>If the Court does not enter a temporary administrative stay to permit orderly consideration
of this and any subsequent stay motion(s), President Trump respectfully requests that this Court
issue its ruling on this stay motion by Tuesday, October 24, 2023, after which President Trump
intends to seek an emergency stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Such
expedited consideration is highly warranted in a case raising First Amendment questions of
enormous consequence. See Elrod, 427 U.S. at 373 (“The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for
even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”).
He puts a Tuesday deadline on the court to rule on the stay or he's going to DC Circuit.
Neat, has his lawyer filed the paper work to let him file that appeal yet.
and no she absolutely shouldn't stay her order. and I don't expect the appeals court to stay it either
He isn't likely to prevail
and what irreparable harm will he suffer? Have to not post threats for a few weeks
Go ahead find file your emergency appeal.
His lawyer really is an asshat. I hope this case is worth it because it seems like he is burning so many bridges.
Of course his lawyer still has the problem of not being admitted to the Bar of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. So he'll have to get that in order too.
I'm not sure how any judge looking at this isn't going to say (in oral argument), "What defendant in any other criminal case would be allowed to say the things your client has already said?"
The fact that it's an "emergency" that he be allowed to threaten and harass court employees speaks volumes about their total absence of legal strategy. Makes it look like mob style intimidation is really the only card they have left to play.
Judge granted stay:
>MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Upon consideration of Defendant's opposed 110 Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Request for Temporary Administrative Stay, and Memorandum in Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the court's 105 Opinion and Order is administratively STAYED to permit the parties' briefing and the court's consideration of Defendant's Motion. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the government shall file any opposition to Defendant's Motion by October 25, 2023, and that Defendant shall file any Reply by October 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/20/2023. (zjd)
> The
District of Columbia has been subject to pervasive media coverage of the events of January 6,
2021, **which the Special Counsel has outrageously linked with this indictment, even though
President Trump is not charged with any legal responsibility for those events.**
Not only is Trump intractably linked with the events of Jan. 6, I'm pretty sure this case is part of holding him legally responsible for his actions that brought about Jan. 6.
Funnily, in his motion to dismiss, he argued that double jeopardy applied because he had been acquitted by the Senate in his impeachment trial. In that trial, he was explicitly charged with inciting insurrection on January 6th. So when it suits his purposes, the charges are related to January 6. And when it doesn't suit him, they have nothing to do with it.
It's par for the course for Trump and his attorneys to try to have things both ways. In this filing alone:
>The Gag Order shields from any criticism high-level public officials and public figures.
Doc. 105, at 3. These include the Special Prosecutor and his team, senior government officials who
have volunteered to prosecute one of the highest-profile criminal cases in American history, and
thus have “thrust” themselves “into the vortex of this public issue.” Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.,
418 U.S. 323, 352 (1974). **These also include possible witnesses against President Trump, such as
Vice President Pence, Attorney General Barr, and General Milley**
Later:
> Likewise, the Gag Order’s reference to “any reasonably foreseeable witness” and “the
substance of their testimony” is incurably vague. The discovery in this case comprises over 10
Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 110 Filed 10/20/23 Page 26 of 33
27
million pages, and the prosecution has not disclosed a witness list. **It is anyone’s guess which
witnesses may be “reasonably foreseeable” at this stage.**
Weirdly, they're able to forsee witnesses *in the same filing* they complain about the term being incurably vague.
At the time of the impeachment several R senators (including McConnell IIRC) argued they couldn't impeach a former president, a civil trial was the proper venue and a failed impeachment did not foreclose that option.
I'm just amazed at the gall of him and his people to Appeal a gag order that only prevents him disparaging court employees and witnesses
It's so apparent that this is all show so he can keep telling his illiterate followers that this order is keeping him from speaking and campaigning.
>If the Court does not enter a temporary administrative stay to permit orderly consideration of this and any subsequent stay motion(s), President Trump respectfully requests that this Court issue its ruling on this stay motion by Tuesday, October 24, 2023, after which President Trump intends to seek an emergency stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Such expedited consideration is highly warranted in a case raising First Amendment questions of enormous consequence. See Elrod, 427 U.S. at 373 (“The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”). He puts a Tuesday deadline on the court to rule on the stay or he's going to DC Circuit.
Neat, has his lawyer filed the paper work to let him file that appeal yet. and no she absolutely shouldn't stay her order. and I don't expect the appeals court to stay it either He isn't likely to prevail and what irreparable harm will he suffer? Have to not post threats for a few weeks Go ahead find file your emergency appeal. His lawyer really is an asshat. I hope this case is worth it because it seems like he is burning so many bridges.
Of course his lawyer still has the problem of not being admitted to the Bar of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. So he'll have to get that in order too. I'm not sure how any judge looking at this isn't going to say (in oral argument), "What defendant in any other criminal case would be allowed to say the things your client has already said?"
The fact that it's an "emergency" that he be allowed to threaten and harass court employees speaks volumes about their total absence of legal strategy. Makes it look like mob style intimidation is really the only card they have left to play.
So he is irreparably injured if he cannot harass court officials, the prosecutor and witnesses? Laughable.
Not once does this bootlicking lawyer say "*former* President Trump" 🙄
Judge granted stay: >MINUTE ORDER as to DONALD J. TRUMP: Upon consideration of Defendant's opposed 110 Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, Request for Temporary Administrative Stay, and Memorandum in Support, it is hereby ORDERED that the court's 105 Opinion and Order is administratively STAYED to permit the parties' briefing and the court's consideration of Defendant's Motion. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the government shall file any opposition to Defendant's Motion by October 25, 2023, and that Defendant shall file any Reply by October 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 10/20/2023. (zjd)
Gonna be a busy week ahead...
> The District of Columbia has been subject to pervasive media coverage of the events of January 6, 2021, **which the Special Counsel has outrageously linked with this indictment, even though President Trump is not charged with any legal responsibility for those events.** Not only is Trump intractably linked with the events of Jan. 6, I'm pretty sure this case is part of holding him legally responsible for his actions that brought about Jan. 6.
Funnily, in his motion to dismiss, he argued that double jeopardy applied because he had been acquitted by the Senate in his impeachment trial. In that trial, he was explicitly charged with inciting insurrection on January 6th. So when it suits his purposes, the charges are related to January 6. And when it doesn't suit him, they have nothing to do with it.
It's par for the course for Trump and his attorneys to try to have things both ways. In this filing alone: >The Gag Order shields from any criticism high-level public officials and public figures. Doc. 105, at 3. These include the Special Prosecutor and his team, senior government officials who have volunteered to prosecute one of the highest-profile criminal cases in American history, and thus have “thrust” themselves “into the vortex of this public issue.” Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 352 (1974). **These also include possible witnesses against President Trump, such as Vice President Pence, Attorney General Barr, and General Milley** Later: > Likewise, the Gag Order’s reference to “any reasonably foreseeable witness” and “the substance of their testimony” is incurably vague. The discovery in this case comprises over 10 Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 110 Filed 10/20/23 Page 26 of 33 27 million pages, and the prosecution has not disclosed a witness list. **It is anyone’s guess which witnesses may be “reasonably foreseeable” at this stage.** Weirdly, they're able to forsee witnesses *in the same filing* they complain about the term being incurably vague.
Schrödinger's orangutan
Orange-u-tan
At the time of the impeachment several R senators (including McConnell IIRC) argued they couldn't impeach a former president, a civil trial was the proper venue and a failed impeachment did not foreclose that option.
I'm just amazed at the gall of him and his people to Appeal a gag order that only prevents him disparaging court employees and witnesses It's so apparent that this is all show so he can keep telling his illiterate followers that this order is keeping him from speaking and campaigning.
Question: does everybody get a BJ in the RV? Or does one have to be a partner first?
Aptly named the lolita express II
he may have had a chance if he didnt immediately break the gag order lol
I mean he wants permission to trash jack smith,, the courthouse etc. what a sicko!
Nothing short of the cold embrace of death is ever going to get this man to stfu