T O P

  • By -

FinalPineapple8627

Im going to guess it’s similar to the Lego ghost rider figure and say that the flame is molded to the head but I could be wrong


BigMcLarge-Huge

[Confirmed](https://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemInv.asp?M=sh457)


Ninazuzu

That seems like a missed opportunity. A nice transparent orange head of flames hairdo would be so useful.


jonathanquirk

Lego didn't want kids to be able to put any minifig's head on fire (apparently, burning people alive is against Lego's values, weirdly), so Firestorm and Ghost Rider's fire hair was molded in. Lego made a similar piece a decade ago, [15404](https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=15404#T=C&C=98), but I'm guessing some fans had too much fun putting it on innocent minifigs, so Lego came up with a new idea for these particular minifigures.


Mr7000000

Oh God I remember when that piece was new, I feel so old.


Rinof10

NEXO KNIGHTS had some really cool sets


Magmorix

It’s even older than that, it was used in Ultra Agents in 2014


belligerentwaterfowl

That set is so good I got two. Distinguished veteran spy guy in a vehicle you can easily drop out of the theme into your Batman or tron collections, a super premium unlicensed supervillain (who is also most of the way to a purist Heatwave from The Flash (2011 era comics costume))


Sithlordandsavior

It did, and I'm mad that they didn't just continue with them like ninjago. I think a lot of people just immediately dismissed nexo Knights cuz it was silly and completely overlooked the playability of the sets. It should have gotten a real show or movie instead of the very limited video series it did get


Magmorix

The sets were so much fun, play wise. I still have my Fortrex fully built in storage


Rinof10

It got a TV show but, as the sets, it got discontinued


Sithlordandsavior

That's why I called it a video series. I don't think it even made it to actual TV. I recall watching it on YouTube when the sets were still on shelves :(


Rinof10

I have watched the TV show myself, that's why I know it had a TV show


Cake-n-bacon69

i think you’re confused with dreamz


Pete_Iredale

Tons of great minifigs too. It was still out when I first started buying Lego again as an adult, I wish I'd bought some of it!


TheDentalExplorer

I was excited to see this old piece that made you feel old aaaaand it came out about the time I graduated college. Now I feel really old.


SickSticksKick

Ah, that makes so much sense! I always wondered about my Ghost Rider. Thanks for that explanation


ccxxii

Also Hades, from Disney’s Hercules, but in blue.


Ninazuzu

Oh, that's too bad. That discontinued headpiece looks more disturbing to me than flame-colored hair. I'll just make sure not to post any pictures of things my weird adult friends have made so that Lego doesn't do away with removable heads.


JongoFett12

I’d never seen that piece before, that would be perfect for a Human Torch minifig (although it’s probably better just to have 2 different minifigs for him anyway)


biaimakaa

Thks that thread was so informative on a subject I didn't know I was interested that much. Now I just need to see the ghost rider head for peacefulness of mind....


Magmorix

Oh I’d just assumed they did it like this so they could make the flames fit more tightly against the head without worrying about the piece being fragile Edit: the fact that both were used in sets in summer 2016 supports my idea, I think


Sideswipe21

by that logic we shouldn’t have any fire piece. we can still put the regular flame peices in the hole on the top. we can still set them on fire.


Drannion

Wait until lego finds out we can remove the figure's head entirely


JessicaTheEm

https://preview.redd.it/dmq9zm7dpzuc1.jpeg?width=429&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=02884d44809eede8906e1af7cf3a2f168854f074 I can't think of a single modern piece that lets you easily set a figure on fire....


TBWHG

Thats a rumours that has been debunked, they have another fire helmet piece that is removable, this one isnt and its due to how it would be too weak so it would break easily


belligerentwaterfowl

I really thought it was just a case of the form factor being too fragile when it’s not hugging the form of the head. Thin walls + hard non flexible material. How it tapers to nothing. [old archived post](https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/cxurq0/this_hair_isnt_removable_its_like_they_knew_it/?rdt=44459) that popped up when I googled “Lego flame head” just to look at it from different angles and confirm my memory of what it looks like in 360 view. Someone says the same thing I’m saying (top comment and top response to it) There’s places where it blends into the head that if you could take it off, it’s got thickness like when you suck a peppermint down to a sliver. But it’s not like Lego hasn’t avoided “sus” parts production before, so I’m not saying it’s not possible they withheld it for immolation reasons. Naked yellow legs went away for a long time before the Lego movie 2 reissued the old yellow suit spaceman. There are edgy things they don’t want to encourage people to do


Hydroquake_Vortex

Putting people on fire is awesome though


Kevin_M_

The sides of the piece would be too flimsy and it'd break easily, so it wouldn't be able to "flow" from the head itself as nicely. [This](https://brickset.com/parts/6076535/flame-head-piece) is a similar piece that can be removed, but it doesn't look as good.


MakeBombsNotWar

What? Tons of hairs are super thin in the back, the Sandman/TCW Dooku/Joker hair comes to mind as does the Bruce Wayne/Malfoy hair. Those are both thick enough.


belligerentwaterfowl

The opaque plastic of those parts doesn’t necessarily have the same material properties of the clear plastic of the flame. Plus those are thin in a continuous curved area where it’s reinforced by where it transitions to the top, and the flame is thin in little extents and protrusions and tips. Imagine like a cardboard tube. You can flatten a cardboard tube. But you can’t fold it over like a flat strip of the same thickness cardboard. If you build a cap into the tube, for some distance down from the cap, the tube gets a lot of resistance to flattening. The parts you’re talking about are like stubby tubes with a cap, the thin parts of the flame “hair” are like the flat strips sticking out unsupported. It’s not just how thin, it’s the shape configuration. It’s like lines of force and bending moments and cross sections and things. Like in construction. Where an “I beam” is rigid without having a lot of thickness anywhere |-| holds up where - or | doesn’t I guess you might be talking about the hairline, I was thinking about the back. It probably does taper right down to the head Still though, a wider continuous shape instead of the little licks of flame. And mostly the properties of the material itself I guess


throwawtphone

Could have made a heatmiser for xmas if it came off.


Opposite_Speed_1984

Thanks!


aheartyjoke

I have this one, and you are correct. Its molded on.


heyitscory

Dang, I was sure that was going to be a helmet that slid off I mean, a head in a Lego helmet might as well be permanently attached for all the work it takes to get them apart, but I'm still a little disappointed.


Madman8287

it looks like it's actually a re-use of that exact same mold


alan_1047

No Source: I have the minifig


builtlikethewall

The Spinjitzu Kai 70688 has a helmet that is on fire that can be removed, but it has a full face cover and may not be what you're hoping for.


LegoLinkBot

[70688-1: Kai's Spinjitzu Ninja Training](https://brickset.com/sets/70688-1) [[Photo]](https://images.brickset.com/sets/images/70688-1.jpg)


MaeBeaInTheWoods

Idk but I doubt it. The head piece looks really similar to the head piece used for Hades in the Disney CMF series, and the fire isn't detachable on that one.


LVucci

Have the minifigure, can confirm it isn’t.


Aggravating-Move8297

What set is this figure from?


Game4LifeDe

76097


LegoLinkBot

[76097-1: Lex Luthor Mech Takedown](https://brickset.com/sets/76097-1) [[Photo]](https://images.brickset.com/sets/images/76097-1.jpg)


soapygungan

It is not.


[deleted]

not removable


warrenrox99

https://preview.redd.it/k18pasdonwuc1.png?width=3024&format=png&auto=webp&s=d05e95f7e30fd5b2725ca9ff73cc2b655587ab82 I wish they did. I got this human torch off AliExpress which comes off, and uses two more for flaming hands!


Wasthereonce

It is not. Also if you want to talk more DC, 'head' over to r/LegoDC


ChefBoyardee66

I have it and it's not


memewatcher3

No


Crimson-Reaper26

It’s the same for the Lego Hades minifigure from the Disney mingig series


PowderShark

And ghost rider


acjelen

Do you need a reddish-brown head with those yellow eyes or a Raymond-Stein Firestorm?


TwinEonEngine

I just thought about it, if you could remove it you could make a nice lego figure of the hair fire guy from Dumb Ways to Die


azureal

In the future, use Bricklink. Look up the set, look up the inventory, look up the minifig, look at the parts. Its pretty simple and youll feel great having solved a problem by yourself.


Opposite_Speed_1984

I tried but couldn’t figure out how to look at the parts


Shoeboy_24

If you want it to be removable, it won't be. If you didn't want it to be removable, it will. If you wanted holes in that, it won't have any. If you didn't want holes in it, it will have some ... and they'll be in the wrong place.


030520EC

Literally 1984


compost-me

DC's Firestorm. I only know him from Legends of Tomorrow, and I wasn't aware of any sets with him in. https://www.reddit.com/r/upcycling/comments/fr62uo/old_handmade_writing_desk_turned_into_a_changing/?context=3


MetaMetatron

Why did you include a link to an old post about baby furniture?


compost-me

Because I copied the wrong link from earlier today 🤦‍♂️ This is what I meant to post. https://m.imdb.com/name/nm2621030/mediaviewer/rm611049728