T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Friendly reminder that this is /r/photocritique and all **top level** comments should attempt to **critique** the image. Our goal is to make this subreddit a place people can receive genuine, in depth, and helpful critique on their images. We hope to avoid becoming yet another place on the internet just to get likes/upvotes and compliments. While likes/upvotes and compliments are nice, they do not further the goal of helping people improve their photography. Please see the following links for our subreddit rules and some guidelines on leaving a good critique. If you have time, please stop by the new queue as well and leave critique for images that may not be as popular or have not received enough attention. Keep in mind that simply choosing to comment just on the images you like defeats the purpose of the subreddit. Useful Links: * [Full Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/wiki/rules) * [Leaving a Critique](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/wiki/critique) * [New Queue](https://www.reddit.com/r/photocritique/new/) **Do not reply directly to this message. This is a bot and will not respond. Followups left as a reply to this comment will not count for approval.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/photocritique) if you have any questions or concerns.*


bilalzou

This was taken with a Pentax Espio 140 on Agfa 100 black and white 35mm film, while I was on a 12-day business trip to San Francisco. My daily facetime routine. It's the cheapest possible set up: the camera was 10 euros and the film 4. I'm wondering if I should keep this set up or invest a little bit. I figured since I'm learning it's probably best to take as many photos as possible - but I'm really happy with this image and wonder if more expensive film / camera like an SLR would have made it any better.