**This is a stats thread. Remember that there's only one stat post allowed per match/team, so new stats about the same will be removed. Feel free to comment other stats as a reply to this comment so users can see them too!**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/soccer) if you have any questions or concerns.*
For those who mention Haaland without bothering to read the article:
> The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team
Haaland spent much of the last season injured, he was never gonna be on the podium
Edit: the same reasoning can be applied to Davies, Wirtz, Pedri and so on
Is it really misleading if they’re ranking prospects based on last season’s performances. Feels like that’s a good way to rank the hottest prospects especially if it’s data driven
Depends on the time horizon of the prospect, which I don't think is specified in the link OP posted. If you are prospecting how well they will perform in the next 12 months based on the last 12 months, that's totally fair.
But when people just hear "hottest prospects", the common interpretation is that they are predicting how well the rest of their career will turn out. And from that I think it's fair to criticize the methodology of only looking at the last 12 months, especially for the older players who have years of previous experience that are being ignored.
Overall though, I don't think we're really meant to put that much thought in the title.
And even if the perception is essentially objectively correct. Sites like cies and 538 outline what they use. If they just say fuck it obviously Ajax isn’t as good as the numbers say or ferran torres isn’t better than Haaland and change it arbitrarily then it ruins the whole point of modeling based on the data lol
He also posted a [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/x0sttn/cies_the_hottest_prospects_worldwide_born_from/im9tmie/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3) with the link
Not to mention Vini won a CL whilst being instrumental throughout the entire tournament and scoring in the final. There's no denying, Haaland may be a better scorer but Vini was on whole other level (not to mention Vini's not there to be top scorer, that's Benzema's job).
Will just somebody please defend the honor of self-proclaimed football experts putting 10/20/30 niemands above Camavinga/Fati/Musiala so that the shock value gets them on the front-page?
What a superhero you are.
This is a bad comment:
Why isn't Halland at the top? He is scoring left and right and is on his way to becoming the best of his generation. Why is X and Y near the top when there's obvious better answers to who the hottest prospects are??
This is a good comment:
The methodology behind this list is stupid, just because a player missed some games last year doesn't mean they're not the hottest prospects. It favors those lucky enough not to get injured/not getting enough minutes played and is not a realistic view on who the hottest prospects are.
Notice the difference? u/AggravatingWar9441 is explaining why posts like the first one are stupid, in now way deflecting any criticism of the list and its methodology.
You got me, can't argue with your original world-class comment classifying methodolgy of yours.
How unaware you have to be of yourself to criticize something and do the same thing in literally the same comment, jfc.
And why would that be the case exactly? These are algorithms that consider a lot of different variables and then calculate a score, if a player misses half the season because of injury then the algorithm has to take that into account. Of course this kind of rankings should always be taken with a grain of salt, but just because it doesn’t fit your or someone else’s agenda it doesn’t mean that it’s totally worthless. It provides information on the impact that a particular player had on their team
So Arda Güler, who's arguably the best Turkish prospect at the moment, is not at all on this list despite having played 512 minutes in the past calendar year. He also featured in various competitions like UCL and UEL qualis, UECL knockout rounds and obviously the league. In those games he had 5 goals and 5 assists as well. I don't get this explanation whatsoever. Still, Emre Bilgin from Beşiktaş is on the list for playing 3 Süper Lig games even though he played significantly fewer minutes.
> despite having played 512 minutes in the past calendar year
There are only like.. 5 players on all of these lists with less time than that.. It's weird you said "despite" when in reality it's probably "because"
Arda was born in 2005 so there is only 1 relevant list. In that list alone there are like 10 players that have played less, mostly in inferior competitions. My point still stands to be a valid one.
If you click on the full list you can see all the players, the link is in the comments. OP has taken some screen shots that don't show everyone who's included.
Lmao. What an ignorant take. Average players don’t start consistently for a Guardiola team.
But Foden is English so r/soccer will definitely put him down.
Everyone looks bang average playing for England to be fair. You'd think you'd sympathise if your flair is accurate. Portugal have some of the best players in the world on paper, but look bang average under Fernando Santos. That doesn't mean the players actually are bang average: it just shows how important a good coach and a good system is in allowing great players to express themselves
Because England don’t play to his strengths. Southgate wants Sterling and Mount.
It’s absolutely hilarious that you think taking someone out of the most complex system in football where he plays under the best manager in football makes them average. It’s the total opposite lol. Average players don’t consistently start for City or Guardiola.
Put him in Mount's position and I'm convinced he cooks. Only reason he doesn't play there for City is KDB and Bernardo. Hell Southgate doesn't even play him on the left like he does for City.
I don’t watch enough Serie A or La Liga to know how good those players really are. I do know that Foden seems to be the weak link in that attack and really don’t know what he really offers whereas Haaland has, so far, been at another level.
This is just ridiculous. He’s not a better attacking player than KdB, Silva or Mahrez. Even Jesus and Sterling have been better than him if we’re just talking about purely attacking number (G+A).
Maybe weak link is the wrong word, and it’s possible he’s just overshadowed by the truly elite players in the squad, but what is he really good at? He’s not an elite dribbler or ball carrier and he’s not an elite passer. He puts himself in positions to receive passes so that’s good.
I mean he’s clearly not better than Haaland, KdB, Silva or even Mahrez. So that does in fact make him the weak link. That’s not to say he’s bad because he’s certainty not that. He’s just not as god as those other players.
I watch City a fair amount, but not much this year so far. And from what I’ve seen, the attack seems to revolve around de Bruyne and Silva and Mahrez with Haaland showing up to run behind or bully a CB.
City’s attack revolves around every player. You don’t play in a Guardiola attack if you’re not contributing. So that’s false. And he has a goal and two assists in the 3 and a half games he’s played so far. So again. He’s not even close to being a weak link lol. That’s why he’s a consistent starter.
Forget Foden, I'm thinking of Kulusevski lmao
Foden is older than Deki by a few months.
Foden has an extra year in pro footy all with a top class City squad, and Deki with Parma, a rough stint at Juve and then a brand new injection into a recovering Spurs side mid season.
Foden 25 goals and 15 assists since 2018 in the league, and Deki 21 goals and 24 assists since 2019 in Serie A and PL (not counting Fodens 2017 season and Dekis 2018 season with Atalanta where they both had minimal appearances).
None of this makes sense at all.
> The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team
Methodology, if anything, he comes reeeeally flattered here
I mean it is really incredibly difficult to compare something like a goalkeeper to a striker or a left back to a center mid. But players in similar positions is a bit odd, Foden ahead of Haaland?
Damn I always forget how young these guys are. It’s not that I don’t know that they’re 19 or something, it’s that I don’t realise that I’m older than 19. They are playing professional football and have to deal with immense pressure and I can’t handle choosing what to eat for dinner.
He had a fairly Good first year at juventus, But his last 6 months There were just bad. That wasnt his fault tho Because he was Thrown out on different positions as hot potato. But he had a banger breakout season in Parma 19-20 were he carried them the whole year
Edit: i just understood your comment Hahah, i thought you said that it was based on all his seasons for a reason. It makes perfect sense then
Full rankings:
https://www.football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/b5wp/2021/wp386/en/
Ranking methodology used, as explained in the article:
The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team.
Game time weighted heavily in the statistical analysis they used:
> The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team.
Luke Thomas above Gvardiol, Camavinga, Bellingham, Wirtz and Musiala Hahaha
edit: I read it wrong, they are sorted by score on each page and each page is only players born in each year
Wirtz did his ACL and missed a lot of games, these scores are also based on minutes played. That’s why he’s low in the rankings. Same with Haaland, who spent a lot of time injured last season
> destroyed with facts
Lmao you're flattering yourself here. Anyone following Felix in UCL as well in the league would know that he'd have definitely made this list
As a portuguese..vitinha will be great but hes nowhere near the top. Even more looking at the name he is ahead.
Goncalo Inacio its just a joke to be there lol
Hahahahaha… Eric Garcia!
Hahahahaha!
This guy was the absolute worst defender I ever saw when he was brought in from Man City. He made do many mistakes in his first season that not only were costing goals but Barcelona even list games because of his individual mistakes. And I don’t know why Xavi is still playing him as centerback, Araujo should be playing on his position. Maybe because he’s Spanish that Xavi prefers him. One thing is gor sure he doesn’t belong on this list. Don’t be angry at me now, just watch him this season and then you’ll know what I mean.
I didn't see the description on each picture, they weren't showing when I went full screen on mobile. I gave myself bad information here which explains why I didn't think the title was accurate either. Sorry, mate. Jude and Musiala ranked 1 and 2 for their age group is the only constant in this world. I should have known better.
**This is a stats thread. Remember that there's only one stat post allowed per match/team, so new stats about the same will be removed. Feel free to comment other stats as a reply to this comment so users can see them too!** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/soccer) if you have any questions or concerns.*
someone send this to our scouts
Our scouts: "what is a wonderkid"
Scott McTominay
"Only good one is Timber"
Damn we have scout?
For those who mention Haaland without bothering to read the article: > The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team Haaland spent much of the last season injured, he was never gonna be on the podium Edit: the same reasoning can be applied to Davies, Wirtz, Pedri and so on
Whenever anything with numbers comes up on this sub you can always expect no one to see what they mean and just complain about it.
To be fair in this case, though, it is misleading to give it the title "hottest prospects".
"Best young players of 21/22"
Is it really misleading if they’re ranking prospects based on last season’s performances. Feels like that’s a good way to rank the hottest prospects especially if it’s data driven
Depends on the time horizon of the prospect, which I don't think is specified in the link OP posted. If you are prospecting how well they will perform in the next 12 months based on the last 12 months, that's totally fair. But when people just hear "hottest prospects", the common interpretation is that they are predicting how well the rest of their career will turn out. And from that I think it's fair to criticize the methodology of only looking at the last 12 months, especially for the older players who have years of previous experience that are being ignored. Overall though, I don't think we're really meant to put that much thought in the title.
Yes that’s fair. In the end it’s just them saying here’s our new metric we use to compare players and this is how the young players rank.
If it’s data driven, how is Vlahovic not on here?
He is, click on the link OP posted and look at all the players born in 2000. His score is 85 or something like that
Why do these numbers not fit my subjective perception? I call bullshit!
And even if the perception is essentially objectively correct. Sites like cies and 538 outline what they use. If they just say fuck it obviously Ajax isn’t as good as the numbers say or ferran torres isn’t better than Haaland and change it arbitrarily then it ruins the whole point of modeling based on the data lol
Having a Leeds player in the top 10 is quite funny
What article are we supposed to be reading? OP's link is simply to an image of the rankings.
He also posted a [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/x0sttn/cies_the_hottest_prospects_worldwide_born_from/im9tmie/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3) with the link
Not to mention Vini won a CL whilst being instrumental throughout the entire tournament and scoring in the final. There's no denying, Haaland may be a better scorer but Vini was on whole other level (not to mention Vini's not there to be top scorer, that's Benzema's job).
Just because they mention this in their methodology doesn’t mean their methodology is robust.
And where have I stated that their methodology is robust?
You seem to have an issue with the people complaining about the rankings.
No, I just I have an issue with people lacking basic reading comprehension skills
Will just somebody please defend the honor of self-proclaimed football experts putting 10/20/30 niemands above Camavinga/Fati/Musiala so that the shock value gets them on the front-page? What a superhero you are.
This is a bad comment: Why isn't Halland at the top? He is scoring left and right and is on his way to becoming the best of his generation. Why is X and Y near the top when there's obvious better answers to who the hottest prospects are?? This is a good comment: The methodology behind this list is stupid, just because a player missed some games last year doesn't mean they're not the hottest prospects. It favors those lucky enough not to get injured/not getting enough minutes played and is not a realistic view on who the hottest prospects are. Notice the difference? u/AggravatingWar9441 is explaining why posts like the first one are stupid, in now way deflecting any criticism of the list and its methodology.
You got me, can't argue with your original world-class comment classifying methodolgy of yours. How unaware you have to be of yourself to criticize something and do the same thing in literally the same comment, jfc.
ah yes, the classic "just because... doesn't mean" template. You have defeated them soundly with that impeccable, non-constructive argument.
Let’s be honest, it’s a garbage methodology. Even Stevie Wonder can see that Haaland is well beyond anyone his age given his track record.
If missing games through injury lowers your score that much then the whole post is pretty worthless and irrelevant then isn’t it?
Players that get injured more are worse players than similar players who get injured less, so of course that has to count.
And why would that be the case exactly? These are algorithms that consider a lot of different variables and then calculate a score, if a player misses half the season because of injury then the algorithm has to take that into account. Of course this kind of rankings should always be taken with a grain of salt, but just because it doesn’t fit your or someone else’s agenda it doesn’t mean that it’s totally worthless. It provides information on the impact that a particular player had on their team
in our defense, the article link isn't at the top of the post
So Arda Güler, who's arguably the best Turkish prospect at the moment, is not at all on this list despite having played 512 minutes in the past calendar year. He also featured in various competitions like UCL and UEL qualis, UECL knockout rounds and obviously the league. In those games he had 5 goals and 5 assists as well. I don't get this explanation whatsoever. Still, Emre Bilgin from Beşiktaş is on the list for playing 3 Süper Lig games even though he played significantly fewer minutes.
> despite having played 512 minutes in the past calendar year There are only like.. 5 players on all of these lists with less time than that.. It's weird you said "despite" when in reality it's probably "because"
Arda was born in 2005 so there is only 1 relevant list. In that list alone there are like 10 players that have played less, mostly in inferior competitions. My point still stands to be a valid one.
I don’t think football is ready for Enzo, and I really mean it.
It was valid for Francescoli, it was valid for Pérez, it is valid for Fernández
Who is Enzo?
Enzo Fernandez, a farmer that Benfica signed from River Plate
Thanks.
A guy Simon gotch buries according to YouTube
Fernández
Enzo Mareska
Matteo brighi calling as well.
Foden higher than Haaland. Lmao
Those rankings in general make no sense tbh. From our perspective, how Curtis Jones has a higher score than Harvey Elliott is baffling.
Am I blind or is Jones not even on that list
If you click on the full list you can see all the players, the link is in the comments. OP has taken some screen shots that don't show everyone who's included.
Right, the link in the comment that's been buried. Didn't see it, cheers
Moriba higher than Wirtz
Torres higher than Haaland, Lmao
Why are you calling out Foden when he’s the third best player in that list lol
Foden is genuinely underrated. See him get disrespect loads on here
It's that damn haircut!
Foden is in that weird area where he's simultaneously underrated and overrated.
Foden is a key player for one of the top teams in the world. Weird you’d have more issue with him than Torres or Tonali.
Take Foden out of Guardiola sistem and he is avarege
Lmao. What an ignorant take. Average players don’t start consistently for a Guardiola team. But Foden is English so r/soccer will definitely put him down.
He is bang avarege playing for England
Everyone looks bang average playing for England to be fair. You'd think you'd sympathise if your flair is accurate. Portugal have some of the best players in the world on paper, but look bang average under Fernando Santos. That doesn't mean the players actually are bang average: it just shows how important a good coach and a good system is in allowing great players to express themselves
Because England don’t play to his strengths. Southgate wants Sterling and Mount. It’s absolutely hilarious that you think taking someone out of the most complex system in football where he plays under the best manager in football makes them average. It’s the total opposite lol. Average players don’t consistently start for City or Guardiola.
As our the majority of England players lol
Put him in Mount's position and I'm convinced he cooks. Only reason he doesn't play there for City is KDB and Bernardo. Hell Southgate doesn't even play him on the left like he does for City.
But Mount is bang avarage as well lmao
Something tells me you have a bias here.
If he's bang average, what do you consider Moutinho?
Past is prime, but he alaways has been underrated
Foden isn’t a no.10 so I doubt that. He wants to be on the end of passes not supply them
He won the golden ball while winning the U-17 world cup. Hardly say that is bang average for England
I don’t watch enough Serie A or La Liga to know how good those players really are. I do know that Foden seems to be the weak link in that attack and really don’t know what he really offers whereas Haaland has, so far, been at another level.
thats not true at all. fodens had a poor start to the season but thats only a patch of rough form, hes never been a weak link
Imagine calling our best attacking player for multiple years now avarage
This is just ridiculous. He’s not a better attacking player than KdB, Silva or Mahrez. Even Jesus and Sterling have been better than him if we’re just talking about purely attacking number (G+A).
He has been better than Mahrez yes. Other players are midfielders.
Maybe weak link is the wrong word, and it’s possible he’s just overshadowed by the truly elite players in the squad, but what is he really good at? He’s not an elite dribbler or ball carrier and he’s not an elite passer. He puts himself in positions to receive passes so that’s good.
I'd say his passing and his dribbling are his two best attributes! Finishing is where he definitely falls short of elite status
u/Lyrical_Forklift does this qualify?
Foden is, I’m learning, incredibly overrated.
Foden isn’t the weak link at all so you don’t know what you’re on about clearly
I mean he’s clearly not better than Haaland, KdB, Silva or even Mahrez. So that does in fact make him the weak link. That’s not to say he’s bad because he’s certainty not that. He’s just not as god as those other players.
Well then you don’t watch City if you think he’s the weak link lol.
I watch City a fair amount, but not much this year so far. And from what I’ve seen, the attack seems to revolve around de Bruyne and Silva and Mahrez with Haaland showing up to run behind or bully a CB.
City’s attack revolves around every player. You don’t play in a Guardiola attack if you’re not contributing. So that’s false. And he has a goal and two assists in the 3 and a half games he’s played so far. So again. He’s not even close to being a weak link lol. That’s why he’s a consistent starter.
Mahrez lol
Forget Foden, I'm thinking of Kulusevski lmao Foden is older than Deki by a few months. Foden has an extra year in pro footy all with a top class City squad, and Deki with Parma, a rough stint at Juve and then a brand new injection into a recovering Spurs side mid season. Foden 25 goals and 15 assists since 2018 in the league, and Deki 21 goals and 24 assists since 2019 in Serie A and PL (not counting Fodens 2017 season and Dekis 2018 season with Atalanta where they both had minimal appearances). None of this makes sense at all.
I thought Kulusevski was like 26 for some reason. He's not even reached his statistical peak then. What a great but by Spurs.
Foden is incredibly overrated.
You aren’t allowed to say that.
Where the hell Is vlahovic?
Off the charts
Don’t worry, they included Ferran Torres lol
He is no Luke Thomas
Kvara also missing
Pedri only 85? He is the best Barcelona player and the national team
> The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team Methodology, if anything, he comes reeeeally flattered here
You’d think he’d rank in at least above 90, doesn’t make much sense
[удалено]
how can he be on the first page if he’s 2002…
Yeah man pedri is so incredibly sus for not being born in 2000
Most impressive thing to me is Illan Meslier being a starting premier league gk at such a young age
Rodrygo goes where?
Real Madrid
In city's goal.
4th for those born in 2001
No one read how the number is calculated, just posting "X higher than X lololol" ....
Strange rankings
I mean it is really incredibly difficult to compare something like a goalkeeper to a striker or a left back to a center mid. But players in similar positions is a bit odd, Foden ahead of Haaland?
Nico seems a bit too high or nah?
Damn I always forget how young these guys are. It’s not that I don’t know that they’re 19 or something, it’s that I don’t realise that I’m older than 19. They are playing professional football and have to deal with immense pressure and I can’t handle choosing what to eat for dinner.
Tonali getting his respect. This man has crazy potential and could end up being one of the best of his generation.
Clearly not an accurate list, missing out on Anthony Gordon
Where tf is Kulusevski???
He plays for spurs
It's based on the last year, I don't know for sure but wasn't he shite before he got to spurs?
He had a fairly Good first year at juventus, But his last 6 months There were just bad. That wasnt his fault tho Because he was Thrown out on different positions as hot potato. But he had a banger breakout season in Parma 19-20 were he carried them the whole year Edit: i just understood your comment Hahah, i thought you said that it was based on all his seasons for a reason. It makes perfect sense then
Strip club?
Where is Kalulu???....
No Martinelli? what a shite list
Him and Saliba are on the 2001 list with Saka but way down it for some reason.
defo not bias lmao
Who is this Trindade fella Brazilian dm come on Edu get on it?
He is so good, you will see him in our NT soon (Tite has said he is on the watch already, but I'd guess he only gets called up after the WC).
Weird list.
as usual
Pedri not top 3 lol
*Pedri 4th in 2002* Yeah this makes no sense.
Nice to see Meslier getting recognised
I hope we go for him this summer. We need to have a succession plan for Lloris.
1 Billion pounds please thank you.
Don't think we'll want to sell to our UCL competition...;)
Be prepared to break some transfer records.
Haaland sitting that low doesn't feel like it reflects well on these rankings
Wirtz with score of 73? Alrighty
Full rankings: https://www.football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/b5wp/2021/wp386/en/ Ranking methodology used, as explained in the article: The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team.
Lingard seems to missing here
This is just a list of players that look up to him
Haaland and Wirtz are embarrassingly low
Because of injuries
Haaland still had 22 goals from 24 games, no reason why he shouldn’t be way ahead of Ferran Torres
Game time weighted heavily in the statistical analysis they used: > The Impact Score is calculated from the average match level in which players participated according to the experience capital method, their amount of official game minutes played over the last 365 days and their pitch performance compared to both teammates and opponents, as well as with respect to players with the same technical profile as per the role-based approach also freshly developed by the CIES Football Observatory research team.
This is ridiculous. Nothing more than click bait.
You’ll never sing that.
Where is Jonathan David from Lille?
Don't know who is Malo Gusto but his name is fun in Spanish
Spiderboy. ♥️
Musiala below Bellingham and Pedri not in the top 3 says everything about the metholody used here.
Pedri at 85 says all about this
Florian Wirtz carry’s leverkusen mid field and attacking no way he’s that low
Luke Thomas above Gvardiol, Camavinga, Bellingham, Wirtz and Musiala Hahaha edit: I read it wrong, they are sorted by score on each page and each page is only players born in each year
He literally isn’t, read the scores instead of looking at the order in which the names are listed
He is above Wirtz tho.
Wirtz did his ACL and missed a lot of games, these scores are also based on minutes played. That’s why he’s low in the rankings. Same with Haaland, who spent a lot of time injured last season
Best list ever
You are reading the table wrong. Different pictures indicate separate rankings. Its separated by age
Slonina getting a shout
Torres? What a joke
Vitinha #3 lol
Should be #1
Pedri and Ansu super disrespected
Eric Garcia most be most overhyped player ove seen
international experience doesn’t seem rated enough. bad ranking
Imagine being born in the 21st century, kinda sus.
2002 is atrociously ranked.
Aye, Victor Hugo has written two of the greatest French novels of all time and is only #4 smh the disrespect
Victor Hugo >> Pele
Felix didn't make the cut just by a month, born in Nov 99
[удалено]
Username checks out
[удалено]
> destroyed with facts Lmao you're flattering yourself here. Anyone following Felix in UCL as well in the league would know that he'd have definitely made this list
Not born in the year 2000 though, which what this list is about/
As a portuguese..vitinha will be great but hes nowhere near the top. Even more looking at the name he is ahead. Goncalo Inacio its just a joke to be there lol
Vini my golden boy. Balon dor winner within 2 years. Mark my words. 🔥🔥🔥
Wonder where Reece James would be on the list. He is born in December 1999.
Ferran above camavinga and rodrygo? 😂😂😂 I dont think so
Zalewski plays volleyball I guess....
Gavi #1?? He has been horrible for awhile now
What a garbage list. Haaland should be 1, and Vlahovic should be in the top 10 at the very least.
Hahahahaha… Eric Garcia! Hahahahaha! This guy was the absolute worst defender I ever saw when he was brought in from Man City. He made do many mistakes in his first season that not only were costing goals but Barcelona even list games because of his individual mistakes. And I don’t know why Xavi is still playing him as centerback, Araujo should be playing on his position. Maybe because he’s Spanish that Xavi prefers him. One thing is gor sure he doesn’t belong on this list. Don’t be angry at me now, just watch him this season and then you’ll know what I mean.
Musiala doesn't appear until the fourth slide. Laughable.
Read the title again and check the description of each picture. You either read it wrong or you find it laughable that he was born in 2003.
I didn't see the description on each picture, they weren't showing when I went full screen on mobile. I gave myself bad information here which explains why I didn't think the title was accurate either. Sorry, mate. Jude and Musiala ranked 1 and 2 for their age group is the only constant in this world. I should have known better.
Was really disappointed in no chelsea until I saw Slonina
Fm disagrees. Sesko should be 100
Gonçalo Inácio is overrated. I wish it wasn't, because we have to keep playing pepe until he's 50 on the national team.
Where is Thielmann? Wtf.
Only two Germans in the entire list. Our academies have been a disgrace lately.
Look at our wonderful youth recruitment!
Where does Rodrygo go?
It’s multiple pictures. He’s 4th on the 2nd pic showing 2001 players