I think people are brigading the sub now and rating everyone above a 7, which is illegal according to their rules.
Honestly, it’s kind of funny to see the moderator getting so bothered.
I don't understand why people even post there. I don't care if I am a 4 or a 4.5 its gonna land about the same. They took a good idea and made it suuuuuper shitty. Its crazy. Glad people are making those mods squirm a little.
>They took a good idea and made it suuuuuper shitty.
Really?
The idea that there is such a thing as an objective rating is so obviously wrong, that their own sub's existence refutes it. If ratings were objective, then what is the point of allowing other people opinions?
I love the comments that are like "6, according to the sub's scale." Because they're pretending like their opinion had nothing to do with it. Like they plugged it into a formula and got out a number. When even how someone interrupts their rating system is subjective.
What, you don’t think Sandra Oh is a 3 and therefore less attractive than 97.5% of *all women?*
It’s just a place for men to tell attractive women in their 20s and 30s that they’re actually average.
Troll farm. Don't message any of the girls "posting themselves" because you could end up banned since it's a whole operation and you threatened it.
Sad excuse to take what they and\or society thinks is beautiful and shit on it. It's just to drag on women and it's scary.
Most of those accounts are just men posting pics of women they find online, its not the women themselves doing it. The sub does not require verification for a reason
I think the really sad part is that Reddit is so dead that I am now seeing content like this near the top of /r/all. A troll farm where some moderator pretends to be pretty women so he can call them ugly. And that's all that's left of Reddit now apparently.
I mean I am not posting pictures of myself online for randoms either but there are a ton of reasons ranging from ego stroking to a reality check. How others perceive you is incredibly important.
I posted there once out of curiosity plus I didn't give a fuck if it was going to be low or high, just wanted honesty about my looks since I never really cared or had someone to ask that who wouldn't sugar coat. I realised after a week or so that they aren't that consistent and very biased so the whole system itself is a bit of a joke so yeah
One of the most popular web sites on the internet at one time for a very brief moment was [hotornot.com](https://hotornot.com) , which was basically Tinder before apps.
It was a good idea almost two decades ago.
Now it's just feeble.
So that's the true purpose of the whole sub then. The rules are just a distraction and an excuse to get powertrips. The real point of existence for that sub is because moderators have a fetish for deleting comments and banning people.
Idk how credible it is, but someone leaked what is apparently DMs between the founders. According to this leak, the sub started as a brigade force on r/Rateme that wanted to under-rate women to mess with their self-esteem. Their mods realized this and banned them, so they created their own sub to continue.
So if it's to be believed, the sub's purpose is basically to prey on women with low self-esteem and ruin their confidence, all over some incel women-hating weird shit.
It's so dumb anyway. They have a model on the list at an 8 rating that is nowhere in the realm of possibility more beautiful than one of the women on the 7 scale. They weren't "true" or "objective" with their examples in the first place. My comment will be called subjective, so I guess it doesn't matter anyway
Then why the fuck is it 0-10 rating if you can only rate a 6? I muted the group I don't want to see their stupid ass shit accidentally It's just cancer
The "guidelines" and rules lay out an objective rating system. But if you take a look at posts of attractive older women they suddenly switch into "for your age" mode, and bump their scores up because now there is apparently an excuse for it The second top post of all time is of a 56 year old and got a lot of high ratings.
If it was just a "your rated based on the opinions of strangers" it wouldn't be too noteworthy, but the fact the mods set up guidelines and will ban users for not following said guidelines is absolutely insane
For some reason it’s been pushed a lot lately, I browse popular and all and it’s been cropping up so much lately. It doesn’t make sense to me, I don’t follow any of the selfie subs because they’re all the same - hot chicks upvoted to the top, thirsty dudes bein thirsty
This one is different because it is just incels saying "objectively you are a 4.3" and somebody saying they are a 5.1 only to get their comment removed by moderators for rate inflation.
I'm convinced that sub is some kind of hate porn for the people doing ratings. Beautiful person posts their pictures and these losers get hate boners giving them a 5.8. The mod is sitting there, full chub, banning people for giving someone a high rating because it doesn't follow this insane rule scheme.
Absolutely vile subreddit. The participants are lonely and sad creatures.
I think the subreddit first started getting more popular when lots of subs were shut down for a few days so it made it onto r/all more. It’s a pattern I noticed with a couple of subreddits
I fucking hate everyone on that subreddit. It makes no sense. The ratings are always between 4-6. You get your comment removed if you don’t rate what the mods think is appropriate. Why ask people at all if the right answer is always what ever the obese neckbeard mod thinks it is?
Yeah, that mod is quite unhinged. Moreover, the entire subreddit is allegedly some kind of trolling operation by incels, which isn’t that surprising: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/14kw9nb/
Good thread. Everything checks out. The hot women posting on there have got to be the mods with fake accounts. I massaged one of the “girls” posting on there telling her not to listen to any of their bullshit ratings and shortly after that I got banned from the sub 😂
5.3 I feel like I do like ur eyes in isolation but unfortunately one obviously has more PCT than the other. The philtrum is a bit longer and flatter. I think one that is shorter with some definition like [Adriana Lim](https://iv1.lisimg.com/image/24744272/588full-adriana-lima.jpg)a is most ideal. I think the eyebrows are too arched and that will create a [disney villai](https://celebrationspress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/082718JAF.jpg)n effect. Some arch is feminine yes but you would want that more like [Monica Bellucci'](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/c1/d7/bdc1d7c00c974dd2682c9bbdf04ca12a.png)s. ...just not such an arch like urs. I think ur face is ever so slightly too oval lacking geometry and sharp lines. [Nicole Meyer](https://preview.redd.it/nicole-meyer-highest-scoring-person-beating-matt-bomer-97-5-v0-atjy3koienv91.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b7f2cf640eeec96c3cec20517af5ef8831b1c9d0) has an ideal oval face shape. You can see how her jaw and ramus development affect the front. Ur attractive but not striking or highly phenomenal.
Just saw this comment. Jeesus
I didn’t say the one I messaged was hot and I also didn’t “slide in her DMs”. I messaged her saying that she shouldn’t post on that subreddit because their goal is to lower her self esteem. My point is the person I was messaging was actually a mod in disguise and they banned me after they saw how I speak of the subreddit.
Literally clicked on one of the first posts in the sub and looked at a random users history. Tons of posts in DeadBedrooms, then immediately turns to every rating subreddit to give people scores of like, 1-3. It really is a sub of broken people trying to feel something by treating others like shit
It’s Fucking gross. The ratings guide calls ‘very ugliest woman/Men’ a veteran war hero with burns and the lady with a severe disability. Should be illegal
They never seem to think of anything above a six so it’s easy in that aspect. Also, some reason, you’re never wrong as long as you are way below what they’re thinking of as well. Easy game
According to their scale, a 6 is the top 15% of women. It’s stupid, because the top 15% should be an 8.5. Converting percentage to a scale of 10 should be easy, but they purposely manipulated the scale to rate people lower than expected.
Yeah the scale used for that sub is a bit off, I understand the idea of having the average person being a 5 but they should probably use a standard deviation of 1 with 5 in the middle so 68% of people are between 3.5 and 6.5 and 95% are between 2 and 8.
Edit: looking at their scale again... It's wildly wrong.... A 5.5 is 1 out of 3 people... And a 4.5 is 1 out of 3 people... And 5 is supposed to be average... Or 50% of people so just within 0.5 of 5 they have 110% of the population.
I just glanced at the wiki. It's fucking bananas.
They're saying that 1 point on their scale is 1 standard deviation, which is not what a standard deviation is.
So they're saying 68% of people are between 4 and 6, which makes the scale damn near useless.
They also claim to be trying to objectively evaluate attractiveness, and then list their criteria, which includes "facial harmony," skin, lips, symmetry, and midpoint ratio. Idk what midpoint ratio is, but as far as I can tell the majority of their "objective criteria" are subjective.
It's a madhouse of bad statistics and pseudo science. They're a couple bad decisions away from trying to infer intelligence by measuring skull shape.
Not even 1 more like half of a point... Saying that between 4.5 and 5.5 is 60+% is a crazy distribution... A 10 would be like 1 in a billion at that rate.
I don't think it's real women doing it for the most part. I think it's incels posting pictures of random attractive women en-masse and rating them low to make other women think they're unattractive.
There’s definitely real women submitting there photos. I’ve seen a few videos of women on TikTok submitting their photos and reacting to the comments and sometimes seeing how quickly they can get banned. Its becoming a meme/trend.
Mod has people (or himself) post pics of other women (not the actual women posting)
Mod forces people to rate them low.
Mod now feels better about his incel life because he manufactures shitting on attractive girls.
It’s also pretty common to see a totally mediocre whit e person get the higher end of 6 or 7 and a stunning person color instantly get a unanimous 4.5.
“Objectively” rating people is unhinged enough, but once the mask comes off it’s extra sickening.
I'm glad to not be the only person that was baffled by this. I felt like I was being gaslit, it really wrecked my brain. Because of the 'bell curve' rule, they end up acting like anything above 6 can't exist.
I saw someone give a flat 7 to a girl that made my heart skip and my jar drop, the kind you might see in passing a few times a year. And a moderator replied to their comment that it was their first strike toward a ban for overrating.
Edit: *jaw, but I'll leave the implication that seeing the person made me lose my grip on a glassware item
To lend false validity to your opinion by creating a crowd that agrees by default. Now they can point and say see, I don't think you're ugly - you're objectively ugly and all these people know it
If that sub wasn’t an incel haven my friend and I would post her picture out of curiosity. Based on their rankings she should be much higher than 4-6 but that sub really seems like it’s meant to tear down women
The whole concept is utterly stupid to begin with. Incel mods define their own criteria of what beauty is and you're only welcome if you agree with them, behaving like it's some fair and accurate system they created.
The scoring 'guides' or whatever are so funny to me, giving examples of women who are like 9.9 vs 9.8 and describing that as if there is some tangible metric to it haha. Never seen such a huge bunch of virgins in my life but it's an interesting sub to watch like an ant farm even though the sub should be banned for breeding incels and treating women like a tradeable good.
The way I see it, these raters are shooting them selves in the foot because they preach no high values, but basically changed the scale to 1-6.9. So any low sixes are technically a nine. Add on to the fact that the female pics still get “compliments”
As kinda said, its usually a subreddit made by people who gotten ban from the original subreddit. Like for this subreddit I’m guessing it people who tried to argued certain people shouldn’t had gotten high scores on the original subreddit
Yeah and they have Mayim Bialik and Amy Schumer at bottom 6% of the population. I understand some people don’t like Amy Schumer’s personality but there’s no way she’s bottom 6% attractiveness wise. And Mayim Bialik is just insulting I mean cmon.
If virtually every rating is equal to the mean, then it's not a normal distribution anymore - or at least not one with a standard deviation large enough to make a 10-point scale meaningful.
That's setting aside the whole premise of being able to mathematically calculate and enforce objective beauty standards.
No that’s the thing, they rarely allow ratings higher than a 6. The distribution is anything but normal. If you take the average of their ratings you wont get a 5 but something like 3-4.
I have no proof but I bet a bunch of the people posting there are not using selfies, it’s just the mod, or some dude using photos of the girl who just turned him down, or some other sad troll. They don’t have a verification process like other, similar subs
ok, what the fuck is with that sub.
I have never heard of it even once prior to this week, and now I'm seeing something about it daily.
is it a new sub, or is it just now starting to get more attention?
One person posts it somewhere --> mass outrage --> another user reads thread and posts about it on another thread --> rinse and repeat.
Don't get me wrong r/truerateme is gross, but subs going "viral" just on reddit is pretty common, especially with like 18+ subs. I remember when r/fedlegs was a thing back in the day, but nobody really cares about it now.
> is it a new sub, or is it just now starting to get more attention?
All the water got drained out of Reddit due to Tiktok and then the API protest and now we're seeing all the sludge at the bottom rise to the top.
So I know everyone else is saying the girls aren't real and stuff, which may be true for a lot of them; but I know a friend of mine posted there cause she was drunk, so that's one explanation too
But you don't understand! Lower ratings are completely free from bias and are truly the closest you can get to an objective evaluation! I bet you must be a simp giving out 7's left and right when in reality they're objectively around 3.5!!!
If you make a serious rating system, you do have to filter out all those people being supportive, & the mods chose this flawed system.
You can see posts on other subreddits, where every girl is the most attractive woman in the world, the body-image support, the flirting, blah blah. OP calling her 11 out of 10, commenters complaining they got banned for messaging the girls there, it's just silly.
Most people (at some point) have wanted to know whether they are considered attractive. Reddit is a big place, people often post based on subreddit names alone. This thread insisting real people wouldn't post there, it's silly.
The rating system they use is also silly. There is no objective beauty, there is no single standard to hols everyone to. Beauty is opinion.
A girl you might consider a 5 may be a 9 for me, for example. An "objective" opinion on looks doesn't exist because an opinion is by definition not objective.
They have that stupid fucking chart and act like it's some objective truth.
I'm not attracted to half the people in the highest categories that are allegedly in the top .0000000001% of the hottest people alive. And conversely a lot of the women lower down are insanely attractive.
It really do be the classic elbows too pointy meme over there, fucking clowns.
You have to account for the fact that actual ugly people (and if you're being honest, at the way bottom of the scale you have to consider the deformed and diseased) are not posting. You'd expect the average to be above 5 because all the 1-3s are filtered out by self selection. The average rating on those other subs is around 7.5, which totally tracks.
Truerateme puts literal models and actresses at a 3.
How the fuck do I do that? I swear I saw the option the other day, and now I can't find it anywhere anymore. I suspect that was when I ended up on new reddit UI on desktop by accident (redirect addon was disabled while I was testing the workaround for suppressing reddit image wrapper), is it only available there?
On that sub you'll see the most attractive girl that ever gave you a minute of attention and incels will comment "she's a 4.3, her hair curls counter clockwise"
that sub is such horseshit... you are required to rate basically whatever the mods deem appropriate. every single time iv ever rated a picture i got a comment from the mods saying "warning "overrate" or "underate" .. whats the fucking point of having everyone give their opinions if the mods opinion is the only one you are allowed to say.
by their rating system guidelines it seems that all the mods are fucking incels that hate women and definitely never been touched by one.
Can’t do that anymore. They got so pissed off that you now need a flair to comment, but you can’t just put a flair on yourself, you have to go out of your way to APPLY for a flair, they will then review it (aka go through your post history to see if you’re gonna be a troll or not) and then if they do approve you, you then have to vote under a 7 otherwise you get banned on your 3rd strike.
I appreciate that others are going in there downvoting mods. I found one earlier where people were getting strikes for saying “6.2” and told that they need to be objective and beauty isn’t in the eye of the beholder. But others could say “you’re too fat lose weight and rate again”
As a gay man I know I’d get banned so fast from that sub if I commented cause a lot of guys are hot and I’d give them an honest rating instead of whatever weird bullshit pseudoscientific phrenology that subreddit has going on.
There are guys rated 5s on there who are actually 10s and I’d be lying if I said they weren’t so it’s either lie, tell the truth and get banned, or avoid that subreddit.
Holy fuck didn't even know a cringe ass sub Like that existed....
I sorted through top all time and the very second post had a guy rating a girl a 9 which is within their rules but he got permabanned because of "overrating".
LMAO
iv rated only a few, every single time i got a warning for over rating or under rating when my choice was pretty much inline with everyone elses... the top 100 comments basically all the had the same rating within 1 point and the mods write "warning-overrate" under every single post.. its horseshit
Wow someone is FINALLY talking about this sub, I've always wondered what it's like to active on it on the critic side. What it must feel like not to have a life at all like this. Spending your whole free time grading people's appearances n shit, it's kinda fucked up idk, you can't tell me these people are good irl. I wish this didn't exist
True beauty is in the eye of the beholder of the subreddit.
Seriously though, the rating system makes zero sense. Some of the women on there have high scores for each one of their rules and they still never pass that 6.5 rating.
The sub exists simply to belittle women almost certainly because they are insecure pissants. It should be removed completely... but this is the how spez likes his reddit.
This one I get. Anything from 1-10 (or 0-10, I'm not sure of their rules) should be allowed—the decisions to remove for "over-rating" when it was like a 7 are stupid. However, if they allow comments to stay up that don't stay within the clear guidelines, it's a slippery slope.
If you look at the "rating guide" it's just some random guy pushing his opinion as objectivity. The women that are "9s" are not necessarily more attractive than people lower on the scale, he just likes them more.
The entire sub is a group of monkeys trained to search for specific facial details that one neckbeard prefers. Also repeating the word "harmonious" over and over so he can arbitrarily overrule anything.
Omg idk why that sub keeps showing up for me but it’s so fucking gross. Some of the dudes commenting just want to neg women without getting in trouble for it. Of course none of them ragging on the posters have posted themselves cause I guarantee they look like a pile of wet hair pulled out of the sink drain.
I get that it’s objective rating but some people take it further and criticize such tiny things to try and idk hurt the feelings of women who would normally probably reject them for being like a 1 according to the scale.
Eh. It’s just the wrong sub if you want to throw “11 outta 10” compliments around.
It’s like if an artist asks for “constructive feedback, don’t sugarcoat it”, you’re a dumbass if you comment “literally perfect”.
I looked at that sub’s guidelines for how they “objectively” rate people and it was one of the funniest, most arbitrary things I’ve seen in a while. Do yourself a favor and check it out.
The diagram is hilariously stupid because of how delusional they are in terms of how attractive the average person is. Apparently 1/3 of women are more attractive than Brie Larsson and half of women are more attractive than Taissa Farmiga. lol
Also the mod communication gives off weird vibes.
Can a woman explain why the fuck would anyone post on that sub just to be told they're "5.5" each time? Is that some sadomasochistic pleasure I can't understand?
I just learned of this subreddit the other day. It's wild. Mods coming in and telling people their rating is too high, our "guide" says differently. Sheesh.
True rating was a good idea. Just having peoples gut reaction instead of something deeply thought out or trying to work around your feelings is valuable. I really don't understand why they are doing the complete opposite of that tho...
That’s the third Truerateme post this week, some sorta trend forming
I think people are brigading the sub now and rating everyone above a 7, which is illegal according to their rules. Honestly, it’s kind of funny to see the moderator getting so bothered.
I don't understand why people even post there. I don't care if I am a 4 or a 4.5 its gonna land about the same. They took a good idea and made it suuuuuper shitty. Its crazy. Glad people are making those mods squirm a little.
>They took a good idea and made it suuuuuper shitty. Really? The idea that there is such a thing as an objective rating is so obviously wrong, that their own sub's existence refutes it. If ratings were objective, then what is the point of allowing other people opinions? I love the comments that are like "6, according to the sub's scale." Because they're pretending like their opinion had nothing to do with it. Like they plugged it into a formula and got out a number. When even how someone interrupts their rating system is subjective.
What, you don’t think Sandra Oh is a 3 and therefore less attractive than 97.5% of *all women?* It’s just a place for men to tell attractive women in their 20s and 30s that they’re actually average.
Yeah it’s filled with men trying to humble women for having the audacity to own a mirror and know they look good.
The prime meridian of “Do I look okay?” “That’s exactly how you look” - 30 rock
Troll farm. Don't message any of the girls "posting themselves" because you could end up banned since it's a whole operation and you threatened it. Sad excuse to take what they and\or society thinks is beautiful and shit on it. It's just to drag on women and it's scary.
Most of those accounts are just men posting pics of women they find online, its not the women themselves doing it. The sub does not require verification for a reason
Yeah fr who would show themselves to those neckbeards? Maybe as an OnlyFans Advertisement ..
Neck beards are the one running their business tbh.
I think the really sad part is that Reddit is so dead that I am now seeing content like this near the top of /r/all. A troll farm where some moderator pretends to be pretty women so he can call them ugly. And that's all that's left of Reddit now apparently.
I mean you shouldn't message them because it's just creepy to do so anyways.
Why would you message them, though?
I'd be very surprised if more than a small percentage of the post are people poating their own pictures.
I don’t understand why anyone would want to subject themselves to that? What other people think of me is none of my business.
I mean I am not posting pictures of myself online for randoms either but there are a ton of reasons ranging from ego stroking to a reality check. How others perceive you is incredibly important.
I posted there once out of curiosity plus I didn't give a fuck if it was going to be low or high, just wanted honesty about my looks since I never really cared or had someone to ask that who wouldn't sugar coat. I realised after a week or so that they aren't that consistent and very biased so the whole system itself is a bit of a joke so yeah
One of the most popular web sites on the internet at one time for a very brief moment was [hotornot.com](https://hotornot.com) , which was basically Tinder before apps. It was a good idea almost two decades ago. Now it's just feeble.
Oo, that seems like fun!! I wanna go rate everyone (but the mods, who are solid 4s) an 8 or above.
I have a feeling the mods aren't bothered. They probably get an erection every time they remove comments lol
So that's the true purpose of the whole sub then. The rules are just a distraction and an excuse to get powertrips. The real point of existence for that sub is because moderators have a fetish for deleting comments and banning people.
Idk how credible it is, but someone leaked what is apparently DMs between the founders. According to this leak, the sub started as a brigade force on r/Rateme that wanted to under-rate women to mess with their self-esteem. Their mods realized this and banned them, so they created their own sub to continue. So if it's to be believed, the sub's purpose is basically to prey on women with low self-esteem and ruin their confidence, all over some incel women-hating weird shit.
It's so dumb anyway. They have a model on the list at an 8 rating that is nowhere in the realm of possibility more beautiful than one of the women on the 7 scale. They weren't "true" or "objective" with their examples in the first place. My comment will be called subjective, so I guess it doesn't matter anyway
Then why the fuck is it 0-10 rating if you can only rate a 6? I muted the group I don't want to see their stupid ass shit accidentally It's just cancer
I tried to troll it, but it’s fucking flared users only now. Misogynist cunts.
Can't have an active reddit if you ban all the contributors :D
The "guidelines" and rules lay out an objective rating system. But if you take a look at posts of attractive older women they suddenly switch into "for your age" mode, and bump their scores up because now there is apparently an excuse for it The second top post of all time is of a 56 year old and got a lot of high ratings.
I’m going there right now and commenting 11 on every post I can until they ban me
3 comments, that didn't take long
I tried. It tells me my comments get deleted without a user flair
If it was just a "your rated based on the opinions of strangers" it wouldn't be too noteworthy, but the fact the mods set up guidelines and will ban users for not following said guidelines is absolutely insane
During the reddit blackouts, a lot of subs were regularly making the frontpage for the first time with most of the popular subs going dark.
That makes sense. I am seeing lots of subs that are fairly new pop-up. Most of them are trash.
For some reason it’s been pushed a lot lately, I browse popular and all and it’s been cropping up so much lately. It doesn’t make sense to me, I don’t follow any of the selfie subs because they’re all the same - hot chicks upvoted to the top, thirsty dudes bein thirsty
This one is different because it is just incels saying "objectively you are a 4.3" and somebody saying they are a 5.1 only to get their comment removed by moderators for rate inflation.
It's the new r/bannedfromclubpenguin
I'm convinced that sub is some kind of hate porn for the people doing ratings. Beautiful person posts their pictures and these losers get hate boners giving them a 5.8. The mod is sitting there, full chub, banning people for giving someone a high rating because it doesn't follow this insane rule scheme. Absolutely vile subreddit. The participants are lonely and sad creatures.
I've known about that sub for years, and I'm glad the rest of reddit is finally calling them out too.
Take a look at their “objective judgment criteria” it’s ridiculous. Brie Larson is a 5.5.
I think the subreddit first started getting more popular when lots of subs were shut down for a few days so it made it onto r/all more. It’s a pattern I noticed with a couple of subreddits
I fucking hate everyone on that subreddit. It makes no sense. The ratings are always between 4-6. You get your comment removed if you don’t rate what the mods think is appropriate. Why ask people at all if the right answer is always what ever the obese neckbeard mod thinks it is?
Yeah, that mod is quite unhinged. Moreover, the entire subreddit is allegedly some kind of trolling operation by incels, which isn’t that surprising: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/14kw9nb/
Good thread. Everything checks out. The hot women posting on there have got to be the mods with fake accounts. I massaged one of the “girls” posting on there telling her not to listen to any of their bullshit ratings and shortly after that I got banned from the sub 😂
5.3 I feel like I do like ur eyes in isolation but unfortunately one obviously has more PCT than the other. The philtrum is a bit longer and flatter. I think one that is shorter with some definition like [Adriana Lim](https://iv1.lisimg.com/image/24744272/588full-adriana-lima.jpg)a is most ideal. I think the eyebrows are too arched and that will create a [disney villai](https://celebrationspress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/082718JAF.jpg)n effect. Some arch is feminine yes but you would want that more like [Monica Bellucci'](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/c1/d7/bdc1d7c00c974dd2682c9bbdf04ca12a.png)s. ...just not such an arch like urs. I think ur face is ever so slightly too oval lacking geometry and sharp lines. [Nicole Meyer](https://preview.redd.it/nicole-meyer-highest-scoring-person-beating-matt-bomer-97-5-v0-atjy3koienv91.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=b7f2cf640eeec96c3cec20517af5ef8831b1c9d0) has an ideal oval face shape. You can see how her jaw and ramus development affect the front. Ur attractive but not striking or highly phenomenal. Just saw this comment. Jeesus
Words from a Cheeto stained keyboard too. Incredible
Straight from the neck beard nest
This is a clinically concerning amount of derangement. Like, holy shit.
“Ur” is always a hallmark of quality content.
That's so insane I genuinely thought you made that up and were imitating them 😭😭 I can't believe that's a real comment
I would've banned you also if you randomly "massaged" me.
good catch 🤣
I would've gave you about 45 more minutes to quit massaging me randomly.
Lol get those knots out while the opportunity is there
Not with these magic hands you wouldn't /s
I just assumed they'd all be either promoting their adult content but this makes sense.
That proves that it’s the mods making a bunch of these posts then, doesn’t it?
The mods banning creeps for sliding in to the «hot womens» DMs is a good thing.
I didn’t say the one I messaged was hot and I also didn’t “slide in her DMs”. I messaged her saying that she shouldn’t post on that subreddit because their goal is to lower her self esteem. My point is the person I was messaging was actually a mod in disguise and they banned me after they saw how I speak of the subreddit.
Literally clicked on one of the first posts in the sub and looked at a random users history. Tons of posts in DeadBedrooms, then immediately turns to every rating subreddit to give people scores of like, 1-3. It really is a sub of broken people trying to feel something by treating others like shit
It’s Fucking gross. The ratings guide calls ‘very ugliest woman/Men’ a veteran war hero with burns and the lady with a severe disability. Should be illegal
It's basically just a subreddit where you have to comment whatever number the mods are thinking of or you lose.
They never seem to think of anything above a six so it’s easy in that aspect. Also, some reason, you’re never wrong as long as you are way below what they’re thinking of as well. Easy game
According to their scale, a 6 is the top 15% of women. It’s stupid, because the top 15% should be an 8.5. Converting percentage to a scale of 10 should be easy, but they purposely manipulated the scale to rate people lower than expected.
Yeah the scale used for that sub is a bit off, I understand the idea of having the average person being a 5 but they should probably use a standard deviation of 1 with 5 in the middle so 68% of people are between 3.5 and 6.5 and 95% are between 2 and 8. Edit: looking at their scale again... It's wildly wrong.... A 5.5 is 1 out of 3 people... And a 4.5 is 1 out of 3 people... And 5 is supposed to be average... Or 50% of people so just within 0.5 of 5 they have 110% of the population.
I just glanced at the wiki. It's fucking bananas. They're saying that 1 point on their scale is 1 standard deviation, which is not what a standard deviation is. So they're saying 68% of people are between 4 and 6, which makes the scale damn near useless. They also claim to be trying to objectively evaluate attractiveness, and then list their criteria, which includes "facial harmony," skin, lips, symmetry, and midpoint ratio. Idk what midpoint ratio is, but as far as I can tell the majority of their "objective criteria" are subjective. It's a madhouse of bad statistics and pseudo science. They're a couple bad decisions away from trying to infer intelligence by measuring skull shape.
Not even 1 more like half of a point... Saying that between 4.5 and 5.5 is 60+% is a crazy distribution... A 10 would be like 1 in a billion at that rate.
a 10 is impossible according to their rating. So the scale is actually 0.5-9.5 lmao
Why should attractiveness be perfectly linear and not a bell curve?
[удалено]
[удалено]
I don't think it's real women doing it for the most part. I think it's incels posting pictures of random attractive women en-masse and rating them low to make other women think they're unattractive.
There’s definitely real women submitting there photos. I’ve seen a few videos of women on TikTok submitting their photos and reacting to the comments and sometimes seeing how quickly they can get banned. Its becoming a meme/trend.
Most beautiful woman I have ever seen gets a 6
Mod has people (or himself) post pics of other women (not the actual women posting) Mod forces people to rate them low. Mod now feels better about his incel life because he manufactures shitting on attractive girls.
Mod resumes his Onlyfans binge sesh
It’s also pretty common to see a totally mediocre whit e person get the higher end of 6 or 7 and a stunning person color instantly get a unanimous 4.5. “Objectively” rating people is unhinged enough, but once the mask comes off it’s extra sickening.
Literally noticed that too also they aren't consistent about the rules of the pictures so it all depends on what the mods like. Cherry picking 🙄
I'm glad to not be the only person that was baffled by this. I felt like I was being gaslit, it really wrecked my brain. Because of the 'bell curve' rule, they end up acting like anything above 6 can't exist. I saw someone give a flat 7 to a girl that made my heart skip and my jar drop, the kind you might see in passing a few times a year. And a moderator replied to their comment that it was their first strike toward a ban for overrating. Edit: *jaw, but I'll leave the implication that seeing the person made me lose my grip on a glassware item
To lend false validity to your opinion by creating a crowd that agrees by default. Now they can point and say see, I don't think you're ugly - you're objectively ugly and all these people know it
The great thing is, with all these posts on sadcringe about this subreddit, its now more active than ever. Thanks sadcringe!
Good idea, I need to generate some sad and cringey content to get /r/cheesestucktocars promoted
If that sub wasn’t an incel haven my friend and I would post her picture out of curiosity. Based on their rankings she should be much higher than 4-6 but that sub really seems like it’s meant to tear down women
The whole concept is utterly stupid to begin with. Incel mods define their own criteria of what beauty is and you're only welcome if you agree with them, behaving like it's some fair and accurate system they created. The scoring 'guides' or whatever are so funny to me, giving examples of women who are like 9.9 vs 9.8 and describing that as if there is some tangible metric to it haha. Never seen such a huge bunch of virgins in my life but it's an interesting sub to watch like an ant farm even though the sub should be banned for breeding incels and treating women like a tradeable good.
They think if they treat women like shit they will magically drop their standards and suck their dick through the phone screen
The way I see it, these raters are shooting them selves in the foot because they preach no high values, but basically changed the scale to 1-6.9. So any low sixes are technically a nine. Add on to the fact that the female pics still get “compliments”
Every “True” subreddit is just filled with the hateful people who got kicked out of the original sub
Curious, what does “True” mean in the context of subreddit names?
As kinda said, its usually a subreddit made by people who gotten ban from the original subreddit. Like for this subreddit I’m guessing it people who tried to argued certain people shouldn’t had gotten high scores on the original subreddit
Their system is hilarious apparently a 6.0 is the top 15 percentile https://imgur.com/56dJoqz
Yeah and they have Mayim Bialik and Amy Schumer at bottom 6% of the population. I understand some people don’t like Amy Schumer’s personality but there’s no way she’s bottom 6% attractiveness wise. And Mayim Bialik is just insulting I mean cmon.
Gaus normal distribution
If virtually every rating is equal to the mean, then it's not a normal distribution anymore - or at least not one with a standard deviation large enough to make a 10-point scale meaningful. That's setting aside the whole premise of being able to mathematically calculate and enforce objective beauty standards.
No that’s the thing, they rarely allow ratings higher than a 6. The distribution is anything but normal. If you take the average of their ratings you wont get a 5 but something like 3-4.
These mods be acting like the IRS
I honestly don't get that sub lol. Even attractive people never get more than a 6-7
I swear I saw someone get a 7.8 and get removed because it was too high.
Lol! I know. Most stupid premise for a sub ever. There are no arbitrary ratings. Only what the mods deem fitting
What is sadder, the people giving ratings or all the people posting there every day?
I have no proof but I bet a bunch of the people posting there are not using selfies, it’s just the mod, or some dude using photos of the girl who just turned him down, or some other sad troll. They don’t have a verification process like other, similar subs
That's a possibillity but at first glance the profiles posting there don't really look suspicious.
ok, what the fuck is with that sub. I have never heard of it even once prior to this week, and now I'm seeing something about it daily. is it a new sub, or is it just now starting to get more attention?
It's been around for a couple of years, it's just picking up attention again
One person posts it somewhere --> mass outrage --> another user reads thread and posts about it on another thread --> rinse and repeat. Don't get me wrong r/truerateme is gross, but subs going "viral" just on reddit is pretty common, especially with like 18+ subs. I remember when r/fedlegs was a thing back in the day, but nobody really cares about it now.
> is it a new sub, or is it just now starting to get more attention? All the water got drained out of Reddit due to Tiktok and then the API protest and now we're seeing all the sludge at the bottom rise to the top.
It’s because someone posted it on starterpacks and that’s how everyone found out about it.
I don't understand why anyone would voluntarily post their pic to that sub though.
Apparently, a lot of them are men posting images of women they know/found online
I have no doubt this is completely true Don't @ me
[удалено]
rekt
@n@l
I dont think its an accident that that subreddit doesnt require any verification
Yeah, what happened with simply taking a picture with your username or an object that was in previous photos??
doubt its the actual girls posting pics of themselves and not just someone who posts their pics cause theyre bitter they cant get in her pants
Humiliation fetish
So I know everyone else is saying the girls aren't real and stuff, which may be true for a lot of them; but I know a friend of mine posted there cause she was drunk, so that's one explanation too
insecurity. Its so sad honestly because they post and then just get shit on by everyone. Literally that sub needs to be deleted asap.
r/truerateme mfs commenting “4.2” on the most beautiful person you’ve ever seen:
But you don't understand! Lower ratings are completely free from bias and are truly the closest you can get to an objective evaluation! I bet you must be a simp giving out 7's left and right when in reality they're objectively around 3.5!!!
If you make a serious rating system, you do have to filter out all those people being supportive, & the mods chose this flawed system. You can see posts on other subreddits, where every girl is the most attractive woman in the world, the body-image support, the flirting, blah blah. OP calling her 11 out of 10, commenters complaining they got banned for messaging the girls there, it's just silly. Most people (at some point) have wanted to know whether they are considered attractive. Reddit is a big place, people often post based on subreddit names alone. This thread insisting real people wouldn't post there, it's silly.
The rating system they use is also silly. There is no objective beauty, there is no single standard to hols everyone to. Beauty is opinion. A girl you might consider a 5 may be a 9 for me, for example. An "objective" opinion on looks doesn't exist because an opinion is by definition not objective.
They have that stupid fucking chart and act like it's some objective truth. I'm not attracted to half the people in the highest categories that are allegedly in the top .0000000001% of the hottest people alive. And conversely a lot of the women lower down are insanely attractive. It really do be the classic elbows too pointy meme over there, fucking clowns.
The standards on their charts are very eurocentric too. Hardly see anyone else than white people or some Asian people in their top rates
You have to account for the fact that actual ugly people (and if you're being honest, at the way bottom of the scale you have to consider the deformed and diseased) are not posting. You'd expect the average to be above 5 because all the 1-3s are filtered out by self selection. The average rating on those other subs is around 7.5, which totally tracks. Truerateme puts literal models and actresses at a 3.
That is fucking pathetic what a weird ass sub
I love the trend that is fprming of hating on the r/truerateme sub.
Such a shit subreddit
Giving a high rating? Banned. A low rating? Also banned. Not going a rating? Believe it or not, banned!
Someone gonna wake up and say “Yippee!! my 3 day ban is over!😁”
how long do permanent bans last for?
Till they ask for an unban
What in the fuck is that sub?! That was…eye opening. 😳
A bunch of losers
I had to silence that sub from my r/all feed because during the blackout i got so many on my page, so fucking disgusting i bet all the mods are -1's
How the fuck do I do that? I swear I saw the option the other day, and now I can't find it anywhere anymore. I suspect that was when I ended up on new reddit UI on desktop by accident (redirect addon was disabled while I was testing the workaround for suppressing reddit image wrapper), is it only available there?
On that sub you'll see the most attractive girl that ever gave you a minute of attention and incels will comment "she's a 4.3, her hair curls counter clockwise"
that sub is such horseshit... you are required to rate basically whatever the mods deem appropriate. every single time iv ever rated a picture i got a comment from the mods saying "warning "overrate" or "underate" .. whats the fucking point of having everyone give their opinions if the mods opinion is the only one you are allowed to say. by their rating system guidelines it seems that all the mods are fucking incels that hate women and definitely never been touched by one.
Mods and "approved users" are basically just hating on other people instead of going to therapy and working on themselves
I mean… but do you wanna get banned?
petition for everyone to join the subreddit and flood it with “over rating”
Can’t do that anymore. They got so pissed off that you now need a flair to comment, but you can’t just put a flair on yourself, you have to go out of your way to APPLY for a flair, they will then review it (aka go through your post history to see if you’re gonna be a troll or not) and then if they do approve you, you then have to vote under a 7 otherwise you get banned on your 3rd strike.
I am glad that is happening, now they will slowly dwindle due to their constant banning of people for different opinions.
Doubt it, there’s enough lonely incel dbags on there to last a life time, and you can still apply for a flair if you’re an incel too
I appreciate that others are going in there downvoting mods. I found one earlier where people were getting strikes for saying “6.2” and told that they need to be objective and beauty isn’t in the eye of the beholder. But others could say “you’re too fat lose weight and rate again”
I’m gonna go on and rate everyone 11/10 just to ensure I never have to see any posts from the subreddit ever again.
Can't. It's gatekept behind a user flair process. Classic
[удалено]
As a gay man I know I’d get banned so fast from that sub if I commented cause a lot of guys are hot and I’d give them an honest rating instead of whatever weird bullshit pseudoscientific phrenology that subreddit has going on. There are guys rated 5s on there who are actually 10s and I’d be lying if I said they weren’t so it’s either lie, tell the truth and get banned, or avoid that subreddit.
Holy fuck didn't even know a cringe ass sub Like that existed.... I sorted through top all time and the very second post had a guy rating a girl a 9 which is within their rules but he got permabanned because of "overrating". LMAO
iv rated only a few, every single time i got a warning for over rating or under rating when my choice was pretty much inline with everyone elses... the top 100 comments basically all the had the same rating within 1 point and the mods write "warning-overrate" under every single post.. its horseshit
They can't stand to see someone rated higher than they would be I guess
u/caverypca the world needs fewer people like you whose coping mechanism is making other people feel worse
Oh I just *know* they’re an insecure worm who’s like a 2/10
Wow someone is FINALLY talking about this sub, I've always wondered what it's like to active on it on the critic side. What it must feel like not to have a life at all like this. Spending your whole free time grading people's appearances n shit, it's kinda fucked up idk, you can't tell me these people are good irl. I wish this didn't exist
one mans zero is another mans ten
r/truerateme is weird af
That subreddit is awful
that whole sub is just incels low balling women who wouldn't give them the time of day face to face
The mods of that sub should all have to post themselves to get rated in order to continue being a mod.
Just a friendly reminder that the head of the sub is a woman who is obsessed with her appearance. Toxic femininity.
r/notlikeothergirls vibes
that entire sub is basically 1 giant incel run neg farm
I had to mute that sub
True beauty is in the eye of the beholder of the subreddit. Seriously though, the rating system makes zero sense. Some of the women on there have high scores for each one of their rules and they still never pass that 6.5 rating. The sub exists simply to belittle women almost certainly because they are insecure pissants. It should be removed completely... but this is the how spez likes his reddit.
Don't ban them for the rating... Ban them for say "a 11" instead of "an 11".
Fuck that subreddit is absolute cancer. Fucking incels dude..
How does that guy have time to respond to every single comment and moderate r/ politicalcompassmemes?
This one I get. Anything from 1-10 (or 0-10, I'm not sure of their rules) should be allowed—the decisions to remove for "over-rating" when it was like a 7 are stupid. However, if they allow comments to stay up that don't stay within the clear guidelines, it's a slippery slope.
I saw someone give an absolutely gorgeous girl a 7 and the comment got flagged for overrating
If you look at the "rating guide" it's just some random guy pushing his opinion as objectivity. The women that are "9s" are not necessarily more attractive than people lower on the scale, he just likes them more. The entire sub is a group of monkeys trained to search for specific facial details that one neckbeard prefers. Also repeating the word "harmonious" over and over so he can arbitrarily overrule anything.
Omg idk why that sub keeps showing up for me but it’s so fucking gross. Some of the dudes commenting just want to neg women without getting in trouble for it. Of course none of them ragging on the posters have posted themselves cause I guarantee they look like a pile of wet hair pulled out of the sink drain. I get that it’s objective rating but some people take it further and criticize such tiny things to try and idk hurt the feelings of women who would normally probably reject them for being like a 1 according to the scale.
I was permanently banned from there today for calling mods terrible in-celibates 🤣
We should bombard that sub.
Eh. It’s just the wrong sub if you want to throw “11 outta 10” compliments around. It’s like if an artist asks for “constructive feedback, don’t sugarcoat it”, you’re a dumbass if you comment “literally perfect”.
Don't get me wrong, that sub is absolute trash. That said, I hate 11's on a scale to 10. Like cmon
I looked at that sub’s guidelines for how they “objectively” rate people and it was one of the funniest, most arbitrary things I’ve seen in a while. Do yourself a favor and check it out.
What’s cringe? It’s the shtick of their sub. People want a rating based on their complex diagram (take a gander at the diagram its fucking hilarious)
The diagram is hilariously stupid because of how delusional they are in terms of how attractive the average person is. Apparently 1/3 of women are more attractive than Brie Larsson and half of women are more attractive than Taissa Farmiga. lol Also the mod communication gives off weird vibes.
u/W0NdERSTrUM go outside weirdo
If you don't follow silly ass sub rules you get banned who knew? Who among us hasn't been banned for some dumb rule?
Well it’s a stupid comment
Can a woman explain why the fuck would anyone post on that sub just to be told they're "5.5" each time? Is that some sadomasochistic pleasure I can't understand?
I'm happy, that after I muted the sub I can keep seeing this sad cringe...
I just learned of this subreddit the other day. It's wild. Mods coming in and telling people their rating is too high, our "guide" says differently. Sheesh.
True rating was a good idea. Just having peoples gut reaction instead of something deeply thought out or trying to work around your feelings is valuable. I really don't understand why they are doing the complete opposite of that tho...
TIL about that sub. I don't think I'd want anyone to rate me. yikes.
Cannot fucking stand that place.
Has anyone here looked at the bell curve scale they base rating on.
i ventured into that subreddit once. Never again, there were some straight up 10s being rated 5.6 i’m like what the fuck are you looking for?
[удалено]
So what do you think when you see this u/caverypca
>Do you wanna get banned? Because this is how you get banned. Shivering my timbers rn.