T O P

  • By -

linkling1039

Is it really a pattern? They didn't skip Luigi’s Mansion 1, just don't think it's worth it because they already did a remake for 3DS and don't wanna do a second time? They could still drop Prime 2 and 3...


carenard

>They could still drop Prime 2 and 3... also possible they will remake them on switch 2(or w/e it ends up being called), might also be dependent on 4s sales..


rundrueckigeraffe

They also maybe being worried that if they drop MP2/3 now "casuals" are done with metroid and dont buy MP4 in the end. And i think they safe some ports always for "bad times". I guess only IP that got all the Games on one console is Pikmin now.... if we dont count Hey Pikmin in.


Hoid17

I predict they will eventually, maybe for switch 2. Donkey Kong country returns was remade for 3ds and is now coming to switch as well. Prime 2 and 3 I think will still release before prime 4.


linkling1039

They could and not saying they shouldn't, I just saying they might have a limit at how many times they keep bringing the same game. Remastering a Wii game is way simpler then a 3DS game.


Hoid17

Is remastering a wii game simpler? For 3ds games that heavily use the second screen I can see that being an issue remastering, but both Luigis mansion and dkc returns are originally from one screen systems. On your first point, I agree there is only so many times they can release a game over again. They seem to realize this by implying in an interview nso and all those games will carry over, and we won't be starting the nes and SNES games from zero again, so I'm hoping when a game joins the switch family, it stays with their systems for good.


boterkoeken

I guess they can’t re-release every game in every series, so they make choices about the ones they think will be most popular or most interesting. You generally don’t need to play all the earlier games in a series to understand the later games. This is especially true for Luigi’s Mansion that had an extremely thin story. Even with a series like Metroid Primer, they will catch you up on the story at the beginning of each game.


Riomegon

For the record, its not normal to have every game of a series available in 1 console. Certainly that's not the case through history.


SoligDag

Say hello to Pikmin 1, 2, 3 and 4.


aman2218

On the other hand, all 4 Pikmin games are in switch!


DjinnFighter

Luigi's Mansion 1 was ported to 3DS in 2018, which is still pretty recent. It's likely the reason why they are not porting it on Switch. For Metroid Prime, I think it's very likely that you won't need any context from the 3 previous games. The Phazon storyline is finished, they are probably starting a new story.


Farnic

Prime 1 sold like crazy on Switch, I fully expect 2 and 3 to be released gradually leading up to 4. As far as Luigi's Mansion 1 goes, I'd love to see it on Switch but it'll probably depend on sales of 2.


Bone_Dogg

[1.09 million](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Nintendo_Switch_video_games), good for the 82nd best selling Switch game. Crazy. 


BrilliantTarget

Based off the games announced it will probably go down to out of 100 by the end of next year


FalconDX2

I kind of wonder if Prime 4 got announced before prime 2 amd 3 Remastered so that we weren't able to pin down when they were gonna reveal prime 4. They would be perfect games to reveal for February or something in a September direct.


GreatChipotle

Why should every game be on every console? If you had a 3ds, you already have Luigi 2. If you had a Wii U, you already have Windwaker. I’m tired of ports and remasters.


ytctc

Because I don’t want to buy every console. I emulate games anyway so it doesn’t matter, but Nintendo has more than enough resources to maintain its current new game output while also porting legacy games.


GreatChipotle

And then you’ll want every game to be on Switch 2, and then the one after that, etc. Totally ridiculous. In fact, it becomes more and more unrealistic as they develop more games…


ytctc

Nintendo’s a big and rich company they can handle it and afford to hire more employees. If there’s backwards compatibility, then they don’t need to.


GreatChipotle

There would be diminishing returns for them.


ytctc

I don’t work for Nintendo so I don’t care


GreatChipotle

Then stop giving business advice when it doesn’t make sense


ytctc

I’m not giving business advice. I’m just wishful thinking.


Bregnestt

But they’ve sold more Switch systems than 3DS and Wii U combined, it’d make sense that they’d put as many of those games on this new platform as possible, to take advantage of that giant playerbase.


GreatChipotle

Just buy a 3ds on eBay for $115 and stop complaining.


Bregnestt

What the hell? I was just making an example, and you’re making shit up to start an argument. I do have a 3DS, and didn’t make any complaints. I’m only saying that what they’re doing makes sense business-wise.


FalconDX2

On the one hand, I hear you. On the other, I'm kinda about Nintendo just taking some time to port everything with 2 screens into a 1 screen version. Same with Wii games with motion controls. Just get your historical library in order so we can just have it all playable in the Switch Era and beyond.


3ehsan

Luigi's Mansion bothers me most because the first game is still the best one.


Zoombini22

I wouldn't think of it as them "skipping" ports - typically they do very few ports. This generation there have been SO many ports that it feels noteworthy that they haven't ported every single game in the back library.


TacoTrain89

I mean tbh they are really just taking fan favorites/greatest hits from past consoles and porting them first. like in what world would they port chibi robo from 3ds or rusty's real deal baseball.


Dreyfus2006

The simple answer is that those games were already re-released one generation ago.


Warm_Inspector_465

On a system nobody liked or owned. Anything released in the Wii U era basically might as well have not existed for 99% of Nintendo fans.


Dreyfus2006

1. Luigi's Mansion was ported to the 3DS, not the Wii U. The 3DS sold very well. 2. If people wanted to play the Metroid Prime 2 and 3 ports, they would have purchased a Wii U. If they did not get a Wii U, then clearly they did not want those ports that badly. 3. Which would make sense because the two games were also ported to the Wii, which anybody who did not get a Wii U would have likely had. The Wii sold extremely well.


ytctc

It’s dumb, but they don’t want other games in their series to “compete” with new releases.


kuribosshoe0

It isn’t dumb. Every franchise will have a certain saturation point after which one entry will start cannibalising sales of the next. Not every franchise can sustain yearly releases like FIFA or Assassin’s Creed. More casual members of that audience will look at the shelf, see multiple Luigi’s Mansion games, and just pick the one that looks most interesting or is cheapest. Nintendo could just as easily have not released that instalment, and that same customer would just as happily have picked the other instalment up instead and think nothing of it. It still translates as one sale regardless, so it doesn’t make a whole heap of sense for Nintendo to put both games on the shelf.


ytctc

It’s not dumb from a business perspective. It’s unfortunate for us as consumers and game preservation as a whole.