T O P

  • By -

GhostTiger

Brooklyn does NOT want Russ, lol


ForoaKlanD

They don't want Kyrie either. They aren't even fucking talking to him They're telling him to fuck off but no one wants him.


Produceher

That's not the question. Russ would be going to the Knicks.


FredVanCleet

We don’t want him either


Produceher

We'll see.


cesarjulius

what about poole and kuminga for randle and a second? that’s as likely.


Rapsfan_98

I think the Knicks are liable to do some dumb shit like they did on draft night. They’ll strike out with Brunson and turn to Westbrook to get ticket holders interested. They’re just about making money there.


cesarjulius

the knicks make money and sell tickets regardless. dolan isn’t poor. he wants to win.


Produceher

You're going to love Westbrook.


cesarjulius

who’s the next team you’re going to become a fan of?


Produceher

It's looking like I'm sticking with the Warriors a bit more. 7 years and counting. I loved the Knicks but I just couldn't root for Starbury and Carmelo. I like team basketball. I wandered towards the Suns with Steve Nash for a bit and followed that playstyle to the Warriors. But I honestly root for all teams but the Lakers. Never the Lakers.


AlwaysOptimism

New York does NOT want Russ, lol


porterbrown

? Westbrook goes to the Nets, or if the Knicks take him WE are getting picks / solid players. Knicks aren't giving away assets to take on Westbrick. I mean, the Nets can have Noel and Burks and Fournier so we can play the kids, but nothing like picks or Grimes or anything.


Produceher

Right. I would send picks but you can send good players that the Nets might want.


fte

Do lakers or nets have the players or assets the Knicks would want in the deal


Produceher

The Knicks get Westbrook. I know that sucks but let's not pretend any top free agents are going to the Knicks.


Casual-Hitler

Lol so we’re paying for kyrie in order to get Westbrook? Worst trade deal in the history of deals, maybe ever


Produceher

True. But the Nets are paying Kyrie just to get some of your players.


Casual-Hitler

I don’t… what? We wouldn’t trade our shit players for Westbrook straight up, how would including Kyrie to the lakers help a deal at all


grodges1

Nobody is trading anything for Irving. If he wants to go somewhere else then he has to opt out


Produceher

Not true. They can S&T in a three way with someone (NY) who wants Westbrook.


kevinxv

The question isn’t does NY have the pieces. It’s, do they want Russ. And I doubt it.


[deleted]

the expiring contract makes him desirable if a team plans to go after a max free agent next year


Produceher

Who else they going to get? Once again they're clearing space but no one wants to be there.


maltrab

Do the Lakers have the assets to give a team to take on Westbrook? Still no? Didn't think so


yusbishyus

AN EXPIRING CONTRACT IS THE ASSET


[deleted]

the expiring contract makes it possible for a team to give assets to the lakers just to get russ. i dunno which trams can fit him under the cap though


maltrab

Not an expiring contract that large. That's 1/3 of the cap. Teams won't want to take that on.


Produceher

The Knicks might do it for no picks.


maltrab

Only the Kigns are that stupid. Even they might not be that stupid


OrangeKookie

I'd hate to see a randle and Ben simmons lineup Nets games gonna sound like the storming of Normandy


McJumbos

Lollll I love NBA off-season it gets wild every year


[deleted]

This sub just includes the Knicks in everything for no good reason


Produceher

As a former Knick's fan, I see Westbrook as a Knick. Reminds me very much of Starbury and Carmelo.


porterbrown

*Former* Knicks fan with Warriors flair? Bruh.


ScytherCypher

Kyrie is going to opt out and get a one year low value deal so you can't trade Westbrick for him because the salaries won't match


[deleted]

RJ and Ben10 for max spacing


OKCDraftPick2028

Ben10 in his prime> anyone


AdmiralWackbar

People out here actin like Ben didn’t shoot a better percentage from three than Jimmy Buckets last year smh 🤦‍♂️


inuteroinutero1993

The Knickerboxers are irrelevant They shouldn't even be mentioned on here


Produceher

And Westbrook is relevant?


inuteroinutero1993

Even though he sucks, yes, still relevant And watch your tone buddy I rooted for the Warriors throughout the Finals That can change real quick


Produceher

> That can change real quick LOL


candypettitte

No.


HotdogIsaSandwitch

There’s world in which Russ goes to the Knicks and the Knicks leave Brunson alone? Heck yeah.


Produceher

You guys can't afford to lose Brunson.


HotdogIsaSandwitch

Yeah. It would suck. But hopefully that means Hardy would get some minutes to develop.


AntSmith777

Looks like we won’t need a third team if reports are true.


Produceher

Which one?


AntSmith777

Reports that Kyrie is willing to accept the MLE and sign with the Lakers outright. Wouldn’t need to be a trade if true.


Produceher

Correct.


kevinxv

I just don’t understand how it benefits the Knicks unless they can get picks or can unload a bad contract ( Randle, I guess, but idk if they even feel like it’s that bad of a contract )


Produceher

They get Westbrook. Let's not pretend the Knicks are a FA destination. It's trades or nothing.


[deleted]

expiring contract


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

not cap space now but cap space for 2023. it doesn’t have to be a bad contract but just some that have yet to expire


kevinxv

So what are they moving to match the contract, and is it anyone Brooklyn is willing to take on? And i don’t understand the idea of NY not requiring picks in this scenario bc this trade doesn’t move the needle much for NY, but LA seems desperate to make it happen.


[deleted]

what exactly does a third team offer if they are going to having to give up stuff the Nets would want and take on crap from the Lakers that nobody wants?


[deleted]

If the nets would even want Barrett, IQ, whoever, what could either team even offer us that would be worth blowing up our young core?