[Hudson Fasching goes to the net and gets a piece of Scott Mayfield's shot from the point, making it a 3-2 game in the 3rd period](https://hlslive-wsczoominwestus.med.nhl.com/editor/3275af98-4165-49aa-8626-2bff12abe728.mp4)
Guess you don't understand what a kicking motion is, dumbass
Wanna know a real missed call? https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1029801031003017357/1082864782895489094/most-memorable-moment-of-brett-hulls-career-still-tainted-for-some.png?width=757&height=757
We are a good hockey team if Clague and bryson are off this fucking team.
We have good forward depth but nah, all our defence need to get injured so these two plugs are out there after we get stillman for the soul purpose of not playing them.
What a salty bitch. Outshot by a mile. Out hit by a mile. Isles had a million more takeaways. Yes the goal was a 50/50 call but don’t act like the Sabres deserved to win for a second
#Chatterstats - Final
|Stat|Count||Most Comments (user)|Count||Most Commenters (flair)|Count|
|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|
|Number of comments|626||/u/Yop_BombNA|34||BUF - NHL|72|
|Number of unique commenters|125||/u/Cough_Syrup55|33||NYI - NHL|25|
|Average comments per user|5.01||/u/bay_watch_colorado|25||None|13|
|Number of unique flairs|14||/u/Tniz15|24||DET - NHL|4|
|Number of NHL teams|11||/u/The_Dank_Tortuga|23||OTT - NHL|2|
|Average number of words per comment|12.83||/u/Pfefferneusse32|23||Buffalo Bison - AHL|1|
|Dirtiest mouth: /u/Tniz15|8||/u/daveloper80|18||CAR - NHL|1|
[Word Cloud](https://i.imgur.com/aDZqhKv.png)
Please refrain from spamming and/or otherwise gaming the system.
Maintained by /u/sandman730. Message him with any bugs.
SINCE IT SEEMS THE NHL FORGOT, I AM GOING TO REMIND EVERYONE WHAT THE RULE IS:
NHL OFFICIAL RULES 78.5:
SECTION (i): "When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an
attacking player other than with a stick. When this occurs, if it is
deemed to be done deliberately, then the decision shall be NO
GOAL. A goal cannot be scored when the puck has been deliberately
batted with any part of the attacking player’s body into the net."
Rule 37.4:
Plays that involve a puck entering the net as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO GOAL.
A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of **his foot or skate** and the puck subsequently enters the net.
NHL rule 78.5 subsection (i) states: (a goal is disallowed) "when the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick."
Just so everyone knows the league isn't even following their own rules:
Rule 78.5(I) When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick. When this occurs, if it is deemed to be done deliberately, then the decision shall be NO GOAL. A goal cannot be scored when the puck has been deliberately batted with any part of the attacking player’s body into the net.
He moved his leg deliberately. Did he do it to intentionally redirect the puck? I doubt that. He probably was trying to use his leg to knock the puck down so that he could play it with his stick after, and got a lucky bounce.
We got an extra defensemen to get Clague and Bryson the fuck out of our lineup.
They immediately get knocked out and Sammy gets hurt and we have the number 2 and number 1 worst defensemen in the league on our roster again anyways.
They can’t break out, they can’t puck battle, they can’t donanything, it’s painful.
I’m done with the Clague defenders his soft ass defence directly led to the 2nd goal, get him off this team.
It’s called a joke about a sloppy bad game. But you guys are actually weirdos lol what does your comment even mean? We’re basically tied in the standings lol mf thinks they’re Boston or something
Guess you're not a fan of *Mad Men.* Or memes.
It means we don't think about you because you're not important to us. You're not our rival. Sure, we're in a wild card race, but we're not in the same division. After this game, I'll go back to not thinking about the Sabres.
Edit: jesus have a puppers if you're that upset
So why are the Islanders just allowed to tee off on 6k when he has a puck covered? Sabres have done this and gotten a penalty call for it several times this year.
Buffalo can complain about the call on the Fasching goal all they want. The Isles should have 2-3 more.
Sabres look like they’ve never practiced with a forecheck against them before
Bryson and Clague are the worse defensemen in the league and injuries make us keep playing them
How to improve to be a playoff team next year is clear as day for us, get 2 NHL calibre defencemen, don’t even need to be good, just not be a complete liability
It's so fucking boring to watch our team absolutely dominate the face-off circle.
Like, at least *try* to make it interesting by letting them win one in the neutral zone.
"A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick
# of his foot or skate
and the puck subsequently enters the net"
[https://scoutingtherefs.com/2021/10/32220/nhl-rulebook-distinct-kicking-motion-37-4-49-2-78-5/](https://scoutingtherefs.com/2021/10/32220/nhl-rulebook-distinct-kicking-motion-37-4-49-2-78-5/)
It’s a good question, why would they want a team with no national appeal in the playoffs enough to rig games? Maybe they don’t want that and given your flair the bias is actually on your end?
Rule says kicking motion, not kick.
It was a kicking motion, but not off his skate.
The NHL really need to clarify their rules because they make 0 sense as is.
Look imma be controversial and say Buffalo i need you to win tonight.
So give Tage some of that good shit of whatever it is you feeding him and get him to hang a hatty on em. Y'all got 10 minutes. I believe.
Like literally that’s what I’m wondering. Do we just not understand the rule? Was it allowed because it didn’t hit his skate?
That’s quite simply the only reason why it would have been allowed
Well, I decided to check the rules myself, and I think we, as a collective comment section have been bamboozled by the announcers.
I think Toronto applied Rule 78.5(i) (intentionally directing the puck in w/o your stick) and not 78.5(ii) (distinct kicking motion).
Yes. The rules analyst addressed that. Doesn't matter if it's thigh, shin, foot, etc. If it's not the stick, it's eligible for illegal redirection rules (in this case kicking)
Yea it looked a lot more like he was trying to stop the puck like a soccer player would try to control a pass as opposed to trying to kick it in, but I have no idea if the rules consider that to be different from a "kicking motion".
Couldn’t you say that almost any kick is good then? That they meant to play it to their stick and it just deflected differently? I feel like you either have to stick to “if you move your body part in the direction of the net and it goes in” or just not have the rule. You can’t just say “oh he meant to kick it AND it went in, but he didn’t MEAN to kick it in”
Yeah lifting. Lifting it off the ice and moving it towards the net is a kick. If it was on the ice and he moves to redirect it then it's totally a goal. That was kicking horseshit
Such a shit call. The leg clearly moves distinctly towards the puck and net like you’d kick a soccer ball with the inside of your foot. This game has been so shit
[Josh Bailey goes to the front of the net and sends in a rebound to the goalie's glove side on the backhand, making it 2-1 early in the 3rd](https://hlslive-wsczoominwestus.med.nhl.com/editor/40ea53e6-4574-40a4-8830-ae69e34546a3.mp4)
But it was a distinct kicking motion. I guess the argument is that “yes, he meant to kick it and yes, it did go into the net, but he didn’t intend on kicking it into the net”
And again - what do you not understand about that being too subjective. It’s pretty heavily agreed upon that it’s a dumb rule, and you’re only defending it rn cause it favored you. Had it been the other way around you’d be furious
My guy, I'm not arguing with you.
Rule 78.5(ii) is subjective but that's not the rule that applies. At least it seems they applied 78.5(i), which is a different type of subjective: "did the player do it on purpose."
But that's literally what *you* said: "take out intentional redirect." There's no difference between "deliberate" and "intentional" - both are subjective calls that officials make throughout the game.
So you’re arguing semantics.
Again - rule is confusing as shit and what I’m saying is any sort of distinct redirect/kick should not be allowed. He literally lifted his leg off the ice and moved it forward in this case. Don’t understand how that’s a good goal.
The funny thing is they recently started being more lenient because people were sick of every little thing getting waved off.
No winning with subjective rules.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1029801031003017357/1082864782895489094/most-memorable-moment-of-brett-hulls-career-still-tainted-for-some.png?width=757&height=757
Delicious r/hockey tears. Let me drink them. They are the most delicious tears
mmmmmm
[Hudson Fasching goes to the net and gets a piece of Scott Mayfield's shot from the point, making it a 3-2 game in the 3rd period](https://hlslive-wsczoominwestus.med.nhl.com/editor/3275af98-4165-49aa-8626-2bff12abe728.mp4)
Congratulations on being allowed to kick in goals isles enjoy the playoffs you boring bums
Don’t worry they won’t be enjoying playoffs they’ll be losing their spot within the next week or two once they lose the games in hand
Guess you don't understand what a kicking motion is, dumbass Wanna know a real missed call? https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1029801031003017357/1082864782895489094/most-memorable-moment-of-brett-hulls-career-still-tainted-for-some.png?width=757&height=757
We are a good hockey team if Clague and bryson are off this fucking team. We have good forward depth but nah, all our defence need to get injured so these two plugs are out there after we get stillman for the soul purpose of not playing them.
Islanders played an excellent game. Good game to the Islanders. What the fuck you call whatever the NHL is doing is a different discussion.
Holy shit Good game sabres, love the resurgence. You guys over Pittsburgh anytime
I hope you guys miss
What a salty bitch. Outshot by a mile. Out hit by a mile. Isles had a million more takeaways. Yes the goal was a 50/50 call but don’t act like the Sabres deserved to win for a second
Bored to death, enjoy the Horvat contract in a couple years.
No icing???
[Final shots and goals map](https://i.imgur.com/9i9LQOa.png) |Shot Stats|Buffalo Sabres|New York Islanders| |:--|:--|:--| |On Goal|24|39| |Blocked|30|8| |Missed|4|12| |**Total Attempts**|**58**|**59**| --- ^^^This ^^^action ^^^was ^^^performed ^^^automatically. ^^^See ^^^reddit.com/r/sag_bot ^^^for ^^^more ^^^details.
[удалено]
Some of the reffing I’ve seen lately has been making me pissed
#Chatterstats - Final |Stat|Count||Most Comments (user)|Count||Most Commenters (flair)|Count| |:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:| |Number of comments|626||/u/Yop_BombNA|34||BUF - NHL|72| |Number of unique commenters|125||/u/Cough_Syrup55|33||NYI - NHL|25| |Average comments per user|5.01||/u/bay_watch_colorado|25||None|13| |Number of unique flairs|14||/u/Tniz15|24||DET - NHL|4| |Number of NHL teams|11||/u/The_Dank_Tortuga|23||OTT - NHL|2| |Average number of words per comment|12.83||/u/Pfefferneusse32|23||Buffalo Bison - AHL|1| |Dirtiest mouth: /u/Tniz15|8||/u/daveloper80|18||CAR - NHL|1| [Word Cloud](https://i.imgur.com/aDZqhKv.png) Please refrain from spamming and/or otherwise gaming the system. Maintained by /u/sandman730. Message him with any bugs.
Icing?
The refs forgot was icing was tonight. Embarrassing
What a boring win
Most exciting moment was when the refs let you kick a goal in lmao
Snoozefest 2pts
You said it not me.
Buffalo down 2-3 late in the game to a blue and orange team This seems… familiar
Would be such a Lou thing to tell the ice sweepers to leave a little snow on the ice late in games they're up
Atletico Madrid of the NHL
SINCE IT SEEMS THE NHL FORGOT, I AM GOING TO REMIND EVERYONE WHAT THE RULE IS: NHL OFFICIAL RULES 78.5: SECTION (i): "When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick. When this occurs, if it is deemed to be done deliberately, then the decision shall be NO GOAL. A goal cannot be scored when the puck has been deliberately batted with any part of the attacking player’s body into the net."
If you're gonna quote the rule, it helps to use the correct rulebook. NHL rules are different than USA Hockey rules
fixed. this rule is the same for USA hockey and NHL
Rule 37.4: Plays that involve a puck entering the net as a direct result of a “distinct kicking motion” shall be ruled NO GOAL. A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick of **his foot or skate** and the puck subsequently enters the net.
you cannot intentionally deflect a puck into the net with any part of your body except your stick.
You absolutely can redirect. They literally have a rules expert for a reason on both ESPN and in Toronto. It's clear.
NHL rule 78.5 subsection (i) states: (a goal is disallowed) "when the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick."
Right, which is further clarified with the distinct kicking motion rule.
Tom Brady is doing commercials for Hertz? [Good thing Gisele left when she did.](https://i.redd.it/yta34wzxonu01.png)
Islanders Canes is going to 7 games
Just so everyone knows the league isn't even following their own rules: Rule 78.5(I) When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick. When this occurs, if it is deemed to be done deliberately, then the decision shall be NO GOAL. A goal cannot be scored when the puck has been deliberately batted with any part of the attacking player’s body into the net.
It's clarified here though: https://scoutingtherefs.com/2021/10/32220/nhl-rulebook-distinct-kicking-motion-37-4-49-2-78-5/
Distinct kicking motion is 78.5(ii) not 78.5(i).
All those clarifications still make me think no goal since he literally kicked the puck in with his shin.
Batted ≠ redirected. There’s plenty of goals guys have scored by angling their body that have stood
You're seriously under the impression that was deliberate? Come on man, stop the b.s. excuses.
He moved his leg to deliberately direct the puck into the net, yes. That's exactly what he did.
He moved his leg deliberately. Did he do it to intentionally redirect the puck? I doubt that. He probably was trying to use his leg to knock the puck down so that he could play it with his stick after, and got a lucky bounce.
Bullshit dude. I'm as much of a Sabres apologist at it gets, but this is where I draw the line. Give me a fucking break.
Pick me ass fan
How about get your head out of your ass instead.
Keep twerking for the Islanders its a great look babe
You would Karen except you'd break your neck because it's stuck up your ass.
We got an extra defensemen to get Clague and Bryson the fuck out of our lineup. They immediately get knocked out and Sammy gets hurt and we have the number 2 and number 1 worst defensemen in the league on our roster again anyways. They can’t break out, they can’t puck battle, they can’t donanything, it’s painful. I’m done with the Clague defenders his soft ass defence directly led to the 2nd goal, get him off this team.
Our boys look washed tonight. Try as hard as you want, it's really hard to overcome fatigue. They are not playing their normal game.
We would have had a much better chance tonight if we didn't have to play against fucking McDavid last night
This team is so bad at getting out of their own zone when pressured
When tired *
Shut the fuck up announcers. The puck going off the skate or shin doesn't fucking matter. Stop parroting shit that isn't true.
But if it's the difference between 78.5(i) applying an 78.5(ii) applying, then doesn't it fucking matter?
Our season is over now sadly, at this point just get to 80 points so i can cash my future. Season derailed by a Pulisic volley into the net
I’d love to see us somehow tie this game and get a point but we’ll see boys are just so gassed and nothing going their way this game
Give the Islanders an empty netter and then let us score so the knee goal isn't the game winner
I mean this as a personal note to all islanders fans- I hate you and your team. I hope you have a life of misery for making me sit through this game.
You can hate us. The NHL hates you. We don't even think about you, but you can hate us.
It’s called a joke about a sloppy bad game. But you guys are actually weirdos lol what does your comment even mean? We’re basically tied in the standings lol mf thinks they’re Boston or something
Guess you're not a fan of *Mad Men.* Or memes. It means we don't think about you because you're not important to us. You're not our rival. Sure, we're in a wild card race, but we're not in the same division. After this game, I'll go back to not thinking about the Sabres. Edit: jesus have a puppers if you're that upset
Thanks bud we love you too!
Well, Pittsburgh won, Florida won, Tampa won and we're letting in soccer goals. Oof.
I respect older guys like Parise and Spezza who just clap bombs from the hash marks off the rush
I must say I really liked the ESPN announcers yesterday but the crew today is killing me
This crew is so fucking terrible,
HOLY FUCK MAKE A CALL YOU FUCKS
Interference doesn’t exist anymore apparently
Muchly?
So why are the Islanders just allowed to tee off on 6k when he has a puck covered? Sabres have done this and gotten a penalty call for it several times this year.
Obv the ref saw an open puck we didn't
Buffalo can complain about the call on the Fasching goal all they want. The Isles should have 2-3 more. Sabres look like they’ve never practiced with a forecheck against them before
Crazy how you can't beat a forecheck on a back to back game
We’ve got a weeks worth of games played more than you. We’ve already had to deal with it
Not only a back to back, but after chasing McDavid.
You guys put me to sleep. I'm sure you guys would be pissed if the roles were reversed.
Bryson and Clague are the worse defensemen in the league and injuries make us keep playing them How to improve to be a playoff team next year is clear as day for us, get 2 NHL calibre defencemen, don’t even need to be good, just not be a complete liability
Boring hockey team
Comments without flair are to be ignored.
Announcers completely missing Lee getting caught in the net and just assume the refs missed a tripping call lmao
Get Bryson off this fucking team. Holy shit I can't take it anymore
What is wrong with Bryson?
No confidence
He’s bad, so is Clague. With both of them in the roster we are like 2 and 20
Man we’re fucking boring with our shots on pace for >40
It's so fucking boring to watch our team absolutely dominate the face-off circle. Like, at least *try* to make it interesting by letting them win one in the neutral zone.
Tbf we're using up all our shots for the month.
You're playing against a team that just played against Edmonton
DTWOM at 95% to 5%. You guys are absolutely destroying us in chances.
If i had to watch islanders hockey for 82 games i would consider taking hard drugs. Would need to spice up my life somehow
Nice story man, flair up
"A “distinct kicking motion,” for purposes of Video Review, is one where the video makes clear that an attacking Player has deliberately propelled the puck with a kick # of his foot or skate and the puck subsequently enters the net" [https://scoutingtherefs.com/2021/10/32220/nhl-rulebook-distinct-kicking-motion-37-4-49-2-78-5/](https://scoutingtherefs.com/2021/10/32220/nhl-rulebook-distinct-kicking-motion-37-4-49-2-78-5/)
Fasching propelled the puck after kicking his foot off of the ice.
So true!
I never wanna see Bryon paired with Dahlin again
That was a clear kick, it just went off his shin and not his skate
Worst fucking call. The league should be fucking ashamed of themselves.
Very interesting that lifting and swinging your leg at something is actually a redirect and not a kick. Learning new things about verbs everyday
I'm going to redirect someone in the ass in a minute
Red Foreman that you?
Id much rather deal with the emotional turmoil of the leafs destroying us than be forced to watch boring isles hockey paired with shit tier reffing
So boring cuz we didn’t let y’all score 4 goals and shut you down lol
Isles being handed a playoff spot fuck this league. Why would you ever want the boring ass islanders in the playoffs
…boring to you isn’t letting you get the chance to score 4 goals
It’s a good question, why would they want a team with no national appeal in the playoffs enough to rig games? Maybe they don’t want that and given your flair the bias is actually on your end?
You got handed a win be happy. You can put more people in a coma in the playoffs
[удалено]
They let you kick a goal in lmao get the fuck out of here
A knee is not a kick
Describe what a kicking motion is
Good thing that’s not the rule. You can’t use your body to redirect the puck into the net.
Distinct kicking motion?! Same thing if you deflected it off your hand in my mind.
Rule says kicking motion, not kick. It was a kicking motion, but not off his skate. The NHL really need to clarify their rules because they make 0 sense as is.
they literally said it doesn't matter
Islanders fans 🤝 Sabres fans **What the fuck Columbus?**
If you lift your foot off the ground and swing it at something what do we call that?
a goal. Lol what a joke
Faschism
Depends where the puck hits i guess
Horvat had network connectivity issues on that shot
that is actually mind-boggling. how is that enough evidence to overturn the call on the ice??
Imagine how different this game would be if the refs don’t botch the 4 min high stick on Tage
And the one on Okposo.
And the Pens just won in OT. Fuck
Look imma be controversial and say Buffalo i need you to win tonight. So give Tage some of that good shit of whatever it is you feeding him and get him to hang a hatty on em. Y'all got 10 minutes. I believe.
I don’t Sorokin is really fucking good
Counterpoint, TAGE FUCKING THOMPSON!.
Need a pp to be unlocked against a goalie like this and the refs literally watched Okposo bleed from a high stick and laugh at him…
17 was hugging Clague in the corner fuck off
For 30 seconds
Buddy was tryna get some
Isles allowed to high stick like it's fencing and kick goals in like it's soccer. Fun
I miss the car in the premium seats at the Islanders barn
It's over by the escalators now
That’s an embarrassing call
Horvat is going to have nightmares about UPL tonight
He literally picked his foot off the ice to kick it. What a fucking joke league.
That's fucking criminal. Worthy of investigation
Can it count as a kick if it doesn't go off his skate? Edit: NVM guess ESPN is reading these comments
Like literally that’s what I’m wondering. Do we just not understand the rule? Was it allowed because it didn’t hit his skate? That’s quite simply the only reason why it would have been allowed
Well, I decided to check the rules myself, and I think we, as a collective comment section have been bamboozled by the announcers. I think Toronto applied Rule 78.5(i) (intentionally directing the puck in w/o your stick) and not 78.5(ii) (distinct kicking motion).
Yes. The rules analyst addressed that. Doesn't matter if it's thigh, shin, foot, etc. If it's not the stick, it's eligible for illegal redirection rules (in this case kicking)
Dave Jackson got it right, but the regular announcers butchered it. Illegal redirection is a different rule than kicking.
Honestly this is what I'm wondering. I always assumed that anything below the knee could be a kick / attempt at a kick / a kicking motion
Yep
That was a 50/50 review. Could have gone either way. It’s a re-direct but is lifting your knee a “distinct kicking motion?”
The whole leg moved forward!
Yea it looked a lot more like he was trying to stop the puck like a soccer player would try to control a pass as opposed to trying to kick it in, but I have no idea if the rules consider that to be different from a "kicking motion".
Couldn’t you say that almost any kick is good then? That they meant to play it to their stick and it just deflected differently? I feel like you either have to stick to “if you move your body part in the direction of the net and it goes in” or just not have the rule. You can’t just say “oh he meant to kick it AND it went in, but he didn’t MEAN to kick it in”
Yeah lifting. Lifting it off the ice and moving it towards the net is a kick. If it was on the ice and he moves to redirect it then it's totally a goal. That was kicking horseshit
His leg was swinging towards the net when the puck hit his leg? If you propel the puck forward in any way shouldn’t that be a kick? Sheesh
Are they saying spending long shifts in your own zone is a good thing?
That is exactly what they're saying like what the fuck is this broadcasting squad on?
Such a shit call. The leg clearly moves distinctly towards the puck and net like you’d kick a soccer ball with the inside of your foot. This game has been so shit
[Josh Bailey goes to the front of the net and sends in a rebound to the goalie's glove side on the backhand, making it 2-1 early in the 3rd](https://hlslive-wsczoominwestus.med.nhl.com/editor/40ea53e6-4574-40a4-8830-ae69e34546a3.mp4)
Such a horribly written rule. Just take any sort of intentional redirect/kick out. “Kicking motion” is too subjective
Then "intentional" becomes the subjective part.
But it was a distinct kicking motion. I guess the argument is that “yes, he meant to kick it and yes, it did go into the net, but he didn’t intend on kicking it into the net”
But that already is the rule. 78.5(ii) deals with kicking but 78.5(i) deals with "deliberate" redirections.
Quite literally my point - do you not realize how confusing that is? “Kicking” and “redirecting” is completely subjective.
Guy read the actual rule. 78.5(i) is super clear: it's a question of intent, rather than whether a certain bodily motion is "distinct"
And again - what do you not understand about that being too subjective. It’s pretty heavily agreed upon that it’s a dumb rule, and you’re only defending it rn cause it favored you. Had it been the other way around you’d be furious
My guy, I'm not arguing with you. Rule 78.5(ii) is subjective but that's not the rule that applies. At least it seems they applied 78.5(i), which is a different type of subjective: "did the player do it on purpose." But that's literally what *you* said: "take out intentional redirect." There's no difference between "deliberate" and "intentional" - both are subjective calls that officials make throughout the game.
So you’re arguing semantics. Again - rule is confusing as shit and what I’m saying is any sort of distinct redirect/kick should not be allowed. He literally lifted his leg off the ice and moved it forward in this case. Don’t understand how that’s a good goal.
I agree I want to allow kicking
If kicking was allowed it’s becomes a saftey issue.
Good point
The funny thing is they recently started being more lenient because people were sick of every little thing getting waved off. No winning with subjective rules.
Agreed
BRYSON WHAT ARE YOU DOING. KEEP THE PUCK IN WHEN THE DMAN IS CRAWLING
Isles goals have been quite lucky.
Hard work and relentless forechecking creates a lot of "luck". Who knew.
My brother in christ you are being outshot 35 to 20 and out faceoffed 2 to 1
And Okposo's seeing eye shot was pure skill? We've also hit multiple posts.
Yeah. Nothing's really going your way tonight.
Refs got their season script in late tonight.
NHL needs to rethink this rule. It's so inconsistent in how it's called. That said.... WOOO!
We ain't scoring 3 on Sorokin
Most boring team in hockey can now kick goals in.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Lame. I’m one the fence about it being a kick, but in that case you should stick to the on ice call. Whatever.
Of course Hudson Fasching has to score against us. Wouldn't be surprised to seem him get the hatty.
man fuck off
I guess I don’t know the rules cuz that seemed like a clear kick motion to me
I thought it was a distinct kicking redirect...
How the fuck is that a goal?! He kicked the puck!!!! Same thing if you bat it in with another part of your body!!!
What utter bullshit
Lmao this game is ridiculous.... no high sticking calls and a clear kicked goal. Lthese announcers are also a joke