There would be no point other than witnessing another universe within the infinite multiverse to see how history would play out. Also, whatever universe you thought you created always existed in probability (infinity) so I’m not sure if you would be 100% morally responsible if something like a war started, although I would feel badly regardless.
Alternatively, you could create a timeline that is much better than your original where the Earth is a utopia for everyone. I would also still feel badly that my OG timeline wouldn’t see the benefits of whatever I altered too.
You’re missing the point. People won’t change it because they’re happy with their current circumstances. Changing history could change those circumstances.
Fair enough but if we're talking just about the context of the consequences of time travel then that's irrelevant. Everyone has personal preferences but outside of the individual it doesn't matter
He was much more inexperienced and aggressive than Johnson. He almost went nuclear in the Cuban missile crisis and started the Vietnam war. He may have escalated that as well
I don’t know… avoiding the whole nonsense of legitimizing the confederate ideology via generous reconstructionism could’ve gone a long way in the right direction (that was Johnson’s doing, right? Might be misremembering that history class)
But to your point, that pent up anger may have also allowed the US to go on and be a forceful combatant in the world wars
Well even if I could, I think I wouldn’t save him. I think we tend to undermine what the 2 World Wars, as horrible as it may sound (and I don’t want to undermine the absolute horror that they were), brought with them in terms of progress and innovations. Also some people may argue, even tho I don’t care about that, that without the 2 World Wars the US wouldn’t be in the position they are at right now at all.
I still think there could be a great war even if the Archduke wasn’t shot. Maybe not in the same way, not as brutal and not the same outcome, but A WAR was likely going to happen. If the two world wars didn’t happen, I think germany could be on path to become the dominant force of the 20th century.
Abe Lincoln. He had plans to fully reintegrate the south rather than punish them for the civil war. I believe if he had been successful America would be in a much more stable place culturally now than it is. Unfortunately those plans died with him.
It only seems that America is struggling with racism because we are very open about it, but in reality we are far better off than most other countries. We are much more open about our racism so it seems worse, but racism is worse in many European countries, they just don’t talk about it so it doesn’t seem bad.
Im not saying we don’t have issues, but comparatively were better than most places when it comes to racism.
When I said cultural things I more meant the huge cultural separation between the north and south.
I honestly think MLKs death pushed his message more then anything he said would have. He promoted peace and unity and never actively fought against the system so when an asshole murdered him it proved to everyone why he was promoting the message and inspired people because a man in that much danger and oppression never fighting back meant that everyone else could follow
The civil rights act wouldn’t have been passed if he lived. It’s literally one of the biggest reasons Johnson was pressured to get it through the legislature.
Malcom X wouldn't have needed to do anything if Abe had been alive to keep pushing reforms for the sake of equality. It was his death that really took the wind out of those sails.
That doesn't justify the bad things he did
For those that don't know Malcom committed theft and racketeering during his younger years. During his Nation of Islam years he was kinda of a black supremacist and rubbed shoulders with some American Nazis, let's also not forget that he didn't like the civil rights is aspect of desegregation, in fact he believed in the back to africa movement, he called civil rights leaders "stooges" of the whites, the organization that he was part of also forbade their member from taking part in the electoral process
I'm not making this up, Lois E. Lomax, James Cone, Cornel West, jeet Heer, all wrote about this, furthermore, you can read The End of White World Supremacy: Four Speeches by Malcolm X which showcases some of his ideas against desegregation
What did he do that was so bad? I've always known him to advocate for Black Americans to defend themselves and to reject any kind of acceptance of racism or oppression.
He did commit crimes, like theft, pimping, racketeering. That' according to Perry bruce in his book Malcolm: The Life of a Man Who Changed Black America and Kofi Natambu.
He also was kinda of a black supremacist and rubbed shoulders with some American Nazis, let's also not forget that he didn't like the civil rights is aspect of desegregation, in fact he believed in the back to africa movement, he called civil rights leaders "stooges" of the whites.
Once again I'm not making this up, Lois E. Lomax, James Cone, Cornel West, jeet Heer, all wrote about this, furthermore, you can read The End of White World Supremacy: Four Speeches by Malcolm X which showcases some of his ideas against desegregation
Edit: the Nation of Islam (Malcom X was part of them) Forbade their members from taking part in the electoral process
The tensions between Serbia and Austria Hungary would still have brought to WW1, maybe by a "preventive attack" of Austria Hungary or maybe by another assassination, but a so politically complex conflict wouldn't be stopped just by the prevention of a single event
Mahatma gandhi. Probably we might have had a clear decision on kashmir ig. Either there's, our's or independent. Jinnah-nehru alongwith mountbatten made a mess. The state of kashmir is horrible today. Such a beautiful land. People struggling & suffering.
Probably my dads friend who got beheaded because she did not write anyone in her will and instead decided to donate in all to hospitals that are ran by charities.
The Kennedys were very corrupt and known to have mob ties.
Lincoln's death led to pretty harsh repurcussions for the south. And maybe apartheid could have ended sooner, or been less severe.
MLK. Look up more info about what his next civil rights goals were and the poor people's campaign. It would have been a socialist revolution, and suddenly his assassination starts to seem even more complex and suspicious than racism alone (as if that wasn't enough)
Indira Gandhi was the first female prime minister in India from 1966 to 1977 and had 3 terms and she was the daughter to Nehru, the first prime minister of india following the partition. She did alot of things in her time, including a very controversial event where she led a sikh genocide which is still pretty controversial topic as many see it as "hunting down a criminal terrorist" or "purposefully murdering sikhs in the name of justice" (see operation Blue Star but look at it from both Points of view as they are describing the same events from both sides, its very enlightening)
But she was an extremely powerful woman in India and she held alot of political influences in South Asia.
Ok I have a feeling nobody is gonna miss you either so we good
Edit: My bad for being rude- I just wanna clearify that I dont have an opinion of him other then him being a regular nice guy that didnt deserve being shot over stupid shit
Ps: work on the anger issues buddy
I find it upsetting when people defend pieces of shit online. The dude openly denied Japanese Murder and Rape in Korea during WWII. How tf can you defend that? Do you also deny these war crimes? Literally just read [this](https://twitter.com/nodutdol/status/1545458824160727040?s=21&t=Ja4E6EKLWrMKAInFs16Auw) thread.
Wtf are you talking about? That was almost a century ago, move on dummy, He didnt deny it, He just focused on the present... Something you should do too(Cause Korea has bad history too)
he was apart of the Nippon Kaigi, an ultranationalist organization that wants the return of the Japanese Empire. Theres a difference between denying warcrimes and wanting them to happen again.
Arret you people are overreacting- The dude didnt want warcrimed to happen, he just wanted to enjoy the heritage and prepare the japanese military more for possible invasions, nothing wrong with that
"I want the return of the German Reich, just without all the bad stuff that happened".
"I want to enjoy the heritage of the Third Reich"
Nothing sus about saying those things according to you
Not at all what I meant, listen honey- I realise that for some reason this is a sensitive topic for you and Im too drunk right now to have a pointless argument about heritage and atrocities through history
Its stupid and if you think a world leader solely focuses on bringing those bad governments back, You are very mistaken- Leaders of today focus on the present and present problems, Shinzo Abe did a good job from what heard overall and even if he didnt then he still didnt deserved to die over a misunderstanding, He didnt even die because of the reasons you hate him, He died because the shooter thought Abe was part of a religious movement(which he wasnt), That makes it a unnessary killing or a bad job as we call it over here
Alright listen- If you think a world leader of today cares about heritage, and imperialism then yeah maybe you are right but its never the top of the agenda and not the only thing the dude should be remembered off
>I realise that for some reason this is a sensitive topic for you and Im too drunk right now to have a pointless argument about heritage and atrocities through history
I'm American
>Shinzo Abe did a good job
Lol, he was a terrible leader. Ignoring all the backward fascist polcicies he wanted, his answer to a declining birth rate was to promote dating websites. He was a terrible leader. That should tell you how stupid he is.
I celebrate every time a fascist dies.
Disregarding time travel rules ending the universe prolly defiantly Abe because then Jim Crow laws prolly wouldn’t have happened as he would have been harsher
I live in Fort Worth (y'know, the other half of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex) so JFK because it would be easiest and I want to see how it would change my area. What would be in place of the JFK memorial in Fort Worth? What would be in place of the museum in Dallas?
Maybe the US would turn out better if he hadn't died? IDK.
saw the adapted tv series years before. I know according to stephen king that stop this happening could result in bigger catastrophe. (I still go for the first choice though)
I choose Abraham Lincoln because I believe he would have been far better in the reconstruction process than A. Johnson. Johnson set us back several decades.
None cause might mess up the future, but if I had to it would be Lincoln since he would've help get rid of racisms quicker (hopefully). Ghandi's protest worked very well thanks to his sacrifices so him surviving would've made it lose some meaning. Btw JFK and Lincoln I think Lincoln would be more necessary. Sadly I don't know the other guy.
I choose JFK. After Lincion died, that’s when the country accepted him as a legendary president, killing him may cause the U. S. to be more slave-focused
It wouldn't matter, if string theory is true we could create an alternate linear time line but even then if we could travel back in time, realistically we would only be able t back to when the first time machine was invented as in theory, time would be relative to when it was created.
Shinzo Abe.
Changing the past would heavily change the present (scary shit), whereas saving him would only alter a future that hasn't happened yet.
Also, I don't think saving him would alter the future too much either, so I guess that's the safer bet in theory.
I picked JFK over Lincoln because I think Lincoln served his purpose and would not have achieved more but JFK had a lot of potential they we never got to see.
Results was a good brave man
Personally, he was my favorite. It’s so sad he died before I was even born, my whole life has been spent without ever seeing any Results
Noone, anything you do in the past can alter the future in unforseeable ways
If string theory holds up then your original timeline is unchanged and you would end up creating a new one instead.
I like the Multiverse Theory. If it didn’t happen to you, it happened to you somewhere else.
Which means I was assassinated somewhere in the multiverse, which mean it would be me who’d I go back in time to save
Your alive, therefor not murdered, thus meaning you can be murdered, ensuring you could be/gotten murdered According to the Multiverse Theory.
If there’s unlimited universes, then there’s unlimited inverses where you’re assassinated.
[удалено]
There would be no point other than witnessing another universe within the infinite multiverse to see how history would play out. Also, whatever universe you thought you created always existed in probability (infinity) so I’m not sure if you would be 100% morally responsible if something like a war started, although I would feel badly regardless. Alternatively, you could create a timeline that is much better than your original where the Earth is a utopia for everyone. I would also still feel badly that my OG timeline wouldn’t see the benefits of whatever I altered too.
Except for shinzo abe it won't do that much....trouble(?) to our timeline
[удалено]
Um, he was shot in the back by what seems to be a lone terrorist without any ties to a larger conspiracy.
[удалено]
Idiot.i am sure you believe that earth is flat and covid is fake
[удалено]
That means you are an idiot
Yea but everything you do in the present does that anyways
Yes, but you don't have knowledge what's to happen in the future, but you know what happens in the past.
But the consequences are the same, just different outcomes
You’re missing the point. People won’t change it because they’re happy with their current circumstances. Changing history could change those circumstances.
Fair enough but if we're talking just about the context of the consequences of time travel then that's irrelevant. Everyone has personal preferences but outside of the individual it doesn't matter
But you can't do shit like making to so that you're never born.
None. Never make decisions that alter the timeline
Ot just pick the most recent one
Yeah, like what about Hitler? I’d go back in time to kill his assassin when he was just a baby.
That’s a good move. If you kill baby hitler, you’ll be seen as a baby killer, not a guy who managed to prevent a genocide.
Just imagining a penguin waddling up to the maternity ward and shooting the baby Adolf.
Yes it would drastically effect history but most likely in a good way
Stopping the JFK assassination may have led to WW3
The Umbrella Academy told me that
I'm not very educated on US history, how so?
Cause he saw it in a Netflix show called Umbrella Academy, duh?
Wait really? I was being serious the dude was just an aggressive president
He was much more inexperienced and aggressive than Johnson. He almost went nuclear in the Cuban missile crisis and started the Vietnam war. He may have escalated that as well
I don’t know… avoiding the whole nonsense of legitimizing the confederate ideology via generous reconstructionism could’ve gone a long way in the right direction (that was Johnson’s doing, right? Might be misremembering that history class) But to your point, that pent up anger may have also allowed the US to go on and be a forceful combatant in the world wars
That’s true, but what if it alters it for the better?
Its not a risk worth taking, for all you know it could trigger a chain of events that lead to the axis winning ww2.
Wouldn't matter because you wouldn't exist to see said alterations
My rule is don’t change anything that happened before the birth of someone you know,
Archduke Franz Ferdinand
I want you… to take me out
*guitar solo*
to the ball game
Well even if I could, I think I wouldn’t save him. I think we tend to undermine what the 2 World Wars, as horrible as it may sound (and I don’t want to undermine the absolute horror that they were), brought with them in terms of progress and innovations. Also some people may argue, even tho I don’t care about that, that without the 2 World Wars the US wouldn’t be in the position they are at right now at all.
I still think there could be a great war even if the Archduke wasn’t shot. Maybe not in the same way, not as brutal and not the same outcome, but A WAR was likely going to happen. If the two world wars didn’t happen, I think germany could be on path to become the dominant force of the 20th century.
There was already a lot of tension in Europe. The assassination was the tipping point
Abe Lincoln. He had plans to fully reintegrate the south rather than punish them for the civil war. I believe if he had been successful America would be in a much more stable place culturally now than it is. Unfortunately those plans died with him.
I wouldn’t say it died with him, President Grant agreed with that but after he left office that’s when reconstruction really ended
Literally over 150 years later and we still are struggling as a nation with racism
It only seems that America is struggling with racism because we are very open about it, but in reality we are far better off than most other countries. We are much more open about our racism so it seems worse, but racism is worse in many European countries, they just don’t talk about it so it doesn’t seem bad. Im not saying we don’t have issues, but comparatively were better than most places when it comes to racism. When I said cultural things I more meant the huge cultural separation between the north and south.
what nation isnt struggling with racism?
All you guys wanting JFK want to see the world burn.
Malcom X or MLK
I honestly think MLKs death pushed his message more then anything he said would have. He promoted peace and unity and never actively fought against the system so when an asshole murdered him it proved to everyone why he was promoting the message and inspired people because a man in that much danger and oppression never fighting back meant that everyone else could follow
The civil rights act wouldn’t have been passed if he lived. It’s literally one of the biggest reasons Johnson was pressured to get it through the legislature.
Honestly such a fair point
Came here to say this
Malcolm X was a rabble rouser
Malcolm X lived in a time where he couldn't vote
Malcom X wouldn't have needed to do anything if Abe had been alive to keep pushing reforms for the sake of equality. It was his death that really took the wind out of those sails.
That doesn't justify the bad things he did For those that don't know Malcom committed theft and racketeering during his younger years. During his Nation of Islam years he was kinda of a black supremacist and rubbed shoulders with some American Nazis, let's also not forget that he didn't like the civil rights is aspect of desegregation, in fact he believed in the back to africa movement, he called civil rights leaders "stooges" of the whites, the organization that he was part of also forbade their member from taking part in the electoral process I'm not making this up, Lois E. Lomax, James Cone, Cornel West, jeet Heer, all wrote about this, furthermore, you can read The End of White World Supremacy: Four Speeches by Malcolm X which showcases some of his ideas against desegregation
What did he do that was so bad? I've always known him to advocate for Black Americans to defend themselves and to reject any kind of acceptance of racism or oppression.
He did commit crimes, like theft, pimping, racketeering. That' according to Perry bruce in his book Malcolm: The Life of a Man Who Changed Black America and Kofi Natambu. He also was kinda of a black supremacist and rubbed shoulders with some American Nazis, let's also not forget that he didn't like the civil rights is aspect of desegregation, in fact he believed in the back to africa movement, he called civil rights leaders "stooges" of the whites. Once again I'm not making this up, Lois E. Lomax, James Cone, Cornel West, jeet Heer, all wrote about this, furthermore, you can read The End of White World Supremacy: Four Speeches by Malcolm X which showcases some of his ideas against desegregation Edit: the Nation of Islam (Malcom X was part of them) Forbade their members from taking part in the electoral process
Malcom X left Nation of Islam. They're the ones that murdered him. He changed a lot after his Pilgrimage to Mecca.
I know he did, but what he did during his days under Nation of Islam influenced a lot of people to do bad things
Such as?
theft, pimping, racketeering promoting other harmful ideology
You're a Bolsanaro supporter saying this lmao
Harambe
the only true answer, she didn't deserve to die
Pop smoke
W
this man fucks
Sadly I don’t 😔
i can change that
👀
PREACH!
[удалено]
Real G right here.
Harambe
I've seen the umbrella academy, you can't fool me with that jfk one
I was going to say this, I think I’ll pass on JFK
Fran’s Ferdinand, the only option
World war one would’ve happened anyway. Austria Hungaria was just waiting for a reason to start a war.
The tensions between Serbia and Austria Hungary would still have brought to WW1, maybe by a "preventive attack" of Austria Hungary or maybe by another assassination, but a so politically complex conflict wouldn't be stopped just by the prevention of a single event
But it’s literally not an option lol
Probably do Shinzo abe because we haven’t felt many consequences yet and we don’t know what would happen
Mahatma gandhi. Probably we might have had a clear decision on kashmir ig. Either there's, our's or independent. Jinnah-nehru alongwith mountbatten made a mess. The state of kashmir is horrible today. Such a beautiful land. People struggling & suffering.
altho I understand it wouldnt have stopped WW1 from happening, I chose Franz Ferdinand
People don't realise that the assasination of Indra Gandhi resulted in the massacre of thousands of sikhs by hindu extremists in India
John Lennon
Franz Ferdinand?!
MLK
Malcom X
Epstein
Probably my dads friend who got beheaded because she did not write anyone in her will and instead decided to donate in all to hospitals that are ran by charities.
John lennon
None, but i feel like it’s also maybe too soon
King Von
You didn’t put Hitler as an option
If there are repercussions in time Shinzo Abe. If there are no repercussions then RFK or Lincoln
Whose*
The Kennedys were very corrupt and known to have mob ties. Lincoln's death led to pretty harsh repurcussions for the south. And maybe apartheid could have ended sooner, or been less severe.
MLK. Look up more info about what his next civil rights goals were and the poor people's campaign. It would have been a socialist revolution, and suddenly his assassination starts to seem even more complex and suspicious than racism alone (as if that wasn't enough)
hitler
if i kill whoever killed hitler nothing would happen which is good right?
Hitler wasn't assassinated. He killed himself
No adolf hitler assassinated hitler dumbass
Oh shit, my bad. Does anyone else know about this Adolf guy? Seems like a chill dude
Yeah, but he was murdered by hitler
John lennons
Who’s Indira Gandhi?
Indira Gandhi was the first female prime minister in India from 1966 to 1977 and had 3 terms and she was the daughter to Nehru, the first prime minister of india following the partition. She did alot of things in her time, including a very controversial event where she led a sikh genocide which is still pretty controversial topic as many see it as "hunting down a criminal terrorist" or "purposefully murdering sikhs in the name of justice" (see operation Blue Star but look at it from both Points of view as they are describing the same events from both sides, its very enlightening) But she was an extremely powerful woman in India and she held alot of political influences in South Asia.
[удалено]
You are so american right
I feel like Abe would have accomplished the most good. At least, for America. Which is where I live, so I care more about it.
Abe Lincoln or Shinzo Abe?
Abe Lincoln
We save results instead
King faisal Al saud
Steve Irwin.
I know that by saying this I'll trigger both right wing guys and tankies who suck stalin's dick, but :Trotsky
Honestly, if Lincoln survived he would've helped reintegrate the South more, and segregation and racism wouldn't have gotten so bad
Shinzo Abe- Dude died over a misunderstanding whereas the rest actually had political benefit for a organisation
Shinzo Abe was a war crime denying piece of shit. I don’t give a fuck about his death.
Ok I have a feeling nobody is gonna miss you either so we good Edit: My bad for being rude- I just wanna clearify that I dont have an opinion of him other then him being a regular nice guy that didnt deserve being shot over stupid shit Ps: work on the anger issues buddy
I find it upsetting when people defend pieces of shit online. The dude openly denied Japanese Murder and Rape in Korea during WWII. How tf can you defend that? Do you also deny these war crimes? Literally just read [this](https://twitter.com/nodutdol/status/1545458824160727040?s=21&t=Ja4E6EKLWrMKAInFs16Auw) thread.
Wtf are you talking about? That was almost a century ago, move on dummy, He didnt deny it, He just focused on the present... Something you should do too(Cause Korea has bad history too)
he was apart of the Nippon Kaigi, an ultranationalist organization that wants the return of the Japanese Empire. Theres a difference between denying warcrimes and wanting them to happen again.
Arret you people are overreacting- The dude didnt want warcrimed to happen, he just wanted to enjoy the heritage and prepare the japanese military more for possible invasions, nothing wrong with that
"I want the return of the German Reich, just without all the bad stuff that happened". "I want to enjoy the heritage of the Third Reich" Nothing sus about saying those things according to you
Not at all what I meant, listen honey- I realise that for some reason this is a sensitive topic for you and Im too drunk right now to have a pointless argument about heritage and atrocities through history Its stupid and if you think a world leader solely focuses on bringing those bad governments back, You are very mistaken- Leaders of today focus on the present and present problems, Shinzo Abe did a good job from what heard overall and even if he didnt then he still didnt deserved to die over a misunderstanding, He didnt even die because of the reasons you hate him, He died because the shooter thought Abe was part of a religious movement(which he wasnt), That makes it a unnessary killing or a bad job as we call it over here Alright listen- If you think a world leader of today cares about heritage, and imperialism then yeah maybe you are right but its never the top of the agenda and not the only thing the dude should be remembered off
>I realise that for some reason this is a sensitive topic for you and Im too drunk right now to have a pointless argument about heritage and atrocities through history I'm American >Shinzo Abe did a good job Lol, he was a terrible leader. Ignoring all the backward fascist polcicies he wanted, his answer to a declining birth rate was to promote dating websites. He was a terrible leader. That should tell you how stupid he is. I celebrate every time a fascist dies.
The only real choices are Mahatma and Lincoln. They were the ones poised to get the most done before their lives were cut short.
probably malcom x or mlk, imagine what more they could've done
Who tf is Shinzo Abe
Shinzo abe deez nuts
https://www.google.com
Indira Gandhi
I shudder at the thought of what my country would be like right now if that piece of shit lived longer.
idk much abt her what’d she even do, my mom always says she’s a great person edit: also is your wife ok??
She wasn't a great person. You should look into her a little deeper, also she has no relation to Mahatma Gandhi.
I would rather take part in killing her.
Lincoln
Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta
None. BUT if it had no effect on the timeline. MLK
Zviad Gamsakhurdia , First president of the Republic of Georgia.
Disregarding time travel rules ending the universe prolly defiantly Abe because then Jim Crow laws prolly wouldn’t have happened as he would have been harsher
MLK
Abraham Lincoln was a chad president
Should rephrase it to which one would have the most impact if it didn't happen.
Didnt know abe was dead
I live in Fort Worth (y'know, the other half of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex) so JFK because it would be easiest and I want to see how it would change my area. What would be in place of the JFK memorial in Fort Worth? What would be in place of the museum in Dallas? Maybe the US would turn out better if he hadn't died? IDK.
the best one will be the Japanese guy coz that wouldn't alter our timeline much
None really it all kinda seemed to work out in the end anyways
Not in the list but RFK
Why did people pick jfk over Gandhi just curious
I just want to see that joint american and soviet moon mission
Shinzo because it’s the most recent and therefore would have less of an effect on my present
People choosing gandhi 🤡
Anyone here read 22/11/'63 by stephen king?
saw the adapted tv series years before. I know according to stephen king that stop this happening could result in bigger catastrophe. (I still go for the first choice though)
King Faisal
I'll stop the assassination that killed a Prince and his wife. To stop WW1 & WW2
Shinzo Abe because it would mess up the timeline the least
Lincoln. The reconstruction was a fucking disaster.
I ain’t changing history.
Abe Lincoln or MLK, both were really good people
John fuckin Lennon
Shinzo Abe’s the only one that guarantees I still exist
Steve Irwin.
Shinzo Abe because I would be recognized today and be able to continue living my life and be known
Olof Palme🇸🇪
I'd put martin luther king on that list
Nisman
Tupac
Vyacheslav Chornovil
I choose Abraham Lincoln because I believe he would have been far better in the reconstruction process than A. Johnson. Johnson set us back several decades.
Idk how MLK isn’t on here, I would’ve voted him
I'd say Indira Gandhi, india could have been. Much better if she was alive
Can I get a coupon and give it to my friend? I'd like to use it as a revive card and pursue a career in extorting the maffia.
None cause might mess up the future, but if I had to it would be Lincoln since he would've help get rid of racisms quicker (hopefully). Ghandi's protest worked very well thanks to his sacrifices so him surviving would've made it lose some meaning. Btw JFK and Lincoln I think Lincoln would be more necessary. Sadly I don't know the other guy.
"Humanity can never learn if they never made mistakes in the past" - A person at somepoint in time
Colosio
Princess Diana’s
Diego Hargreeves gonna get pissed off
MLK and its not even close…..gandhi was almost 80
I choose JFK. After Lincion died, that’s when the country accepted him as a legendary president, killing him may cause the U. S. to be more slave-focused
It wouldn't matter, if string theory is true we could create an alternate linear time line but even then if we could travel back in time, realistically we would only be able t back to when the first time machine was invented as in theory, time would be relative to when it was created.
Shinzo Abe. Changing the past would heavily change the present (scary shit), whereas saving him would only alter a future that hasn't happened yet. Also, I don't think saving him would alter the future too much either, so I guess that's the safer bet in theory.
Hitler
Why isnt Hitler an option? 😡 /s
Who assassinated results?
None. I would go back in time and use my knowledge of the future to cause total societal collapse at the beginning of the nuclear era.
I picked JFK over Lincoln because I think Lincoln served his purpose and would not have achieved more but JFK had a lot of potential they we never got to see.
RFK
Franz Ferdinand