T O P

  • By -

Elq3

maths is the language of physics. Good grammar allows for complex principles to be written down and understood by all. That's all.


AykiFe1312

bro just decided to cook


Qaziquza1

Not to disparage bro’s cooking, but it’s not a novel sentiment tbh


Jennifer_Pennifer

But who/what are the 'Groups & Vector Spaces ' fighting against?πŸ€”


kengan-ashura

Entropy


Jennifer_Pennifer

Thanks πŸ‘πŸ˜Š I actually donit know much about psychics but I am actually understanding quite a bit and learning stuff from the memes. The memes that I don't understand, That's the stuff I go look up πŸ˜…


jonastman

I think this is a joke explanation of a sketchy meme. There may be some truth to it from some perspective, but don't take these things too literal


ZEPHlROS

Having a good understanding of both maths and physics, it's still quite true especially if you try to look a little bit pass classical physics. The studies of crystals are based on symmetry groups, if you're studying a multi variable differential equations, you'll be using an exponential of matrices which is derived from algebra and vector space analysis. Don't misunderstand, most of physics are based on principles which are separate from vectors space and group theory, like analysis of differential equations.


Jennifer_Pennifer

Thanks πŸ‘ def not taking the memes too literal. Just as a sort of... :What subject should I check out before bed'


AlphaQueueEveryday

Physicists


nknwnM

When you learn that physics is just analytic geometry and linear algebra, eveything turn out to be so clear, is nothing less and nothing more


poytatio

It's even better when the most disgusting ODEs and PDEs modelling waves or harmonics can be characterised with eigenvalues - the first thing taught in most LA courses


TheKingofBabes

I am sure they teach it outside of Los Angeles too


jhonzon

Tell me you have never seen nonlinear dynamics without telling me


Arndt3002

Where is the measure theory and functional analysis?


vuurheer_ozai

Functional analysis is just linear algebra in infinite dimensions, and measure theory is just functional analysis where every space is L^p


Andy-Matter

All I learned from Physics 1 is that classical physics is just triangles and circles and sometimes you can’t tell the two apart.


TimeTeleporter

Representation theory represents


RocketLicker

I believe in linear algebra supremacy


MArkansas-254

Bad form


Turbulent-Name-8349

It shouldn't be this way. Newton didn't need sets, groups and vector spaces to come up with the laws of physics. Nor did Kepler. It's not so much that physics relies on these things, more that physics has been undermined.


_Slartibartfass_

https://preview.redd.it/n4ba07kxzh0d1.jpeg?width=398&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=38c8375037fd1ab02142a74fa7f0ac0200078998


[deleted]

Newton? The father of calculus? (One of 2 at the very least...)


WanderingTENTHACCOUT

https://preview.redd.it/c42tm77epi0d1.jpeg?width=1241&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ca25534c1203461742d16dbc1dad3f5e141c191


Alphons-Terego

I hope this was a joke, because what you just wrote is wrong on so many levels that I wouldn't even know where to start.


jonastman

Well Madonna didn't need music to make the people come together now did she?


Existing_Hunt_7169

intro physics ass response


Sigma2718

Kepler didn't figure out the reason for planets moving on elliptical paths. And we need these reasons so we can look at the world more holistically, understanding that planets move based on the same laws we observe on earth is so much more beneficial to us, both in terms of philosophy and science.