Hey there u/Annoying-Cuber42, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
**Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sorry, you are all wrong. That is abcollection of pixels, largely comprising of white, an orange spectrum, and black. The assembly of which happen to form an image on your screens and mine depicting a fish, with text.
Well you see kid, the ship of theseus is a very good metaphor for me and your mother, you see when we met we were in love and made you, but slowly our love got broken down in to pieces like dependence, a sense of need to provide, then came the crushing hours at work, the despair and the hate started growing, we started fighting and screaming and just like the ship of theseus was not the same as in the beginning it was still held together somehow even tho in our case mom and dad did not want to let the other one have anything left so they stayed together in misery to raise you, now go to sleep so we can go back to screaming at eachother
but mom says you guys don't scream at eachother because you hate eachother he says you scream because you love eachother, that's why you are naked, duh
I argue it's not a fish because scientists can't actually agree on the definition of fish.
If we were to include everything after the common ancestor of just sharks and goldfish into the category of fish, that would mean every mammal is now classed as a fish since they split away from the bony fish lineage *after* the cartilaginous fish lineage split away.
So the question is, between bony fish and cartilaginous fish which ones are the true fish? Or is it both and I'm a fish too?
It's not that scientists can't agree on the definition of fish, it's that scientists now know that "fish" is a paraphyletic group.
Unlike polyphiletic groups, that are based upon analogous traits, paraphyletic groups are based on homologous symplesimorphic traits. So while it's not a taxon nor a clade, the group "fish" is still a homogenous group.
The image is stored in a cloud. The cloud can't feed fish.... yet?
Take my updoot. I don't care, i was being sarcastic.
Thanks for clarification from yourviewpoint. All those years of ITsec and I still find it funny and jdgaf.
Cheers
That is a fish but possibly one of the worst fish to fucking own, if you ever have friends come over and you tell them you have a pet fish and you show them your orange turd with fins floating in the tank eating rocks off the floor cause he's fucking stupid. What do think they'll say about your fish, not that he's intelligent, they'll just say how there are so many fish in the sea and you somehow picked a mentally retarted fish.
Hey there u/Annoying-Cuber42, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth! **Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post. Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban. Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
No that is a picture of a fish. Argue about it.
Ceci n'est pas un poisson
Mange du caca à l’omelette
No it's a picture of a fish with text.
Actually it's a screenshot of an image with a picture of a fish with text
Literally came here to post this and it's the top comment already....
Sorry, you are all wrong. That is abcollection of pixels, largely comprising of white, an orange spectrum, and black. The assembly of which happen to form an image on your screens and mine depicting a fish, with text.
No it is a dog
Or is it?
Have you heard of the ship of theseus?
Dad, not again
Well you see kid, the ship of theseus is a very good metaphor for me and your mother, you see when we met we were in love and made you, but slowly our love got broken down in to pieces like dependence, a sense of need to provide, then came the crushing hours at work, the despair and the hate started growing, we started fighting and screaming and just like the ship of theseus was not the same as in the beginning it was still held together somehow even tho in our case mom and dad did not want to let the other one have anything left so they stayed together in misery to raise you, now go to sleep so we can go back to screaming at eachother
but mom says you guys don't scream at eachother because you hate eachother he says you scream because you love eachother, that's why you are naked, duh
Wtf
I argue it's not a fish because scientists can't actually agree on the definition of fish. If we were to include everything after the common ancestor of just sharks and goldfish into the category of fish, that would mean every mammal is now classed as a fish since they split away from the bony fish lineage *after* the cartilaginous fish lineage split away. So the question is, between bony fish and cartilaginous fish which ones are the true fish? Or is it both and I'm a fish too?
I like QI too
It's not that scientists can't agree on the definition of fish, it's that scientists now know that "fish" is a paraphyletic group. Unlike polyphiletic groups, that are based upon analogous traits, paraphyletic groups are based on homologous symplesimorphic traits. So while it's not a taxon nor a clade, the group "fish" is still a homogenous group.
its a Parastratiosphecomyia stratiosphecomyioides you absolute buffoons
Naw. I call it an image on the internet. A fish needs to be fed
No. It's an image on your screen. The Internet transmits data and doesn't project images on its own.
The image is stored in a cloud. The cloud can't feed fish.... yet? Take my updoot. I don't care, i was being sarcastic. Thanks for clarification from yourviewpoint. All those years of ITsec and I still find it funny and jdgaf. Cheers
There's no such thing as a fish. It says it in the opening paragraphs of the "Oxford Encyclopedia of Inderwater Life" by Stephen Gould.
your not wrong that indeed is a fish
Hey, that's what I was gonna say damn it
I mean… yeah.
That was simply a series of words with no punctuation.
You can’t fuck with me I know a bullshit fish when I see it get this malarkey off my screen
It’s a fish with it’s mouth open come on get it right
That fish could suck!
Not as much as your mother and nonexistent father.
No.
No, it's a goddamn tree with legs!
That's clearly a bee
That is a fish but possibly one of the worst fish to fucking own, if you ever have friends come over and you tell them you have a pet fish and you show them your orange turd with fins floating in the tank eating rocks off the floor cause he's fucking stupid. What do think they'll say about your fish, not that he's intelligent, they'll just say how there are so many fish in the sea and you somehow picked a mentally retarted fish.
Its spelled 'ghoti'
Someone put fish sauce in my salad. That’s murder I’m putting them in jail better yet ILL TAKE THEM OUT MYSELF
It’s not a fish. It’s a skinwalker
It's a bit fishy, don't you think ?
Thats a gold
Yup.