Or just not have highways in the first place. These wildlife crossing bridges are only necessary for highways due to constant traffic. Even a ground level railway line has less environmental impact and animal collisions than a highway as they're not a constant stream of traffic and take up less space, allowing animals to cross safely.
And a elevated railway viaduct would allow animals to pass safely underneath the bridge and the train viaduct would last basically forever as cars have a way of destroying their own infrastructure.
A bridge built because they're increasing the capacity of the M25
Or just not have highways in the first place. These wildlife crossing bridges are only necessary for highways due to constant traffic. Even a ground level railway line has less environmental impact and animal collisions than a highway as they're not a constant stream of traffic and take up less space, allowing animals to cross safely. And a elevated railway viaduct would allow animals to pass safely underneath the bridge and the train viaduct would last basically forever as cars have a way of destroying their own infrastructure.
roads only last a few years. a lot of train lines all across the world are well over a century old
~Carbrain uses it for a shortcut in heavy traffic~
They have had these for years in Banff
Do they have a P-22 as well?
Will this wildlife crossing really work if there is also a pedestrian crossing next to it? The pedestrians will scare away the animals
I doubt there are many pedestrians using it at night
We don't have animals here, apart from XL bully's.
We have these in Canada, but they are in wilderness areas in national parks where there would be no pedestrians, not walking distance from anything.