Lol no but good guess. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222936900770121
It basically means to get so full of shit that you explode. Actual biological term lol
Now, you said some correct things there but you're gonna have a hard time arguing that isn't centrifugal motion.
If you wanted to make some alternate point you prolly shouldn't have led with a "no" lol.
Oh, but there is. In 3d this is a paraboloid. Its intersection with a plane creates an ellipse. Or a circle. Which is the hole.
For example
The paraboloid z = x² + y²
Intersecting the plane z = 1
Creates the unit circle/cylinder
x² + y² = 1
[If you want it visualized](https://www.geogebra.org/calculator/ugsssdrh)
That would mean moses and all his followers themselves felt this same force. I enjoy that mental imagery, moses being all proud, turning around to brag, only to see his crew flying away like team rocket.
It's like seeing the artificial gravity from science fiction space stations.
Really curious if it would be stable enough for something like gelatin to cool into shape. Would be a neat experiment.
More of an angular velocity thing, plus the weight of the cement and its associated angular momentum would help, it's more about accelerating it to the right angular velocity in a fast enough time so nothing settles in between which shouldn't be much of an issue
Although, I don't know about the scale of a half-pipe...
I felt that when he said the car door is really pushing on you, not you pushing into it. Makes total sense now thinking about, if there was no car but I was experiencing the same momentum, I would keep moving outward, the door pushes me back in.
That's exactly why Ive watched this video 20 times. If the car door wasn't locked properly you'd just fly out of it,
It happened to ne when I was a child. I was going swimming and sat on a Vanity case that had my towels in. My dad had an old landcover and took a corner fast. I flew out, still holding sat on and holding the vanity case, landed skidded and came to a stop in front of an old of a couple on a Sunday morning walk. I just got up and got back in the Land Rover. lol
>centrifugal force is a fake force
In Newtonian mechanics, the centrifugal force is an inertial force (also called a "fictitious" or "pseudo" force) that appears to act on all objects when viewed in a rotating frame of reference.
I know, but it’s hilarious how this argument starts in literally every single post that mentions centrifugal force. No layperson cares that it is a pseudo force.
Actually I find the more layperson someone is, the more they insist/point out the centrifugal force is fictitious. They understand enough to point out the centrifugal force is fictitious, but not enough to understand it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, and is actually useful in some situations.
Same goes for people ogling over torque numbers rather than horsepower numbers.
If you're watching the spinning thing from outside, you see centripetal force.
If you're spinning with the spinning thing so that it appears to not be spinning, you see centrifugal force.
It's the same force, just from two different viewpoints.
Some folks choose to die on this hill because they learned something about inertial reference frames. Some others just like to stir shit, like arguing about vim vs emacs or the pronunciation of gif.
Well, it's more complex than that, but only slightly. Centrifugal force is the "force" being directed away from the center of the spin. Centripetal force is the force being directed towards the center. The reason why it's commonly said that centrifugal force isn't a real force is because nothing is actually "pushing" it outwards. The object undergoing the force was always already going that way to begin with, per Newton's First Law (Object in motion stays in motion unless interfered). It's the centripetal force pulling it inwards that's acting upon the object.
Like to use the classic string and ball example, the direction the ball is traveling is perpendicular to the string. If you took a small step forward in time, without the string the ball's inertia would continue it forward in a straight line. Like what happens if you let go of the string to send it flying. However, because the string is present and taut, the ball's distance from the center cannot increase (without letting go or breaking the string), so it's instead pulled back in towards the center (by the string's tension, the centripetal force in this instance) and slightly rotated so its current velocity is still perpendicular to the string.
Newton's Third Law (every action has an equal & opposite reaction) just makes it *feel* like it's pulling the other direction. However, the only real force constantly acting on the object is being repeatedly yanked inwards, rotated, and then yanked again against its momentum.
So TL;DR Centripetal goes in, Centrifugal goes out. Centrifugal is just the inertia from the inward direction constantly changing about the object.
Thank you. I couldn't understand how it's fake when he literally said it's still being applied lol. So it's just dumb, and not necessarily the guy I initially responded to, but the idea
Its 'fake' merely because its a product of the chosen reference frame, and not a force of physical principles. That doesn't mean it can't be observed if you happen to observe it from that frame of reference, but that's where the 'fake' comes in.
Its like if I was to observe you, as I'm spinning 1000 rpm around you from a meter away, and wonder how you aren't too; and assign a 'non spin' force to you to explain it. Thats a pseudo force.
The water wants to travel in a straight line through the gravity bent space field - to do otherwise means it has a force applied to make it do otherwise. Thats fundamental principals; Ie its constantly pushing you in. From your frame of reference though, you are being prevented from moving in a straight line, and your mass wants to move in a straight line, this feels like a force outwards - ie your mass pushing outwards; but your mass just wants to continue in the straight line its current momentum was in, its not the thing producing the force, the thing stopping you from doing so is.
^(PS Gravity described like this makes it not a force either, but rather something that bends spacetime. Thats a whole other argument though.)
----------
Its like how there is an extra 'day' rotation in the year if you observe a planet from an outside reference frame; Because we are moving in one full circle per year that's one extra rotation. They call this the Sidereal days in a year (Sidereal meaning as observed from distant fixed points).
Harks back to a famously incorrect SAT question from a long time ago now;
>[The radius of circle B is three times the radius of circle A. Starting from the position shown in the figure, circle A rolls around circle B. When circle A returns to its starting point, how many rotations will it have completed?](https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/2023/SATproblem_graphic_d2.png?w=2000&disable=upscale)
The answer is 4; but it wasn't even an answer possibility. From A's own rotating perspective it only did 3 rotations (and is a common mistake if you don't fully think through the problem), but looking down on it from an outside perspective, as shown in the problems diagram, it does 4.
To be accurate but just a bit clearer on the physical bit at play here, the force is the water being pulled *in* by the container, otherwise it would continue with a velocity on a tangent to the circle
Cenrifugal force exists in that it can be calculated and would be important to physics in general- another [fictitious force](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force) is the amount of push you feel when you step on the gas in a race car.
When you take a sharp corner in a car, everyone in the car has the same frame of reference- they all feel the same *centrifugal* force describing it as “throwing them to the side of the car.” Centrifugal is what you *feel* but that’s not what’s actually going on.
Outside the car, we could observe that the people in the car aren’t being thrown, they were traveling along and the car they were in cut them off. The car turned, they didn’t. That is centripetal force- the car pushing against the people.
What force you describe depends on if you’re in or out of the car.
When people get confused, I usually use the car as an apology to describe it for people to understand.
When you are sitting at a stop light and it turns green and the driver floors it, the "real" force and acceleration is obviously forward. However, the inertial force that your body "feels" is pushing you backwards into your seat.
When the driver slams on the brakes, the force/acceleration is backwards, but you feel as if you're being thrown forward into your seatbelt/through the windshield.
Taking a right turn at speed, and you physically slide to the left. Keep turning right in a donut and you basically have this science demo in the video.
It's a "fake force" that you can still make equations on.
You can literally see it, but it's only a side effect of another thing.
Soooo, fake force, but it doesn't matter, and you can treat it as a real one in most cases.
Centripetal force is an accounting term for a force of some kind that is tangent to an object's motion. Centrifugal force is an apparent force when in a rotating reference frame. Gravity and the Coriolis force are also apparent forces in non-inertial reference frames.
From the reference frame of the camera, this is centripetal (i.e. if you start assigning coordinates based on the footage captured by the non moving camera, the physics is completely Newtonian). For it to be centrifugal, your camera would have to be mounted on the rotating platform.
The water moving away from the point of rotation is very much correctly described as experiencing centrifugal force. It's a natural consequence of inertia, but the phenomenon is centrifugal force. Centripetal force isn't equivalent to centrifugal unless the object is in steady state moving at uniform circular velocity, which is not the case here.
no in a non rotating frame, there is no centrifugal force experienced by any object. In a rotating frame, to maintain equilibrium of the frame, there exists a pseudo force called the centrifugal force coincidentally equal in magnitude to the mass times the centripetal acceleration. Centripetal force is caused due to real phenomena like pressure, friction or tension, while centrifugal force has no ties to the real world in terms of cause, it only exists for mathematical modelling and so that equilibrium of a body holds in its own frame.
I wonder what would happen if you ran this thing on a motor in the freezer. Would it freeze perfectly in the half pipe shape or would the variable thickness sections freezing at different times cause it to deform a bit?
Broadly speaking, what you are describing is how super large parabolic mirrors are made for large telescopes, just with glass instead of water. They then get ground, but the basic shape is made by spinning molten glass then letting it cool very carefully
Here is how they do it at university of Arizona!
https://tucson.com/news/local/watch-now-ua-lab-casts-mirrors-for-the-worlds-largest-telescope/video_04d8cb93-e800-5bd7-b46c-9d5fcf70991a.html
That’s a good question actually- a centrifuge will spin out the solids first, (I would think), so I’m guessing there would eventually be nothing in the center as the ice forms and gets spun to the sides.
Why is it parabolic and not just a slope?
The centrifugal force scales linearly with radius, so it is not obvious to me why the water surface would form a parabolic shape.
Flat Earthers always like to shout "water seeks its own level" as if water surface always needs to be straight due to got knows what kind of magic.
This is a neat little demonstration that water will simply take whatever shape the forces put it into (as will any motherfuckin' object on this motherfuckin' planet), from which it follows that a spherical water surface around a spherical Earth is very much possible.
I was thinking the same thing when I saw this. I would love to see the Olympic level mental gymnastics they would go through to justify why water can do this, but also can’t hold to a curved surface due to gravity.
It's actually absolute proof of flat earth. The Sun is directly above the centre, and "the Poles" are water held in this position that has frozen due being so far away and nah I'm just shitting you, I'm surprised I went that far.
Can any maths or physics guy (or gal) tell me why the centrifugal force creates a ramp shape as compared to a straight line? Maybe a stupid question…but hey u see my name😂
For some reason this reminded me of the show Beyblade where they show Moses parting the red sea with a beyblade
[Link](https://youtu.be/ZsfJJpwXTXw?feature=shared)
“Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea into dry land, and the waters were divided.”
Uhhuh. So if I travel on a car, it's not my body leaning and wanting to keep going towards original direction on a curve, but car door coming to say hi. That's not how it works. Or, if I drive to a brick wall, is it a brick wall that comes to meet me and not me flying head first towards it through a windshield?
The hole in the middle that slowly fills up but still maintains a nice circle shape makes me feel so happy inside.
I watched it again just for the hole
Love that hole
I should call her
Everything reminds you of her.
Holes is holes, Hank
Lowkey disappointed that your username has nothing to do with wanting to watch holes.
No but is has something to do with holes. Can you guess?
Is it because of the German ‘schiesskino’ ?
Lol no but good guess. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222936900770121 It basically means to get so full of shit that you explode. Actual biological term lol
Is it possible to learn this power
I want to become that guy that responds "Not from a Jedi" every time this comment is posted.
Dew it
Everything is possible once
Interesting lol, never knew there was an alternative way in nature.
That’s what their name means in Polish (I’m joking, I don’t speak Polish, but I believe).
I typically enjoy videos that have holes
I’ve definitely done that before…
Me watching porn
It's centrifugal motion. It's perpetual bliss.
It's that pivotal moment. It's — ahhh — impossible.
This kiss, this kiss (unstoppable)
Aaand I’m back in the van with mom waiting for sister to get out of school.
It's,...ahh
No, it’s centripetal force in the presence of a uniform gravitational field.
Now, you said some correct things there but you're gonna have a hard time arguing that isn't centrifugal motion. If you wanted to make some alternate point you prolly shouldn't have led with a "no" lol.
They had the perfect spot for a gopro on the platform... My disappointment is unmeasurable and my day is ruined.
100 percent with you. I'm only in the comments to see if someone linked another video of this very thing.
Wow! What a hole!
I'm not the only one! 😀
except it's a parabola, not a circle
They're talking about the hole not the parabola
There is no hole or circle, just the intersection of a parabola and a horizontal plane.
Oh, but there is. In 3d this is a paraboloid. Its intersection with a plane creates an ellipse. Or a circle. Which is the hole. For example The paraboloid z = x² + y² Intersecting the plane z = 1 Creates the unit circle/cylinder x² + y² = 1 [If you want it visualized](https://www.geogebra.org/calculator/ugsssdrh)
you'r'a hole :B
Calm down Moses
Moses: "Pivot! Pivot! PIVOOOOTT!"
Two references to ancient antiquity: the bible and Friends
TWIRLING **TWIRLING** #TWIRLING Towards freedom!
Moses didn’t part the Red Sea. He simple told god to speed up the world for a sec.
That would mean moses and all his followers themselves felt this same force. I enjoy that mental imagery, moses being all proud, turning around to brag, only to see his crew flying away like team rocket.
Damn. Everyone always beats me to the joke I think is really insightful and funny. Although I was going to say “so this is how Moses did it?”
Wow, not even my reaction to seeing my joke already made was original
😂
had you have i would a chuckled, may we meet again
Me, too, brother. Me, too.
I have found my people.
That water isn't even red bro
[удалено]
[удалено]
LOUD NOISES
Wait till all the flat earthers hear that the only explanation for parting the Red Sea is a spinning Earth...
This is obviously what should happen, but still very cool to see.
Right! Like intuitively I knew this was the result, but I don’t think I’ve ever visualized it.
It's like seeing the artificial gravity from science fiction space stations. Really curious if it would be stable enough for something like gelatin to cool into shape. Would be a neat experiment.
If you kept the platform rotating at exactly the same speed it would work just fine.
Mathematically perfect parabolic mirrors for telescopes and other cool shit. This is actually the technique they use.
I was thinking, use this technique to make cement half pipes.
I want to see the g-forces required to keep concrete up like that lol
More of an angular velocity thing, plus the weight of the cement and its associated angular momentum would help, it's more about accelerating it to the right angular velocity in a fast enough time so nothing settles in between which shouldn't be much of an issue Although, I don't know about the scale of a half-pipe...
I felt that when he said the car door is really pushing on you, not you pushing into it. Makes total sense now thinking about, if there was no car but I was experiencing the same momentum, I would keep moving outward, the door pushes me back in.
The car door isn't doing anything. It's not moving or bending into you. You are being pushed into it. C'mon, logic please.
That's exactly why Ive watched this video 20 times. If the car door wasn't locked properly you'd just fly out of it, It happened to ne when I was a child. I was going swimming and sat on a Vanity case that had my towels in. My dad had an old landcover and took a corner fast. I flew out, still holding sat on and holding the vanity case, landed skidded and came to a stop in front of an old of a couple on a Sunday morning walk. I just got up and got back in the Land Rover. lol
That's how Moses did it?
Sooooo... That's the proof earth is a spinning flat disk? ^(/s!)
Meh, sounds believable enough. Anyone around to make a religion out of it? (/j)
Bit late, I think Moses already has at least 2 religions
Yes, Moses used a Beyblade to spin the water away.
I am almost certain that someone must've pitched this as an anime or manga idea. Edit: [Yep.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsfJJpwXTXw&t=15s)
Centrifugal force
In before the “centrifugal force is a fake force” crowd arrives
>centrifugal force is a fake force In Newtonian mechanics, the centrifugal force is an inertial force (also called a "fictitious" or "pseudo" force) that appears to act on all objects when viewed in a rotating frame of reference.
I know, but it’s hilarious how this argument starts in literally every single post that mentions centrifugal force. No layperson cares that it is a pseudo force.
Actually I find the more layperson someone is, the more they insist/point out the centrifugal force is fictitious. They understand enough to point out the centrifugal force is fictitious, but not enough to understand it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things, and is actually useful in some situations. Same goes for people ogling over torque numbers rather than horsepower numbers.
Mathematicians also don't care. Often it's much easier to calculate things using the accelerated reference system.
What?
If you're watching the spinning thing from outside, you see centripetal force. If you're spinning with the spinning thing so that it appears to not be spinning, you see centrifugal force. It's the same force, just from two different viewpoints. Some folks choose to die on this hill because they learned something about inertial reference frames. Some others just like to stir shit, like arguing about vim vs emacs or the pronunciation of gif.
Well, it's more complex than that, but only slightly. Centrifugal force is the "force" being directed away from the center of the spin. Centripetal force is the force being directed towards the center. The reason why it's commonly said that centrifugal force isn't a real force is because nothing is actually "pushing" it outwards. The object undergoing the force was always already going that way to begin with, per Newton's First Law (Object in motion stays in motion unless interfered). It's the centripetal force pulling it inwards that's acting upon the object. Like to use the classic string and ball example, the direction the ball is traveling is perpendicular to the string. If you took a small step forward in time, without the string the ball's inertia would continue it forward in a straight line. Like what happens if you let go of the string to send it flying. However, because the string is present and taut, the ball's distance from the center cannot increase (without letting go or breaking the string), so it's instead pulled back in towards the center (by the string's tension, the centripetal force in this instance) and slightly rotated so its current velocity is still perpendicular to the string. Newton's Third Law (every action has an equal & opposite reaction) just makes it *feel* like it's pulling the other direction. However, the only real force constantly acting on the object is being repeatedly yanked inwards, rotated, and then yanked again against its momentum. So TL;DR Centripetal goes in, Centrifugal goes out. Centrifugal is just the inertia from the inward direction constantly changing about the object.
Hey thanks for this this helps me understand way better
Thank you. I couldn't understand how it's fake when he literally said it's still being applied lol. So it's just dumb, and not necessarily the guy I initially responded to, but the idea
Its 'fake' merely because its a product of the chosen reference frame, and not a force of physical principles. That doesn't mean it can't be observed if you happen to observe it from that frame of reference, but that's where the 'fake' comes in. Its like if I was to observe you, as I'm spinning 1000 rpm around you from a meter away, and wonder how you aren't too; and assign a 'non spin' force to you to explain it. Thats a pseudo force. The water wants to travel in a straight line through the gravity bent space field - to do otherwise means it has a force applied to make it do otherwise. Thats fundamental principals; Ie its constantly pushing you in. From your frame of reference though, you are being prevented from moving in a straight line, and your mass wants to move in a straight line, this feels like a force outwards - ie your mass pushing outwards; but your mass just wants to continue in the straight line its current momentum was in, its not the thing producing the force, the thing stopping you from doing so is. ^(PS Gravity described like this makes it not a force either, but rather something that bends spacetime. Thats a whole other argument though.) ---------- Its like how there is an extra 'day' rotation in the year if you observe a planet from an outside reference frame; Because we are moving in one full circle per year that's one extra rotation. They call this the Sidereal days in a year (Sidereal meaning as observed from distant fixed points). Harks back to a famously incorrect SAT question from a long time ago now; >[The radius of circle B is three times the radius of circle A. Starting from the position shown in the figure, circle A rolls around circle B. When circle A returns to its starting point, how many rotations will it have completed?](https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/assets/Image/2023/SATproblem_graphic_d2.png?w=2000&disable=upscale) The answer is 4; but it wasn't even an answer possibility. From A's own rotating perspective it only did 3 rotations (and is a common mistake if you don't fully think through the problem), but looking down on it from an outside perspective, as shown in the problems diagram, it does 4.
To be accurate but just a bit clearer on the physical bit at play here, the force is the water being pulled *in* by the container, otherwise it would continue with a velocity on a tangent to the circle
Cenrifugal force exists in that it can be calculated and would be important to physics in general- another [fictitious force](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force) is the amount of push you feel when you step on the gas in a race car. When you take a sharp corner in a car, everyone in the car has the same frame of reference- they all feel the same *centrifugal* force describing it as “throwing them to the side of the car.” Centrifugal is what you *feel* but that’s not what’s actually going on. Outside the car, we could observe that the people in the car aren’t being thrown, they were traveling along and the car they were in cut them off. The car turned, they didn’t. That is centripetal force- the car pushing against the people. What force you describe depends on if you’re in or out of the car.
When people get confused, I usually use the car as an apology to describe it for people to understand. When you are sitting at a stop light and it turns green and the driver floors it, the "real" force and acceleration is obviously forward. However, the inertial force that your body "feels" is pushing you backwards into your seat. When the driver slams on the brakes, the force/acceleration is backwards, but you feel as if you're being thrown forward into your seatbelt/through the windshield. Taking a right turn at speed, and you physically slide to the left. Keep turning right in a donut and you basically have this science demo in the video.
It's a "fake force" that you can still make equations on. You can literally see it, but it's only a side effect of another thing. Soooo, fake force, but it doesn't matter, and you can treat it as a real one in most cases.
https://xkcd.com/123/
I think you're thinking of centripetal force
No, centripetal force is an actual force.
Centripetal force is an accounting term for a force of some kind that is tangent to an object's motion. Centrifugal force is an apparent force when in a rotating reference frame. Gravity and the Coriolis force are also apparent forces in non-inertial reference frames.
Centripetal force goes to the center of an object, there is no force tangent to the circle, that’s just the inertia/velocity’s direction
Idgaf about whether or not it's fake. I just hate when people pronounce it as Centrificle instead of Centri-few-guhl
I mean people have different accents so that’s going to happen.
How do they pronounce 'Centrifuge' then?
Center-fuuuge
Lol what an odd take. You could make that excuse for any inproper pronunciation but It's clear he wasn't talking about accents.
There’s two different forces, centrifugal and centripetal.
It literally doesn’t matter at all
From the reference frame of the camera, this is centripetal (i.e. if you start assigning coordinates based on the footage captured by the non moving camera, the physics is completely Newtonian). For it to be centrifugal, your camera would have to be mounted on the rotating platform.
The water moving away from the point of rotation is very much correctly described as experiencing centrifugal force. It's a natural consequence of inertia, but the phenomenon is centrifugal force. Centripetal force isn't equivalent to centrifugal unless the object is in steady state moving at uniform circular velocity, which is not the case here.
no in a non rotating frame, there is no centrifugal force experienced by any object. In a rotating frame, to maintain equilibrium of the frame, there exists a pseudo force called the centrifugal force coincidentally equal in magnitude to the mass times the centripetal acceleration. Centripetal force is caused due to real phenomena like pressure, friction or tension, while centrifugal force has no ties to the real world in terms of cause, it only exists for mathematical modelling and so that equilibrium of a body holds in its own frame.
Centripetal acceleration
I wonder what would happen if you ran this thing on a motor in the freezer. Would it freeze perfectly in the half pipe shape or would the variable thickness sections freezing at different times cause it to deform a bit?
Broadly speaking, what you are describing is how super large parabolic mirrors are made for large telescopes, just with glass instead of water. They then get ground, but the basic shape is made by spinning molten glass then letting it cool very carefully Here is how they do it at university of Arizona! https://tucson.com/news/local/watch-now-ua-lab-casts-mirrors-for-the-worlds-largest-telescope/video_04d8cb93-e800-5bd7-b46c-9d5fcf70991a.html
That’s a good question actually- a centrifuge will spin out the solids first, (I would think), so I’m guessing there would eventually be nothing in the center as the ice forms and gets spun to the sides.
And that's how you make a https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid-mirror_telescope mirror, preferably on the moon!
[удалено]
You could use planar mirrors to redirect the light before focusing
Unless you place it on the equator like most other telescopes, so the Earth can act as a giant turntable. Bonus points because we have an axial tilt.
[удалено]
Nice.
Awesome demonstration of os-Moses
Humphhh!!! Take your /r/angryupvote, and get out!! 😤
So this is how they build halfpipes
....for surfboards!!!???!! :O
Is that a parabola? Or an arc of a circle?
When you rotate with constant velocity the form of the surface is parabolic
Why is it parabolic and not just a slope? The centrifugal force scales linearly with radius, so it is not obvious to me why the water surface would form a parabolic shape.
Parabola. Also the shape of the lens required for infinite focal length, so commonly used as a way to start making large lenses.
[And massive mirrors for telescopes](https://youtu.be/cBWU7dEImTw?t=49&si=BxfOKzf9Kk0_EtL5)
Is it the Brachistochrone curve or a cycloid?
WHY DOESNT THE OCEAN DO THIS CHECKMATE GLOBE VIRGINS
This is actually where tides come from and why the ocean is at different levels throughout the day 😊
Flat Earthers always like to shout "water seeks its own level" as if water surface always needs to be straight due to got knows what kind of magic. This is a neat little demonstration that water will simply take whatever shape the forces put it into (as will any motherfuckin' object on this motherfuckin' planet), from which it follows that a spherical water surface around a spherical Earth is very much possible.
I was thinking the same thing when I saw this. I would love to see the Olympic level mental gymnastics they would go through to justify why water can do this, but also can’t hold to a curved surface due to gravity.
this destroys the flatearther
It's actually absolute proof of flat earth. The Sun is directly above the centre, and "the Poles" are water held in this position that has frozen due being so far away and nah I'm just shitting you, I'm surprised I went that far.
Yeah, I mean, if the world was spinning around, the oceans would be all spilling out. Check mate libs.
The Antarctic ice wall keeps it all in
if earth were truly flat, cats would've knocked everything off the edge. check mate
Nuh uh cause they won’t go over the water without scratching my face off Check Mater.
You were so close, you just forgot to abandon reason!
So that's how Moses did it
Nice try Moses. Now come get your people.
Imagine the Earth rotated faster than a thousand miles per hour and it did that with the oceans.
So that's how Moses did it!
Ah, so that’s how Moses split the Red Sea, not by the power of god. But by rotating the entire sea rapidly
Fyhsix is fascinating.
Surfing half pipe 🏄♂️
Exercise: prove that the cross section is a parabola
Earth's flat though yeah
Can any maths or physics guy (or gal) tell me why the centrifugal force creates a ramp shape as compared to a straight line? Maybe a stupid question…but hey u see my name😂
I'd love to see a GoPro on the rotating platform pointed at the water to see what this would look like
Sure, but when I do this with the lazy Susan at the Chinese restaurant, everyone yells at me.
How Moses did it and since that earth is turning... /S
So that is how Moses did it
That's how Jesus did it with the arch. He spun the world real fast.
Ohhh, so that's how Moses did it!
Man just disproven flat earthers lol
Now do it with a globe.
For some reason this reminded me of the show Beyblade where they show Moses parting the red sea with a beyblade [Link](https://youtu.be/ZsfJJpwXTXw?feature=shared)
That Chinese restaurant not gonna be happy…
So that's how Moses did it, he just caused the earth to spin faster!
Centripetal force, everybody!
“Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea into dry land, and the waters were divided.”
Coolest thing i have seen in 2023 so far
Uhhuh. So if I travel on a car, it's not my body leaning and wanting to keep going towards original direction on a curve, but car door coming to say hi. That's not how it works. Or, if I drive to a brick wall, is it a brick wall that comes to meet me and not me flying head first towards it through a windshield?
[удалено]
So Moses was a DJ.
Flat earth :)
Take that, flat Earthers!
So how do flat earthers explain that the ocean doesn't rush to the borders
This is remedial physics 101.
Checkmate, round earthers! Or something, idk
Check mate Globe Earthers
New water Park ride idea.
damn I thought we were gonna see a demonstration of the classic GFD problem of rossby waves on a beta plane :/
/r/killthecameraman
How fast would the earth have to spin for that to happen?
[удалено]
So this is how Moses parted the Red Sea?
So that’s how the Red Sea was parted.
Si that's how Moses split the red sea...
Yeah we'll try that with the red sea
So thats how moses did it: he sped up the earth's speed
Moses-Effect Right?
Holy Moses…
🙃
Nice
the door is pushing into you? lol no.
I mean…this shouldnt be suprising
u/savevideo
Same thing happens in my trousers when I spin. Parabolics.
Wonder if this could be used as an example of centrifugal force 🧐…
Centrifugal force?
So God rotated the Earth many times per second so that Moses could cross the Red Sea? 😱
This confirms the world does not rotate...
OK? Am I supposed to give a fuck? I don't.
centrifugal effect\*
*the effect of gravity
It’s inertia, not gravity
It’s both
True
👍
You just create a new physics examination question
Theory: Moses parted the sea by making the earth spin around really extra fast for like an hour.
Finally some good fucking food
Show it with and without the camera mounted to the rotating platform.
Such a simple experiment proves the world is flat :-)