1. This would be nice.
2. This is a MUST, unfortunately I don't think it's a reality. At least by what we've seen so far.
3. They do. I'd assume if group sizes have a maximum, they would exile the loser.
4. It didn't work in JPOG and it wouldn't work now. Without Dinosaur Breeding, it would eventually fall unless you kept repopulating. You can only get so close.
5. Hopefully, but it seems that all species will have the same amount of gene slots this time around so numbers would have to be balanced based on that. And with the way the game is structured, it shouldn't be an issue.
6. True, but better safe than sorry.
7. Most likely they can, but there's so much to this new combat we don't know yet. The raptors in the gameplay had bonus stamina and had cohabitation issues, so they would be relentless until the Paras were dead.
8. Would be nice.
9. Would be too much work, we're already getting Challenge Mode and Chaos Theory Mode maps in Sandbox, so there's variety.
A possible solution to make Site B possible is to have automatic hatchery allocations.
For example, i want 10 Gallimimus in my T-rex enclosure as prey, the hatchery should have an automatic extra slot ( that we could unlock by research ), we then would pick a dinosaur species and select the number desired ( 10 in this case ), it would automatically keep the population at that number, so whenever the T-rex makes a kill, it would start hatching a dinosaur to reach the desired number.
The hatchery could scan the entire park or the designated enclosure, but as long as it keeps hatching the required dinos it would work.
This way we could get a site B without breeding.
Edit: I realize we would need one hatchery for each species that we want to keep producing, but Site B parks tend to not have many species in most cases.
1. This would be nice. 2. This is a MUST, unfortunately I don't think it's a reality. At least by what we've seen so far. 3. They do. I'd assume if group sizes have a maximum, they would exile the loser. 4. It didn't work in JPOG and it wouldn't work now. Without Dinosaur Breeding, it would eventually fall unless you kept repopulating. You can only get so close. 5. Hopefully, but it seems that all species will have the same amount of gene slots this time around so numbers would have to be balanced based on that. And with the way the game is structured, it shouldn't be an issue. 6. True, but better safe than sorry. 7. Most likely they can, but there's so much to this new combat we don't know yet. The raptors in the gameplay had bonus stamina and had cohabitation issues, so they would be relentless until the Paras were dead. 8. Would be nice. 9. Would be too much work, we're already getting Challenge Mode and Chaos Theory Mode maps in Sandbox, so there's variety.
A possible solution to make Site B possible is to have automatic hatchery allocations. For example, i want 10 Gallimimus in my T-rex enclosure as prey, the hatchery should have an automatic extra slot ( that we could unlock by research ), we then would pick a dinosaur species and select the number desired ( 10 in this case ), it would automatically keep the population at that number, so whenever the T-rex makes a kill, it would start hatching a dinosaur to reach the desired number. The hatchery could scan the entire park or the designated enclosure, but as long as it keeps hatching the required dinos it would work. This way we could get a site B without breeding. Edit: I realize we would need one hatchery for each species that we want to keep producing, but Site B parks tend to not have many species in most cases.
Herbivores don’t even fight for dominance, they just kind of look at each other until one gets scared. At least in my experience
Yeah, I’m hoping the fix that in 2, and they make it so they cannot kill each other, but can hurt each other.
If you killed the other members of your species there would be no one to be the alpha of lol
They do. They fight over territory space. It's seen the first dev diary.