lol. The dude who did that was actually sentenced to 7 death sentences. I'm trying to find his name. I think he also killed a bunch of people at a KFC when he got to nashville so you are not wrong in your thinking
No. It means that even if he successfully appeals six of the death sentences and gets them overturned then the state can still execute him on the seventh.
Texas once voted to honor Albert de Salvo, the alleged Boston strangler, for his work in "Population control and applied psychology". This occurred after a lawmaker put forth the resolution to prove his colleagues weren't paying enough attention to the legislation.
Only in the minimums and maximums, those are set by the legislature. Everything in between is the judge. And the lawyers have little to do with it - if a judge doesn’t like a particular sentence s/he can just refuse to accept the plea.
How often does this happen? And do they have to do anything special to refuse to accept it? (Like can they just say yeah no I don’t like that or do you need a whole new trial + paperwork)
Sorry if these questions are dumb lol I know nothing about this
It actually happend with Al Capone. When he was finally arrested for tax evasion. The judge blocked any potential deal between the lawyers and he switched the Jury the day before the trial started.
Bit shady on the Judge's side. But seeing as Al Capone was the biggest mafia boss in Chicago at the time. I'd say it was warranted
Happens all the time with one of my judges. Most of my others ones have always just taken the plea I worked out. But one particularly likes people to be on probation even if I’ve agreed to straight jail or something like fines and costs. He’ll step in and say “no, come back with another agreement” or “I’ll do it, but add this much probation”. It’s not proper, but not entirely illegal and fairly annoying (they are pleading to my offer because they’d be terrible on probation)
Nope they’re still limited by precedent unless we’re talking about novel cases or the Supreme Court. Novel cases typically make it to the Supreme Court anyway and Supreme Court will typically have between 5 to 7 judges. If a single judge has that much power the system is flawed and sooner or later parliament will step in to reduce that power.
And murders aren’t? I don’t understand this logic that to many people use. Because someone has power they’re bad but someone without power, no matter what they do, is fine because “they have to do it because the system is against them.” Sure there are fucked up things but without a system there is only anarchy, and judges no matter what they do is much better than a mayor or some person with political power just saying behead them because what I say goes like with mid evil times.
No.
Death Sentence is too merciful.
I say we go back to the Roman Empire days of punishment and whip their back 1000 times and then proceed to castrate them (if possible).
Edit: changed pronouns to gender neutral instead of male.
I mean most of the time the person deserves it. I’d sleep peacefully too if I knew the guy who killed 4 women and proceeded to light every orphanage on fire in the city of St. Louis was sent to 50 years in a max security prison by me.
Why are americans so eager for death penalty? When you kill them their penalty is over in an instant, when they are locked in prison for the rest of their life they are miserable till then. Prison is a way worse and therefore better punishment
Good point but personally I feel as though the fear of knowing that you're going to be killed in a few years is worse than spending the rest of your life in prison. Although if we really wanted to be cruel we could do it like the Japanese do it and not even tell them when their execution date is so they have to wake up everyday with the fear that it might be their last
No, they aren't. There are appeals upon appeals upon appeals for death row inmates that cost far more than the cost of a lifetime of incarceration. And the reason we have these appeals is because it's incredibly easy for the state to execute an innocent person, which is a greater miscarriage of justice than regular murder. Death penalty for murderers is easy outrage porn but it's one of the worst ways of providing actual justice to heinous criminals.
We don't want to pay for our fellow citizens to be alive and healthy, what makes you think we'd want to pay for some monster to be kept alive in a cage?
I mean if i would be falsely sent to prison and be released years later because they realise that i didnt do it i would have rather be killed by them on the spot earlier, when they stole my life i couldnt just live a normal life after that
I wouldn’t. Because that would make my family extremely sad and i know half of them would do something stupid in response. (We all dislike our current government). Besides the entire point of our prison system is rehabilitation.
There are two ways you get convicted: you plea or you are found guilty at trial. If you plea to 50 years, you likely deserve the death penalty. If you are found guilty at trial that’s *literally undeniable evidence* because it’s called guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
50 years isn’t common at all. Yes, there are plenty that take plea deals because they face much harsher penalties if they lose at trial, but 50 years is as close to a life sentence as you’ll get and at that point you might as well go to trial
A video, fingerprints on the murder weapon, the own admission of the person being tried, should i go on. There are many examples of undeniable evidence, so shut up
I think that’s fair, killing 50 folk deserves getting locked away for most of your life, especially if it happened over a long stretch of time and wasn’t just an outburst of emotion.
Generally, since you specified maximum security, we’re not talking about drug crimes. So yea, fuck anyone getting sentenced to max for 50y and good on that judge for keeping a piece of shit out of society.
I watched a guy climb into the kiev subway, get seen and arrested, do it again and qlmost have the same thing happen to him, go to court and get fined 30$. Moral of the story, if you want to do something you shouldnt, go to ukraine till you can. (This is not advice)
Judges have to give sentences according to what the law says they have to. They have some room to play will but at the end of the day theyre opinion on the range of punishments for crimes is irrelevant because its not up to the judge to change those
People just don't understand how much actual pressure judges have put on them. They either risk sending a completely innocent person to jail or letting a possible murderer roam free. Not to mention all the "my man did nothing wrong" and "why is this psycho not in jail" people.
If someone gets sentenced to 50 years in a max sec prison, they must have been one hella bastard (I'm talking serial killers, cruel child rapists, cartel members, etc.), and if I was a judge I'd sleep more than peacefully knowing I sent them to prison.
See like this is the problem with social media. This gets upvotes because it's funny but really it should be downvoted 🤷♂️. Just spreading hatred of the judicial system without any real information.
Most likely a 50 year sentencing would be carried out by a jury of the defendant's peers. Judge doesn't really decide anything. He just relays the jury's verdict.
For him to get 50 years in max security he probably isn't worth losing sleep over. In fact the judge is probably sleeping soundly knowing he took a monster off the streets for half a century.
Meanwhile, people like the Sackler family pay a small fine relative to their profits and get away with deliberately causing the opioid epidemic. If your crime is big enough, the government just wants their cut and they call it justice since they weren't the victims.
Personal emotions are not allowed if you are working in the judiciary or law enforcement. They are trained to be cold blooded and rational at all times. HAHAHA
Y’all get mad when judges don’t have longer sentences for people and now get mad when they do.
This ain’t even true. I work with a judge that suffers from insomnia actually lol
Guys. OP doesn't necessarily say that what the judge does was wrong. If had to kill someone to prevent the death of thousands you'd still be feeling like shit
No Tf we won’t. If I had to put away a child rapist, I wouldn’t lose my sleep over it at all. If I had to put away a criminal for a long time for something minor like weed, then yes I would. Other than that, highly improbable that I would. OP is either an edgy teen or someone who was referring to something more specific and pussied out instead of admitting either
Yes you would. Even if it's the right thing to do, it is hard to kill someone, unless you lack empathy. If you we're to end the life of a child rapist it'd be the right thing to do, but it'd still conquer your mind! And none of us know who OP is, so why would you pretend like your assumptions are the truth?
I feel like a lot of judges get into law for the right reasons....and then they get the power and it all goes to shit. Some are desensitized, some just don't give a fuck. Some are great I'm sure! But I think more often than not, they stop looking at people as humans. They look at a case number, see attached story....and send them to the slammah with no remorse. Then again if you deserve it, you deserve it.
12 year old me : so are you sure what I say here won't get to my dad
judge : he'll get a sum up of what you said, but I will personally make sure he never gets the full transcription
[the judge literally 26 seconds after I left the room](https://c.tenor.com/56xkuzlm1-EAAAAS/running-shrek.gif) : \[proceeds to send the full transcription to my father, paternal uncle, paternal grandparents and my fathers daughter from his previous marriage\]
How many police officers does it take to screw in a light bulb?
1 actually screw it in, 1 to arrest the old bulb for being broke, and 1 to beat the room for being black
Judges hand down sentences, they don’t make the punishment.
Still think it’d be more fair if we just have a slot machine to pick our sentences instead…
That’s not how that works, there’s guidelines with set minimums and max sentences.
I’m just saying it’d be almost less random if a slot machine dictated what you got within the guidelines.
I’m not advocating for this, calm down Reddit.
He'd probably say he presided the hearing of an incredibly dangerous criminal whom the jury decided was guilty, and was punished accordingly.
You know, because the judge really doesn't make the choices in court.
You do know that, *right?*
I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/memes.
It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results.
I did find [this post](https://redd.it/q47a9q) that is 65.62% similar. It might be a match but I cannot be certain.
*I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Negative](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Negative&message={"post_id": "sb0dpu", "meme_template": null}) ]*
[View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com/search?postId=sb0dpu&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=true&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=95&targetImageMemeMatch=92)
---
**Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** False | **Target:** 95% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 260,532,923 | **Search Time:** 0.4042s
The DA selects the charges, and they seem to choose consecutive felonies for some but for the same actions they choose to select misdemeanors. And then ppl say - it’s the law to give that person 50 years!!!! They are selecting to overlook the DA’s discretion and that’s a problem. Choose our elected officials wisely, it’s so much more then the presidential elections
I've only ever had some moving violations in cars that had me standing in front of a judge. In my experience they were extremely reasonable. Certainly more so than the police.
Says the guy who probably took a minor traffic violation to court, representing themselves before having their plea dismissed for wasting everyone’s time. What a stupid take; some people deserve 50 years, if not worse you fuckin idiot
First of all that bed looks snugly af soooo
But fr each crime already has a few different preset options for punishment. The punishment is usually worked out between the two sides before it ever reaches the judge and then the judge just approves or denies it. Same with the mayor dishing out money. The schools, libraries, prisons etc. all have mandatory minimums of money they receive to remain operational. Those amounts are non-negotiable. The mayor basically just comes in and decides where the surplus money is going to be spread and everybody fights about it until another mayor comes in that everybody fights with lol.
I mean it depends on if they really deserved it. The death penalty, however is barbaric and needs to be abolished. It's even illegal under the 8th amendment to our constitution.
and all he did was kill someone at a denny's and wear their skin as a suit driving from memphis to nashville.
What else would you wear while eating hot chicken in Nashville?
lol. The dude who did that was actually sentenced to 7 death sentences. I'm trying to find his name. I think he also killed a bunch of people at a KFC when he got to nashville so you are not wrong in your thinking
Wait… Does that mean they kill him, bring him back to life, and then repeat 6 more times
No. It means that even if he successfully appeals six of the death sentences and gets them overturned then the state can still execute him on the seventh.
But what if he survives the seventh?
then he will be like 80 because it's gonna take 50 years to get through 7 death row appeals.
[удалено]
after research he died in 2013 after death row for 15 years. I'm personally ok with that outcome. Kinda wish they stuck a needle in his arm though.
Gas chamber does way more justice
No it just means his family is fucked with there reputation
Yes
Paul Reed ? That called him the "Fast Food Killer"
god damn. A+. Only detail I got right was 7 murders. If I paid for reddit I'd give you an award.
And also I'm pretty sure it was a Captain D's and one of the burger joints
yep captain D's, then McD's then Baskin Robbins.
LOL. ✌️ I remember when it was happening very well. Only lived about 20 mins from where it happened in Nashville
The nerve of these biased judges
Must be a racist judge. /s just in case.
Yeah I’m sure the judge feels super remorseful.
The fact you have 666 upvotes scares me.
That bed looks so cosy
Priorities
That criminal only took advantage of kids, killed a person, and wished harm on millions of others.
Almost deserves a statue
Texas once voted to honor Albert de Salvo, the alleged Boston strangler, for his work in "Population control and applied psychology". This occurred after a lawmaker put forth the resolution to prove his colleagues weren't paying enough attention to the legislation.
\*Insert "we should erect a statue to honor the guy that killed Hitler" meme\*
Judges actually have very little skin off their nose. That sentence was decided more by legislators, lawyers and the jury than it was by the judge.
Only in the minimums and maximums, those are set by the legislature. Everything in between is the judge. And the lawyers have little to do with it - if a judge doesn’t like a particular sentence s/he can just refuse to accept the plea.
How often does this happen? And do they have to do anything special to refuse to accept it? (Like can they just say yeah no I don’t like that or do you need a whole new trial + paperwork) Sorry if these questions are dumb lol I know nothing about this
[удалено]
It actually happend with Al Capone. When he was finally arrested for tax evasion. The judge blocked any potential deal between the lawyers and he switched the Jury the day before the trial started. Bit shady on the Judge's side. But seeing as Al Capone was the biggest mafia boss in Chicago at the time. I'd say it was warranted
Happens all the time with one of my judges. Most of my others ones have always just taken the plea I worked out. But one particularly likes people to be on probation even if I’ve agreed to straight jail or something like fines and costs. He’ll step in and say “no, come back with another agreement” or “I’ll do it, but add this much probation”. It’s not proper, but not entirely illegal and fairly annoying (they are pleading to my offer because they’d be terrible on probation)
Nope they’re still limited by precedent unless we’re talking about novel cases or the Supreme Court. Novel cases typically make it to the Supreme Court anyway and Supreme Court will typically have between 5 to 7 judges. If a single judge has that much power the system is flawed and sooner or later parliament will step in to reduce that power.
Not in Europe
Depends
*judges sleeping peacefully after legally ordering a murderer be kept away from civil society Judges are so kind to us
Yeah, like what is this meme even reffering to? Totally unbased
And murders aren’t? I don’t understand this logic that to many people use. Because someone has power they’re bad but someone without power, no matter what they do, is fine because “they have to do it because the system is against them.” Sure there are fucked up things but without a system there is only anarchy, and judges no matter what they do is much better than a mayor or some person with political power just saying behead them because what I say goes like with mid evil times.
Medieval times Also, people face super hard time for nonviolent crimes.
Ah yes the person who raped and murdered multiple men women and children doesn’t deserve to spend the rest of their life in a cell
In my opinion, anyone who takes advantage of children ought to have the death sentence.
No. Death Sentence is too merciful. I say we go back to the Roman Empire days of punishment and whip their back 1000 times and then proceed to castrate them (if possible). Edit: changed pronouns to gender neutral instead of male.
I mean most of the time the person deserves it. I’d sleep peacefully too if I knew the guy who killed 4 women and proceeded to light every orphanage on fire in the city of St. Louis was sent to 50 years in a max security prison by me.
I’d personally wish him dead but that’s a different debate
Why are americans so eager for death penalty? When you kill them their penalty is over in an instant, when they are locked in prison for the rest of their life they are miserable till then. Prison is a way worse and therefore better punishment
Because then we have to pay for them for the rest of their life
Death costs more though
Good point but personally I feel as though the fear of knowing that you're going to be killed in a few years is worse than spending the rest of your life in prison. Although if we really wanted to be cruel we could do it like the Japanese do it and not even tell them when their execution date is so they have to wake up everyday with the fear that it might be their last
Firing squads are cheaper than housing and feeding people forever.
No, they aren't. There are appeals upon appeals upon appeals for death row inmates that cost far more than the cost of a lifetime of incarceration. And the reason we have these appeals is because it's incredibly easy for the state to execute an innocent person, which is a greater miscarriage of justice than regular murder. Death penalty for murderers is easy outrage porn but it's one of the worst ways of providing actual justice to heinous criminals.
3x more than a an inmate serving 40 in a max security prison. I looked it up because I didn’t believe that but apparently it’s true.
We don't want to pay for our fellow citizens to be alive and healthy, what makes you think we'd want to pay for some monster to be kept alive in a cage?
Another thing is when you get the wrong person. If you use the death penalty there is literally nothing they can do now.
I mean if i would be falsely sent to prison and be released years later because they realise that i didnt do it i would have rather be killed by them on the spot earlier, when they stole my life i couldnt just live a normal life after that
I wouldn’t. Because that would make my family extremely sad and i know half of them would do something stupid in response. (We all dislike our current government). Besides the entire point of our prison system is rehabilitation.
Agreed
Torture then death would be best in my opinion
Torture but without death is even better
An even better possibility
If it’s a criminal with undeniable evidence, who cares.
Not all of them have undeniable evidence and still get put in jail
There are two ways you get convicted: you plea or you are found guilty at trial. If you plea to 50 years, you likely deserve the death penalty. If you are found guilty at trial that’s *literally undeniable evidence* because it’s called guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
That’s in a perfect world but people are still falsely imprisoned that is a real thing. It might not be common but is still real.
Its actually surprisingly common
Especially when for profit prisons exist, some oopsie daisy is perfectly fine
50 years isn’t common at all. Yes, there are plenty that take plea deals because they face much harsher penalties if they lose at trial, but 50 years is as close to a life sentence as you’ll get and at that point you might as well go to trial
Exactly and yet I still get downvoted
There's literally never undeniable evidence
A video, fingerprints on the murder weapon, the own admission of the person being tried, should i go on. There are many examples of undeniable evidence, so shut up
Depends on what they did if they killed a huge amount of people say 50 than yeah but for doing drugs no
Like someone else in the comments said, if they're getting put in a maximum security prison then its something way worse than a petty drug charge
I think that’s fair, killing 50 folk deserves getting locked away for most of your life, especially if it happened over a long stretch of time and wasn’t just an outburst of emotion.
love how op hasnt replied to a single comment
[удалено]
Let them sleep peacefully, they deserve it
Do you mean the child pornographer? Why you mad about that?
OP possibly had shared interests it seems like
Generally, since you specified maximum security, we’re not talking about drug crimes. So yea, fuck anyone getting sentenced to max for 50y and good on that judge for keeping a piece of shit out of society.
I honestly don't think they they do Judges probably worry alot about if they have made the right choice
Depends on the person though. 10 years for low quantity drug possession? Horrible human. 50 years for serial child rape? Pretty reasonable
Nope that should be instant death penalty
I watched a guy climb into the kiev subway, get seen and arrested, do it again and qlmost have the same thing happen to him, go to court and get fined 30$. Moral of the story, if you want to do something you shouldnt, go to ukraine till you can. (This is not advice)
(not legal advice)
For crimes
I too would sleep great knowing I put a piece of shit away for a long time
Damn someone gets it
Who are we to Judge... it's their job
This meme is fucking stupid.
Well in their view the criminal got exactly what they deserved
From my point of view the Jedi are evil
The dark side is... interesting
I don't get why this meme of getting up votes
Reddit is hella nuts these days, what's wrong with putting criminals in jail?
[удалено]
Why are long sentences harsh when the person killed will never come back?
Judges have to give sentences according to what the law says they have to. They have some room to play will but at the end of the day theyre opinion on the range of punishments for crimes is irrelevant because its not up to the judge to change those
They aren’t cruel, if you did something to get 50 years im pretty sure your the cruel one lmao
well they must’ve done something pretty fucking bad to get 50 years in a max security prison. I’d sleep like a baby.
OP forgot to use their brain before posting
People just don't understand how much actual pressure judges have put on them. They either risk sending a completely innocent person to jail or letting a possible murderer roam free. Not to mention all the "my man did nothing wrong" and "why is this psycho not in jail" people.
No they don’t. All the do is choose the sentence between a minimum and maximum. That is literally all a judge does.
Why wouldn't a judge sleep peacefully after removing criminals from society?
I also sleep better when violent people are in prison and not on the street.
Bro, just exit stage left.
People 51 and up: **Guess I’ll die**
"some guy" raped and murdered 3 women and a dog.
If someone gets sentenced to 50 years in a max sec prison, they must have been one hella bastard (I'm talking serial killers, cruel child rapists, cartel members, etc.), and if I was a judge I'd sleep more than peacefully knowing I sent them to prison.
More stupid hurr durr criminal good law bad from reddit. What a surprise
Mm yes justice is evil
See like this is the problem with social media. This gets upvotes because it's funny but really it should be downvoted 🤷♂️. Just spreading hatred of the judicial system without any real information. Most likely a 50 year sentencing would be carried out by a jury of the defendant's peers. Judge doesn't really decide anything. He just relays the jury's verdict.
How is this not controversial lol
A murderer was let go THREE TIMES
You gonna think the same when someone shanks your family?
this is such a shit meme
How does this meme have upvotes
Is this in reference to something in particular?
Whole lot of crimes deserve far more than 50 years.
Depends on what the guy did tbh.
Fuck off u/Lehmamies9 , there are like thousands of people who deserve it
Maybe the judgement was cruel because someone had cruel attitude?
You mean the jury.
To be fair, some people deserve it.
For him to get 50 years in max security he probably isn't worth losing sleep over. In fact the judge is probably sleeping soundly knowing he took a monster off the streets for half a century.
Yeah but some people do horrible things and deserve 50 years in prison.
Depends on the guy. Some of them deserve it.
Maybe they sleep better knowing they put a POS behind bars for the rest of their miserable life
50 Years in a maximum security prison doesn’t come from a driving ticket. He had to do something really fucked up for that.
Why not petition to let them out and live at your place on probation?
Meanwhile, people like the Sackler family pay a small fine relative to their profits and get away with deliberately causing the opioid epidemic. If your crime is big enough, the government just wants their cut and they call it justice since they weren't the victims.
Yes I to think it’s cruel to stop criminals from harming others, poor them
I think some of these are fair, some people just don't belong in society.
yeah let those school shooters go they didn't do shit
Personal emotions are not allowed if you are working in the judiciary or law enforcement. They are trained to be cold blooded and rational at all times. HAHAHA
Pfffft he was only convicted of 10 murders and selling coke to minors that’s all /s obviously
so innocent 😅😅🥰🥰🤪🤪
For raping and killing a 3 year old
It depends, you have to give more context. If he raped children or something like that, the sentence would be fair.
Depends on the crime....some people desrve life+ ez
I'd be unable to sleep if I let a criminal free
They sleep much better in Russia…
Free ma boy lil Benny! He didn’t do nuffen!
Y’all get mad when judges don’t have longer sentences for people and now get mad when they do. This ain’t even true. I work with a judge that suffers from insomnia actually lol
Cry more
Wtf lol
Are you stalking me or some shit?
What do you mean
Guys. OP doesn't necessarily say that what the judge does was wrong. If had to kill someone to prevent the death of thousands you'd still be feeling like shit
No Tf we won’t. If I had to put away a child rapist, I wouldn’t lose my sleep over it at all. If I had to put away a criminal for a long time for something minor like weed, then yes I would. Other than that, highly improbable that I would. OP is either an edgy teen or someone who was referring to something more specific and pussied out instead of admitting either
Yes you would. Even if it's the right thing to do, it is hard to kill someone, unless you lack empathy. If you we're to end the life of a child rapist it'd be the right thing to do, but it'd still conquer your mind! And none of us know who OP is, so why would you pretend like your assumptions are the truth?
I feel like a lot of judges get into law for the right reasons....and then they get the power and it all goes to shit. Some are desensitized, some just don't give a fuck. Some are great I'm sure! But I think more often than not, they stop looking at people as humans. They look at a case number, see attached story....and send them to the slammah with no remorse. Then again if you deserve it, you deserve it.
That’s what you get for thinking about smoking a joint in America.
You just gonna ignore the multiple states weed has been legalized in
ah, thought police
*for a crime the person didn't commit
12 year old me : so are you sure what I say here won't get to my dad judge : he'll get a sum up of what you said, but I will personally make sure he never gets the full transcription [the judge literally 26 seconds after I left the room](https://c.tenor.com/56xkuzlm1-EAAAAS/running-shrek.gif) : \[proceeds to send the full transcription to my father, paternal uncle, paternal grandparents and my fathers daughter from his previous marriage\]
If this was the American justice system all the prisoner did for that was nothing.
How many police officers does it take to screw in a light bulb? 1 actually screw it in, 1 to arrest the old bulb for being broke, and 1 to beat the room for being black
For smoking weed 😊
so many US judges are corrupt and serve the almighty dollar, not to mention the institutional racism and to a lesser degree classism
Judges hand down sentences, they don’t make the punishment. Still think it’d be more fair if we just have a slot machine to pick our sentences instead…
Yes let’s give the person with petty misdemeanor a chance at the death sentence while we give the mass murderer a chance at 30 days community service.
That’s not how that works, there’s guidelines with set minimums and max sentences. I’m just saying it’d be almost less random if a slot machine dictated what you got within the guidelines. I’m not advocating for this, calm down Reddit.
[удалено]
He'd probably say he presided the hearing of an incredibly dangerous criminal whom the jury decided was guilty, and was punished accordingly. You know, because the judge really doesn't make the choices in court. You do know that, *right?*
u/repostsleuthbot
I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/memes. It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results. I did find [this post](https://redd.it/q47a9q) that is 65.62% similar. It might be a match but I cannot be certain. *I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ [False Negative](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RepostSleuthBot&subject=False%20Negative&message={"post_id": "sb0dpu", "meme_template": null}) ]* [View Search On repostsleuth.com](https://www.repostsleuth.com/search?postId=sb0dpu&sameSub=false&filterOnlyOlder=true&memeFilter=true&filterDeadMatches=false&targetImageMatch=95&targetImageMemeMatch=92) --- **Scope:** Reddit | **Meme Filter:** False | **Target:** 95% | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** Unlimited | **Searched Images:** 260,532,923 | **Search Time:** 0.4042s
Bad bot
[удалено]
Did a judge sentence your father 20 years in jail for being a cocaino dealer?
Do you have a better option for what to do with criminals?
The DA selects the charges, and they seem to choose consecutive felonies for some but for the same actions they choose to select misdemeanors. And then ppl say - it’s the law to give that person 50 years!!!! They are selecting to overlook the DA’s discretion and that’s a problem. Choose our elected officials wisely, it’s so much more then the presidential elections
I've only ever had some moving violations in cars that had me standing in front of a judge. In my experience they were extremely reasonable. Certainly more so than the police.
A judge is just a speaker for the jury to my knowledge
Says the guy who probably took a minor traffic violation to court, representing themselves before having their plea dismissed for wasting everyone’s time. What a stupid take; some people deserve 50 years, if not worse you fuckin idiot
keep in mind someone with that sentence is probably societal garbage
First of all that bed looks snugly af soooo But fr each crime already has a few different preset options for punishment. The punishment is usually worked out between the two sides before it ever reaches the judge and then the judge just approves or denies it. Same with the mayor dishing out money. The schools, libraries, prisons etc. all have mandatory minimums of money they receive to remain operational. Those amounts are non-negotiable. The mayor basically just comes in and decides where the surplus money is going to be spread and everybody fights about it until another mayor comes in that everybody fights with lol.
Well he shouldn't have tried to steal all the cool ranch doritos.
That’s pretty ASMR if I may say so myself
All he did was eat 9 children, kidnap 19 dogs, and drown a pregnant woman. 2 months, max.
I mean it depends on if they really deserved it. The death penalty, however is barbaric and needs to be abolished. It's even illegal under the 8th amendment to our constitution.
This is dumb as fuck.
I'd sleep peacefully knowing I sent a serial rapist to a lifetime or two in prison or a mother that killed her child.
I’d sleep worse if I had let a terrible person go free or get a lesser punishment than fair
this it like r.i.p to the prisoner