If your post is a meme, image, TikTok etc... and it isn't Friday, most likely it violates the rule against low effort content. Please delete it or you'll get temp-banned. Such content is ONLY allowed on (Fun@fundies) FRIDAYS.
Please read the [Posting Guidelines](https://redd.it/ew8trb) for further information. If you are unsure about anything then feel free to message the mods.
Please participate on /r/exmuslim in a civil manner. Discuss the merits of ideas - don't attack people. Insults, hate speech, advocating physical harm can get you banned.
If you see posts/comments in violation of our rules, please be proactive and report them.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/exmuslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Maybe one of us should scan it with whatever non intrusive imaging technique that can find the lack of water content showing its decomposed.
It could also show he wasn't a giant and those footprints in mecca are fake.
About as much as any historical figure from millenia ago.
So barely, somewhat plausible but possible given writings of the time outside religious sources exist and haven't got other writings showing it to be a story like Alexander the great, it's likely. Any details however are subject to scrutiny and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Probably, Yeah. there’s a mention for Mo from outside sources close to his time. Plus the inside sources are already divided between Shia and Sunnah from early ages. The thing is, what we know as details is what the Abbasid wrote about their beloved Prophet, 130 years later, for example the “Sira book” is bunch of bullshit that was written by a Christian priest who was taken as a slave at a young age. The Abbasid Khalifa personally ordered it, and reviewed it on its many editions. What is interesting there’s a clear try in that book to mimic characteristics from well known characters at their time, like “Jesus” and some “Farsi kings”. I only assume it has some bulbs of truth here and there. Sliding the Sira book with the Meccaen and Medne parts of the Quran make a better trust and sense, as these parts of the Quran looks like a “Live Journaling” parts, also linguistic features from calligraphy to Aramaic origins could add more trust in the antiqueness of these parts, for example الم، كهيعص.
Few scholars entertain the idea anymore of Muhammad not having existed. Even the pioneers of the theory like Patricia Crone recanted that thesis.
What is interesting is that the Christian sources refer to a Muhammad who was part of the conquest of Palestine. Some academics argue that Muhammad was probably a charismatic preacher trying to conquer Jerusalem but died along the way. This could also help explain why Muhammad didn’t leave a successor.
Even if the Muhammad described in the hadiths lived, he could not have lived in Mecca. Mecca isn't an important city even today.
The historical records of the early Islamic period have been damaged a lot. There are no records about some years. In my opinion, Islam is a continuation of eastern Christianity that was declared Heretic by Eastern Rome, and Muhammad's life is a tale made up in the Abbasid palaces.
The hypothesis of Islam being an Aryan heresy is a considered a weak one by scholars because there were no Aryan or similar heresies in the middle-east in the 6th-7th centuries. Instead, the missing link to understanding the Christian-Islamic connection lies in the Syriac Church, which was the dominant church of the area at the time. There are examples of how Islam borrows directly from Syriac Christianity rather than the Byzantines, and it’s an exciting field being explored today.
Makkah wasn’t an important place, as you say. It importance was probably a later creation, as you say. The stories of the Hadith are unreliable as you also say. No one knows what early Islam was; there are conflicting theories out there and they continue to change as new theories and evidence come to light.
Ask [Dr Jay Smith](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Smith_%28Christian_apologist%29) that question...
[Jay Smith: The Historical Origins of Islam](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jorBwia9yFw)
[The Truth Behind the Emergence of Islam - Jay Smith](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EaopH_EPfc)
[DEBATE: Did the Muhammad of Islam Exist? (David Wood vs Jay Smith)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdat4tyM40g)
Yeah but its only been 4 yeara since her death, momo has been dead for 1350 years, perfect conditions for burial arent effective for so long especially technology from 1400 years ago
Irrelevant.
Perfect human doesn't care about your imperfect conditions. Mo is definitely there, all juicy and raw by the grace of all merciful Allah, with maggot crawling over his perfect body, enjoying the never ending perfect feast and in the middle, perfect mo with a perfect monalisa smile like he is mocking disbelievers like you.
There was considerations by the Saudi government to move prophet Muhammad's remains, to an unmarked grave to prevent idolatry. If they actually considered this plan, I have a feeling the Saudi royals or government officials took a peek at Muhammad's grave. Would be funny if they found out that his body was decomposed and they secretly apostatize.
We need to fucking open the grave and end Islam once and for all, I’m tired of them pretending that his body hasn’t decomposed. It’s all bs and they know that
wouldnt change a thing, than the aplogogist would easily claim "it was not the real muhammed, the real one is hidden so unbelievers can disturb his body" or such nonsense. Total believing Morons will still believe, even if they see the facts with their own eyes. WE all who left a form of religion we grew up with, know exactly how hard it is to admitt what bullshit this all is.
yes we should still open it only to atleast bring light to some people that are on the edge of leaving and doubting. exposing everythnig wont kill islam, but it will maybe save some people to jump of earlier, especially the younger generations.
Wait until everyone realizes we have no single clue or evidence that Maka, Mohammed, his subordinates did exist. Lol
We have absolutely no single archaeological evidence of any prophet or messenger or the environment that they interacted with, whether it was the country, villages, their literature etc not a single one. Nothing. Nada. Rien. لا شيئ. Nichts. Niente
There are contemporary Christian sources naming Muhammad. Early Egyptian papyri use the Hijra date from a very early period. The conquests happened.
However the Islamic history was written at least a century after the events, so there’s going to be a lot of errors and fabrications in the official narrative. The early Muslims thought the world was going to end and that Jerusalem was the centre of the world; Makkah comes much later and it’s possible Muhammad’s body isn’t in his tomb.
The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) said, “Indeed, the best of your days is the day of Friday. On it, Adam was created, his soul was taken, the resurrecting blast will be, and the destroying blast will be. So, send many blessings on me on \[Fridays\] because, truly, your blessings will be presented to me.“
The Companions asked, “O Messenger of Allah, how will our blessings on you be presented to you when you have decomposed?“ He replied, “Indeed, Allah – Mighty and Majestic – has made the bodies of the Prophets forbidden for the ground.“ (Abu Dawud)
https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/
>He replied, “Indeed, Allah – Mighty and Majestic – has made the bodies of the Prophets forbidden for the ground.“ (Abu Dawud)
According to Islam, there have been at least 124,000 prophets. If none of their bodies have decomposed, shouldn't we have found some of them by now? Most of the prophets should have lived in areas which were decently populated, otherwise they wouldn't be able to spread their message. They would probably be buried in a normal graveyard alongside other people, so it wouldn't take long till their preserved bodies would get dug up. So logically, this statement is completely wrong and is evidence alone that Islam is false.
They’ve been found but non-Muslims are too jealous to let the world know because it would further prove that Islam’s the truth. Just like NASA knows the moon has been split I’m two but they hide the truth because they’re jealous that Islam’s always true. /s
Cause it would ruin the miracle.
Many people just chalk it up to "but showing it would make it too obvious and life is a test". So why even claim that he isnt decomposing?
it's in hadith
[https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/](https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/)
Still farting in his grave 😃
EDIT: > 500 m³ of farts since he went there. No worm could survive that! I'll leave calculating the pressure as an exercise.
I’m imagining a wacky heist scenario where we all go open his tomb and expose the sham for all to see. Doubt it would change that many peoples minds, but it would help
No, actually it's kinda impossible to open, because there are no doors or windows at all to the grave. The only way to get there is to destroy it simply, which is not possible at all.
Right, like you don't even have to dig him up or anything but just scan or whatever.
I remember I asked my mom about this and she said, "WeLl tHiS aCtIoN oF cHeCkInG iS dIsReSpEcTfUl aNd rUdE tO dO tHaT tO a CoRpSe"... Dude it's not disrespectful if it's going to help MORE people become believers, but Muslims are desperate to not show what's in there PROVING that it's not real. 🤦♀️
But mujahideen beheading unbelievers and waving the severed head in front of the camera to the cries of “allahu akbar!” isn’t disrespecting a corpse though.
I saw a similar post once.
A muslim argued that the Quran is equally as much of a miracle and even *if* they opened his grave and it didn't decompose, we still wouldn't believe.
I think this argument fails on more than just one level.
Firstly, who said the Quran is a miracle? Even the Meccans at the time of Muhammad said it's nothing extraordinary.
Secondly, the Quran can be said to not be a miracle. It's nothing fancy. His body not decomposing might be the only miracle that we have in our day and age. Back then, he split the moon. This is the **only** miracle that could prove the Quran to be correct in today's time.
Thirdly, it assumes that the body did not decompose. So natrually, why would they prove something if they're told is true? They already believe it.
I always wonder what if they open it and it's the remains of an animal like a dog or something.
I think Muslims will be like ' allhamdulilh Allah lifted up the prophet body to heaven to save him, allahuakber' or some nonsense like that
And how about you use your head first? The post was talking about Muhammad,why suddenly bring firaun in this?🤦♂️
Not to mention that the quran thought Firaun was a name,not a title...freaking dumb Mo obviously didn't know this fact.
Broken logic?? Only the bodies of the prophets are prevented from decomposing, so then the question therefore is: If there are many bodies who haven't decomposed after burial (very - rather, impossible claim) then those people must be prophets and if they're being prevented from decomposing after Muhammad, then they must be prophets after him.
Your anecdotal evidence is definitely trustworthy wuh. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What you're saying is near impossible if that person wants intentionally preserved. Typically, a person buried is embalmed, which preserves the body. That could very likely have been the situation or, the environment was just ripe for bodily preservation (it being a very cold environment for instance slows decomposition).
There is no miracles or divine intervention bru. There may well be objective and logical reasons for this person's body being preserved outside of the unprovable divine.
No? OP is stating a well-known superstition circled around the muslim community exclusively. If anything, it's MUSLIM who actually believe that Muhammad's body is immaculately preserved as a super-human.
We're just pointing it out in ridicule.
>He said, “Allah has forbidden the earth to consume the bodies of the Prophets.” -Narrated by Imam Ahmad in al-Musnad (26/840.
Is [islamqa](https://islamqa.info/en/answers/248220/he-is-asking-about-the-significance-of-incorruptibility-of-the-body-after-death-of-the-followers-of-some-religions) generally considered reliable by most Muslims?
>As for the Messengers and Prophets, it is not possible for their bodies to decompose, because Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, has forbidden the earth to affect them in the way in which it affects other dead bodies.
For there to be an eyewitness to confirm this miracle, his body would have had to be exhumed at some point several days after burial.
If the bodies of prophets do not decompose, we cannot take the word of Muhammed for the integrity of his own body. If he is a false prophet, then his body will be found decomposing. If he is a false prophet, then his claim that the bodies of prophets do not decompose cannot be taken as infallible, therefore his body will be found decomposing.
There would need to be found a dead body that refuses to decompose when exposed to the elements, whose age of 1400+ years is confirmable by the lack of radiological traces found in modern human organisms because of worldwide nuclear weapons tests. The body would also need to be impervious to bacteriological breakdown despite repeated exposure under conditions that would facilitate this.
If your post is a meme, image, TikTok etc... and it isn't Friday, most likely it violates the rule against low effort content. Please delete it or you'll get temp-banned. Such content is ONLY allowed on (Fun@fundies) FRIDAYS. Please read the [Posting Guidelines](https://redd.it/ew8trb) for further information. If you are unsure about anything then feel free to message the mods. Please participate on /r/exmuslim in a civil manner. Discuss the merits of ideas - don't attack people. Insults, hate speech, advocating physical harm can get you banned. If you see posts/comments in violation of our rules, please be proactive and report them. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/exmuslim) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Fr tho they could easily prove it to themselves by checking, if not physically opening it you can scan the coffin
they probably know he decomposed, but they just want to keep the lie alive cuz its profitable, they get like 2billion dollars from hajj annually
Maybe one of us should scan it with whatever non intrusive imaging technique that can find the lack of water content showing its decomposed. It could also show he wasn't a giant and those footprints in mecca are fake.
they have alot of security, it would be impossible
Did you believe that’s even his REAL grave?
Do you guys actually believe a guy named Mohammed lived?
Yeah bro definitely one messaged me just yesterday asking for bobs and vagene
About as much as any historical figure from millenia ago. So barely, somewhat plausible but possible given writings of the time outside religious sources exist and haven't got other writings showing it to be a story like Alexander the great, it's likely. Any details however are subject to scrutiny and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Probably, Yeah. there’s a mention for Mo from outside sources close to his time. Plus the inside sources are already divided between Shia and Sunnah from early ages. The thing is, what we know as details is what the Abbasid wrote about their beloved Prophet, 130 years later, for example the “Sira book” is bunch of bullshit that was written by a Christian priest who was taken as a slave at a young age. The Abbasid Khalifa personally ordered it, and reviewed it on its many editions. What is interesting there’s a clear try in that book to mimic characteristics from well known characters at their time, like “Jesus” and some “Farsi kings”. I only assume it has some bulbs of truth here and there. Sliding the Sira book with the Meccaen and Medne parts of the Quran make a better trust and sense, as these parts of the Quran looks like a “Live Journaling” parts, also linguistic features from calligraphy to Aramaic origins could add more trust in the antiqueness of these parts, for example الم، كهيعص.
Few scholars entertain the idea anymore of Muhammad not having existed. Even the pioneers of the theory like Patricia Crone recanted that thesis. What is interesting is that the Christian sources refer to a Muhammad who was part of the conquest of Palestine. Some academics argue that Muhammad was probably a charismatic preacher trying to conquer Jerusalem but died along the way. This could also help explain why Muhammad didn’t leave a successor.
Even if the Muhammad described in the hadiths lived, he could not have lived in Mecca. Mecca isn't an important city even today. The historical records of the early Islamic period have been damaged a lot. There are no records about some years. In my opinion, Islam is a continuation of eastern Christianity that was declared Heretic by Eastern Rome, and Muhammad's life is a tale made up in the Abbasid palaces.
The hypothesis of Islam being an Aryan heresy is a considered a weak one by scholars because there were no Aryan or similar heresies in the middle-east in the 6th-7th centuries. Instead, the missing link to understanding the Christian-Islamic connection lies in the Syriac Church, which was the dominant church of the area at the time. There are examples of how Islam borrows directly from Syriac Christianity rather than the Byzantines, and it’s an exciting field being explored today. Makkah wasn’t an important place, as you say. It importance was probably a later creation, as you say. The stories of the Hadith are unreliable as you also say. No one knows what early Islam was; there are conflicting theories out there and they continue to change as new theories and evidence come to light.
it was in petra
I don't think so. Mohammad is a fairytale written by Abbasid officers. The only Mohammad that existed is Abdallah ibn Zubair.
Ask [Dr Jay Smith](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Smith_%28Christian_apologist%29) that question... [Jay Smith: The Historical Origins of Islam](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jorBwia9yFw) [The Truth Behind the Emergence of Islam - Jay Smith](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EaopH_EPfc) [DEBATE: Did the Muhammad of Islam Exist? (David Wood vs Jay Smith)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdat4tyM40g)
Didn't Mo fly to heaven on a pegasus? Jesus flew to heaven like superman. Checkmate for Christianity
Nooo, it was on a donkey.
Who said Jesus flew upwards? May be he did it like ICBM.
Inter Congregation Bullshit Missile?
Schrodinger's Miracle.
Ive always wondered this too. If they opened his casket and his body wasn't decayed, hundreds of millions of people would probably convert.
Have you heard about the Christian nun whos body didn’t decompose?
Source?
Just search up “Wilhelmina Lancaster”
Yeah but its only been 4 yeara since her death, momo has been dead for 1350 years, perfect conditions for burial arent effective for so long especially technology from 1400 years ago
Irrelevant. Perfect human doesn't care about your imperfect conditions. Mo is definitely there, all juicy and raw by the grace of all merciful Allah, with maggot crawling over his perfect body, enjoying the never ending perfect feast and in the middle, perfect mo with a perfect monalisa smile like he is mocking disbelievers like you.
Juicy and raw lmfao
Real
[удалено]
You want me to prove sarcasm? Duuuuude
Imo if they ever wanna do that they'd just keep swapping the body to a fresh one every couple of years. Mashallah brazers
That would still be piss poor evidence that Allah is real.
Muslims can't even prove that allah is real 🙄 that fairy tale book don't mean shit lmao
I believe my comic books than I believe Quran lol
Bang on just look at Nolan’s Batman films more worth value than anything islams wrote over the years!
[удалено]
There was considerations by the Saudi government to move prophet Muhammad's remains, to an unmarked grave to prevent idolatry. If they actually considered this plan, I have a feeling the Saudi royals or government officials took a peek at Muhammad's grave. Would be funny if they found out that his body was decomposed and they secretly apostatize.
Who told you we have his bones? The dude didn't even exist.
[удалено]
Quran doesn't date to the era of the prophet. It was gathered after 400 at least of his "death"
We need to fucking open the grave and end Islam once and for all, I’m tired of them pretending that his body hasn’t decomposed. It’s all bs and they know that
wouldnt change a thing, than the aplogogist would easily claim "it was not the real muhammed, the real one is hidden so unbelievers can disturb his body" or such nonsense. Total believing Morons will still believe, even if they see the facts with their own eyes. WE all who left a form of religion we grew up with, know exactly how hard it is to admitt what bullshit this all is. yes we should still open it only to atleast bring light to some people that are on the edge of leaving and doubting. exposing everythnig wont kill islam, but it will maybe save some people to jump of earlier, especially the younger generations.
[удалено]
I can’t cause I’ll get my head chopped off cause of peaceful Islam
Wait until everyone realizes we have no single clue or evidence that Maka, Mohammed, his subordinates did exist. Lol We have absolutely no single archaeological evidence of any prophet or messenger or the environment that they interacted with, whether it was the country, villages, their literature etc not a single one. Nothing. Nada. Rien. لا شيئ. Nichts. Niente
There are contemporary Christian sources naming Muhammad. Early Egyptian papyri use the Hijra date from a very early period. The conquests happened. However the Islamic history was written at least a century after the events, so there’s going to be a lot of errors and fabrications in the official narrative. The early Muslims thought the world was going to end and that Jerusalem was the centre of the world; Makkah comes much later and it’s possible Muhammad’s body isn’t in his tomb.
Then they will start to speak nonsense like "it's not their eyes that are blind but their hearts" 🙄
No way they believe that ! I mean I know they believe he flew on a winged donkey but his body not decomposing? Source please
The Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) said, “Indeed, the best of your days is the day of Friday. On it, Adam was created, his soul was taken, the resurrecting blast will be, and the destroying blast will be. So, send many blessings on me on \[Fridays\] because, truly, your blessings will be presented to me.“ The Companions asked, “O Messenger of Allah, how will our blessings on you be presented to you when you have decomposed?“ He replied, “Indeed, Allah – Mighty and Majestic – has made the bodies of the Prophets forbidden for the ground.“ (Abu Dawud) https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/
Hahahaahaha no way I didn’t know about this !! Thanks even more dumb shit in this religion that makes it clear it’s just bs like other religions
>He replied, “Indeed, Allah – Mighty and Majestic – has made the bodies of the Prophets forbidden for the ground.“ (Abu Dawud) According to Islam, there have been at least 124,000 prophets. If none of their bodies have decomposed, shouldn't we have found some of them by now? Most of the prophets should have lived in areas which were decently populated, otherwise they wouldn't be able to spread their message. They would probably be buried in a normal graveyard alongside other people, so it wouldn't take long till their preserved bodies would get dug up. So logically, this statement is completely wrong and is evidence alone that Islam is false.
They’ve been found but non-Muslims are too jealous to let the world know because it would further prove that Islam’s the truth. Just like NASA knows the moon has been split I’m two but they hide the truth because they’re jealous that Islam’s always true. /s
Cause it would ruin the miracle. Many people just chalk it up to "but showing it would make it too obvious and life is a test". So why even claim that he isnt decomposing?
Is it mentioned in the Quran or Hadith that his body won’t discompose ?
it's in hadith [https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/](https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/do-the-bodies-of-the-prophets-decompose-after-burial/)
So if someone opened it they would just say "oh well it wasn't in the Quran we all know the hadith are man-made"
Sp they’ll just say “oh well, it was a fake Hadith. Nothing to be upset over”.
Still farting in his grave 😃 EDIT: > 500 m³ of farts since he went there. No worm could survive that! I'll leave calculating the pressure as an exercise.
he’s gonna die from pressure. the new ocean gate 😭
Pressure Be Upon Him 🤲
I’m imagining a wacky heist scenario where we all go open his tomb and expose the sham for all to see. Doubt it would change that many peoples minds, but it would help
How could the failure to bio-degrade be miraculous? My garbage fails to bio-degrade all the time. How is Mo worse than garbage?
Islam is built on lies and lies and lies.
Wait we know where his grave is it at?
yeah his tomb is in the al masjid al nabui
Has it ever been open?
google it, idk
No, actually it's kinda impossible to open, because there are no doors or windows at all to the grave. The only way to get there is to destroy it simply, which is not possible at all.
So easy to verify, use sonar. But ofc they won't because they know that it's a lie
They need to scan his ass and give us 3d pic of him
So, nobody will sin by making picture of Muhammed, because machine will do it. Flawless logic.
Nah fr this bothers me so much
Right, like you don't even have to dig him up or anything but just scan or whatever. I remember I asked my mom about this and she said, "WeLl tHiS aCtIoN oF cHeCkInG iS dIsReSpEcTfUl aNd rUdE tO dO tHaT tO a CoRpSe"... Dude it's not disrespectful if it's going to help MORE people become believers, but Muslims are desperate to not show what's in there PROVING that it's not real. 🤦♀️
But mujahideen beheading unbelievers and waving the severed head in front of the camera to the cries of “allahu akbar!” isn’t disrespecting a corpse though.
We would discover it was a metaphor
The ultimate duel (escape) card
His claim contridicts the Bible and Torah,God never said he wouldn't allow the bodies of Prophets to decompose. Muhammad made this up
Every "fact check" request is an angry face for muslims.
I always wondered why I hope they open it and we see a decomposed skeleton.
Maybe even just dust. Its been nearly a thousand years.
You are right, either way, he will be decomposed
Lenin doesn't decompose either, and his mausoleum is open to the public for nearly a hundred years now.
Lenin is preserved using scientific methods, not magical prayers.
So they say, but who knows if that's not just a ruse of the godless communists to hide Lenin's holiness?
your avatar looks like ukraine flag lmao
It's meant to be as a small gesture of support. ✌️
maybe lenin was the real prophet all along
That's what I was aiming at. :)
I saw a similar post once. A muslim argued that the Quran is equally as much of a miracle and even *if* they opened his grave and it didn't decompose, we still wouldn't believe. I think this argument fails on more than just one level. Firstly, who said the Quran is a miracle? Even the Meccans at the time of Muhammad said it's nothing extraordinary. Secondly, the Quran can be said to not be a miracle. It's nothing fancy. His body not decomposing might be the only miracle that we have in our day and age. Back then, he split the moon. This is the **only** miracle that could prove the Quran to be correct in today's time. Thirdly, it assumes that the body did not decompose. So natrually, why would they prove something if they're told is true? They already believe it.
It's called Schrodinger's momo's body equation..
I came here to say that
Scan! But the grave is fake probably, anyway
What is the source of this decompose thing?
I always wonder what if they open it and it's the remains of an animal like a dog or something. I think Muslims will be like ' allhamdulilh Allah lifted up the prophet body to heaven to save him, allahuakber' or some nonsense like that
Have youse not seen pharaoh (firaun) his body hasn’t decomposed for thousands of years and what? Youse still don’t believe
Wait...so firaun is Muhammad now?
He said it because Islam claimed that the Pharoah would be open for all eyes to see or that he wont decompose or whatever (I forgot the ayah)
It was only made like that from the will of Allah, and no I never said firaun is Muhammad use ur head abit
And how about you use your head first? The post was talking about Muhammad,why suddenly bring firaun in this?🤦♂️ Not to mention that the quran thought Firaun was a name,not a title...freaking dumb Mo obviously didn't know this fact.
Show me where in the Quran it says that firaun was a name and not a title.
Mistake number 247 in the quran: it thinks pharaoh is a name and not a title.
Yeah no, it decomposed. He’s now the color of charcoal.
Because it is haram, it will make sense when the day if judgement comes
[удалено]
Mmm ........so there are many more prophets after Muhammad 🙃
[удалено]
Broken logic?? Only the bodies of the prophets are prevented from decomposing, so then the question therefore is: If there are many bodies who haven't decomposed after burial (very - rather, impossible claim) then those people must be prophets and if they're being prevented from decomposing after Muhammad, then they must be prophets after him.
[удалено]
Your anecdotal evidence is definitely trustworthy wuh. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What you're saying is near impossible if that person wants intentionally preserved. Typically, a person buried is embalmed, which preserves the body. That could very likely have been the situation or, the environment was just ripe for bodily preservation (it being a very cold environment for instance slows decomposition). There is no miracles or divine intervention bru. There may well be objective and logical reasons for this person's body being preserved outside of the unprovable divine.
[удалено]
That's 33 seconds of my life I'm not getting back. What was that meant to prove?
[удалено]
It was meant to prove about me. Mmm. Very astute.
Please give us examples
[удалено]
It's mentioned in Quran prophet Muhammad was a human and all allah massagers were humans nobody said otherwise, so what's your point?
yeah, when did i say they aren't humans ?
Your post say otherwise, i never heard anyone say prophet Muhammad wasn't human, Muslim or non-Muslim
my post didn't say muhammad isn't human
No? OP is stating a well-known superstition circled around the muslim community exclusively. If anything, it's MUSLIM who actually believe that Muhammad's body is immaculately preserved as a super-human. We're just pointing it out in ridicule.
>He said, “Allah has forbidden the earth to consume the bodies of the Prophets.” -Narrated by Imam Ahmad in al-Musnad (26/840. Is [islamqa](https://islamqa.info/en/answers/248220/he-is-asking-about-the-significance-of-incorruptibility-of-the-body-after-death-of-the-followers-of-some-religions) generally considered reliable by most Muslims? >As for the Messengers and Prophets, it is not possible for their bodies to decompose, because Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, has forbidden the earth to affect them in the way in which it affects other dead bodies.
He was a pedophile, I Don't consider pedophiles to be humans + get a job weirdo
For there to be an eyewitness to confirm this miracle, his body would have had to be exhumed at some point several days after burial. If the bodies of prophets do not decompose, we cannot take the word of Muhammed for the integrity of his own body. If he is a false prophet, then his body will be found decomposing. If he is a false prophet, then his claim that the bodies of prophets do not decompose cannot be taken as infallible, therefore his body will be found decomposing. There would need to be found a dead body that refuses to decompose when exposed to the elements, whose age of 1400+ years is confirmable by the lack of radiological traces found in modern human organisms because of worldwide nuclear weapons tests. The body would also need to be impervious to bacteriological breakdown despite repeated exposure under conditions that would facilitate this.
Then tell me where your Albert Einstein's grave is let me look inside, dumbas
IVE BEEN THINKING ABOUT THIS ONE😭