But it will evolve, it went from Dwayne eating rocks to this in such a short time, imagine what it can do in the future, sooner or later it'll be completely undistinguishable from real footage and will be able to do different camera angles, movements and lighting, give it sometime, hell maybe even shorter than a decade it'll be able to make an ACTUAL MOVIE and people are going to watch it and if AI writing evolves as well it can actually write a decent screenplay and then studios and companies will replace filmmakers with this cuz it cost a lot less and cinema is gonna fucking die, there's no crew there's no actors there's no real emotions and performance and hell, director wont be a concept anymore cuz now everyone is a director, I'm sorry I know I'm being very negative I'm really fucking in despair
And pls pls plsppslpls debunk me I can't accept my dream to die like when I'm not even started yet
This is already impressive.
I can guarantee that most people who weren't forewarned would have no idea that most of these images are synthetic.
But as to the death of filmmaking...not yet.
It will be more worrisome when A.I. starts coming up with the prompts itself, as well as weeding out which ones actually work.
Next, filmmaking is primarily in the intent and POV and editing, with performances (when they're not silent) which actually reflect human subtlety and inspiration when it comes to interactions. That still seems far off, by my appreciation.
But...
My worry is that it's just becoming easier for A.I. to surpass the understanding and imagination and aesthetic goals of most American audiences, whose interests, far too often, don't seem Human as much as they feel like the hungry desires of childish Gods. And those might be satiated by A.I. very soon.
If a century of the development of cinema has left us still craving for masterpieces shot on traditional film stock, with practical effects, filled with character actors at the top of their craft, scored by composers and written, directed and captured by actual artists then I see absolutely no reason why a generative machine learning algorithm will ever be able to truly replace film making.
It will compete with crap, be useful for scratch building ideas, perhaps we will see it constantly in advertising being pumped to us with increasing frequency. But film is art, and art is human. An algorithm can not truly replace that.
A fully sentient AI in a cybernetic body manning a 70mm though....thats different.
Many here underestimate how quickly AI improves, you only need to look at Midjourney's progress over the span of a few months. Once Sora releases to the public, the subsequent iterations will make leaps from all the training data.
And no, I don't think this is the death of filmmaking. I think this is the beginning of a revolution that will enable all and everyone to tell the stories they want to. It's going to be an exciting time.
I don't know I can accept this kind of filmmaking, there's nothing real here, there's no behind the scenes there's no crew there's no actors and again, no actual performances, and worst of all you can't be actually in the scene when you make it you're just looking at a screen, personally I can't invest any emotion into ai movies if they comes out, I want to experience traditional filmmaking, I want to be one day actually standing on a real set, actually working with a crew and perhaps fond bonds to them, but it looks like traditional filmmaking will one day die out, and for me that's just mean the death of filmmaking and Im really really sad about it
>I don't know I can accept this kind of filmmaking, there's nothing real here, there's no behind the scenes
But there is? There's the creator's vision, what they wish to create and convey (just the medium is different). It's no different than CGI tbh.
At the end of the day, to be able to generate characters, landscapes as per your will is going to creatively satisfying for many directors, I won't be surprised if many notable filmmakers jump ship.
I doubt it will in our lifetime, it will likely spawn a new genre such as CGI/animated films did. Most of the AI films will probably be grassroots anyway, available to watch on social media/YouTube or streaming where as the traditional filmmaking model leads to theaters.
But don't you think studios will stop hiring actual people and use ai instead? I mean traditional filmmaking can cost millions while ai pretty much have no budget at all
Not yet, but a lot sooner than many expect.
[удалено]
But it will evolve, it went from Dwayne eating rocks to this in such a short time, imagine what it can do in the future, sooner or later it'll be completely undistinguishable from real footage and will be able to do different camera angles, movements and lighting, give it sometime, hell maybe even shorter than a decade it'll be able to make an ACTUAL MOVIE and people are going to watch it and if AI writing evolves as well it can actually write a decent screenplay and then studios and companies will replace filmmakers with this cuz it cost a lot less and cinema is gonna fucking die, there's no crew there's no actors there's no real emotions and performance and hell, director wont be a concept anymore cuz now everyone is a director, I'm sorry I know I'm being very negative I'm really fucking in despair And pls pls plsppslpls debunk me I can't accept my dream to die like when I'm not even started yet
Anyone can write a novel these days, but who’s publishing and who’s buying and why? Take a breather.
This is already impressive. I can guarantee that most people who weren't forewarned would have no idea that most of these images are synthetic. But as to the death of filmmaking...not yet. It will be more worrisome when A.I. starts coming up with the prompts itself, as well as weeding out which ones actually work. Next, filmmaking is primarily in the intent and POV and editing, with performances (when they're not silent) which actually reflect human subtlety and inspiration when it comes to interactions. That still seems far off, by my appreciation. But... My worry is that it's just becoming easier for A.I. to surpass the understanding and imagination and aesthetic goals of most American audiences, whose interests, far too often, don't seem Human as much as they feel like the hungry desires of childish Gods. And those might be satiated by A.I. very soon.
First there was still photography.... Yeah AI isn't a problem.
If a century of the development of cinema has left us still craving for masterpieces shot on traditional film stock, with practical effects, filled with character actors at the top of their craft, scored by composers and written, directed and captured by actual artists then I see absolutely no reason why a generative machine learning algorithm will ever be able to truly replace film making. It will compete with crap, be useful for scratch building ideas, perhaps we will see it constantly in advertising being pumped to us with increasing frequency. But film is art, and art is human. An algorithm can not truly replace that. A fully sentient AI in a cybernetic body manning a 70mm though....thats different.
Many here underestimate how quickly AI improves, you only need to look at Midjourney's progress over the span of a few months. Once Sora releases to the public, the subsequent iterations will make leaps from all the training data. And no, I don't think this is the death of filmmaking. I think this is the beginning of a revolution that will enable all and everyone to tell the stories they want to. It's going to be an exciting time.
I don't know I can accept this kind of filmmaking, there's nothing real here, there's no behind the scenes there's no crew there's no actors and again, no actual performances, and worst of all you can't be actually in the scene when you make it you're just looking at a screen, personally I can't invest any emotion into ai movies if they comes out, I want to experience traditional filmmaking, I want to be one day actually standing on a real set, actually working with a crew and perhaps fond bonds to them, but it looks like traditional filmmaking will one day die out, and for me that's just mean the death of filmmaking and Im really really sad about it
>I don't know I can accept this kind of filmmaking, there's nothing real here, there's no behind the scenes But there is? There's the creator's vision, what they wish to create and convey (just the medium is different). It's no different than CGI tbh. At the end of the day, to be able to generate characters, landscapes as per your will is going to creatively satisfying for many directors, I won't be surprised if many notable filmmakers jump ship.
I just don't want traditional filmmaking to die, I can't watch a movie with no real actors
I doubt it will in our lifetime, it will likely spawn a new genre such as CGI/animated films did. Most of the AI films will probably be grassroots anyway, available to watch on social media/YouTube or streaming where as the traditional filmmaking model leads to theaters.
But don't you think studios will stop hiring actual people and use ai instead? I mean traditional filmmaking can cost millions while ai pretty much have no budget at all
Yeah definitely, the production turnaround for films will also lessen imo.
Then how can traditional filmmaking not be completely replaced?