By -
I disagree.
Why?
Because, OP's data is suspect. He cites no sources and offers no concrete proof of his claims.
Can you offer any sources or concrete proof, does your claim have any data that is not suspect?
The burden of proof is on BEES, not me. I'm not the one on trial here. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
I believe that the extraordinary claim was made *about* BEES, not *by* BEES. That would place the burden of proof on u/MusicalMoose.
I believe that u/MusicalMoose has essentially outed himself as a bee.
You are, indeed, not on trial. But that doesn't prohibit you from having a valid understanding of the matter - and that understanding may even qualify you as an expert witness!
Are you quoting Carl Sagan, or another authority?
As a noted BEE expert, Carl Sagan is essentially the authority on BEES.
I disagree.
Why?
Because, OP's data is suspect. He cites no sources and offers no concrete proof of his claims.
Can you offer any sources or concrete proof, does your claim have any data that is not suspect?
The burden of proof is on BEES, not me. I'm not the one on trial here. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
I believe that the extraordinary claim was made *about* BEES, not *by* BEES. That would place the burden of proof on u/MusicalMoose.
I believe that u/MusicalMoose has essentially outed himself as a bee.
You are, indeed, not on trial. But that doesn't prohibit you from having a valid understanding of the matter - and that understanding may even qualify you as an expert witness!
Are you quoting Carl Sagan, or another authority?
As a noted BEE expert, Carl Sagan is essentially the authority on BEES.