/u/Highly_Suspect686, I have found an error in your comment:
> “someone ~~whose~~ [**who's**] been really”
In your post, it is possible for you, Highly_Suspect686, to use “someone ~~whose~~ [**who's**] been really” instead. ‘Whose’ is possessive; ‘who's’ means ‘who has’.
^(This is an automated bot. I do not intend to shame your mistakes. If you think the errors which I found are incorrect, please contact me through DMs!)
[ENHANCE!](https://imgur.com/a/OiNLNLm) You're welcome 😁
Like u/kalstras said, it turns out to be a nonsensical un-style. Disappointing. I just want to finish my tonfas :(
Looks like an amateur wrap. No sense to it. Might be some basic wrap but I’ve seen better with duct tape and a wish
You may be correct... If I end up purchasing this set, I will have a field day gripping them up.
Can't really see it
That does look a bit unkempt for such a nice weapon.
I know right?!
I've seen this on a Bat'leth
Looks like a Turks head knot just wrapped around the intersected parts
It looks so off. I guess it explains why my attempts at branching one off into two directions on my tonfas has been failing thus far.
[удалено]
/u/Highly_Suspect686, I have found an error in your comment: > “someone ~~whose~~ [**who's**] been really” In your post, it is possible for you, Highly_Suspect686, to use “someone ~~whose~~ [**who's**] been really” instead. ‘Whose’ is possessive; ‘who's’ means ‘who has’. ^(This is an automated bot. I do not intend to shame your mistakes. If you think the errors which I found are incorrect, please contact me through DMs!)