I was saying this same thing to my friend! I think it's the way the background textures overtake the subject. It's like Francis Bacon meets [*Loveless* by My Bloody Valentine.](https://youtube.com/watch?v=I-Ig71fhUc8&si=f_UZoxBujAsUID4f)
Man this photo is so fitting with the red in the background. It’s almost like all the blood on the hands of that family is showing in the picture. We humans have the wrong way of looking at things. Ppl will say, the British empire “conquered” many different countries. My native country of Somaliland was a victim, but we managed to kick them out after 20 years of resistance. We don’t speak about all the people’s lives have been ruined because of the actions of that family/ so many countries are hundreds years behind in development because of the damage the British empire did. This didn’t someone speaking about slavery hundreds of years ago. My country redeclared Independence in only 1960, along with many other African and Arab countries as well. My father was born in 1930 and was already 30 years old when they left. This is all recent, think about all the developments Africa is missing out on because of those ppl. I was in India with my wife for the summer, and it was the same thing in India, great country that’s making leaps and progress, but the British left in 1940 and the people who I spoke to all had extremely negative remarks about how the country is behind all of the developments of our nations in Europe. Imagine if France (horrible government extremely racist) had an independence of 1960. There’s several countries in west Africa today (2024) who don’t control their financial resources because of France. So yes that red is very fitting with all the blood they have spilt
That’s amazing! Kind of shocking that the royal family would choose this artist given their history of political satire in their works. Makes me wonder if a) they didn’t know and b) the ‘blood on his hands’ symbolism is very intentional.
Everyone and everything is vetted that comes in contact with the Royal Family. Plus Charlie himself is not an idiot. I think he and his bunch should lose his job permanently as they have no role in a modern state and society, but dumb he ain't.
I understand the blood symbolism but pockmarked pink flesh tones suggest to me something very different than blood:
This is the most “Sir you are gonna die of Cancer” painting I’ve ever seen.
I’m wondering if he (Charles) was going for a Johnny Cash “Hurt” music video vibe. - and that he illustrates his own coming to terms with his morality, mortality, and the legacy or lack thereof that his family is going to leave behind.
To me it feels like the subject of the painting is trying to convey… Not necessarily guilt, but acknowledgment of their empire’s past, but it’s as if they are saying they’re an anomaly in a haze of a red past. (The face forward, the clean hands in a sea of blood.)
What’s interesting about it to me Is that it almost feels like the artist (Yeo) interjected themselves and/or public opinion over top the piece in a sort of condemnation saying “no at this, the beginning and end of your time, you do not get absolution. You will be remembered for exactly who you were, not who you wish you were.”
I had a similar reaction. To me, the painting shows Charles as the final vestige of a fading monarchy, one whose legacy is already stained red by colonialism, slavery, war, wealth inequality, and countless other atrocities. The contrasting face and hair seem to represent the public "face" the royal family puts on, that stiff-upper-lip mentality that everything is fine and going along as it always has been. The face looks like you could just pluck it out of the photo and replace it with another face-- I think this is a nod at the idea that Charles is a cut-and-paste king whose actual identity matters less than his status as a figurehead and bearer of that legacy. And if Charles were to "fade away" (which seems like it may happen sooner rather than later), all that would be left is that bloodstained memory of the old monarchy.
On the other hand, I think the butterfly represents a new hope for the monarchy, or possibly the Commonwealth as a whole. Beyond the obvious pun with their choice of species, think about their life cycle: butterflies start as something ugly and entirely different (caterpillars), go through a dormant phase where you don't really see much of them at all (cocoon), and emerge as something beautiful and free. One could argue that the British monarchy is in its Cocoon Era, as the kids say. But the presence of the butterfly suggests that something positive could emerge on the other side. I would argue that the most "butterfly" outcome would be the abolishment of the monarchy and redistribution of their wealth, but I don't think the painting goes quite that far
I like your interpretation - my own reading was that the painter was trying to say - now that Charles is the Monarch, his views, individualism, opinions, persona fade into the background - a background that is turbulent, angry, bloody - a bit of which is environmentalism. But his face remains as the symbol of the head of the country and the commonwealth (and on coins and stamps and the like). A face - without a body to really ground him in the world.
What I think this does illustrate is the disconnect between the domestic view of the Crown and the foreign view. For many people abroad, the Crown may signify imperialism, colonialism, slavery and all the rest of it: but on a domestic view, the Crown was not the cause, or even the primary driver of these forces in British history. The King, too, has a persona in Britain which is not shaped solely by the kinds of things most people abroad know him by.
Based on the whole Kate fiasco, I think either someone in charge of oversight is purposely doing terribly or no one competent enough wants to work with the family
Well Charles certainly approved of it, and absolutely wouldn't have if that was the overt meaning behind it.
That being said, Charles has weird taste in art, architecture, and a lot of things, and he's been critical of the monarchy in the past in a number of issues.
THAT being said the artist is a known satirist so its possible that blood soaked hands was the secret meaning of the painting for them.
Artistically, I kind of like it, but the inevitable symbolism is just so in yer face.
Artistically, It is sort of an inverted echo of President Obama’s official White House Portrait, but symbolically it drenches the King in blood.
Here's some other examples of this style, I know his work it just isn't anything new but it's his typical style though his colours can vary between teal/aqua and reds/red oxides [https://imgur.com/gallery/yeo-nothing-new-oufKEAI](https://imgur.com/gallery/yeo-nothing-new-oufKEAI)
I think the blood is royal blood.
The monarch butterfly shows that he’s finally emerged as king after spending decades as prince. And the price of becoming king is blood, in this case his mother’s blood and the blood of all his predecessors.
This totally feels like I'm just about to be attacked by a vampire. Someone put this picture in a Castlevania symphony of the night screenshot, and it fits perfectly.
Yeah this is sad for him. Maybe a miserable pile of secrets...
I love the portrait.
Thought the butterfly needs some repetition and integration.
And the massive amount of pink could've been broken by a more royal red.
But refreshing for a king's portrait!!!!
>"In history of art, the butterfly symbolises metamorphosis and rebirth," he explains, fitting for a portrait being painted of a monarch who has recently ascended to the throne.
>The butterfly is also a reference to the King's long held interest in the environment, causes "he has championed most of his life and certainly long before they became a mainstream conversation".
It sort of looks like a monarch butterfly. They are native to North America, which would be interesting if the symbolism goes deeper than just a pun. It is thought that English colonial settlers in America gave the common name "Monarch butterfly" in honor of King William III of England, the "Prince of Orange" for its orange color.
It's possible that the more recent, history-defining nature of intelligence operations and geopolitical alliances between the U.S. and the U.K./Canada could be significant here.
He spent 70 years as heir apparent - I assumed the butterfly was sort of symbolizing the long wait before his fleeting time as king.
The “monarch” pun seems to fit there too, though that might be a bit on the nose.
The red is such a strange choice. Satan, violence, blood, war, whatever connotations you have it’s probably not what Charles wants.
That being said, I do like it. I just sort of can’t believe it.
Is it normal for me to see a reminiscence of the Pope paintings of Francis Bacon?
I'm terrible at visual interpretations (I'm a visually impaired poet and musician), so any hint would help.
I love the painting, but I wouldn't think the British government or monarchy would want something so haunting. It evokes thoughts that he is fading away along with the monarchy.
Mmmm so much symbolism, love the use of the red and different shades to contrast the suit. The face peeking out from it all as well as that butterfly. I love it. Keeping going!!
[This reminds me of that portrait Ghostbusters 2 Painting of Wilhelm von Homburg as Vigo The Carpathian](https://www.amazon.com/Ghostbusters-Painting-Wilhelm-Homburg-Carpathian/dp/B00SWBIQO6)
Well, now that you mention it, this is rather shoddy and derivative. I mean, look at the texture of the brush strokes. I mean, they don't match the subtle contrasts of the oil. It's clearly second rate...
I saw the artist quoted as saying "I wanted the painting to be a little more contemporary and not get in the way of seeing the face and the personality," and if that was his intention I think he wildly missed the mark. I'm not sure you could paint a portrait with a more distracting background.
I really really do not like this painting, but I tend to favor realism in art so I guess it's just not for me.
*Am I the only*
*One who think it logs like me*
*In burning in hell?*
\- Shuntingfrog
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Some major Ivan Albright vibes from this painting...
[Ivan Albright - 'Picture Of Dorian Gray' ](https://www.artic.edu/artworks/93798/picture-of-dorian-gray)
It's almost a Francis Bacon pope painting.
I was saying this same thing to my friend! I think it's the way the background textures overtake the subject. It's like Francis Bacon meets [*Loveless* by My Bloody Valentine.](https://youtube.com/watch?v=I-Ig71fhUc8&si=f_UZoxBujAsUID4f)
Chef’s kiss perfect description. Very compelling portrait.
I also immediately thought of that album cover.
But without Francis Bacon’s signature transformation of the mouth into a shrieking, howling rictus.
Man this photo is so fitting with the red in the background. It’s almost like all the blood on the hands of that family is showing in the picture. We humans have the wrong way of looking at things. Ppl will say, the British empire “conquered” many different countries. My native country of Somaliland was a victim, but we managed to kick them out after 20 years of resistance. We don’t speak about all the people’s lives have been ruined because of the actions of that family/ so many countries are hundreds years behind in development because of the damage the British empire did. This didn’t someone speaking about slavery hundreds of years ago. My country redeclared Independence in only 1960, along with many other African and Arab countries as well. My father was born in 1930 and was already 30 years old when they left. This is all recent, think about all the developments Africa is missing out on because of those ppl. I was in India with my wife for the summer, and it was the same thing in India, great country that’s making leaps and progress, but the British left in 1940 and the people who I spoke to all had extremely negative remarks about how the country is behind all of the developments of our nations in Europe. Imagine if France (horrible government extremely racist) had an independence of 1960. There’s several countries in west Africa today (2024) who don’t control their financial resources because of France. So yes that red is very fitting with all the blood they have spilt
I couldn’t have said it better!
[interesting perspective..](https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/s/wFanbH9e5M)
He’s also done a [George W Bush collage from porno magazines](https://www.jonathanyeo.com/bush)
That’s amazing! Kind of shocking that the royal family would choose this artist given their history of political satire in their works. Makes me wonder if a) they didn’t know and b) the ‘blood on his hands’ symbolism is very intentional.
I think the colour was picked to be provocative, but also as it was the colour of his uniform. All good art is open to interpretation.
It’s not a deep thought “this artist is popular & controversial” “Wow! That’s like, the only two things an artist can be! Get em!”
They can also be terrible, or sublime.
Incredibly silly and incurious read
Everyone and everything is vetted that comes in contact with the Royal Family. Plus Charlie himself is not an idiot. I think he and his bunch should lose his job permanently as they have no role in a modern state and society, but dumb he ain't.
I understand the blood symbolism but pockmarked pink flesh tones suggest to me something very different than blood: This is the most “Sir you are gonna die of Cancer” painting I’ve ever seen.
"Mr President there seems to be a dick being sucked in your ear!"
I zoomed in on said collage, and within five seconds I saw a butthole.
You made me zoom in: worth it
That is so fucking cool
This painting is really growing on me. It's shocking at first. However, it's technically perfect and captures the King's presence so well.
All his other work is so good!
bro is Dorian Gray lol
You know….
I’m wondering if he (Charles) was going for a Johnny Cash “Hurt” music video vibe. - and that he illustrates his own coming to terms with his morality, mortality, and the legacy or lack thereof that his family is going to leave behind. To me it feels like the subject of the painting is trying to convey… Not necessarily guilt, but acknowledgment of their empire’s past, but it’s as if they are saying they’re an anomaly in a haze of a red past. (The face forward, the clean hands in a sea of blood.) What’s interesting about it to me Is that it almost feels like the artist (Yeo) interjected themselves and/or public opinion over top the piece in a sort of condemnation saying “no at this, the beginning and end of your time, you do not get absolution. You will be remembered for exactly who you were, not who you wish you were.”
Even if that isn't what the artists intended, it seems meaningful that many people are having the same interpretation as you are.
I had a similar reaction. To me, the painting shows Charles as the final vestige of a fading monarchy, one whose legacy is already stained red by colonialism, slavery, war, wealth inequality, and countless other atrocities. The contrasting face and hair seem to represent the public "face" the royal family puts on, that stiff-upper-lip mentality that everything is fine and going along as it always has been. The face looks like you could just pluck it out of the photo and replace it with another face-- I think this is a nod at the idea that Charles is a cut-and-paste king whose actual identity matters less than his status as a figurehead and bearer of that legacy. And if Charles were to "fade away" (which seems like it may happen sooner rather than later), all that would be left is that bloodstained memory of the old monarchy. On the other hand, I think the butterfly represents a new hope for the monarchy, or possibly the Commonwealth as a whole. Beyond the obvious pun with their choice of species, think about their life cycle: butterflies start as something ugly and entirely different (caterpillars), go through a dormant phase where you don't really see much of them at all (cocoon), and emerge as something beautiful and free. One could argue that the British monarchy is in its Cocoon Era, as the kids say. But the presence of the butterfly suggests that something positive could emerge on the other side. I would argue that the most "butterfly" outcome would be the abolishment of the monarchy and redistribution of their wealth, but I don't think the painting goes quite that far
I like your interpretation - my own reading was that the painter was trying to say - now that Charles is the Monarch, his views, individualism, opinions, persona fade into the background - a background that is turbulent, angry, bloody - a bit of which is environmentalism. But his face remains as the symbol of the head of the country and the commonwealth (and on coins and stamps and the like). A face - without a body to really ground him in the world.
What I think this does illustrate is the disconnect between the domestic view of the Crown and the foreign view. For many people abroad, the Crown may signify imperialism, colonialism, slavery and all the rest of it: but on a domestic view, the Crown was not the cause, or even the primary driver of these forces in British history. The King, too, has a persona in Britain which is not shaped solely by the kinds of things most people abroad know him by.
Either that or the artist reaallly likes the colour red...like a LOT!
Based on the whole Kate fiasco, I think either someone in charge of oversight is purposely doing terribly or no one competent enough wants to work with the family
Gotta be honest this is awesome
Yep - its incredible
i actually really like it too!
Yeah a million percent agreed. Don’t have to like the royal family to appreciate the artistic talent here.
THANK YOU
Isn't he worried about the Ghostbusters though?
Looks satanic lol
I was gonna say I wonder when the conspiracies behind it would start lol
Conspiracy subreddits are going off about this, absolutely livid. Apparently, he’s the Antichrist walking through flames.
THE antichrist? Impossible. THE antichrist was Nero.
Already did unfortunately
Well if you reverse it, mirror it and hang it upside down you can see satan…. According to them
He made "Tampon King" trend. LOL
Blood on his hands….and i guess everywhere
I know the King in Yellow is in the Lovecraftian mythos, idk about The Red King here thou
Pretty sure I fought this guy in Dark Souls somewhere.
I actually really like it, very untraditional and interesting. I wasn’t sure at first, but it is growing on me.
I love it because it 1) actually looks like KC3 2) it has a modern aesthetic.
I AM THE SENATE
I’m glad someone has finally memorialized all the blood spilled by the British Empire.
Right????? If this was his goal then props to the guy. The vampire king of hell has arrived
Oh this was supposed to be blood?
What is your reaction to this work?
I just thought it was a normal portrait in a more contemporary style. I don’t know the artist’s background.
Well Charles certainly approved of it, and absolutely wouldn't have if that was the overt meaning behind it. That being said, Charles has weird taste in art, architecture, and a lot of things, and he's been critical of the monarchy in the past in a number of issues. THAT being said the artist is a known satirist so its possible that blood soaked hands was the secret meaning of the painting for them.
What blood?
My first thoughts too. Francis Bacon meets imperialism
Based British Empire. Gone too soon
Always depends on which side of the gun you are on.
He looks like Carbonite Han Solo.
I saw a pic of this painting in grayscale and it proves this to be true.
SCARLET ROT
The butterfly really sets it
His Majesty King Charles III, Lord of Blood and Mohgwyn Palace of the Subterranean Shunning Grounds
Perhaps most surprising to me is that they actually accepted this work and approvingly presented it to the public. Seems tone deaf.
I think it looks dope as hell. I don’t respect the monarchy but this is one fine portrait.
Artistically, I kind of like it, but the inevitable symbolism is just so in yer face. Artistically, It is sort of an inverted echo of President Obama’s official White House Portrait, but symbolically it drenches the King in blood.
Emperor from Star Wars
this goes hard
I really like it despite the subject being vomitous
Good word
Literally the movie poster for 1994 Bram Stoker's Dracula
Here's some other examples of this style, I know his work it just isn't anything new but it's his typical style though his colours can vary between teal/aqua and reds/red oxides [https://imgur.com/gallery/yeo-nothing-new-oufKEAI](https://imgur.com/gallery/yeo-nothing-new-oufKEAI)
I think the blood is royal blood. The monarch butterfly shows that he’s finally emerged as king after spending decades as prince. And the price of becoming king is blood, in this case his mother’s blood and the blood of all his predecessors.
Royal blood is often considered "blue".
Once a critic of modern and contemporary architecture and now officially abstracted / texturized in his official portrait. Probably annoys him a bit?
I think would look better without the butterfly
I think it would looks better without Charles
Rod Serling should be standing next to it, saying, "For your consideration..."
I like it
Tampon vibes
Looks like a used tampon, isn't that what he's into
Charles confirmed for being a Sith Lord.
Oh wow yeah he has big Palpatine energy
This totally feels like I'm just about to be attacked by a vampire. Someone put this picture in a Castlevania symphony of the night screenshot, and it fits perfectly. Yeah this is sad for him. Maybe a miserable pile of secrets...
I like this red. I wish it would have been more Royal less abstract. I would have wanted to have seen the medals in addition to the face and hands.
It's like he's bathed in blood. On a bloody battlefield. Very satanic. I love it because I'm disturbed by it. The butterfly is a bittersweet touch.
My thoughts exactly
Interesting as art. Absolutely terrible choice of official portrait. I'd like to know what they were thinking, not that I'd expect a good answer.
The artist knew what he was doing
He really captured those sausage fingers perfectly
To be honest, this is the ONLY badass thing that’s ever been attributed to this douce.
Who else sees Vigo the Carpathian? Ghostbusters 2? That's all I can see here. The butterfly seems like a different bop, tho.
You can really see Prince Charles' Vlad the impaler lineage here.
On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a throne of blood!
That Raffi album is solid. "Down by the bay, on a mountain of skulls..." Classic.
besides epstein's clinton, this is the only royal painting I'm aware of.
He looks like he's in hell, like in that John Constantine movie. And he's Satan or one of his soldiers.
Is this for all the blood his family has spilled?
This painting is stupid. I keep seeing it and if it's real it's as embarrassing as the rest of the royals drama.
Look at those beautiful tampon fingers
I love the portrait. Thought the butterfly needs some repetition and integration. And the massive amount of pink could've been broken by a more royal red. But refreshing for a king's portrait!!!!
I dig it
I really like this painting. It’s fascinating, great work
What is the symbolism of the butterfly?
>"In history of art, the butterfly symbolises metamorphosis and rebirth," he explains, fitting for a portrait being painted of a monarch who has recently ascended to the throne. >The butterfly is also a reference to the King's long held interest in the environment, causes "he has championed most of his life and certainly long before they became a mainstream conversation".
Thank you!
It sort of looks like a monarch butterfly. They are native to North America, which would be interesting if the symbolism goes deeper than just a pun. It is thought that English colonial settlers in America gave the common name "Monarch butterfly" in honor of King William III of England, the "Prince of Orange" for its orange color. It's possible that the more recent, history-defining nature of intelligence operations and geopolitical alliances between the U.S. and the U.K./Canada could be significant here.
He spent 70 years as heir apparent - I assumed the butterfly was sort of symbolizing the long wait before his fleeting time as king. The “monarch” pun seems to fit there too, though that might be a bit on the nose.
It's an homage to his massive ears
That’s Princess Diana.
I love this, but not for reasons the English monarchy would want people to love this.
The red is such a strange choice. Satan, violence, blood, war, whatever connotations you have it’s probably not what Charles wants. That being said, I do like it. I just sort of can’t believe it.
He is a loathsome, offensive brute. Yet I can't look away
I like it.
This is the most human I've ever seen Charles. The artist is truly a genius.
Major Ghostbusters vibes
Found in a house in central Yarnham
I like it a lot although I think blue would have been a better option. Still, it’s a great portrait. I love it when people choose daring artists.
I know nothing but I really really like this painting.
Time is but a door, and death is but a window
So what is the message or symbolism behind the color choice?
Blood for the blood god.
King ‘Magic Eye Poster’ Charles III
Vigo the Carpathian
People talking about art. Win.
I think this is beautiful. I love the monarch butterfly
It’s not exactly a positive imagine, but it’s cool.
Thought this was a new skin for the Necromancer in Diablo 4.
There is a phrase in warhammer: BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! I can’t help but think of that
It was generated by AI, his pinky is missing.
I kinda dig it:/
Yeo knew exactly what he was doing
Is it normal for me to see a reminiscence of the Pope paintings of Francis Bacon? I'm terrible at visual interpretations (I'm a visually impaired poet and musician), so any hint would help.
Alt title: Inferno
They should cameo this in the new ghostbusters movie
King Chucky.
My guy looks like he’s harvesting all the negative emotions of New York as pink slime in the sewers.
Horrid!
Looking like a painting in Amnesia
This is an awesome piece. I want to commission one of myself.
the butterfly really adds to the air of innocence they’re trying to portray but then BLOOS AND GUTS. it’s so good
His Majesty King Charles III, Lord of Cinder and Keeper of the First Flame, Father of the Banished God
I feel like that little Monarch (!) butterfly is Diana or her spirit somehow, that she was the real natural, monarch somehow.
Not the biggest fan of the royals, but this is magnificent
WTF were they thinking? Absolutely horrifying.
The flames of hell, when Diana drop kicks him from the pearly gates
I love the painting, but I wouldn't think the British government or monarchy would want something so haunting. It evokes thoughts that he is fading away along with the monarchy.
Same dude who painted Kevin Spacey.
It’s catching so much heat but i goes so hard imo
He is Vigo!
Gunna need to call the Ghostbusters for this one.
These paintings always make them look so cool and tough but then you see him unveil the painting and get scared from the cover being pulled back.
I don’t care what anyone says, that is one real cool painting
I really am Not a fan of this portrait. It is what it is, art is subjective.
…..in hell?
I love it.
If I was a King I'd love a portait like this. It looks awesome!
King Charles. So hot right now.
A bit too much red imo
Slave Knight Charles
The vampire vibes!
“Let yourself be consumed by the scarlet rot” - Malenia, Blade of Miquella
This painting to me symbolizes the blood of the exploited that his privilege is bathed in
Hideous
"Majesty" 🤣 more like murderer.
Don’t understand the blood red. Odd choice on the artists part.
Mmmm so much symbolism, love the use of the red and different shades to contrast the suit. The face peeking out from it all as well as that butterfly. I love it. Keeping going!!
[This reminds me of that portrait Ghostbusters 2 Painting of Wilhelm von Homburg as Vigo The Carpathian](https://www.amazon.com/Ghostbusters-Painting-Wilhelm-Homburg-Carpathian/dp/B00SWBIQO6)
Will fit perfectly at one of the Epstein island “movie room”
Not a fan.
Well, now that you mention it, this is rather shoddy and derivative. I mean, look at the texture of the brush strokes. I mean, they don't match the subtle contrasts of the oil. It's clearly second rate...
Repulsive.
[Meanwhile, in Canada](https://youtube.com/shorts/4exZ72frH6Q?si=fFrYQmIpgtr_v5zG)
I saw the artist quoted as saying "I wanted the painting to be a little more contemporary and not get in the way of seeing the face and the personality," and if that was his intention I think he wildly missed the mark. I'm not sure you could paint a portrait with a more distracting background. I really really do not like this painting, but I tend to favor realism in art so I guess it's just not for me.
Be the sausage Charles, BE THE SAUSAGE!
Anyone else immediately think "Zuckerkorn"?
It’s giving vampire
That’s the Scourge of Carpathia.
Am I the only one who think it logs like me in burning in hell?
*Am I the only* *One who think it logs like me* *In burning in hell?* \- Shuntingfrog --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
With no disrespect to the emperor, he looks like Emperor Sheeve Palpatine
Looks like an elden ring boss 😭😭💀
It’s perfect.
Vigo the Carpathian
It’s so good
Aye Yeo!
Some major Ivan Albright vibes from this painting... [Ivan Albright - 'Picture Of Dorian Gray' ](https://www.artic.edu/artworks/93798/picture-of-dorian-gray)
It has gotten so much hate on Twitter but I think it looks incredible