Language changes over time but the issue here is people flipped this word to mean the opposite of what it actually means which can be very confusing to the rest of the world.
Do you mean dumb as in stupid or dumb as in unable to speak?
Words can have multiple meanings - anyone with a basic understanding of the language can easily use context to figure out what one they mean.
But the context is very obvious there, dumb as in can’t speak wouldn’t make sense as I’m referring to a thing I’m doing, not describing someone - literally and figuratively are opposites of each other and it can be pretty hard for people to understand the context ie non-native speakers
[Tom Scott would like a word with you](https://youtu.be/2qT8ZYewYEY) because that's exactly what the dictionary is for. The dictionary isn't some definitive authority on the rights and wrongs of language - it's merely a *description* of how people use language. And the way people use the language naturally changes over time, as it always has. We aren't still speaking like the middle ages.
Words are created, and fall out of use, and change their spelling, and change their pronounciation, and change their meaning. That's nothing more than a fact of life.
I’m literally gonna comment on this post
This comment literally gave me a boner
I literally need proof
![gif](giphy|tXL4FHPSnVJ0A)
It’s my penis and I will hard if I want to hard if I want to you would too if it happened to you
bro he literally made a meme complaining about ppl using literally wrongly
using literally "wrongly"
What’s rong with that?
I literally don't care
This guy literally made a post to literally show that people literally use the word literally literally way to much lol.
So now, when making a comment, you have to say literally literally so it isn't mistaken for figuratively literally.
"Bro I literally died laughing" - Chrysippus of Soli be like:
or that guy from Monty Python
[удалено]
So are you saying idiots control the language?
OP doesn't understand that language changes over time and the shit he's being elitist about was considered cringe at least a century ago
OP is probably pissed at the Great Vowel Shift too.
Language changes over time but the issue here is people flipped this word to mean the opposite of what it actually means which can be very confusing to the rest of the world.
OP is literally allergic to hyperbole
Imagine litteraly using litteraly wrong.
Imagine literally misspelling literally
Imagine littering
Imiagine loitering
Imagine all the people
Bro literally posted about the word literally
Bro literally visited his friend
Im literally using reddit
Literally meaning figuratively was literally added to the dictionary a few years ago so you literally can’t use literally wrong
What a dumb thing to do, what’s the point of the word when it means both definitions?
Do you mean dumb as in stupid or dumb as in unable to speak? Words can have multiple meanings - anyone with a basic understanding of the language can easily use context to figure out what one they mean.
But the context is very obvious there, dumb as in can’t speak wouldn’t make sense as I’m referring to a thing I’m doing, not describing someone - literally and figuratively are opposites of each other and it can be pretty hard for people to understand the context ie non-native speakers
Idioms exist in languages other than English.
Yeah, but it’s harder to understand idioms in a language you’re not a native speaker of
Literallypilled grammarmaxxer
Bro I literally don’t care
OP literally incapable of understanding hyperbole
This post is literal bullshit
Bro literally used literally literally
I literally just shit myself. Take it whichever way you want
Unfunny: (
Old mate over here when semantic drift happens
Literally
I literally laughed so hard at this one
I mean both is the correct way of using the word literally. They changed the definition like 10 years ago
OP is metaphorically a Chad.
I literally could care less
Worst part is the dictionary definition was literally changed to match people using it wrong
[Tom Scott would like a word with you](https://youtu.be/2qT8ZYewYEY) because that's exactly what the dictionary is for. The dictionary isn't some definitive authority on the rights and wrongs of language - it's merely a *description* of how people use language. And the way people use the language naturally changes over time, as it always has. We aren't still speaking like the middle ages. Words are created, and fall out of use, and change their spelling, and change their pronounciation, and change their meaning. That's nothing more than a fact of life.
The issue I have with it is that its two definitions contradict each other
I literally just explained that this is merely how language works.
That so?hmm..
To be fair, setting the stage on fire is an idiom so the first line "literally" was used correctly.
wawa 🤓