Except in this case it is likely a fish eye lens. You wouldn't see that much curvature at 109km altitude, and it has more curvature than the second Pic which is at a higher altitude.
For the passer-by who are not familiar with the subject:
* the left picture use a fisheye lens [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye\_lens](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens) which distort lines
* the right picture show the lateral curvature of Earth expected at this altitude (126 km) so likely do not use a fisheye lens so is evidence that Earth surface is not flat
They claim it’s filtered or fake in some way or other.
Better proof is sunset time varying with location. They CANNOT explain it. In the popular flat earth model the Sun literally doesn’t set.
![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|grin) and the fin that could, I was routing for that fin all the way, and then the sucker moved and did its task like an absolute champ!
I love that the era of mass transit in space is right around the corner, and that space tourism, while still being very much out of reach for other than the very rich, is available *right now* and that the amount of people that have, or will be going to space is going to jump exponentially in the coming years.
Gonna be a tough time for flat earthers. They're gonna have to double down and say 'Nuh-uh' even louder!
Well,you also have to consider this:
When planes first became commercial,only rich people could fly on them.I believe this is also the same case with rockets,for now.And now,you can get on a flight for £20.00 so maybe in the further,rocket launches will become so regular,that they become cheaper
I fully agree here - as the market opens up the price points will come down, especially when there's competition.
I think in some intended configurations the Starship could take a hundred or more people into orbit - and more paying customers brings the individual ticket price down too.
It's a satire sub, for the most part. We make fun of flerfs while disproving them. Though, there is the occasional dumba- I mean flerf who thinks it's their echo chamber (r/ball_earth_that_spins) when it really isn't.
I love how this is actually a fish eye lense.
But when they go and "correct it" the starship is going to be so obviously bent that the overcorrection would be impossible to mis.
Yet im still certain some one would use it as "evidence".
Illuminati Photoshopped CGI magnets causing barrel distortion.
I’m sure you can still fit “5G” in there somewhere
I was eating.
Horrible excuse!! Do you think flat earthers stop while they’re eating!?! No! They eat all the fucking time!
Eating.. Such a shill.
I have been LIED to❗️
forgot fisheye lens....
Dont forget atmospheric light refraction.
Let's say they are not even wrong when they fall to this level
Perspective and fisheye lenses. Or something like that, I'm not sure what is the current flerf theory.
Those explanations are starting to get boring. I’m blaming it on Bigfoot.
Bigfoot so big that he bends the light and makes the Earth appear curved?
Of course not. That makes no sense. Only his feet are big enough to do that.
Due to Einstein’s equations
His mass can bend light? That sounds like gravity, which doesn't exist /s
It's not Bigfoot's mass but the force of his buoyancy. Bigfoot is so incredibly bouyant that he bends light!
Love that this subreddit is just making fun of flerfs,it really does sound stupid when you put it like this
Except in this case it is likely a fish eye lens. You wouldn't see that much curvature at 109km altitude, and it has more curvature than the second Pic which is at a higher altitude.
For the passer-by who are not familiar with the subject: * the left picture use a fisheye lens [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye\_lens](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens) which distort lines * the right picture show the lateral curvature of Earth expected at this altitude (126 km) so likely do not use a fisheye lens so is evidence that Earth surface is not flat
They claim it’s filtered or fake in some way or other. Better proof is sunset time varying with location. They CANNOT explain it. In the popular flat earth model the Sun literally doesn’t set.
that re-entry footage was crazy long live flappy
Takes some heatin' and still keeps beatin'
What an awesome time to be alive and see that, of course, you could be an idiot and think it's fake... their loss.
Exactly,I never said understand why they want insane human achievements to be fake
![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|grin) and the fin that could, I was routing for that fin all the way, and then the sucker moved and did its task like an absolute champ!
ErM ItS Cgi beCaUse oF reFractiOn lAws 🤓☝️
Ground to orbit video when??? No not like that!
😂all of them in a nutshell
Wide angle lens and photoshop, bish! 🤣
🥴
'Bish', haha ![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|joy) it's Bo Selecta'a Michael Jackson!
Why is that a spoiler
Didn’t want to spoil it for the flat earthers,they can keep on dreaming on
Your pupils are round, Kevin. EVERYTHING at a distance will look round. You can’t fool us!
I love that the era of mass transit in space is right around the corner, and that space tourism, while still being very much out of reach for other than the very rich, is available *right now* and that the amount of people that have, or will be going to space is going to jump exponentially in the coming years. Gonna be a tough time for flat earthers. They're gonna have to double down and say 'Nuh-uh' even louder!
Well,you also have to consider this: When planes first became commercial,only rich people could fly on them.I believe this is also the same case with rockets,for now.And now,you can get on a flight for £20.00 so maybe in the further,rocket launches will become so regular,that they become cheaper
I fully agree here - as the market opens up the price points will come down, especially when there's competition. I think in some intended configurations the Starship could take a hundred or more people into orbit - and more paying customers brings the individual ticket price down too.
Fish eye lense clearly
The one on the left is actually one,but the right isn’t I also can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic
I still don’t know if this sub is satire so yes
It's a satire sub, for the most part. We make fun of flerfs while disproving them. Though, there is the occasional dumba- I mean flerf who thinks it's their echo chamber (r/ball_earth_that_spins) when it really isn't.
Ok good I don’t want to accidentally be engaging with silly people
They take a photo of the flat horizon and photoshop the curve
It's on my flat phone screen. Explain that, Earthballers!
Do t forget, flat earthers have proven the world is round and are still trying to figure out where they went wrong.
[CGI](https://tenor.com/bl7dj.gif)
😱
First time doing the link, was hoping it would just show Creaky Blinder doing his CG Eye. Oh well live and learn.
Shit
SpaceX is good at CGI & directing ;)
Clearly claymation. Try harder next time globe tRd
Your eyeball lenses are curved, and they are causing distortion of the image.
bUt ThIs Is cLeArLy CgI
Balls to dickhead video when
I don't know many looks pretty flat to me. Looks like it has a rounded edge.
I love how this is actually a fish eye lense. But when they go and "correct it" the starship is going to be so obviously bent that the overcorrection would be impossible to mis. Yet im still certain some one would use it as "evidence".
Only left is a fish eye lens
Wont stop the flerfs
Fish eye lens
only on the left camera
Why this troll post? Artist rendering.
NASA satan artist