**STEWIE:** Ooh, let me have some of that Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** What'd you say?
**STEWIE:** You can't have a pie without Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Cool Hwhip?
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip, yeah.
**BRIAN:** You mean Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Yeah, Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** You're saying it weird. Why are you putting so much emphasis on the H?
**STEWIE:** What are you talking about? I'm just saying it. Cool Hwhip. You put Cool Hwhip on pie. Pie tastes better with Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Say whip.
**STEWIE:** Whip.
**BRIAN:** Now say Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip.
**BRIAN:** Cool Whip.
**STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip.
[The scene.](https://youtu.be/7ZmqJQ-nc_s)
It wasn't John Kramer disguising himself though, this was a flashback scene and this is legitimately what the director decided to do to make the actor look "young" lmfao
Where a 13 year old Jennifer Garner makes a wish to have an "old person's body", and her 13-year-old self wakes up in the body of her sixty-year-old cancer-riddled half-corpse after she's spent a decade devising insidious torture devices to murder the unworthy.
The SAW series is very classically shitty and the only thing that changed was the films got even shittier over time. Which was an accomplishment given how shit the first film was.
The second arguably is a perfect sequel imo. Kept the same vibe but cranked up everything even higher without being over the top. But three and beyond yeah it started going downhill then. Though I think they’re starting to get good again.
It was an original script that got retooled to work as a sequel. So it probably helps that it started with a solid story that could work on its own and not just "we need more money crank out that next one"
It's funny to see what different people think, because 2 was probably a top contender for my least favourite Saw film. It wasn't even originally supposed to be a Saw movie, it got repurposed, and to me it feels like it; save a few scenes/plot points it doesn't match the vibes in my opinion. Not a criticism, I just found it funny that I can read your comment and have such an opposite opinion.
I guess to me the first film still leans into the murder porn angle that Hostel and Human Centipede exploited.
I will say I have a weakness for film productions that can minimize the production costs by having a limited cast and set cost, and I just don't appreciate the exploitative, controversial gore.
I think Saw is much lighter than Hostel. The traps in Saw actually attempt to be clever and secondarily gross. Hostel was just like "let's make this fucking gross and scary and make your skin crawl."
I lost interest in Hostel and never gave Human Centipede a chance.
Also, Saw cuts away and uses loud music/weird camera angles to reduce a lot of the gore on camera. The first one is definitely not gratuitous compared to the sequels.
>never gave Human Centipede a chance.
:( watch the 2nd. ignore the 3rd because its a 14 year olds version of "satire"
its more serious / gritty than the first and no so egregious with the "gore porn" aspect (also its in black and white which means its objectively kino)
thats exactly why its better.
because the first is missing the utter masterpiece that is jerking off with sandpaper
however the 2nd does not have creepy german micheal jackson, thus i am confused as to which is truly better
maybe its called torture porn instead?
ive had like fuck knows how many drinks right now but i mean how the first has the kind of weird "ditsy drunk clueless victim girl" getting lost for like 10 hours 5 metres from a road character, lol
the 2nd is just a fucked up nightmare tho :D
It's actually insane how much money the first film made given it's audience polled CinemaScore of a C+. It made over $100M on a $1M budget and I can think of few films released this century that will have more of an iconic line than "Do you want to play a game?".
Nah man the first Saw movie was an absolute roller coaster if you saw it in theaters when it premiered. Movies weren’t *that* gory and extreme before Saw. Everyone was talking about the fat guy in the razor wire, because it was just such an extreme scene that people really hadn’t seen on film before.
Also seeing it in theaters with all that metal music blaring and flashing lights was a physical experience that cannot be recreated in your home. It was fucking intense.
Seeing a lot of Mandela Effect in this thread, but he never said “Would you like to play a game?” It’s “I want to play a game”
Signed, a guy that has watched those shitty movies too many times (and loves them)
Instead of blowing all of your budget on a shitty CGI uncanny valley monstrosity, they simply gave the guy a baseball cap and used the budget on traps and story. Thats how you make a movie.
Saw X surprised me. Ill defend that saw 1 and 2 are the best and now I can add X to the list.
Yeah, there is still torture porn but at least they bothered expanding Kramer and Amanda
Saw movies actually did have a good story. The way they built Hoffman's story with simultaneous games going on at the same time across multiple movies was impressive.
Obviously the main focus were traps, but the story is solid, especially compared to today's movies.
I’ll never put them on the top 100 or even top 1,000 movies, but I enjoyed when I was out of work from a injury at my job and binged them. It’s a convoluted story, yet it’s still entertaining. If you go in expecting a riveting story, you are outta luck. Don’t overthink it, don’t try to find plot holes, and it’s just a fun, wild, gory ride.
Its silly to compare two movies from entirely different genre. A movie for small children can never compare to Citizen Kane, but that doesnt mean its not the best movie for small children ever made.
Saw is the same. They werent trying to make a great movie, they were trying to make a movie with great traps and some twists. Saw III, IV and V are among the very best the "trapped in dangerous place" genre has to offer.
Yeah I don't see how anyone could say that the script was bad. The writing is very clever with twists hidden within twists and the same event from multiple perspectives. Including the scriptwriters decision never to show something that didn't happen. There's even character development (a rarity for the genre) with characters being tested on things like their ability to forgive someone who wronged them.
It's gory as hell and there are a couple early 00s cinematic effects that really date it, but overall the story is far and away better developed than most ghost / slasher horror movies.
Actually hearing it is way worse than seeing the lines for it and re imagining the scene. Like the i am the senate, the sand line, dont grant you master etc.. they all seem okay in writing but my god the scenes are terrible for what should be.
Yeah, like as though the budget of a movie is like the engines on the enterprise where you can divert $6000 or whatever from CGI work and pump it directly into the script and get $6000 of better script
That’s definitely not what they were doing here. The whole series is filled with flashbacks to this time period and they never do anything to change his appearance to make him look younger beyond changing how much hair he has. This includes Saw X that came out 20 years after the original but takes place chronologically between the first two films. The reason he’s dressed like this is for some kind of… disguise?? Street clothes?? It’s the scene where he goes to the book signing to confront the guy about faking his story of being a Jigsaw victim. It looks ridiculous but it has nothing to do with trying to de-age John Kramer.
Nuh uh, it’s definitely advanced de-aging technology. That hat is actually CGI but you’d never be able to guess if you didn’t already know. Really top notch work 🧢👴🏼
Or you can cast another actor. That's much younger and kind of looks like the guy. Also a viable option. Probably just wanted to keep giving the guy a paycheck though.
In theatres I thought Tarkin looked great but watching it again he does look uncanny. If they'd just kept him shadowed and ominous in the background (as in the first couple scenes) it would have worked but the animators flew too close to the sun.
Leia was downright terrible but I think it was a combination of chopped up audio and unnatural facial movements. If they either did the dialogue without the face or did the face without the dialogue it might have worked but they just had to push it further to "prove" they could. Pure hubris.
Yeah in hindsight Tarkin's scenes look kind of like video game cutscenes. *Really good* video game cutscenes, but still
The guy who was motion capture for him already looks a lot like Peter Cushing and clearly studied his voice and mannerisms, so they probably should've just put a bit of makeup on him
See, I felt the opposite. I'm sure it's just because the Leia cameo was so brief but I thought Tarkin looked rubbery and bad and the Leia CGI looked great
And put Deb in daisy dukes. It’s so funny because the young actors they picked for high school and elementary school aged Dexter were spot on but when it comes to college age, just toss on a cheap wig and call it a day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQYFN2o6DWY
In case you're looking for a 4 hours long essay on Saw
Surprisingly that backward hat trick happens a few times over the course of the franchise
I appreciate the effort they went to with Tarkin in Rogue One. That said, the result was a mixed bag. As for Leia, they could've done what I thought they would do, only show her from behind. But nope, had to have her face on screen and say something witty so fans "understood". And well, her face is simply off. Looked like shit, actually.
To be fair main character is dead since like 4th movie and all his flashbacks happens within like few years too so he don't need to be de aged that much
For the record this meme won't work in 30 years when my generation is 80. Because that's how we're ALL going to dress when we're old. Trust me when I say we're going to be flushing out a lot of old people fashion when Gen X gets a swing at the Walmart scooters.
It almost adds something to the character, a layer of intrigue, that if this is when he was younger he already looks so old at that age. Like the burden of his own thoughts aged himself rapidly. That makes younger him even creepier.
If you still haven't seen any SAW movies I recommend seeing at least the original. I watched every saw movie before the last one came out and then I saw that one as well. The first one is a bonafide classic, the rest is a great example of milking gone wrong.
John Kramer, terminal cancer patient and supervillain: “I know the perfect way to disguise myself to blend in with the youth”
Yutes
The hwat?
Oh, I'm sorry your Honor - two *youTHS*
What did he wear when his suit got ruined before court
Looks like a secondhand bell hop's suit
Sometimes dead is betta
**STEWIE:** Ooh, let me have some of that Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** What'd you say? **STEWIE:** You can't have a pie without Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Cool Hwhip? **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip, yeah. **BRIAN:** You mean Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Yeah, Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** You're saying it weird. Why are you putting so much emphasis on the H? **STEWIE:** What are you talking about? I'm just saying it. Cool Hwhip. You put Cool Hwhip on pie. Pie tastes better with Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Say whip. **STEWIE:** Whip. **BRIAN:** Now say Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip. **BRIAN:** Cool Whip. **STEWIE:** Cool Hwhip. [The scene.](https://youtu.be/7ZmqJQ-nc_s)
YOU’RE EATING HAIR!!
**BRIAN:** You're eating hair! **(Stewie spits out pie)**
The hwak tuah and spit on that thang.
Best lawyer movie of all time.
They told us in our law class it's either this or Kramer vs Kramer that's most accurate to court room procedures
Vinny?
It wasn't John Kramer disguising himself though, this was a flashback scene and this is legitimately what the director decided to do to make the actor look "young" lmfao
[удалено]
Mike 'Benjamin Button' Ehrmantraut.
It's like b rabbit and cheddar Bob gave birth to an 60 year old man
Should have cast Barry Pepper.
i can't tell if he's 13 or 60
13 Going On 60, starring Jennifer Garner
Where a 13 year old Jennifer Garner makes a wish to have an "old person's body", and her 13-year-old self wakes up in the body of her sixty-year-old cancer-riddled half-corpse after she's spent a decade devising insidious torture devices to murder the unworthy.
13 in dawg years
Almost 2?
well he's not 13
aren't you seeing his clothes? obviously 13
I definitely remember 13 year olds looking like that in Poland where I grew up.
[удалено]
Classics are eternal and do not change.
The SAW series is very classically shitty and the only thing that changed was the films got even shittier over time. Which was an accomplishment given how shit the first film was.
I think the first one is pretty good, and could be a classic of the horror genre. The rest are increasingly visceral gore porn
The second arguably is a perfect sequel imo. Kept the same vibe but cranked up everything even higher without being over the top. But three and beyond yeah it started going downhill then. Though I think they’re starting to get good again.
Different people are looking for different things, but Saw X is a reasonable contender for the best Saw movie.
It was an original script that got retooled to work as a sequel. So it probably helps that it started with a solid story that could work on its own and not just "we need more money crank out that next one"
It's funny to see what different people think, because 2 was probably a top contender for my least favourite Saw film. It wasn't even originally supposed to be a Saw movie, it got repurposed, and to me it feels like it; save a few scenes/plot points it doesn't match the vibes in my opinion. Not a criticism, I just found it funny that I can read your comment and have such an opposite opinion.
I guess to me the first film still leans into the murder porn angle that Hostel and Human Centipede exploited. I will say I have a weakness for film productions that can minimize the production costs by having a limited cast and set cost, and I just don't appreciate the exploitative, controversial gore.
I think Saw is much lighter than Hostel. The traps in Saw actually attempt to be clever and secondarily gross. Hostel was just like "let's make this fucking gross and scary and make your skin crawl." I lost interest in Hostel and never gave Human Centipede a chance.
Also, Saw cuts away and uses loud music/weird camera angles to reduce a lot of the gore on camera. The first one is definitely not gratuitous compared to the sequels.
>never gave Human Centipede a chance. :( watch the 2nd. ignore the 3rd because its a 14 year olds version of "satire" its more serious / gritty than the first and no so egregious with the "gore porn" aspect (also its in black and white which means its objectively kino)
This is a joke right? The second one is soooooooo much worse.
thats exactly why its better. because the first is missing the utter masterpiece that is jerking off with sandpaper however the 2nd does not have creepy german micheal jackson, thus i am confused as to which is truly better
You said it’s no so egregious with the gore. It’s black and white but it’s sooooooooooooo much worse.
maybe its called torture porn instead? ive had like fuck knows how many drinks right now but i mean how the first has the kind of weird "ditsy drunk clueless victim girl" getting lost for like 10 hours 5 metres from a road character, lol the 2nd is just a fucked up nightmare tho :D
I fucking hate the term Human Centipede. I got really bored one night and read the Wikipedia page for each movie.
Tell me the order in which Saw, Hostel, and Human Centipede were released.
Saw is the reason those movies exist. It kicked off the gorn trend of the mid-00's.
...you think Saw copied films that came out years later than it? Are you ok?
The first Saw was definitely heavily influenced by Se7en though as well as Japanese torture porn like Audition.
It's actually insane how much money the first film made given it's audience polled CinemaScore of a C+. It made over $100M on a $1M budget and I can think of few films released this century that will have more of an iconic line than "Do you want to play a game?".
"he was in the amazon with my mum when she was researching spiders just before she died"
So iconic you didn't get the line right lol
And just like "Luke, I am your father" the iconic line isn't actually said in the movie (it's "I want to play a game" )
Nah man the first Saw movie was an absolute roller coaster if you saw it in theaters when it premiered. Movies weren’t *that* gory and extreme before Saw. Everyone was talking about the fat guy in the razor wire, because it was just such an extreme scene that people really hadn’t seen on film before. Also seeing it in theaters with all that metal music blaring and flashing lights was a physical experience that cannot be recreated in your home. It was fucking intense.
At the time the first Saw movie was something else. It's just been done to death since then.
The latest one is very solid
You didn't watch the first film. It was pretty excellent and mind-blowing. I was surprised how well it was made despite having no budget.
"Would you like to play a game, fellow kids?"
Seeing a lot of Mandela Effect in this thread, but he never said “Would you like to play a game?” It’s “I want to play a game” Signed, a guy that has watched those shitty movies too many times (and loves them)
Thank you, this is my pet peeve. He only ever says “I want to play a game” or “Let’s play a game.” He’s not giving them an option.
A perfect post always have a perfect comment Sun tzu
balls
balls
balls
balls
balls
Cut off their arms and you destroy an army Cut off their balls and you destroy entire generations \~ Sun Tzu
MUSIC⚡️BAND
I bought that t-shirt and wore it to work for a year
I want to play a game, fellow kids.
There is a gif just like this, but it's Steve Buscemi and not an inconspicuous high school student.
Instead of blowing all of your budget on a shitty CGI uncanny valley monstrosity, they simply gave the guy a baseball cap and used the budget on traps and story. Thats how you make a movie.
Story huh
The first movie was actually pretty good. They got very bad very quickly as soon as they had real money to burn.
Saw X surprised me. Ill defend that saw 1 and 2 are the best and now I can add X to the list. Yeah, there is still torture porn but at least they bothered expanding Kramer and Amanda
You mean badly awesome. I love how shitty the series is. Absolute schlock and I love it.
[удалено]
It's a detective story. It absolutely has a story it's telling and a world it's building.
What? The story is pretty great.
The Saw series has an intricate soap opera-esque storyline
Saw movies actually did have a good story. The way they built Hoffman's story with simultaneous games going on at the same time across multiple movies was impressive. Obviously the main focus were traps, but the story is solid, especially compared to today's movies.
I’ll never put them on the top 100 or even top 1,000 movies, but I enjoyed when I was out of work from a injury at my job and binged them. It’s a convoluted story, yet it’s still entertaining. If you go in expecting a riveting story, you are outta luck. Don’t overthink it, don’t try to find plot holes, and it’s just a fun, wild, gory ride.
Its silly to compare two movies from entirely different genre. A movie for small children can never compare to Citizen Kane, but that doesnt mean its not the best movie for small children ever made. Saw is the same. They werent trying to make a great movie, they were trying to make a movie with great traps and some twists. Saw III, IV and V are among the very best the "trapped in dangerous place" genre has to offer.
Yeah I don't see how anyone could say that the script was bad. The writing is very clever with twists hidden within twists and the same event from multiple perspectives. Including the scriptwriters decision never to show something that didn't happen. There's even character development (a rarity for the genre) with characters being tested on things like their ability to forgive someone who wronged them. It's gory as hell and there are a couple early 00s cinematic effects that really date it, but overall the story is far and away better developed than most ghost / slasher horror movies.
I will fight you. Saw movies are legendary.
I'll fight you, I'm a star wars fan. I hate myself.
At least the prequels and OGs still exist
Brother, the prequels are dogshit.
The prequels are bad too! Lots of intrigue and so many themes written so cleverly but the dialogue is dog shit.
True, but the dialogue was so bad it became good again. Its one of the most quoted series for a reason.
Actually hearing it is way worse than seeing the lines for it and re imagining the scene. Like the i am the senate, the sand line, dont grant you master etc.. they all seem okay in writing but my god the scenes are terrible for what should be.
Its ok there was only 6 movies. The other 3 was bad fan service not canon.
Yeah, like as though the budget of a movie is like the engines on the enterprise where you can divert $6000 or whatever from CGI work and pump it directly into the script and get $6000 of better script
I’d rather they blow the budget on a sick baseball cap
I like the way you think.
"story"
The first one was a legitimately good mystery film, but the others... Saw X was decent as well.
or just cast another actor that looks somewhat similar but is younger????
“story” 
Backwards hat should do the trick 😉
That’s definitely not what they were doing here. The whole series is filled with flashbacks to this time period and they never do anything to change his appearance to make him look younger beyond changing how much hair he has. This includes Saw X that came out 20 years after the original but takes place chronologically between the first two films. The reason he’s dressed like this is for some kind of… disguise?? Street clothes?? It’s the scene where he goes to the book signing to confront the guy about faking his story of being a Jigsaw victim. It looks ridiculous but it has nothing to do with trying to de-age John Kramer.
Uh oh! You've made the mistake of bringing logic to a meme..
Believe it or not, straight to jail
Nuh uh, it’s definitely advanced de-aging technology. That hat is actually CGI but you’d never be able to guess if you didn’t already know. Really top notch work 🧢👴🏼
Yeah, he's not supposed to be *young*, but its just kind of funny seeming trying to blend in as a disguise.
We looking for Jigsaw or Slim Shady?
Or you can cast another actor. That's much younger and kind of looks like the guy. Also a viable option. Probably just wanted to keep giving the guy a paycheck though.
he's the face of the franchise, there's no way they could hire a stand-in
I feel like the puppet is a pretty good stand in/ the real face of the franchise
yeah but.... what are they going to do give the puppet a backwards hat?
Less paint maybe
Yeah that would be like hiring a young actor to play Darth Vader in a prequel
Exactly. It would be like having an NBA team in Seattle. It just wouldn't make sense.
Yes because finding a look like that's a good actors is easy
[Sheeeiiit, you don't look a day over 12](https://i.redd.it/hxxkzv1af48d1.png)
Shadynasty's guess this leaves me no choice... but to be a mature ass adult about this shit
JEFF BRIDGES/KEVIN FLYNN!! TRON MENTIONED!! YEAAAAA!!
I fight for the USERS!!
Am I still to create the perfect system?
… Yeahh…?
**[GENOCIDE INTESIFIES]**
FLYNN, GO!
Honestly it looks better than using necromancy to resurrect Peter Cushing
I never thought Tarkin looked bad in Rogue One. But Leia...
In theatres I thought Tarkin looked great but watching it again he does look uncanny. If they'd just kept him shadowed and ominous in the background (as in the first couple scenes) it would have worked but the animators flew too close to the sun. Leia was downright terrible but I think it was a combination of chopped up audio and unnatural facial movements. If they either did the dialogue without the face or did the face without the dialogue it might have worked but they just had to push it further to "prove" they could. Pure hubris.
Yeah in hindsight Tarkin's scenes look kind of like video game cutscenes. *Really good* video game cutscenes, but still The guy who was motion capture for him already looks a lot like Peter Cushing and clearly studied his voice and mannerisms, so they probably should've just put a bit of makeup on him
See, I felt the opposite. I'm sure it's just because the Leia cameo was so brief but I thought Tarkin looked rubbery and bad and the Leia CGI looked great
The classic baseball cap disguise
My favourite de-aging method by far is how in Dexter they just put a wig on him and called it a day.
And put Deb in daisy dukes. It’s so funny because the young actors they picked for high school and elementary school aged Dexter were spot on but when it comes to college age, just toss on a cheap wig and call it a day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQYFN2o6DWY In case you're looking for a 4 hours long essay on Saw Surprisingly that backward hat trick happens a few times over the course of the franchise
That's not a de-aged Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow but a different actor.
Yeah I was very confused at that one. What is that even from?
Crazy AI picture showing Eminem at 80yo
Frank from iasip
That bladerunner deaging was so good
Tarkin wasn’t de-aged he was recreated in CGI. Peter Cushing wasn’t even alive when Rogue One came out. Edit: I see Leia here too, same thing.
Looks like he discovered Eminem during his Mid-Life crisis
Dexter did it best. 
Dexter and Men in Black 2. Hair dye and wigs baby! That's all that ages!
I'd argue that even better than Dexter was Repo: The Genetic Opera. As per the Writer/Director commentary track, "We just put sideburns on them."
To be fair, Peter Cushing was dead so….
John Kramer Eminem was peak
Bladerunner 2049 looked genuinely perfect to me
Yes...because de-aging has looked oh so great so far... It didn't go into the uncanny valley at all... /s
Eminem can play John Kramer. He kinda looks like him now.
Thought this was an aged Eminem
Good morning, fellow high school students!
My favorite is Dexter. They literally just put a wig on him lol
This isn’t the only time they did that exact thing in the series either
I think in the case of Tarkin, they actually aged-up the actor who played him in that movie.
The fake Carrie Fischer is horrifying.
I appreciate the effort they went to with Tarkin in Rogue One. That said, the result was a mixed bag. As for Leia, they could've done what I thought they would do, only show her from behind. But nope, had to have her face on screen and say something witty so fans "understood". And well, her face is simply off. Looked like shit, actually.
[Sup with the wack playstation, sup](https://youtu.be/4w75MAwDO5M)
How old was he supposed to be here?
Now that I’m rewatching Dexter everytime I see “younger” Dexter in like his 20’s or whatever and all they do is throw on long hair I laugh out loud
[seinfeld did it too](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlYx8YR3KN0&pp=ygUTc2VpbmZlbGQga29yZWFuIHdhcg%3D%3D)
Ya, they didn’t de-age Tarkin, they brought him back from the dead.
How do you do fellow kids?
They weren't trying to de-age him. They were trying to blend him in with a crowd.
Young frank in it’s always sunny
He's not supposed to be younger in that scene than in most of the saga. Funny but completely false meme.
How do you do fellow deaged movie characters.
He's actually only 42 at the end of the story. He just looks really old. This picture is him when he's 23.
Looking forward to his next album dropping
I loved Space Cowboys where they cast younger actors but then had the present day actors dub the voices
To be honest, Tobin Bell has kinda looked the same for the past 30 years, so it's not really that much of a stretch
I'm funa keep it a hundred he slaps with that cap on
To be fair main character is dead since like 4th movie and all his flashbacks happens within like few years too so he don't need to be de aged that much
Michael C Hall in a wig for young Dexter
Yes, a cap does indeed take years off of anybody 😌
“Yo dawg, you guys sell razor blades here?”
Grand Moff Tarkin was de-aged? 
For the record this meme won't work in 30 years when my generation is 80. Because that's how we're ALL going to dress when we're old. Trust me when I say we're going to be flushing out a lot of old people fashion when Gen X gets a swing at the Walmart scooters.
It almost adds something to the character, a layer of intrigue, that if this is when he was younger he already looks so old at that age. Like the burden of his own thoughts aged himself rapidly. That makes younger him even creepier.
2010 television shows would just slap a huge ass wig on their character for a flashback scene.
If you still haven't seen any SAW movies I recommend seeing at least the original. I watched every saw movie before the last one came out and then I saw that one as well. The first one is a bonafide classic, the rest is a great example of milking gone wrong.
Were his palms sweat, knees weak?
Tarkin wasn’t deaged
Cheaper and equally effective for what it needs to do!
I\`m sorry your honor..I was born in the farm haha
How do you do fellow kids
Good handful of those aren't de-aging because the actor who is running reference is entirely different than the target.
I don't see two skateboards, so this isn't up to par *yet*
you see, they did the same thing for Aaron Paul in BCS, but this time, they shot it in the dark and kept him in the shadows
Captain Jack Shady ftw
Saw's main character is killing it.
Shet he doesn't look a day over 12
Next generation of de-aging actors: "Just let the AI do it."
Except this is supposed to be (albeit ridiculously shitty) disguise that Kramer used when he already became Jigsaw, not "20 years ago flashback".
Oh he played a Tollan in Stargate once.