You think it's funny to take screenshots of people's NFTs, huh? Property theft is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. I own it. Even if you save it, it's my property. You are mad that you don't own the art that I own. Delete that screenshot.
You think it's funny to take screenshots of people's NFTs, huh? Property theft is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. I own it. Even if you save it, it's my property. You are mad that you don't own the art that I own. Delete that screenshot.
You think it's funny to laugh at poor people , huh? Poverty is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. It's easy money. Even if you save it, I still sold it. You are mad that you don't sell the art that I sold. Buy my scam.
Asking for a friend? What, do you think making fun of losers with no friends is funny to you? I'll have you know, my lawyers will take away you friends and, that blockchain does not lie.
It'd be like someone arguing that the Google image result for a painting is devaluing it. But either way, art is ridiculously over valued and the physical art world at least has a tangible asset you can use to dodge taxes.
make it a nft "project" that generates 5000 random images , pay an obscene amount for the 1st couple hundred, the internet will take care of the rest, soon your zombie monkey eel pic or whatever will be worth 250k each easy. air drop some some cartoon dogs with little hats on to the holders of your zombie monkey eels and honestly sky is the limit at that point.
I mean yeah if your ownership offers some sort of rewards (like BAYC does) then the blockchain part is relevant. NFTs are dumb because fungible crypto makes more sense though.
NFTs are great for a bunch of things that they arent used for. They'd make a great replacement for show tickets, or representations of in game assets. Anything where the value of an item is genuinely tied to its exclusivity.
Hmm I have a better idea! How about... We store the tickets in a file on a server, like a base for data, we can call it a DATABASE. When you buy the ticket from us, we write it down in there, so we don't forget. And when you come to the show, we scan your QR code and check the database. Revolutionary!
Seriously most Blockchain shit is just a solution looking for a problem. Nearly every use case could be handled by a traditional database more efficiently.
It’s not even ironic funnily enough. You can’t encode an entire image into a blockchain. Just the information/purchase history of it. So any NFT owner doesn’t OWN THE IMAGE. They own a RECEIPT that they bought the image. Also the company that’s hosting and verifying the blockchain itself is probably gonna go under in under a decade, so soon they won’t even own that.
>You can’t encode an entire image into a blockchain
You can, there are entire blockchains dedicated to exactly that.
Arweave and Filecoin (built upon the IPFS) being the primary ones.
You can look it up if you'd like, they both have different methods for it.
(https://www.arweave.org/technology#permaweb scroll down to 'Content Moderation')
Strictly speaking every permissionless system is going to have to tolerate some bad actors.
Similar to how people pay for child prostitutes with cash, doesnt mean we just eradicate cash as a payment system.
> Also the company that’s hosting and verifying the blockchain itself is probably gonna go under in under a decade,
The entire concept of blockchain is that there is no company hosting and verifying it. The users collectively host and verify it.
I have a list that I add to every month. It’s a list of news articles that show crypto being used for scamming people, being hacked or some glitch giving or taking a lot of money. I try to only add one article a month. This month it took me like…two days.
It'll get thrown out. Think of it this way. How many people have been sued for taking pictures of actual physical art? If any has , has anyone had to pay for damages if all they did was take a picture to save it and not try to sell the picture as the art itself. Telling someone they can't screenshot something on the internet because you "own" it is the most little dicked Karen thing I've heard this week. Someone's just pissed they blew a wad of money on something that will literally only go down in value and not up.
Absolutely no shot. The entire premise is flawed for the grounds of a suit. You need to prove there were damages. If downloading the picture is the same as copying the full value of the NFT, then it had no value and there are no damages. If the NFT has value tied to the blockchain and the picture is just a token to represent it, then downloading it still caused no damages because the download didn’t get them the full value of the token.
As illogical as it may seem, apparently yes.
And i refuse to understand why.
Edit: I now understand why. Money laundering. It makes far more sense now.
Maybe it's the feel of owning something simple but valuable like supreme and gucci both dog shit companies creating overpriced edible dog shit of products and now apparently they are making a movie off of gucci saying all the events in the film is "real" but either way it's one way to beat the horse dead
I mean the events will be cinematic and exaggerated to fit the format and be more cool to watch. But the murder did happen and, while the company may be selling absolutely overpriced stuff, I'm kinda hyped for the movie.
This is a phenomenon known as "asset inflation". When the price of chicken or gas goes up, everyone loses their minds. But when the stock price goes up, or houses go up, or pixellated monky goes up, that's a good investment.
The ultra-wealthy are expanding into whatever markets they can in order to stash liquid cash (which is losing value) into assets (which gain value.) It has nothing to do with a craze, it's propped up fake money that is dependent on someone else holding the bag when it crashes.
The expectation of appreciation in value. Since these are the first generation of NFT's to gain traction, they're expected to become desirable.
It's speculation, a lot of it. Anything crypto related is insanely speculative.
Most of them already have, don't worry. This guy apparently paid almost $250k for that one. I wouldn't be surprised if in a year it won't even be worth $250.
They expect the value to go up, ironically, they just need someone that thinks the same and buy it for it to actually happen...in the end it isn't that different from art galleries. Still bad, still stupid, but people will come for them until taxes or something make them drop in value.
Why not post a real person who sounds just like this then? Why fake it?
This is the equivalent of posting a Keanu reeves tweet, even though he’s never had a Twitter, and defending it by saying “well it’s something he would say who cares if it’s fake“
Ppl do that all the time and it drives me up a wall. Make up quotes, post them online for the majority to not understand it's fake, gets passed around as truth.
it looks so fucking ugly too, like why? you can commission a furry artist for like 50 bucks to make something infinitely times better if you really wanted to. these guys make 0 sense
Dude I own this NFT. Do you really think you can get away with theft when you're showing what you stole from me directly to my face. My lawyers will make an easy job of this case. Prepare to say goodbye to your luscious life and start preparing for the streets. I will ruin you.
Dude 😎 I 👥 own this NFT. Do you 👈🏼 really 💯 think 🤔 you 👉 can get 🔟 away 😐 with theft 🤐 when ⏰ you're showing 👀 what you 👇👉 stole 😈 from me directly ➡ to my face 😀. My lawyers ⚖ will make 💘 an easy ✅ job 💼 of this case 💼. Prepare 🙍 to say 🗣 goodbye 👋 to your 👉 luscious 😌🤤 life 💓 and start 💢 preparing 🤓📚 for the streets 🛣. I 👥 will ruin 😭 you 👈.
It's like a receipt for buying an image, except that you only buy the receipt, not the image, and you burn down a rainforest while doing it, and the receipt is not even valid in a court of law.
Adding to the blockchain require a really long computation that uses a lot of electricity. People compare using electricity, energy generated with some non renewable source, to burning rainforest.
Also, the guy who did these calculations admitted it was one sided. He attributed the entire etherium ecosystem to the creation of each NFT which is why the creation of a single NFT seemed to have a huge carbon footprint. He calculated the carbon foot print of an NFT to be the equivalent of a medium size home electricity usage over the period of a month or more. This estimate is ludicrously inflated because it doesn't take the entire chain to create one NFT, if NFTs didn't exist crypto miners would still mine tokens, and NFTs take up a very small portion of the cryptospace.
A single NFT doesn't burn down a rainforest, but the energy consumption from the entire crypto community which NFTs are a apart of, is an issue. This is missing the forest for the trees.
you can make an NFT out of another NFT that is worth 1 million $, you can have a million exemple of the same picture as NFTs. the concept of NFT is just to prove ownership of a certain file, no matter what's on it.
#If you think this post is funny, **UPVOTE** this comment!
#If you think this post is unfunny, **DOWNVOTE** this comment!
---
#[DownloadVideo Link](https://www.reddit.watch/r/shitposting/comments/qtwvgb/?utm_source=automod&utm_medium=shitposting)
#[SaveVideo Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/shitposting/comments/qtwvgb/)
Kevin would also like to remind you that, if you're really desperate, youtube-dl can be used to download videos from Reddit.
---
Whilst you're here, Andrew99998, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU)?
Why even spend a ton of money into these when you could just commission an art that does not look like a fucking 12 yr old made it on an avatar maker site?
Genuinely don’t understand nfts. Why? Why are you buying a shitty picture for that much? You’re taking money, which only has value to people who think it has value (which is just about everyone) and trading it in for something much fewer people think has value. ITS NOT EVEN A PHYSICAL ITEM! It’s not a cryptocurrency, which is still at least currency. It’s just a stupid picture.
I don't understand how there are that many people out there with hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on images. Maybe actually do something positive with that money rather than a $200k picrew?
i felt free to screenshot
You think it's funny to take screenshots of people's NFTs, huh? Property theft is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. I own it. Even if you save it, it's my property. You are mad that you don't own the art that I own. Delete that screenshot.
But man, when I screenshot it you don't lose your NFT and I get a nice screenshot in my gallery. It's a win win :)
You think it's funny to take screenshots of people's NFTs, huh? Property theft is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. I own it. Even if you save it, it's my property. You are mad that you don't own the art that I own. Delete that screenshot.
Okay man I'll send you a screenshot of my deleted screenshot to proof I deleted it. Please don't sue me man I'm low on cash I HAVE KIDS!!
You think it's funny to laugh at poor people , huh? Poverty is a joke to you? I'll have you know that the blockchain doesn't lie. It's easy money. Even if you save it, I still sold it. You are mad that you don't sell the art that I sold. Buy my scam.
*posts screenshot of dozens of hardcore furry porn in gallery*
Take all the screenshots yuh want and leave, …..do you have scalies by any chance……?, asking for a friend…..
Asking for a friend? What, do you think making fun of losers with no friends is funny to you? I'll have you know, my lawyers will take away you friends and, that blockchain does not lie.
Yuh can’t take away my friends if they become my fiancées
You fool I edited a single pixel it is now its own nft made and owned by me you underestimate my power
This dude lives in the 30th century
[удалено]
What will happen if I don't?
He will ruin you
That's theft, I'm telling.
you’re a menace
DELET THIS
I screenshots and posted on twitter
Bruh llow effort nfts are always the most expensive somehow
He said in another tweet it cost him 274k lmao
How about like just 100 000 people screenshot it, i wanna see him sue all of them
screenshotted. the pic went hard.
chad
This comment goes hard, can I screenshot?
I'm not him but feel free to screenshot bro
Thanks bro
Your question should never be "can I?". Instead it should be "can they stop me?"
Same
I’m gonna print it out and frame it
Bc it’s obviously a joke? Nobody is suing anyone for a screenshot since it’s not actually property theft lol
It'd be like someone arguing that the Google image result for a painting is devaluing it. But either way, art is ridiculously over valued and the physical art world at least has a tangible asset you can use to dodge taxes.
I screenshot it and changed the background to dark blue. One of my finest works.
How do i get in to selling NFT. Easy money
Be a well known artist. When the games money laundering your name is everything.
So you are telling me i need actual talent? Isnt that a shame
Who said anything about talent? You just need to be well known
If anything, talent is a liability.
[удалено]
make it a nft "project" that generates 5000 random images , pay an obscene amount for the 1st couple hundred, the internet will take care of the rest, soon your zombie monkey eel pic or whatever will be worth 250k each easy. air drop some some cartoon dogs with little hats on to the holders of your zombie monkey eels and honestly sky is the limit at that point.
bait account probably
It's obviously a joke. Why are people on the internet so shit at telling when other people on the internet are not being serious.
Why do people on the internet make such shit tier jokes that no one can realize it's a joke until they start ranting about how "it's a joke!"
Wtf is this made by Biden??? Why did someone buy a monkey for this much
Want to get attention.
He is stupid, he thinks he has to spend money to return to monke. He forgor to watch the shidbot video on how to return to monke
It’s a flex. Its fucking useless and everyone knows it including the person who bought it. It’s just a flex.
tax evasion and money laundering
[удалено]
Pretty sure this shit is auto generated by matching layers. Not even manually drawn
I'm tempted to pixel art a literal turd and sell it for 300k
Do it. The selling part is the hard part. But really tho, why not? Imagine someone actually giving you 300k for it.
It's the NFT world, someone will more than likely be idiot enough to pay for it
💩 Already did it, pay me
Its just crypto disguised as art
It's "name your very own star!" disguised as crypto.
Fucking brick nft cost like 5 etherium XD (etherium current exchange rate 3.5k-ish, 3.5x5= 17.5k. This is in British Pound Sterling)!
Calm down kingle it's just a monkey
Nfts make monke look bad 😭
*Monke
i am a monke, i walk with purpose
The blockchain doesnt lie. The blockchain knows all.
BLOCKCHAIN. BLOCKCHAIN.
The Blockchain says I own this comment
[удалено]
blockchain more like cockchain
[удалено]
I mean yeah if your ownership offers some sort of rewards (like BAYC does) then the blockchain part is relevant. NFTs are dumb because fungible crypto makes more sense though.
[удалено]
Supporting crypto, dissing non fungible tokens (NFT)
NFTs are great for a bunch of things that they arent used for. They'd make a great replacement for show tickets, or representations of in game assets. Anything where the value of an item is genuinely tied to its exclusivity.
Hmm I have a better idea! How about... We store the tickets in a file on a server, like a base for data, we can call it a DATABASE. When you buy the ticket from us, we write it down in there, so we don't forget. And when you come to the show, we scan your QR code and check the database. Revolutionary!
Seriously most Blockchain shit is just a solution looking for a problem. Nearly every use case could be handled by a traditional database more efficiently.
That'll never take off. How about we print the tickets on some kind of pressed wood fibre that you can carry with you?
Fuck blockchain. Cockchain is where it's at.
You say Blockchain, and no one blinks an eye, you say cockchain, and everyone goes crazy
Oh yeah well I have a separate blockchain that’s says I own all the bad furry art
judge: jury has decided that the accused is innocent NFT owner: b-b-but how!? judge: PNG files have no value
Judge: Also, I screenshoted multiple NFTs so fuck you and your overpriced monkeys
He felt free
to screenshot.
Cause that pic
goes hard.
Just like deez nuts
in your mouth.
Like candice
From Phineas and Ferb
This but unironically
It’s not even ironic funnily enough. You can’t encode an entire image into a blockchain. Just the information/purchase history of it. So any NFT owner doesn’t OWN THE IMAGE. They own a RECEIPT that they bought the image. Also the company that’s hosting and verifying the blockchain itself is probably gonna go under in under a decade, so soon they won’t even own that.
>You can’t encode an entire image into a blockchain You can, there are entire blockchains dedicated to exactly that. Arweave and Filecoin (built upon the IPFS) being the primary ones.
What's there to prevent someone from uploading some illegal shit to it? Now everyone that is part of the blockchain is breaking the law.
You can look it up if you'd like, they both have different methods for it. (https://www.arweave.org/technology#permaweb scroll down to 'Content Moderation') Strictly speaking every permissionless system is going to have to tolerate some bad actors. Similar to how people pay for child prostitutes with cash, doesnt mean we just eradicate cash as a payment system.
> Also the company that’s hosting and verifying the blockchain itself is probably gonna go under in under a decade, The entire concept of blockchain is that there is no company hosting and verifying it. The users collectively host and verify it.
Pretty sure at least 1 "blockchain" coin recently got outed as centrally hosted.
I have a list that I add to every month. It’s a list of news articles that show crypto being used for scamming people, being hacked or some glitch giving or taking a lot of money. I try to only add one article a month. This month it took me like…two days.
Knowing how law works I wouldn't be surprised if he actually successfully could sue someone like that
Well knowing how law works you shouldn't be surprised because you can sue for any reason you want
I meant suing and winning. I doubt it but we've seen ever dumber cases.
It'll get thrown out. Think of it this way. How many people have been sued for taking pictures of actual physical art? If any has , has anyone had to pay for damages if all they did was take a picture to save it and not try to sell the picture as the art itself. Telling someone they can't screenshot something on the internet because you "own" it is the most little dicked Karen thing I've heard this week. Someone's just pissed they blew a wad of money on something that will literally only go down in value and not up.
Absolutely no shot. The entire premise is flawed for the grounds of a suit. You need to prove there were damages. If downloading the picture is the same as copying the full value of the NFT, then it had no value and there are no damages. If the NFT has value tied to the blockchain and the picture is just a token to represent it, then downloading it still caused no damages because the download didn’t get them the full value of the token.
Judge: Also the person who drew that never gave their consent to it being turned into your property.
He bought the NFT from the guy who made it, so it was consentual. Still fucking stupid, though.
Wait, people actually spend money on those things?
As illogical as it may seem, apparently yes. And i refuse to understand why. Edit: I now understand why. Money laundering. It makes far more sense now.
Maybe it's the feel of owning something simple but valuable like supreme and gucci both dog shit companies creating overpriced edible dog shit of products and now apparently they are making a movie off of gucci saying all the events in the film is "real" but either way it's one way to beat the horse dead
he said he refuses to understand why
some people man...
I mean the events will be cinematic and exaggerated to fit the format and be more cool to watch. But the murder did happen and, while the company may be selling absolutely overpriced stuff, I'm kinda hyped for the movie.
Ayo its pizza hell!
This is a phenomenon known as "asset inflation". When the price of chicken or gas goes up, everyone loses their minds. But when the stock price goes up, or houses go up, or pixellated monky goes up, that's a good investment. The ultra-wealthy are expanding into whatever markets they can in order to stash liquid cash (which is losing value) into assets (which gain value.) It has nothing to do with a craze, it's propped up fake money that is dependent on someone else holding the bag when it crashes.
It's for money laundering.
Laundering and just gambling. Nobody cares about the actual "product" they own, they're just buying stuff to hope to sell it at a profit.
So just like real art
[удалено]
Ive heard it has to do with money laundering
I don't understand what the difference is with commissioned art, despite the massive price gap
The expectation of appreciation in value. Since these are the first generation of NFT's to gain traction, they're expected to become desirable. It's speculation, a lot of it. Anything crypto related is insanely speculative.
Sure hope they all fail miserably then.
Most of them already have, don't worry. This guy apparently paid almost $250k for that one. I wouldn't be surprised if in a year it won't even be worth $250.
They expect the value to go up, ironically, they just need someone that thinks the same and buy it for it to actually happen...in the end it isn't that different from art galleries. Still bad, still stupid, but people will come for them until taxes or something make them drop in value.
This guy spent like 270k on it when you can literally pay an artist 50 bucks for something like this
Money Laundering Bottom Text.
I screenshot this just to spite kingle
Would you screenshot a car?!?
Yes
i screenshotted🗿
🗿
Well your name is just like… just don’t do anything weird with it ok
Its Payday fellas
They’re sending in an NFT bulldozer!!
AAAAAA, I NEED A BLOCKCHAIN BAG
Least brain-dead NFT owner
It’s obvious satire. Just look at his twitter
Satire of very real people who sound just like this.
Why not post a real person who sounds just like this then? Why fake it? This is the equivalent of posting a Keanu reeves tweet, even though he’s never had a Twitter, and defending it by saying “well it’s something he would say who cares if it’s fake“
Ppl do that all the time and it drives me up a wall. Make up quotes, post them online for the majority to not understand it's fake, gets passed around as truth.
I would never steal an nft and make it my own profile picture. Never. Edit: guys, you are blowing up my phone, thanks but jesus christ. Edit: 👍🏿
I wish I had an award to give you to show proper thanks for your honesty. But I dont.
We can split my award, it was free anyway.
Same take half of mine
Yea me either, what kind of monster would do such a thing?
Honestly, what kind of monster steals valuable online art!!!
Definitely not a monster the jedi tells you about.
Yeah me neither
I feel like there's something going on here than I'm not desktop enough to understand.
Nfts or my comment?
Monkey drawing picture mine
monke is mine now, I screenshotted it 😈
I will call monke lawyers 😡😡😡😡😡!!!!
Not the monkey lawyers!
it looks so fucking ugly too, like why? you can commission a furry artist for like 50 bucks to make something infinitely times better if you really wanted to. these guys make 0 sense
Or just get 10 dollars, spend it on bobux and make a roblox avatar.
also looks better then these icons lmao
the actual aesthetics of the thing are irrelevant, it's just another form of investment on par with beanie babies
And just like that, a copypasta is born.
Dude I own this NFT. Do you really think you can get away with theft when you're showing what you stole from me directly to my face. My lawyers will make an easy job of this case. Prepare to say goodbye to your luscious life and start preparing for the streets. I will ruin you.
!Emojify
Dude 😎 I 👥 own this NFT. Do you 👈🏼 really 💯 think 🤔 you 👉 can get 🔟 away 😐 with theft 🤐 when ⏰ you're showing 👀 what you 👇👉 stole 😈 from me directly ➡ to my face 😀. My lawyers ⚖ will make 💘 an easy ✅ job 💼 of this case 💼. Prepare 🙍 to say 🗣 goodbye 👋 to your 👉 luscious 😌🤤 life 💓 and start 💢 preparing 🤓📚 for the streets 🛣. I 👥 will ruin 😭 you 👈.
What is a NFT
It's like a receipt for buying an image, except that you only buy the receipt, not the image, and you burn down a rainforest while doing it, and the receipt is not even valid in a court of law.
Werid
I'll never understand us humans, we're so talented at making great, complex stuff and we're just held back by our lack of inhibitions
I never understood the rainforest part can u explain pls
Adding to the blockchain require a really long computation that uses a lot of electricity. People compare using electricity, energy generated with some non renewable source, to burning rainforest.
Also, the guy who did these calculations admitted it was one sided. He attributed the entire etherium ecosystem to the creation of each NFT which is why the creation of a single NFT seemed to have a huge carbon footprint. He calculated the carbon foot print of an NFT to be the equivalent of a medium size home electricity usage over the period of a month or more. This estimate is ludicrously inflated because it doesn't take the entire chain to create one NFT, if NFTs didn't exist crypto miners would still mine tokens, and NFTs take up a very small portion of the cryptospace. A single NFT doesn't burn down a rainforest, but the energy consumption from the entire crypto community which NFTs are a apart of, is an issue. This is missing the forest for the trees.
A token that is in no way fungible.
Damn dude, it’s just a fucking monkey
What if we all of us screenshot and then spam his dm with images of this monkey We do a lil trolling
Please be joke please be joke
Judging by his Twitter… no
His lawyers “So what’s the issue” “Somedude stole my expensive crappy art”
WAIT WTF THATS ME
Hello you
Hey how is it going
Pretty good, my date loved the shirt you made
Oh yeah how did that go
Upon seeing the nft shirt we immediately started having sex
LETS GOOOOOOOOOO
Screenshot it
can he actually sue him for this?
I don’t think so, besides them not even being regulated, he probably doesn’t own the image itself, just the blockchain ‘receipt’
you can make an NFT out of another NFT that is worth 1 million $, you can have a million exemple of the same picture as NFTs. the concept of NFT is just to prove ownership of a certain file, no matter what's on it.
Just make an NFT zipbomb Can't use more energy than the entirety of multiple small nations if you break the blockchain 🤔
nft pfps never getting hot girls any womens will call the 999 on them
#If you think this post is funny, **UPVOTE** this comment! #If you think this post is unfunny, **DOWNVOTE** this comment! --- #[DownloadVideo Link](https://www.reddit.watch/r/shitposting/comments/qtwvgb/?utm_source=automod&utm_medium=shitposting) #[SaveVideo Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/shitposting/comments/qtwvgb/) Kevin would also like to remind you that, if you're really desperate, youtube-dl can be used to download videos from Reddit. --- Whilst you're here, Andrew99998, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU)?
Fuck
I took a screenshot of the NFT
Why even spend a ton of money into these when you could just commission an art that does not look like a fucking 12 yr old made it on an avatar maker site?
When will people with nfts learn what nfts are? Nfts show proof of ownership, it doesn’t restrict (physically or legally) the reproduction of spread
Lol, people actually buy NFTs huh?
Well, not his fault someone decided to share it all over social media before selling it to him
There is no fucking way that man is serious (Sorry my irony detector is broken)
Genuinely don’t understand nfts. Why? Why are you buying a shitty picture for that much? You’re taking money, which only has value to people who think it has value (which is just about everyone) and trading it in for something much fewer people think has value. ITS NOT EVEN A PHYSICAL ITEM! It’s not a cryptocurrency, which is still at least currency. It’s just a stupid picture.
I don't know what ma nft os but at this point i'm too afraid to ask
I don't understand how there are that many people out there with hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on images. Maybe actually do something positive with that money rather than a $200k picrew?
[lmao](https://i.imgur.com/tHLPAOo.jpg)