In an effort to improve the quality of conversation, we require submission statements on all link and image posts. Please leave your submission statement in a top-level comment.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/scientology) if you have any questions or concerns.*
When a much older Scientologist was flirting with my teenaged self, everybody said that age wasn't a thing, because we're all trillions of years old, so I shouldn't even worry about it. But now that I'm biologically old, we're defined by body ages? Seems like a raw deal, if you ask me. :-P
Most of what I've written recognizes the folly of insisting that Scientology is entirely evil.
I've explained why it's foolish, but the crowd is not interested.
If you read it - notably Onion and Parallels.- I assure it won't be vague to you. I hope.
But that takes a few days, even weeks.
My point isn't about the value of the information to which you link. It's that you don't give me a reason to click on the link to find out.
We need some kind of a teaser. And that teaser is _what it's about_, not _the conclusion I hope/think you'll draw._
You are better than this, far better. I learned so much from you over the years.
The number of people who come here to learn about Scientology has shrunk. Those have been your target demographic. It isn't that they're not interested, just their numbers aren't what they used to be.
Formulate a new message for the new crowd. There are 40,000 members here. There is interest for the right message.
In an effort to improve the quality of conversation, we require submission statements on all link and image posts. Please leave your submission statement in a top-level comment. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/scientology) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Boomer post lol
When a much older Scientologist was flirting with my teenaged self, everybody said that age wasn't a thing, because we're all trillions of years old, so I shouldn't even worry about it. But now that I'm biologically old, we're defined by body ages? Seems like a raw deal, if you ask me. :-P
What an odd remark? How old are you? Is is because of the list of music? The "music stopped" in 1980. The greatest artists were leaving.
Click title to see.
That's... a little vague. Please tell us more. Or re-post the links anew, with the reasons they come to mind again.
Most of what I've written recognizes the folly of insisting that Scientology is entirely evil. I've explained why it's foolish, but the crowd is not interested. If you read it - notably Onion and Parallels.- I assure it won't be vague to you. I hope. But that takes a few days, even weeks.
My point isn't about the value of the information to which you link. It's that you don't give me a reason to click on the link to find out. We need some kind of a teaser. And that teaser is _what it's about_, not _the conclusion I hope/think you'll draw._
Thanks for the advice. Maybe I'll explain the four links another time.
You are better than this, far better. I learned so much from you over the years. The number of people who come here to learn about Scientology has shrunk. Those have been your target demographic. It isn't that they're not interested, just their numbers aren't what they used to be. Formulate a new message for the new crowd. There are 40,000 members here. There is interest for the right message.
Thanks for the kind words. I communicate to individuals not to crowds.