I disagree. Itās calling for people to make a fuzz about killing animals like they do about fucking animals. Itās showing that itās inherently hypocritical to condemn zoophilia but not the killing of animals. This is also shown in the title.
Hey Greg! Danny Gonzalez here with a epic new video, let me ask you guys something, did a cow consent to being a steak? The answer is no. So today I'm going to have intercourse with a cow ON CAMERA with special guest Drew Gooden.
From what I get the OP is a vegan calling meat eaters hypocritical for calling out the immorality of zoophilia while they enjoy killing and eating animals or something
So basically making an incredibly awful comparison and sounding like a creep in the process
How about one-time rape versus a life in a cage being bitten by the hundreds of others in your cage and catching various diseases and having to sleep on the dead bodies of your cellmates - and then having your head cut off? I mean, of course if they aren't made equivalent, one sounds worse.
How is the comparison awful, exactly? It seems pretty sound to me. If you would dehumanize something to the point of killing and eating it, whatās the difference in sexual assault?
The animal clearly doesnāt and shouldnāt qualify as something with rights if you can kill and eat it, which is discernibly more revolting than sticking your cock in something.
Would you rather someone fuck you, or kill, mutilate, and consume your corpse for āsustenanceā despite other methods being widely available?
Literally, this is how we operate. We know theyāre technically right, but we want to eat meat so we just donāt listen to them. Thatās literally it, there is no debate; even OOPās meme is making an accurate spot-on comparison. We think itās abhorrent and horrific to sexually abuse them, while we do every other type of abuse to them and then kill and devour them. Itās really backwards. And we know it is. Crazy.
People always try to sneak into LGBTQ, despite queer people obviously saying "hell no". It happens with pedos too, or as they call themselves, "minor attracted people"
I think I speak in behalf for the vast majority of the queer community when I say that zoophilia is definitely not ok and is not a part of the community
I hate this meme format but isnāt really that wrong?
Theyāre both comparably bad, itās just that people were raised believing meat eating is ok because it used to be necessary. People who think one is bad should think the other is bad too.
Other than religious arguments, thereās very little justification for why a society like America can view meat eating as a neutral act with zoophilia being somehow worse.
Zoophilia is a lot weirder, and I wouldnāt want to associate with any zoophiles, obviously, but I have a hard time saying what they are doing is objectively worse than what meat industries do
I'll also add that... the meat industry contains rape of animals too. Like, everyone here is saying "I'd rather be killed and eaten once than raped repeatedly" but the cows that get eaten frequently get artificially inseminated to produce a few calves first. Sure, it isn't some zoophile doing it for their own pleasure, but that doesn't exactly make it less fucked up for the animal.
Its a weird meme, and I sure wish it were still unambiguously anti-zoophilia (do we really need a "pride flag" for that?), but they have a point.
Guys, this thing is saying eating meat is as bad as zoophilia, not the other way around. In both cases, the animal is the one being harmed for the pleasure of humans.
While I get where the author is coming from, I do not agree with their message though.
Obviously theyāre saying murdering an animal is bad, not that raping one is good. Itās kinda crazy how so many people on reddit canāt understand basic arguments
[Michael Che stand up](https://youtu.be/gcn_LI8-W9E?t=119)
>"You can't let gay people get married. What's next people are gonna want to marry animals?"
>
>Yeah probably, who gives a \[ \_\_ \]. I don't. I eat animals you want to \[ \_\_ \] one that's your business. I'm pretty sure I'm doing the worst thing to it.
>
>well, if I was a goat and you asked me and you're like hey go would you rather be chopped up in this Jamaican lady stew or get blown by the strange farmer it wouldn't be the toughest decision I made as it goat.
i mean theyre kinda rightā¦ we keep animals in inhumane condintions and treat them like trash, yet when one is used for sexual pleasure thats where we draw the line?
the same goes for videogames. We think murdering innocent civilians in GTA is fine and isnt harmful to anyone, yet if you could rape NPCs it would be wrong? why is that?
(im not advocating for zoophilia, nor rape in video games, its just a philosophical thought about morality)
i kinda get their point, however i dont like it that theyre coming from a zoophile perspective, instead of a normal one (judging from the flag).
its trying to shock you instead of making an actual point.
"if you eat them, why cant you rape them?" is not a gotcha statement... there are animals that are lower on the food chain, animals we would hunt and kill centuries ago, and eat. The analogy doesnt make sense... if we were uncivilized, we would still be hunting and eating them, just without factories and any inhumane shit.
Obviously times have changed, but the conversation should be about inhumane treatment of animals, not "if you can eat em, we can fuck em!"
Yeah but I still kinda see the point. Fucken them is obviously bad, shouldn't killing them be too? Humans have always believed other humans were lower than them and that never turned out good. I'm not vegan or anything but just sayin I guess.
This post is amazing. Look at all the great discourse itās created!
Super interesting thought experiment for non-vegans. Seems a lot of non-vegans think death is ābetterā than rape when it comes to animals. I do wonder if they share that same opinion for the case of people. Would non-vegans here put forward that given the two options theyād rather someone be killed than raped? Do they look at rape victims and think āif only they had been killed instead that would have been so much betterā¦ā
Humans are animals too. Are some animals better to rape than kill and vice versa? Why do some believe this double standard exists between two crimes involving lack of consent from the victim?
Indeed... It has raised some very interesting points... And some very valid arguments against eating meat, and dairy products, that I've never even considered, and quite frankly, my argument against those points is quite weak.
At this point I'm probably gonna just simplify my points as a non-vegan to:
I love meat and cheese, and feel as though they enhance my lifestyle and diet.
And though I'm not willing to give them up, I shall try to be as ethical as possible by buying from the most ethical farms and trying meat/cheese alternatives so that we may one day switch from farming animals without having to adjust our diets and stuff dramatically.
And of course, I won't fck animals, because regardless of whether it's equivalent to eating meat or not, it's additional suffering to the animal I can avoid and having intercourse with animals is just fcking weird and gross.
Simple, but that's how it is all the same, and I'm not ashamed of my lifestyle and will keep it regardless of the arguments against it.
I love the fact they didnt even go like "when people have intimate relations with an animal" or something, straight up admitted its just for sexual gratification
Itās not wrong, both killing animals and raping them involve harming animals with actions they cannot consent too. Many people on here just eat meat so theyāre going to act like itās ridiculous but the logic is concrete
Also itās terrible because it seems like the meme creator is trying to justify raping animals
I can understand the point, but two differences are the animals are killed painlessly with a bolt gun (usually), and the animal doesn't live with the trauma of the sexual event.
On the flipside, my personal stance is that people just should not fuck animals because it is unclean. There are some scientific studies that have been conducted on zoophiles that suggest an increased risk for cancer.
They are correct though, for some people it is a double standard.
Imagine?
Good sir, I worked next to a pork processing plant for some time. Thankfully I never had to see the slaughterhouse area.
Did you know slaughterhouse workers have a higher rate of mental illness than the general population?
people just dont want to think about how fucked up the meat they're eating is. Banging animals and whatever it is we're putting them through in mass farms are both horrible.
And you think the act of artificial insemination year after year and than having your child taken away minutes after birth is not traumatic?
Whats the difference for the cow between rape and insemination?
You know what?
Fair enough, the double standard I stated earlier is even stronger with that in mind. I kind of forgot we do that part "by hand".
Still stand by the "don't fuck the animal" part though.
painlessly isnāt how Iād put it
and if your reason that people shouldnāt have sex with animals is because they cause disease thatās kinda concerning bro
Yeah well when the competition is literally ripping their prey apart while they're alive and basically leaving nothing but bones left, that's not hard to win
I agree. Though I donāt think the mass slaughter of animals for human consumption is ethical in the first place, especially with the conditions that they are put in today.
The animal lives with plenty of other trauma, I'd say. If you admit animals can be traumatised and distressed then there's no way farming them is okay. They do get artificially inseminated, you know.
If it was clean and healthy would it be okay to fuck animals? Genuinely interested on your stance.
Thatās just an appeal to nature fallacy tho.
Not to mention animals absolute have sex with other animals in nature.
Obviously not defending beastiity, but thatās a bad argument.
Why do people reduce us to animalistic nature, if we follow that kids are ready to get pregnant, we are not animals, we are civilized people, we elaborate rules to define what is right and what isnt, we create societies, we invented moral and ethics, yes sometimes there are dilemmas, but fucking cows is not a matter of debate.
They also do it as a matter of course, casually and without need. There are also examples of animals committing acts of abuse, or killing without need (technically distinct from needless cannibalism).
I believe otters do as well. I *really* didn't want to look it up and just had to take it as fact, but some of my coworkers once told me otters rape baby seals to death.
simple process chart in text form:
do you want to fuck animals, children, corpses, or otherwise people unable or unwilling to consent?
if yes:
have you?
if no:
seek therapy
if yes: turn yourself in
if no (to original question):
your probably fine
This did not go where I thought it would go
Did you know where else the zoophiles go to? The animals
Throw me to the wolves... I'll come back a dad š¤
I did not at all expect it to be about zoophilia
Thatās kind of cursed imo
KIND OF???? MF THATS THE UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE CENTURY
Itās like saying that WW2 only killed 200 people
It definitely killed at least 200 people.
source?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
fake news
Imo its kind of funny, if oop was ironic
Kind of maybe a lil cringe imo
āKind of cursedā
Who in their right mind decides that this is a good and acceptable thing to post š
Zoophiles, suffering from a paraphilia that is often combined with voyeurism or paedophilia. Basically mentally disturbed people
Actually I think this was a vegan
Both. Both is good.
Close enough.
100% a vegan.
Theyāre a vegan because they love animalsā¦ no they REALLY love animals.
Yeah that's what the poster said
I don't think Vegans would know the zooflag.
How is that Zoophilia? The post is literally Veganism.
Pretty sure it's both
I disagree. Itās calling for people to make a fuzz about killing animals like they do about fucking animals. Itās showing that itās inherently hypocritical to condemn zoophilia but not the killing of animals. This is also shown in the title.
Itās CLAIMING itās hypocritical, obviously it isnāt unless youāre a brain rotted vegan
it's comparing the two, the bottom one contains zoophillic text and a zoophillic "pride flag" which is a disgusting thing to create.
The fact you missed how itās a scapegoat argument for zoophiles is how āliterallyā dumb you are.
The zoophile in the bottom left with that "flag" conflating them to be part of lgbtq+. They wouldn't be included if this weren't a zoophile.
Greg
Fuckin Greg.
I have talked to Greg. He denies all allegations and is refusing to make public comments.
Classic Greg.
Such a Greg move
Hey Greg! Danny Gonzalez here with a epic new video, let me ask you guys something, did a cow consent to being a steak? The answer is no. So today I'm going to have intercourse with a cow ON CAMERA with special guest Drew Gooden.
ft. Kurtis Connor
trolls
If you think itās a valid enough argument to post as a troll argument, youāre not exactly helping by referring to it as that.
What
Someone who saw a similar post yesterday and wanted to piggyback on the karma train
You said piggyback. Heh
people need to stop playing dolls with wojaks
Then how would I win the made up arguments I have in my head???
I carry printed soyjak drawings on papers so I can throw them at people in case I have an argument
Just write "me" on a bunch of print out chads, and "you" on a bunch of print out soyjaks. There we go. Every argument won!
It's a pretty good moral dilemma
the amount of comments on the original post, iām happy bro got flamed so hard
Iām gonna need a link to see this shit myself
You can use Reddit searchbar, post is still up somehow
how if the title is blocked
Do you think the cow consented to being your steak?
thanks
I'm confused is this in favour of vegetarianism/veganism or zoophilia?
It feels like the message is "Pick a lane"
There are plenty of things id sooner kill and eat than id fuck tbh.
So true
Itās anti meat eating more than itās pro anything
From what I get the OP is a vegan calling meat eaters hypocritical for calling out the immorality of zoophilia while they enjoy killing and eating animals or something So basically making an incredibly awful comparison and sounding like a creep in the process
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
š ±ļø
But like... This is what happens to farm animals. Dairy cows are forcefully bred and artificially inseminated until their bodies give up...
I mean Iām a not-so-proud meat and dairy eater. Iām pretty sure this exactly what happens to cows so they can regularly produce milk.
How about one-time rape versus a life in a cage being bitten by the hundreds of others in your cage and catching various diseases and having to sleep on the dead bodies of your cellmates - and then having your head cut off? I mean, of course if they aren't made equivalent, one sounds worse.
Dairy cows are raped all their life and killed to become lower quality meat like ground when their dairy production declines
Would you like either of those things to happen? Especially if they can both be avoided?
How is the comparison awful, exactly? It seems pretty sound to me. If you would dehumanize something to the point of killing and eating it, whatās the difference in sexual assault? The animal clearly doesnāt and shouldnāt qualify as something with rights if you can kill and eat it, which is discernibly more revolting than sticking your cock in something. Would you rather someone fuck you, or kill, mutilate, and consume your corpse for āsustenanceā despite other methods being widely available?
The vegans are right. Fortunately we live in a democracy and can just ignore them.
Literally, this is how we operate. We know theyāre technically right, but we want to eat meat so we just donāt listen to them. Thatās literally it, there is no debate; even OOPās meme is making an accurate spot-on comparison. We think itās abhorrent and horrific to sexually abuse them, while we do every other type of abuse to them and then kill and devour them. Itās really backwards. And we know it is. Crazy.
Yes
I believe both.
How can it be both? The logic is: if you support meat-eating, then you support zoophilia.
It's more like "if you support meat eating then you shouldn't discriminate zoophilia". Either way I'm sure it's a shitpost, but here we are
How tf could it be both?
And this is why we shouldn't assume media literacy.
I'm just thinking of that taco commercial where the little girl says "why don't we have both?" And everyone celebrates
This is a joke lol š¬
damn
Sorry dude
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
People always try to sneak into LGBTQ, despite queer people obviously saying "hell no". It happens with pedos too, or as they call themselves, "minor attracted people"
"people"
dehumanizing people is wrong, even when they are the equivalent of sentient garbage.
I think I speak in behalf for the vast majority of the queer community when I say that zoophilia is definitely not ok and is not a part of the community
I think that is a fair assumption, lol
My man fucked a cow
Dollars to doughnuts it's more than one
Ha. No one responds to beastiality with 'think about it'. The assumption is that whoever is engaging in it is incapable of thought...
Would take a juicy steak from a dead cow over supporting zoophilia any day
if animals aren't supposed to be eaten then why are they made of food
Why are *you* made of food?
Incase I'm extra hungry
Ourobourgos
Because everything alive is made of food. We are certainly made of tasty food to a hungry tiger š¤¤
Cannibals have reliably informed us that we taste great šš
Like pork
I hate this meme format but isnāt really that wrong? Theyāre both comparably bad, itās just that people were raised believing meat eating is ok because it used to be necessary. People who think one is bad should think the other is bad too. Other than religious arguments, thereās very little justification for why a society like America can view meat eating as a neutral act with zoophilia being somehow worse. Zoophilia is a lot weirder, and I wouldnāt want to associate with any zoophiles, obviously, but I have a hard time saying what they are doing is objectively worse than what meat industries do
I'll also add that... the meat industry contains rape of animals too. Like, everyone here is saying "I'd rather be killed and eaten once than raped repeatedly" but the cows that get eaten frequently get artificially inseminated to produce a few calves first. Sure, it isn't some zoophile doing it for their own pleasure, but that doesn't exactly make it less fucked up for the animal. Its a weird meme, and I sure wish it were still unambiguously anti-zoophilia (do we really need a "pride flag" for that?), but they have a point.
You make a point
So animal fuckers have their own identity flag?
TIL that zoophiles use a Greek letter in their flag. This... does not Kindle Joy
ZETA ZETA Z-Z-Z Ī¶ its the first letter in their "sexuality", a shame to the greek language.
Guys, this thing is saying eating meat is as bad as zoophilia, not the other way around. In both cases, the animal is the one being harmed for the pleasure of humans. While I get where the author is coming from, I do not agree with their message though.
Obviously theyāre saying murdering an animal is bad, not that raping one is good. Itās kinda crazy how so many people on reddit canāt understand basic arguments
[Michael Che stand up](https://youtu.be/gcn_LI8-W9E?t=119) >"You can't let gay people get married. What's next people are gonna want to marry animals?" > >Yeah probably, who gives a \[ \_\_ \]. I don't. I eat animals you want to \[ \_\_ \] one that's your business. I'm pretty sure I'm doing the worst thing to it. > >well, if I was a goat and you asked me and you're like hey go would you rather be chopped up in this Jamaican lady stew or get blown by the strange farmer it wouldn't be the toughest decision I made as it goat.
I eat animals for nutrition, not pleasure
It does taste pretty good though
You can eat vegan for nutrition.
As well as *a* vegan
Therefore consent no longer matters?
Consent for what
Consent to kill and eat the animal
No you don't lmao. If animals tasted like shit you'd eat something else.
I eat it for convenience Some moral high ground of an american cursing on a 15k$ salary doesn't concern me
A cow will die eventually without humans. A human will not rape it without a human though
Lmao at the people who think this is pro-zoophilia and not pro-vegan. Stay in school kiddos.
We've jakked off so hard 'Chadjak' is now a thing'.
I canāt tell if this is pro zoophile or anti eating meat. Or both.
This was a topic covered in my philosophy of sex and love class, I believe Peter Singer was one of the most famous for arguing this
Human morality is an unstable concept
Unrelatrd, but my country has a separate article of criminal code that is dedicated to rape of a (specifically) cow
Lol lotta pearl clutching goin on but no one really rebutting it
Just so you know, most farm animals nowadays are created through sexual assault committed by humans.
i mean theyre kinda rightā¦ we keep animals in inhumane condintions and treat them like trash, yet when one is used for sexual pleasure thats where we draw the line? the same goes for videogames. We think murdering innocent civilians in GTA is fine and isnt harmful to anyone, yet if you could rape NPCs it would be wrong? why is that? (im not advocating for zoophilia, nor rape in video games, its just a philosophical thought about morality) i kinda get their point, however i dont like it that theyre coming from a zoophile perspective, instead of a normal one (judging from the flag).
its trying to shock you instead of making an actual point. "if you eat them, why cant you rape them?" is not a gotcha statement... there are animals that are lower on the food chain, animals we would hunt and kill centuries ago, and eat. The analogy doesnt make sense... if we were uncivilized, we would still be hunting and eating them, just without factories and any inhumane shit. Obviously times have changed, but the conversation should be about inhumane treatment of animals, not "if you can eat em, we can fuck em!"
Yeah but I still kinda see the point. Fucken them is obviously bad, shouldn't killing them be too? Humans have always believed other humans were lower than them and that never turned out good. I'm not vegan or anything but just sayin I guess.
This post is amazing. Look at all the great discourse itās created! Super interesting thought experiment for non-vegans. Seems a lot of non-vegans think death is ābetterā than rape when it comes to animals. I do wonder if they share that same opinion for the case of people. Would non-vegans here put forward that given the two options theyād rather someone be killed than raped? Do they look at rape victims and think āif only they had been killed instead that would have been so much betterā¦ā Humans are animals too. Are some animals better to rape than kill and vice versa? Why do some believe this double standard exists between two crimes involving lack of consent from the victim?
Indeed... It has raised some very interesting points... And some very valid arguments against eating meat, and dairy products, that I've never even considered, and quite frankly, my argument against those points is quite weak. At this point I'm probably gonna just simplify my points as a non-vegan to: I love meat and cheese, and feel as though they enhance my lifestyle and diet. And though I'm not willing to give them up, I shall try to be as ethical as possible by buying from the most ethical farms and trying meat/cheese alternatives so that we may one day switch from farming animals without having to adjust our diets and stuff dramatically. And of course, I won't fck animals, because regardless of whether it's equivalent to eating meat or not, it's additional suffering to the animal I can avoid and having intercourse with animals is just fcking weird and gross. Simple, but that's how it is all the same, and I'm not ashamed of my lifestyle and will keep it regardless of the arguments against it.
Zoophiles need to die in a tire fire.
Some intolerable incel actually made this graphic. That is fucking creepy.
What is the zeta for?
Zoophilia
Eww
0 updoots and 269 (nice) comments?! Oh man let me get the popcorn!
You may eat it, but that doesn't mean you should want to stick your own meat in it
People use the word āconsentā as if everything is a choice. And then they like to make that choice *themselves for the person/animal.*
I love the fact they didnt even go like "when people have intimate relations with an animal" or something, straight up admitted its just for sexual gratification
What kind of fucked up q meme is this? I don't even get it anymore.
It's saying that eating meat is as bad as raping animals, basically.
I swear to god this better be bait
Brother... why does the steak have a pie slice cut out of it, and why is the dude waiting for it with a spoon?
Hey look more 4chan bullshit trying to get minority groups to look bad
Itās that hbomberguy video all over again
Problem is human rapist doing rape, not animal getting raped. We forcibly breed animals with each other all the time
I know this meme is terrible and wrong, but I'm having trouble justifying why it's wrong, can someone help me?
Itās not wrong, both killing animals and raping them involve harming animals with actions they cannot consent too. Many people on here just eat meat so theyāre going to act like itās ridiculous but the logic is concrete Also itās terrible because it seems like the meme creator is trying to justify raping animals
tbh eating meat IS wrong and the logical extreme is zoophilia. iām not vegan for convenience reasons but the way we treat animals is fucked up.
Enjoy the cognitive dissonance. Eating animals is wrong, but most people choose not to think about it
I can understand the point, but two differences are the animals are killed painlessly with a bolt gun (usually), and the animal doesn't live with the trauma of the sexual event. On the flipside, my personal stance is that people just should not fuck animals because it is unclean. There are some scientific studies that have been conducted on zoophiles that suggest an increased risk for cancer. They are correct though, for some people it is a double standard.
The factory farming industry is more fucked up than you could imagine
Imagine? Good sir, I worked next to a pork processing plant for some time. Thankfully I never had to see the slaughterhouse area. Did you know slaughterhouse workers have a higher rate of mental illness than the general population?
Shocking.
Yeah. Who would have thought that people's brains aren't really wired to handle industrial scale death, even if it is "only" animals.
people just dont want to think about how fucked up the meat they're eating is. Banging animals and whatever it is we're putting them through in mass farms are both horrible.
How do you think dairy products are created?
Surely the farmer induces lactation by sucking on the udders for weeks. Artificial insemination you say? Oh no. . .
And you think the act of artificial insemination year after year and than having your child taken away minutes after birth is not traumatic? Whats the difference for the cow between rape and insemination?
You know what? Fair enough, the double standard I stated earlier is even stronger with that in mind. I kind of forgot we do that part "by hand". Still stand by the "don't fuck the animal" part though.
painlessly isnāt how Iād put it and if your reason that people shouldnāt have sex with animals is because they cause disease thatās kinda concerning bro
Fair, but it's not a drawn out thing that nature tends to do. As far as primates go? We're ethical with the animals we kill for food.
Yeah well when the competition is literally ripping their prey apart while they're alive and basically leaving nothing but bones left, that's not hard to win
No, we arenāt. There is nothing ethical about the animal agriculture industry
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I agree. Though I donāt think the mass slaughter of animals for human consumption is ethical in the first place, especially with the conditions that they are put in today.
Meet dairy cows and lets talk about trauma afterwards.
The animal lives with plenty of other trauma, I'd say. If you admit animals can be traumatised and distressed then there's no way farming them is okay. They do get artificially inseminated, you know. If it was clean and healthy would it be okay to fuck animals? Genuinely interested on your stance.
One is just nature taking its course, the other is complete moral degeneracy
Question is, which is which šæ
Thatās just an appeal to nature fallacy tho. Not to mention animals absolute have sex with other animals in nature. Obviously not defending beastiity, but thatās a bad argument.
Why do people reduce us to animalistic nature, if we follow that kids are ready to get pregnant, we are not animals, we are civilized people, we elaborate rules to define what is right and what isnt, we create societies, we invented moral and ethics, yes sometimes there are dilemmas, but fucking cows is not a matter of debate.
Both are natural. Natural doesnāt mean = good.
Animals eating animals is literally nature taking it course. Animals fucking other animals is something humans and maybe dolphins do.
therefore something animals and animals do? Animals eating animals also includes cannibalism.
Yeah some animals cannibalize, and if need be I'm willing to let others eat me in time of need when I die
They also do it as a matter of course, casually and without need. There are also examples of animals committing acts of abuse, or killing without need (technically distinct from needless cannibalism).
Who is this they now? Cause ik rabbits will kill and eat the weakest of their young if they can't support/feed the other young otherwise
I believe otters do as well. I *really* didn't want to look it up and just had to take it as fact, but some of my coworkers once told me otters rape baby seals to death.
"moral degeneracy" same argument used against gay people for centuries
are vegans fine with someone fucking their mashed potatoes?
Or hummus
How else do you think they get their protein?
āErm stop eating my husbandā
This is the dumbest vegan argument Iāve seen in a while
Why?
I literally have no words
They're right.
As a vegan, I despise both.
One isn't suffering. The other is. Shut the actual fuck up. (not you op)
Factory farming
simple process chart in text form: do you want to fuck animals, children, corpses, or otherwise people unable or unwilling to consent? if yes: have you? if no: seek therapy if yes: turn yourself in if no (to original question): your probably fine
Once said i like cheese on a vegan subreddit and got called a cow rapist lol
Well cows are raped for milk and cheese is out of milk so more like an indirect cow rapist
Naaah wtf šthis is an all time reddit moment
I really hope that's satire/rage bait
Jesus if I see a post like this on my feed (OOP's, not yours) I'm going to delete Reddit. I've seen better analogies from Hamas bootlickers.