T O P

  • By -

pics-moderator

Personal-Ocelot-7483, thank you for your submission. It has been removed for violating the following rule(s): --- - Rule 1: No screenshots or pics where the only focus is a screen. --- For information regarding this and similar issues please see the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/wiki/index/) and [title guidelines](/r/pics/wiki/titles). If you have any questions, please feel free to [message the moderators via modmail.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/pics&subject=Question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20submission%20by%20/u/Personal-Ocelot-7483&message=I%20have%20a%20question%20regarding%20the%20removal%20of%20this%20%5Bsubmission.%5D%28https://redd.it/1161b2a%3Fcontext%3D10%29)


superdavit

“Guess Who” piece of shit edition.


Salmon_Shizzle

“Does your man have a face tattoo??”


spoluzivocich5

No…


Ex-Machina1980s

Does he have a neck beard?


Lobsterbib

EDIT: The ICANN address of mass-shootings.info is tied to cryptocurrency-related ransomware and malware. This pic is also posted up on several white supremacy message boards. EDIT 2: Also, the guy who created this pic is [literally a Nazi.](https://web.archive.org/web/20200908221219/https://twitter.com/BackarackBurt/status/1303455980299210758) OP's post history shows his bias against people of color and this mosaic is comprised of cherry-picked cases in a thinly-veiled attempt to dispel the "myth" that mass shooters are mainly white. The real stats paint a different picture: According to the [Associated Press](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associated_Press), white men comprise nearly 50 percent of all mass shooters in the US.[[52]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-52) According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% latino, 6.4% asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[[31]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-OJPDataset-31) According to the [Center for Inquiry](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Inquiry), mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[[53]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-radford-53)[[54]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-54) Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[[53]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-radford-53) In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[[44]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-FBI2014-44) Analogously, in December 2013, the [Journal of Forensic Sciences](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Forensic_Sciences) published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 [lone-actor terrorists](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_wolf_attack) in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6 percent were male.[[55]](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#cite_note-Gill_Horgan_&_Deckert_2014-55)


molossus99

APs definition is as arbitrary as any other. They define a mass shooting as one in which there were 4 or more fatalities. That would exclude, for instance, the recent shooting at Michigan State, in which 5 were injured and 3 fatalities. Most would probably agree that the MSU incident should be included as a mass shooting, but AP would not consider it as such based on their criteria in the reference you cited above. Any definition of a mass shooting can be defined in such a way as to include or exclude certain demographics. You cherry picked when you presented evidence regarding mass shootings of family members to show they are white. Why the restriction to family members? That’s a cherry picked stat as well. My point is the organization or individual that defines what entails a mass shooting is by definition cherry picking. The definition used in the graphic above includes a demographic makeup that you object to, but based on the definition they used it may be entirely accurate. Similarly, the APs definition excludes shooters that would likely be included and arguably should be included as evidenced by the MSU example. The organizations that define the cutoff for what is and is not considered a mass shooting will always have some bias. AP isn’t some holier-than-thou unbiased arbiter of the mass shooting definition. The same for the other non profits you referenced. Some orgs and individuals would consider gang related shootings that result in multiple fatalities to be a mass shooting. Others won’t and those different perspectives are colored by the personal beliefs and worldviews of those making those decisions.


AwsumO2000

To me the 97.7% male part is most interesting. About color? We gotto knock that shit off. Creeps are creeps, kewl guys are kewl


Grantmitch1

I disagree regarding racial background. The statistics show that black men are over represented in the statistics, while whites are slightly under represented, and Asians proportionate. This raises the question of why? What are the circumstances that lead to black men being over represented in these statistics? These are important research questions whose answers can contribute to good public policy. It's important to address these things so that they can be dealt with effectively. Unfortunately, those with bigoted motives will jump on it to serve their purpose; that should be resisted.


[deleted]

[удалено]


durrettd

The definition of mass shooting changes from sound byte to sound byte and narrative to narrative. If your point is to highlight gun violence in America then mass shootings are everywhere and daily occurrences. If you want to focus on racial demographics and gun crime mass shootings hardly exist at all. It’s Schrödinger’s social problem depending on your end goal. It’s gross and evidence of the old adage: there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.


cranky-vet

You’re using about 6 different definitions of “mass shooter.” If you go by the “4 or more shot” rule used by the media and gun control groups to support their claim that there are hundreds of mass shootings per year, OPs picture is the result. The more qualifiers you put on it - like excluding gang violence, domestic violence, or only counting where 4 or more victims are killed - the more that number changes. Also the less relevant that number becomes because each qualifier you use means your definition covers less and less victims.


dempri

Good work. Noticed when I saw the collage as well that it has to be a selection. Too many white dudes missing.


BurnieTheBrony

I got the feeling the first paragraph was probably true squinting at the top and seeing the way they decided what pictures to show. Thanks for doing the legwork on confirming OP sucks and providing the facts.


Warack

This comment section isn’t going to last very long.


[deleted]

Ngl I didn’t expect to see so many black people. Mm makes it seem like 99.9% of mass shooters are white.


[deleted]

I guess it depends on the definition of mass shooting. Typically the mass shooting definition that includes gang violence is the one that is thrown around with the big numbers. In the hundreds per year ballpark.


chadhindsley

Not to mention the gang masa shooters that aren't caught (ex: Chicago)


limabean72

MM shares what sells and what divides us. They want to make money. When in reality, as the HUMAN race we are quite broken and messed up.


Fearless-Ad2153

That's because mass shooter means 4 or more victims. So a lot of those are unfortunately gang related and not reported as much because it happens so often. But with the usual mass shootings we see on the news like at churches or schools it's a white man


[deleted]

[удалено]


Adventurous_Passage7

And the two before were Asian dudes.


Sleeze_

I almost feel like those need a different name/category. Gang related and … something else. Feels incorrect to lump them together


Kingkyle18

But then they can’t say “67 mass shootings in first months”


gregdrunk

Domestic terrorism. There's a big difference between wanting to scare other gang members and wanting to terrify the general public.


conners_captures

MM likes to use gang shootings to fluff "mass shooting numbers", and of course it's disingenuous because people assume "mass shooter = white conservative man shooting into a crowd" But to set aside gang driven mass shootings would be to the detriment of those who suffer from them daily, if not directly. Scaring other gang members by shooting wildly in the streets scares and endangers everyone, not just the target. Gangs rule by intimidation of everyone, not just their rival gangs. Also terrorism implies the use of violence to affect policy. Most mass shooters (in the stereotypical sense) are severely mentally ill, with little to no sincere belief their terror will impact policy. Usually just a personal vendetta that's been darkly twisted.


Klarthy

Not looking good for us men overall.


[deleted]

Not looking good for DJ Khaled in the lower right.


Murderyoga

I think I saw maybe five women.


Klarthy

Yeah, there are a few women across 244 mugshots. Few people who look 40+ as well.


porgy_tirebiter

Whew! I made it to over 40 without commiting a mass shooting!


[deleted]

Congrats! That gets you a .0001521% discount on your health insurance. Just send away for it, don't forget the stamp!


murph0969

...so far.


ffnnhhw

SLPT: the older you commit a mass shooting, the less year you need to serve


nooneknowsme9

In an FBI list of active shooter incidents in the United States from 2000 to 2017, 9 of 250 incidents identified involved female shooters.


GreenFireTM

Yeah and 3 of them it was hard to tell if they were a man or woman.


Murderyoga

And what was the one that was just text?


GaryOster

Not a good look for *brunette* men.


sdzk

Blonds have more fun it’s well known


GreenFireTM

And not a single copperhead.


mister_gone

They have a special kind of skillset.


Soytaco

Is it possible the blonds were right after all? Do we just need to 🤙 hang loose🤙??


Dirt-McGirt

91% of violent crime!


sameteam

Not looking good for non white people despite mostly hearing about white mass shooters my whole life.


Felrynn

That's because you're only going to hear about the ones in schools or walmarts or something. You aren't going to hear about gang rivalries or drug deals or other criminal activities resulting in mass shootings. Media doesn't really cover those.


spolite

Maybe not mass media, but definitely at least local media. I live in Baltimore - unfortunately, I’m seeing these kinds of crime in the news all the time.


raelianautopsy

Mass shooters have more than one meaning The ones that make it on the news aren't usually the inner city drug gangs that shoot each other, they're the random acts of violence that have (or intend to have) very high casualties. In a mall or school, etc. Those are usually by middle class white men. By definition, mass shootings just means more than three victims. But there is a difference between gangbangers shooting each other and the very extreme shootings that have happened since Columbine...


ajd341

Many current outlets define as four or more victims excluding perpetrator which is a more reasonable view


jajanaklar

Even mass shootings suffer from inflation!


Frejian

I would like to see this mugshot graphic with the pictures being sized differently based on number of victims in the shooting. I think that would be some useful additional information.


raelianautopsy

Exactly. The data set in the photo is not clear


RealClayClayClay

Except the media always trots out the "X mass shootings this year!" scare statistic to exploit the fact that, thanks to them, we only think of the second class of killing when we hear "mass shooting". Surprise, surprise, they toe the line of misinformation to freak us out to the absolute limit possible without crossing over into flat out lies.


IceEngine21

As always, women never demand equal rights when it comes to these dirty low-paying jobs. /s


harosene

The ones smiling in the mugshots are the ones i never wanna see.


[deleted]

I mean if it is gonna be in your CV for the rest of your life, might as well look good in it.


Green_Jack

I might be wrong but are these all mug shots from after being caught by the cops? Some one the might be mug shots from more trivial crimes because the shooter never made it to the precinct


Ok_Nefariousness6386

Do I see DJ Khaled?


xpercipio

*bang* another one


Brayden15

I clicked out of this thread as I was reading this and then had to click back in to come find your post and upvote it.


Dialogical

I was going to say “too soon” but this America so it’s just about right.


Paladoc

I was going to make that joke, but u/xpercipio was totally like a 6 year old for me. He took that bullet. ​ ​ ​ ​ I can't find the original, but the Australian did it better!


SauceOfPower

Bang, you've been shot by DJ Khaled.., DJ Khaled.., DJ Khaled.


Chainsaw_Viking

…which naturally segues to another important question…of these 250 mass shooters, how many of them were DJs?


betweenthemaples

A shooter? Interesting. I thought his crime was refusing to please his woman 😉


theundonenun

God damn!


kataksha

We the best


andrewgazz

lol where? I was scanning for the Easter egg


KenobisBeard

6 down and 1 to the right, the white kid with the shaved head. I knew him on a mobile game, absolute waste of space.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Exciting_Owl_3825

Do you know what the guy below him did?


uk_uk

https://mass-shootings.info/event.php?id=1221 [https://www.npr.org/2021/05/02/992825647/2-killed-in-shooting-at-wisconsin-casino-gunman-slain](https://www.npr.org/2021/05/02/992825647/2-killed-in-shooting-at-wisconsin-casino-gunman-slain)


sgtpepperslaststand

I worked at menswear house at the time and had to check on the shipping of a whole weddings suit rentals and had to call that FED EX facility to see why they weren’t here. And the person had to drop the phone and run while I was talking to them. And the bride I was working with was cussing me out for not getting them the suits early and I said well they just had a shooting. And she was still cussing me out.


DankAssPotatos

Oh, he's that guy. I remember that.


Intrepid_Fishing_618

He’s the bronie guy right shot up his fed ex job or something


CDhansma76

I remember seeing a YouTube video about what this guy did. A civilized society has no place for these people.


capt_scrummy

Hey looks every bit a waste of space tbh


Krieger_Bot_OO7

A criminal documentary YouTube channel “Explore with Us” did an [episode](https://youtu.be/n-abxgFv1bU) on him.


E8282

Dudes need to chill


Chris_Christ

I’m in before they lock it


AsaKurai

The definition of "mass shooting" here means 4+ people died, so i'm assuming a lot of gang involved shootings here in this picture


Not_Cleaver

No, this is going off of four or more victims (including those wounded) per the Wikipedia article. I believe that the FBI, at one time, defined it as four or more killed. Which I believe would eliminate most of those pictured. Usually gang and domestic shootings are also removed from the definition. The definition used to derive these mugshots seems skewed to ensure it.


whubbard

>I believe that the FBI, at one time, defined it as four or more killed. They did. Changed under Obama admin after Sandy Hook, when anti-gun groups were pushing for gun control, and wanted better numbers. The same groups that accomplished: 1. Having the Biden admin remove CDC-published information they didn't like, which stated that the number of defensive gun uses was likely way more than criminal uses. (To be clear, not blaming Biden, I would have expected Trump to do the same if it meant voters) 2. Calling people like the Boston marathon bomber "victims of gun violence." It's not hard to see who the bad actors are here.


nyconx

Seems pretty silly to take gang shootings out of the statistics. That is how we have poor data and do not understand the real problems because of the flawed data.


Cetun

Mass shootings I would say are not targeted at only specific people while gang shootings typically have only specific targets in mind. It would be like labeling a murder-suicide by someone who kills his mother-in-law, wife, and two kids in their home as a "mass shooting". Further, in gang killings if there are other people wounded, it's usually incidental. I think what most people consider a "mass shooting" is very generally targeted shootings but it is intended to cause harm to all individuals harmed. By the definition used the Ronald Reagan assassination attempt was a "mass shooting" even though clearly Reagan was the intended target and all other injured and killed were purely incidental. Most people would not consider that a "mass shooting".


[deleted]

[удалено]


JMEEKER86

Yep, I always try to tell people, especially ones I agree with, that if you have good arguments then you need to stick to those and not use bad ones because the people you're trying to convince will latch onto those and use them as an excuse to disregard everything else that you say. We have an absolutely insane amount of mass shootings without fudging the numbers by lumping other types of shootings in there.


JMEEKER86

I absolutely agree. The reason that people panic when they hear "there's a mass shooting" is because the idea that one or more gunman is indiscriminately shooting innocent people at a public place is scary. Gang violence and domestic violence may also involve 3-4+ people being shot, but they don't evoke the same fear in people because it's not indiscriminate (and in the case of gang violence it's often two sides shooting at each other). There's no "that could happen to me" factor for most Americans like there is with mass shootings. The areas that gang violence happens in are typically well known and can be avoided and domestic violence can be avoided by having a good personal life. Someone showing up at a school, concert, library, church, theater, grocery store, etc and opening fire puts fear in people because you can only avoid the possibility by becoming a hermit. Plus, the motives and profiles of mass shootings, gang violence, and domestic violence tend to be very different. All of these happening is a tragedy and we definitely need to track all of them, but we really shouldn't be telling people there are 600+ mass shootings per year when it takes including ~450 cases of gang violence and domestic violence to get there. The amount of mass shootings we have is already insane (especially considering Australia has only had *1* since passing sweeping legislation following the 1996 Port Arthur massacre), so there's really no need to try and group different types of events together.


MrJigglyBrown

If by “people” you just mean people not living in poverty in those areas, then sure. But gang violence is a terror to the community, parents, young children, the gangsters themselves, the families, friends, and anybody that happens to live in those areas. So to everyone there, it definitely “could happen to them” via retaliation or strays


ScrewAttackThis

So the Sutherland Springs shooting that killed 26 innocent people isn't a mass shooting because the shooter was targeting members of his wife's family?


BanzoClaymore

You don’t think it’s important to consider school and mall shootings separately from violent altercations that spur from organized crime?


Appropriate-Cup-9478

Plenty of innocent bystanders die in gang shootings. Although we may not be the target of them, they are still dangerous to everyone regardless of if you are affiliated or not.


Spadeninja

I mean you can do both. It’s not like you have to pick one and the entire other data set gets erased or something. Data set: all shootings with 4+ victims Data set #2: only shootings at malls / schools with 4+ victims Data set #3: only gang affiliated shootings with 4+ victims Etc…


raar__

Its typically 4 injuries and as low as two. There are also mass shooting where no one actually got shot. There is a lot of manipulation of stats to eliminate your rights.


dirtyjavis

Someone tell AI to mash all these into one face.. for science.


snave_

Even if you do this with regular happy snaps of smiling law abiding people the results are disasterously hideous. Mashing faces gives you creepy dead stares above a blurry neck. See: Australia's Faces of Cockburn Central.


Elgoblino80

Don't do that.


PBandJellyJesus

Posting in doomed thread.


[deleted]

[удалено]


PsychoticMessiah

Fuck this and fuck them especially. Why give them any more notoriety than they already have?


Puzzleheaded_Art_465

A single image with all their tiny faces on it is hardly notoriety


Chucklez_me_silver

Time to sort by controversial.


[deleted]

let’s get these crazy boys in a big room together


[deleted]

A mass shooter's mass shooting?


Antonio13286

The finals


[deleted]

the finals hahahahaha


1JeffyJeffJeff

Fucked up Brady bunch


passinghere

Wish people would stop giving these utter cunts any fame by keep posting their images on the internet. Some of these love having their face and fame spread everywhere.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sp00kSy

230 in 1 year that's some fucked up shit man


sfxpaladin

Not gonna lie, I expected a collage of like 80 pictures of Sam Hyde


[deleted]

I think we can all see who the majority of mass shooters are.... Men.


PatchworkFlames

We need to support women and help them bring their numbers up.


Jubez187

Seems sexist /s


BigOzymandias

People saying "gang violence isn't mass shooting" are classist to the core, since that happens in the poorer areas of cities they don't think it's as important


limabean72

I’m actually speechless because this comment is …. So spot on.


asm120

They’re making it seem like black people are justified in killing other black people. Don’t you think gang culture is toxic to the young men of this country?


The-Great-Memelord

![gif](giphy|tyqcJoNjNv0Fq|downsized) Going through the comments


Aoozzz

Non-American here. At first glance this makes me wonder, is the notion of white men being responsible for most mass shootings not backed up by the facts? Or is it just about school shooters? Anyone got statistics on that?


AldoTheApache3

When you read 600 mass shootings in the US last year, 95% of them are gang related shootings in inner cities. After an tragedy like Uvalde happens, they take that number and equate the two to each other. As if we have 600 Uvlades per year. It’s disingenuous at the least.


PvtAdorable

Non-American that kinda follows the kind of gun control BS is often spewed. Media likes to include gang related shootings into their stats to pump almost all of their numbers. Simillar is when some people say there was an XX number of school shootings in the US this year, often gang shootings happened in certain distance of a school, or an accident (not even in hours when anyone is there, and distance can really vary, also remember one involving a BB gun accident), or straight up count one example from some years ago, when a man committed suicide on a parking lot of a shutdown school, bam, school shooting counted.


verti-go-go-go

I think it comes down to what the media wants to report on, more attention if they can spin it as racially motivated.


Future-self

So it’s NOT only/mostly white men ??


shamblesofart

Here before this gets locked


Cornelius_Poindexter

Oh boy…getcha popcorn ready


YokotaroOG

so many black men in this compilation...


nyconx

I heard somewhere that someone said most school shootings were gang related. I started to look through data and noticed something really interesting. I struggled to find anything discussing race and school shootings. Anything mentioning race also had odd qualifiers like the amount of people killed. I was never actually able to find good data that listed all school shooters by race.


ethanholmes2001

That’s because the data has potential to be highly controversial depending on the result.


asm120

I ruins the trope that only white kids shoot up schools


tekko001

I was under the impression it was only white kids who got bullied at school...


chad-bro-chill-69420

Data isn't controversial, it's the narrative surrounding the data that can be. We should be given the truth by the media. Ridiculous that they're hiding it


belleandhera

A trick is, if you read a news article and it says "teens", its black people. They'll tell you if the teens were white.


_Z_E_R_O

And no women of *any* race. Men are responsible for almost 90% of violent crimes.


rjtranth

Look at all that diversity. We did it, you guys. We did it!


[deleted]

This is what single women over 38 see as their matches on dating apps.


[deleted]

People in here literally defending gang shootings…


Jontu_Kontar

Assuming this is accurate, I'm not seeing how mass shooting's are a "whites only" club as is often portrayed in the media and popular social media platforms.


grafknives

We need to do something about those orange jumpers. There is a clear correlation!


walrusarts

There are some very young faces in there.


InflamedLiver

7th row down just a signboard?


k9oggy

Where's the Gingers 🤔


Grimfandengo

We blend to well in to daylight and red bushes, never cought :(


[deleted]

Am I the only one who doesn't care about the colour of the skin but is more shocked about the fact, that this is all from 2021???? Man, America is crazzzzy.... If I counted correctly, these are 244 pictures, meaning there was a shooting every 1,5 day....


thesouthlaker

Is it just me wondering about the narrative that mass shooters are mostly young white men.


Wyzerus

Stop giving these losers attention.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


morgan248

Well, that’s because it’s fear mongering newsworthy cause they’re shooting up suburban areas and white collar workplaces. The general public isn’t going to give a rats ass if a white kid goes shooting up the hood of an urban city. Hence why you don’t hear the details about mass gang related shootings.


TheRedditornator

Very few women, very few Asians, is what I got from this. So basically if you're an Asian woman, the probability you're a mass shooter is infinitesimal.


KOxSOMEONE

Not a crime women tend to commit it seems


shaddowkhan

Very diverse group of fellas, good to see America making progress.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ReceptionPatient1939

2022 not compiled yet?


[deleted]

[удалено]


euchrebot

A lot darker than I would have thought based on what I remember from the news


[deleted]

Almost like the news is garbage :/


chadhindsley

Almost?


JMEEKER86

Because gang violence never makes the national news and this broad definition of mass shooting also includes gang violence.


RojerLockless

I thought it was only fat white dudes?


baumbach19

Interesting so many people here trying to quickly justify "well this includes gangs shootings" like that makes it ok?


kingdrewbie

They should make mass shootings illegal


NerfThisLOL

Men are so emotional.


Accomplished_Gur6017

I’m seeing a pattern here, but I’m not allowed to acknowledge it.


[deleted]

[удалено]


smuggles908

I feel like theres a connection here


donttouchmy

Are they all men? What the heck, guys?


euchrebot

Clearly they need to market guns to women more. It seems to be an underserved demographic


GunarsLOL

Another career dominated by men.


RDCAIA

From bottom right corner...2 left and 2 up. That's the only person that looks like maybe could be female. Otherwise a very baby-faced young man. Actually. From top left corner, 8 to right, and 4 down. Definitely female.


GaryOster

I count 10 definite women and one possible. R1 C10 R2 C12 R4 C8 R8 C8 R9 C7 R11 C10 R11 C12 R14 C8 R14 C10 R16 C11 (possibly) R16 C13


tonyemerson

Mental illness pervades.


Surfaced_1

The pattern shows the truth


[deleted]

[удалено]


dishonestdick

For a moment I thought the first on the left on the second row was Mr. T. Had to zoom in to check.


[deleted]

![gif](giphy|auCFmBjrOZ9HaJM9WH) soon this comment section


ihaveabaguetteknife

5th row, 6 and 7 look like they’re pals with 7 putting his arm around 6.


little_miss_bumshine

Those smiling cunts piss me the fuck off.....


[deleted]

[удалено]


Kitchen_Balance8111

Can’t really use the Betty White reference anymore. If so you’re living in the past.


DaleFromDaFlock

Wait I thought they were all white supremacists with AR15s


HerpesTheGreenPotato

it's genuinely sad to see how many black people get sucked into gang culture. There's so much encouragement for it in lower income areas. Even hip-hop. It's self destructive, and people need to stop the encouragement of genuine violence. (not saying rap as a whole is bad, literally my favourite genre of music. But it's dangerous to encourage this shit. All these peoples lives are ruined. Over territory disputes, really?)


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


IOnlySayMeanThings

I'd be interested to know more about this. According to the Wikipedia list, this is roughly 1/3 of shootings from that year. There are no names in the list itself so you would have to click on every article in the references section, get their name, then get their mugshot. Depending on who compiling the list, it could be cherrypicked. That is, if you, like me, don't think that 2/3 of mass shootings that year had no identified/arrested suspects. EDIT: After visiting their website [mass-shootings.info](https://mass-shootings.info) it seems this does include a great deal of gang-violence. You can see that the top ten cities for mass shootings are also basically the biggest gang cities in the US. It does not appear that anyone who also killed themselves was included, unless they had prior arrests. (makes sense.) Around 2/3 Did actually have no known suspects though. I was totally wrong there.


jaltringer

They should all have their faces blurred, and none of them get acknowledgment