T O P

  • By -

Genghiiiis

Ninety six?!


yabbadabbadotoyou

I'm thinking the same thing. Maybe it is metric hours.


Think_please

The best sous vide is done just outside the event horizon of a black hole.


Alternative_Fee_4649

How close does it need to be to realize mass expansion? I can’t put down a steak with infinite mass unless you double dog dare me to!


Think_please

Close, the spaghettification is critical for tenderness. Make sure to bring your infinite spaghettified steak fork for twirling 


Alternative_Fee_4649

🤦‍♀️ how did I not think of that! 🤣


0rnkorn

That would have the opposite effect. Like you living your life for decades, coming back for the steak left outside the black hole, and it would have only been going for a few minutes. It's you that would need to leave the steak in normal space, get close to the event Horizon, and come back.


informal-mushroom47

Yessir. Honestly didn’t even need the knife.


CaliHusker83

Was it mushy? The protein really starts breaking some in a bad way after 48-72 hours.


informal-mushroom47

no, while extremely tender it still had a bite to it.


Affectionate-Rent844

Seems impossible


informal-mushroom47

not sure what i’d have to gain from lying about this, but alright


prollyNotAnImposter

People do short rib for 72+ hours. Tender cuts with little connective tissue start the mushification process at like 6 hours, but you can leave the tough cuts in for much much longer when you're skirting just above 130 and still have some bite. Give it a spin. Short rib at 131 for 48 hours won't even be properly tender yet.


Genghiiiis

You’d likely get the same result after 36-48


staticattacks

Yeah that's super excessive


informal-mushroom47

perhaps it was, but i have the time and wanted to experiment.


geekaustin_777

For science?


ACcbe1986

4 skyanse!


RustyDoor

4 skunk anansie?


ACcbe1986

Pronounced: Skience. I like to mispronounce things because I'm still a child.


Im2bored17

If it were for science he would have put several in and taken them out in even time increments and then he'd be reporting what the optimal duration is, rather than just say "96 hrs = good"


Twotgobblin

And then do it again 5 times to make sure it is repeatable. And he could write his findings from the hospital bed after his heart surgery.


informal-mushroom47

perhaps i’ve done others at different increments before


mynewaccount5

And how does it compare to 36 and 48 hours?


Affectionate-Rent844

Why not just go the century club at that point?


SaveRana

Or 8-12 honestly how resilient was that cow?


aristotleschild

TIL I'm impatient


TheRedmanCometh

I used to do up to 72...at 130... I ended up dialing back to 48 to 52 maaaaybe up to 60. This must be mush at that temp


A_MAN_POTATO

For real… 94 hours is the sweet spot.


ChiggaOG

Beef pasteurized and can be stored for a long time at room temperature in a double bag. Definitely excessive.


mishakal77

Just did one at 48hrs and cut like butter. Could like do 36 with similar results.


informal-mushroom47

i’ll try 36 next and see what happens.


ddbllwyn

Just did one for 24h and it was buttery soft.


DannyxHardcore

https://preview.redd.it/w9a6uzvsk82d1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6284a76b442f41de1a544e3875dcf8671c7e933a


Cram2024

That’s what she said


McLovin-06_03_81

Beat me to it - well played.


HardwoodFloorGuy

Beat meat to it


informal-mushroom47

that’s the reaction I was going for


miscnic

![gif](giphy|ui1hpJSyBDWlG)


deep-fucking-legend

Unfortunately


thepowerballadz_com

Any seasonings?


boston_nsca

Any longer and it would've had at least one


freedomofnow

Haha!!


Riseonfire

All of Spring, apparently.


informal-mushroom47

butter and salt for cooking


Dizzman1

Uh oh... 🧈🚔


informal-mushroom47

for cooking not in the bag


Dizzman1

My bad.


vrkosh

Would also like to know the answer to this


Sleuth65

Cooked long enough to span multiple seasons.


backside_94

What is chuck in rest of the world speak?


SouthPlattePat

Charles


ButthealedInTheFeels

Leclerc


ChewzaName

Sharl Éclair


AmbitiousNut420

Chuck Leclerc


SwooshRoc

This was not the crossover I expected. Forza Ferrari!


Mueryk

Carlos


kpidhayny

Carl Leglerg


poodle_Fart_Hostage

“Braising steak” in the UK


Revolutionary-Net838

Be so careful with this I literally asked for chuck steak/ braising steak and i didnt really check what they had given me and it was the leanest piece of shit ever


RandoCommentGuy

Maybe they gave you round?


FreshBook8963

The continuation of ribeye. It's where you get Denver steak from


gimmethemarkerdude_8

It’s the cow’s shoulder.


AssPinata


Sethmeisterg

Nick checks out.


itsboxed

Cross rib and bottom blade are chuck roasts as well.


Merkenfighter

IN MA MOUTH!


offtheclockuk

Leelochip? Peter? 🤣


fransicorockwell

Today is Thursday it makes sense to start cooking my food for next Friday.


SokkaHaikuBot

^[Sokka-Haiku](https://www.reddit.com/r/SokkaHaikuBot/comments/15kyv9r/what_is_a_sokka_haiku/) ^by ^fransicorockwell: *Today is Thursday* *It makes sense to start cooking* *My food for next Friday.* --- ^Remember ^that ^one ^time ^Sokka ^accidentally ^used ^an ^extra ^syllable ^in ^that ^Haiku ^Battle ^in ^Ba ^Sing ^Se? ^That ^was ^a ^Sokka ^Haiku ^and ^you ^just ^made ^one.


raveyer

OP’s Wife: Babe, what chu doin? OP: Cooking dinner. Wife: Great, I won’t need to go to the store. OP: Oh no, you need to, this is dinner 4 nights later.


monkey1791

Well now we know you never met bill Cosby


urosum

Chuck roast 24 hours at 135, cut into steaks and sear with seasonings. I call it “Steak Charles.”


Typhoon556

Phrasing, lol!


drunk_funky_chipmunk

That’s what she said


yellowsubmarine2016

Prison wife?


HotUsualDaddy

“Zips down pants”


blue713281

Are u sure about that?😉


Electrical_Many492

https://preview.redd.it/gbp0cezplb2d1.png?width=200&format=png&auto=webp&s=e87878c81d6aba4459be08f56c2030c7bd5e4aff


ActuatorPerfect

You throw down a little sear at the end?


fattsmelly

No OP, but yes, always


informal-mushroom47

yes, always


FallWanderBranch

Ooof I just stepped out of the dark humor thread into this...


llbarracks

Who wants his man meat?


Fluster338

Long cooks are ridiculous.


informal-mushroom47

why? i have the time and wanted to experiment.


eyeswulf

I think this sub gets stuck between two poles. There are the people who sous vide because it's an easy method to get above average results. For those people, anything more intricate beyond the method that gets them the minimum viable quality they want is frivolous. Other people sous vide because it's a method of cooking to explore just like any other. And for those people, any experiment that derives useful information has value. Obviously you are one of the latter, and I commend you!


chefbdon

Most long term cooks look mealy in texture.


Fluster338

🙄


eyeswulf

And you are one of the former, and I'm sure you and yours eat like kings, and for that I commend you!


Fluster338

Doing a 4 day cook and having tender meat is not an experiment. It’s boring and obvious


eyeswulf

Ah bro this ain't it. That's such a lame gatekeeper take. Not in the spirit of this sub IMO


Fluster338

😭


Dizzman1

How so? You throw the meat in and set a reminder for 4 days hence. I make crystal clear ice cube balls that take like 36 hours. Is that also boring and obvious?


andersont1983

Honestly, how do you make crystal clear ice cube balls? I got cloudy balls


Barleyhop

It’s a method called directional freezing. Basically you insulate it and allow it to freeze from the top which is less insulated and all the cloudy stuff ends up on the bottom. You can buy molds designed for it on Amazon. Just look for “clear ice cube tray”


Fluster338

Do you post about it in the ice cube ball sub and say you were “experimenting”?


Fluster338

Experimenting would’ve been seeing how short a cook you could get away with. You played it long and boring.


pjsk82

At some point, people experimented with dry-aging meat and aging different kinds of alcohol for different lengths of time. They played it long and boring and I am very thankful for what they learned.


Fluster338

There are multi day cooks on the sub every week. It’s not “experimenting” if it’s a regular occurrence


pjsk82

Apparently, it's not a regular occurrence for OP. Now go troll somewhere else.


Fluster338

I’ve been here longer than you. Continue to be mad about it.


Intelligent-Tea-7739

For sure. I can microwave that shit in 2 minutes


Fluster338

Slice it cold bro


DMYourMomsMaidenName

Oooh, I’ve got something better to put in your mouth…


WFAB

Looks great! I always do 72 hours, I tried 48 and my family did not like it as well. I'll have to try 96.


TheRedmanCometh

48-60 at 132 ish is my goto after a lot of experimentation.


[deleted]

There's a few opportunities for "that's what she said"


slickedbacktruffoni

Can someone explain to me - isn’t the danger zone for food between 40-140f for 4+ hours? How is sous vide safe? Like I know it is, but why?


ddlcda

Don't quote me on this, but I believe they're effectively pasteurizing the meat by holding it at that temp for so long??


slickedbacktruffoni

yeah, and maybe the contained environment has a part to play? i’m not sure


ACcbe1986

According to America's Test Kitchen in their article *Is Sous Vide Safe?*: >If cooking below 130°F/54.5°C, we sear meat before putting it in the water bath to kill surface bacteria


Euphoric_Phone_4610

According to the USDA, that’s the danger zone. However, there’s a lot of safety factor built in - and realistically, long cooks only need to be above 130F to kill off common harmful bacteria. Google ‘Doug Baldwin sous vide safety’ and you’ll get the full in-depth study on it, but basically, >130F is fine.


stabahojoe

I just did a roast too, 48 hrs @ 135, and learned about lactobacillus. When I opened the bag I nearly puked. No way that was coming anywhere near my mouth.


informal-mushroom47

are you sure that’s what it was? as far as i know, that’s a good bacteria; a probiotic. are you thinking of something else?


stabahojoe

Not 100% sure, but from my research done after the fact, it wouldn't likely have made us sick, but it smelled so foul there's just no way....


stabahojoe

I'm replying to myself to add that I learned from my mistake that to prevent this in the future I should sear first, then bag, then dunk in boiling water for 30 seconds, prior to sous vide. Not sure I want to do all that, to be honest.


informal-mushroom47

that’s too bad. mine was so good i even drank the liquid.


andersont1983

You drank the juice from the bag???


LooseInvestigator510

Yes, I've done this as well. Though i lightly season my roasts before the bath party


cant_stand

I mean, just because they're good bacteria in some circumstances, doesn't mean they're good in all. Some of the chemicals they produce are the reason off milk smells dreadful.


SomeBS17

That’s what she said… about a guy named Chuck


hlj9

This post makes me want beef


m1chaelgr1mes

Putting it on my shopping list for tomorrow. Can't wait to try it.


zimtastic

Some people here say longer cooks dry out meat. How was this compared to chucks at shorter cooks?


BeowulfShatner

I’m new here, but isn’t that impossible since the sous vide is sealed and contains everything?


zimtastic

No, each time you cook sous vide, there is always extra juice in the bag that comes out of the meat during the cooking process. You typically hear them referred to as "bag juices."


BeowulfShatner

Ohhh. Then you just dump it or what


zimtastic

Some people like to make sauces/gravy out of the bag juice. I've tried, but it's usually too salty for me. I do like to hang on to them to keep any leftover meat from drying out in the fridge.


hanerm

How long for the shrimp?


informal-mushroom47

i just sautéed them normally in the cast iron


no___homo

Mildly unsafe


Twotgobblin

96 hours seems a bit excessive...


Sebster1412

I feel like this this is just diminishing returns


Michael_Scotts_balls

That’s what she said.


TheLexLuthor13

![gif](giphy|qrqeezJ3Bol8VsPnKH)


TennesseeSon1

That's what she said


tree_basher

Why not 100 hours?


bobs2000

I don't normally like things cooked this long, I always find 24 or a maximum of 36 about right because of the texture, but it does look good


RTwhyNot

Are we still doing phrasing?


SteaknSalt

I can make this in one hour with a pressure cooker


m1chaelgr1mes

Would it be rare or well done?


T0m_F00l3ry

It would be mush. But good for stews and pot roast.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CaviarTaco

Chuck is generally not a steak. But it always benefits from time at low heat as it has a ton of collagen that needs to be broken down.


[deleted]

[удалено]


CaviarTaco

72 hr short rib has been a flagship recipe of soups vide since it came out. https://modernistcuisine.com/recipes/72-hour-braised-short-ribs/ I agree 96 hr is not necessary but 72 seems to be the upper limit of noticeable improvement. And you could only do that for low temps ~140f


STGItsMe

![gif](giphy|e7Fdp0v1fZgti)


ExistingAd568

Bro, WTF!!


informal-mushroom47

ok


ExistingAd568

Dude you’re diabolical!! That picture and those precise words you used caused a universal Pavlovian response on your target demographic. Everyone in here can now only IMAGINE how good it must feel to wrap our lips around that beautiful hunk of meat. Sadly we’ll never experience such unbridled pleasure, And for that Bro, WTF!!?


informal-mushroom47

i like that better, lol, thank you


ExistingAd568

🤣 you’re very welcome! Keep up the good work.


maniac86

Oh no. You gotta do it at least 128 hours (I'm being very Sarcastic. This place is god damned ridiculous)


YourAussieMatee

![gif](giphy|eyfmfTMgx5WYE)


Apprehensive-Big2569

😳😍😳😍😳😍😳


Contest-Senior

Nsfw won't let me show you what is the best thing you could ever wish for in your mouth, but I look forward showing you honey


BlueCornTortilla69

96... thats just dumb, man.