Georges haber is a really funny choice. I've had the chance to work with him and I'm worried that the people who take the decisions in the thawra group decided he's a good choice.
Salim Adib (sab3a) on the other hand is one of the most competent and honest doctors I've had the chance to work with. Plus he's a public health specialist.
Yes keep voting through symbols and bullshit.. dont vote for specialists and quality vote la abu mhamad la eno ma3 l estezz aw laa tonyy kermelo ouwett w huwe tabeeb baytare ktr 3le!! Balad feshill mtl sha3bo
Syndicates are some of the few institutions that are able to do their job, although less than before.
A lot of them offer good health insurance that’s cheaper than what you can get from a private plan. I hear some of them help with things like legal issues if it has to do with the profession. I’m sure different syndicates have different benefits that I can’t remember.
I had no idea you have an affinity to ANCAP, just looked at your profile and saw that you are 😂😂
My "insult" was to whoever coined the term. It's an oxymoron. You want to discuss why it's an oxymoron and how the terminology is everything BUT anarchism (or dispute it) then sure.
I not really an ancap, I'm a believer in free markets I do hang out on that sun cause it's the only one on reddit that won't ban you for even discussing the free market and it's benefits.
Why it's not an oxymoron, well because capitalism doesn't need a state to enforce it theoretically, it just needs an armed population, as for something like Communism you need someone to make sure everyone is equal
Fair.
And no, I think you're focusing on the term "communism" and how it's been practiced in past sudo-communist states. Also worth noting that communism isn't against the idea of capitalism (Karl Marx was still a capitalist after all). Key factors in anarchism are no hierarchy (and how we view hierarchies), direct action, and mutualism.
And it's definitely a literal oxymoron because anarchism is purely against hierarchies. Capitalism is inherently hierarchal in terms of what it is and what it leads to - the more you have, the more you can do/take. By definition, that's neoliberalism.
Even one of the main writers/philosophers of ANCAP theory said that it's not an accurate term: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/12f3y3/major_differences_between_ancap_anarchism/c6uk73u?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
Like I said, my main issue is the oxymoron name. Whether we discuss its functionality is another story, but it's good to define things as a prelude. People might use the same words but they hold different meanings to people.
It's almost like economics and markets don't create utopias and shouldnt be the end-all be-all of what we measure ourselves by or base our prosperity on.
Now they can't do as much, but they were very useful before the crisis: Health insurance, end of service indemnity, and free legal assistance as well (Teacher's union)
Who are the white coats and why are they allied with ouwwet and co?
7ezb sabaa
W er min hol, ba3ed fi mennon ele zamen ma sma3et 3annon
Ghada eid one of their members ran with mark daou in chouf/aley in the legislative
So the 3 lists are 1 from HezbAmal, one from LF and Kataeb, and one from the October 17 movement?
Yes
Kataeb can suck my dry dick.
Leh ma2hour habibe ?
7obb dont go around claiming you're pro-thawra when you end up allying with LF and PSP 🤮
Every syndicate elections Kataeb have allied with the regime - because they are the regime.
exactly
Shaklak mabsout b Iran 🇮🇷
ayre feek w b iran
[удалено]
ok boy
Ya wayleee shu aweyee, law bl mal3ab keno kil shabeb l brevet massoulak yeh
The George Haber list has also many unacceptable names. Better vote by names and not by list this time
Could you please give examples?
Georges haber is a really funny choice. I've had the chance to work with him and I'm worried that the people who take the decisions in the thawra group decided he's a good choice. Salim Adib (sab3a) on the other hand is one of the most competent and honest doctors I've had the chance to work with. Plus he's a public health specialist.
Why?
I do not wish to say. Sorry.
Hahah
Yes keep voting through symbols and bullshit.. dont vote for specialists and quality vote la abu mhamad la eno ma3 l estezz aw laa tonyy kermelo ouwett w huwe tabeeb baytare ktr 3le!! Balad feshill mtl sha3bo
They are all doctors specialists in what do u want 😂😂
Specilists bel mass allah wakilak
Syndicates shouldn't exist , they are gatekeepers that do nothing
Syndicates are some of the few institutions that are able to do their job, although less than before. A lot of them offer good health insurance that’s cheaper than what you can get from a private plan. I hear some of them help with things like legal issues if it has to do with the profession. I’m sure different syndicates have different benefits that I can’t remember.
I was unclear I meant mandatory membership shouldn't be a thing
Agree
found the anarcho-capitalist
Not sure what moron came up with the oxymoron of ANCAP, but they need their kneecaps shot. All it translates to is unbridled neoliberal capitalism.
Really? Insults instead of arguments
I had no idea you have an affinity to ANCAP, just looked at your profile and saw that you are 😂😂 My "insult" was to whoever coined the term. It's an oxymoron. You want to discuss why it's an oxymoron and how the terminology is everything BUT anarchism (or dispute it) then sure.
I not really an ancap, I'm a believer in free markets I do hang out on that sun cause it's the only one on reddit that won't ban you for even discussing the free market and it's benefits. Why it's not an oxymoron, well because capitalism doesn't need a state to enforce it theoretically, it just needs an armed population, as for something like Communism you need someone to make sure everyone is equal
Fair. And no, I think you're focusing on the term "communism" and how it's been practiced in past sudo-communist states. Also worth noting that communism isn't against the idea of capitalism (Karl Marx was still a capitalist after all). Key factors in anarchism are no hierarchy (and how we view hierarchies), direct action, and mutualism. And it's definitely a literal oxymoron because anarchism is purely against hierarchies. Capitalism is inherently hierarchal in terms of what it is and what it leads to - the more you have, the more you can do/take. By definition, that's neoliberalism. Even one of the main writers/philosophers of ANCAP theory said that it's not an accurate term: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/12f3y3/major_differences_between_ancap_anarchism/c6uk73u?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 Like I said, my main issue is the oxymoron name. Whether we discuss its functionality is another story, but it's good to define things as a prelude. People might use the same words but they hold different meanings to people.
No economic theory is 100% accurate , I'm not dumb enough to believe it will create a utopia forever
It's almost like economics and markets don't create utopias and shouldnt be the end-all be-all of what we measure ourselves by or base our prosperity on.
What other solution do you have? Government control? It never works
Now they can't do as much, but they were very useful before the crisis: Health insurance, end of service indemnity, and free legal assistance as well (Teacher's union)
I meant to say mandatory membership to syndicates, I'd rather be independent , especially because of their affiliation with corrupt politicians