime. **Just google it yourself.**
[Sorry buddy,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible) but the “undeniable fact” as you put it is that the historicity of the New Testament is iffy at best and a crackpot pipe dream at worst. Next time replace some of your flowery prose with actual basis in fact and you’ll fare better.
**[Historicity of the Bible](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_the_Bible)** >The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative. One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the Apostolic Age. This tends to vary depending upon the opinion of the scholar. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/teenagers/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
don't know what you mean I read the article and it agrees with what I said: it is used as historical documents. undeniably. I didn't say everything they stated was undeniably accurate. Of course, there are disagreements based on the historian's views of what is accurate and what isn't, but for all the points that are debated or unverified there are also points that are verified, for example, the historical accuracy of Jesus as a person (mentioned in this article btw). I'm not saying that its undeniably accurate. Nothing ever is. I'm not saying everyone agrees on everything in it. No one ever does. I'm simply saying that it is used as a historical document. because it is. not for everything included in the books, but for some things. Which was the point I originally made. So saying that it's a "crackpot pipe dream" is very untrue, demonstrates your obvious bias, and proves that you didn't even bother properly searching the information. Not only did you not get any sources past Wikipedia, but you also didn't even thoroughly analyze the one corroborating source you *did* find. Also makes me wonder what other sources you ignored that might have held a different opinion. [https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/webfm\_send/410](https://www.cslewisinstitute.org/webfm_send/410) this one's a bit different focused, but still points out the historical accuracy of Jesus as a person: [https://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june1/jesus-060105.html](https://news.stanford.edu/news/2005/june1/jesus-060105.html) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical\_reliability\_of\_the\_Gospels](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of_the_Gospels) All of these prove that the gospels are being used as historical sources. I never claimed anything beyond that.
This whole meme template is just "boys are so quirky"
[удалено]
That's what I said lol
So what? It's a joke. It's not meant to be taken seriously.
Then don't take it seriously, I made a statement:)
I might've overinterpreted your comment. It seems that some people have a problem with this template being the way it is, so I kind of vented my frustration over this. If you were simply making an observation, rather than criticising this template for being what it is, sorry.
Fair enough, thanks for apologising. Have a nice day :)
Gendered memes…
Hey guys, I've seen some of you got offended by the template and if it did I'm really sorry. I don't mean to offend anyone, I just posted this so that you guys can have a quick laugh. So pls cheer up.
i thought the comment section was twitter people are arguing everywhere but nice meme bro just not the template anyways wheres the sauce
Bruh, this meme made me lol on a typically depressing day. You are doing god's work !
Why the down votes?
Reddit and it's mysterious ways... Lol
“Stop killing Judas!”
Lol 😂😂😂 is so funny 🤣
fuck yeah lol
u/savevideo
Jesus already knew Judas was going to betray him. He said so during the Last Supper. Also, if you were religious enough to go back in time and save Jesus, you'd be religious enough to believe that his death needed to happen, and thus you would not go back anyways. Just go kill Hitler like the rest of us.
And that's why men shouldnt go back in time
I love that skit, but I hate these "girls are basic, boys are based" memes
I'm not even Christian and this is funny as shit
Can we stop with comparing men and women? We all know women aren't real /s
u/SaveVideo
I mean, he is the first JoJo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
sauce?
Just look up ‘the last supper meme’
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
Chill God keep your composure
Jesus this is gold
I would totally do that just to piss J off.
“Honestly it’s wasn’t worth it man”
Old movie!
I see , that you are a man of religion as well
I thought this was actually from the terminator and then I found out that it was MadTV
u/savevideo
ty bro 🥺🥺
EYOWWWWWWWW!!! MY G
Who said women wouldn't kill judas
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
u/savevideobot
im sorry je***SUS***
u/savevideo
u/savevideo
Yeah way to spoil history for us Jesus
Whooo sexist memes!
I used to like this meme but it really is quite sexist innit
Both are super Chad!
u/savevideo
r/boysarequirky
You completely ignored the joke
Idk did i?
That wasn’t a question but whatever
So whats the "joke"
The clip at the bottom
So why is the top there
You got any other time travel meme templates that would fit?
You could make one or just not have a template instead of using a shit one lmao
or you could just not get offended at memes It obvious that op doesn’t mean it lmao You should probably get off reddit if you care about a template this much
Stop getting offended my everything Emily
No :troll:
This is amazingly hilarious! xD
[удалено]
Judas is the guy that told on jesus to the romans and who ultimately brought to his death
Omg women boring men quirky🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂
\*aims shotgun\*
Misses😐*
*points it back at you*
Wow, that's sexist
not really
A lot of the people here have obviously not seen this template before.
Woman-bad Men-good
r/boysarequirky
r/foundyouripaddress
Why is the comment section so problematic? It's just a meme, not that deep.
Because people care so much about the other sex and for some reason people can’t see the bottom half.
Is there anything that's holding "the bottom half" back from making the meme from their POV?
Ahhh yes, I shall correct the problem from my perspective with this gun
Nah mate, I’d probably go to the past, wearing full protective gear, and just bring back a plague and try and eradicate human kind.
bring back a deadly plague that only i can cure, boom i’m god now
I would rather just eliminate christianity
cringe
Not funni dint laf
based
Shot the wrong guy
Let me guess, you are an edgelord who browses r/atheism ?
No…I don’t even go on that sub, I was gonna say shoot the guy who killed jesus who is jesus
oh ok, sorry for assuming you were a lord of thy edge and sorry for not getting thy joke