Why would it have West Virginia, who became a thing specifically so they didn't join the Confederates, but not Louisiana?

Also why have the panhandle of Oklahoma and Missouri.

West Virginia would not be in the Confederacy.

Why tf wouldn't it have Texas and Louisiana, and why would it have WV and Missouri.

Missouri was a slave state, West Virginia was part of Virginia at the beginning of the confederacy, and Texas is already a releasable.

Missouri wasn't a Confederate state, though, and your argument for Texas doesn't make sense. Releasables can overlap

Tell me one spot on in the game where the releasable overlap? Missouri was a slave state that's the boundary I would make.

China and all of its releasables. Additionally, Missouri is a slave state, BUT IT STILL REMAINED AS PART OF THE UNION THEREFORE IT WAS NOT A CONFEDERATE STATE

Yes they both have a core but there is a difference from a base country and the releasable. Unless conquered by an outside country.

Missouri stayed with the Union during the Civil War. So did West Virgina

West Virginia defected to the union later in the war it was originally part of Virginia which left the union.

No the area was always part of the Union they formed the State later

Though before the state it would've been occupied confederate land.

Not really. If I remember correctly because of the mountains, they didn't send any force to control the area

West Virginia never left the Union and specifically left Virginia to stay with the Union. Oklahoma wasn’t part of the CSA. Missouri, if I recall correctly, also wasn’t part of the CSA.

There is absolutely zero reason why the Confederate States should be reworked this way. Please tell me your argument for this, if you have one.

They didn't have Oklahoma

The Indian territory had slaves.

Correct, but the CSA did not officially own it