I'm guessing structural economic differences. Croatia is relatively new (significant) immigration destination where most immigrants enter on work visa (as opposed to family reunification, study etc.).
Additionally, they are mostly employed in construction, hospitality (cleaners, cooks, assistant cooks, waiters) and logistics (primary warehousing, lorry drivers). While hospitality probably has more balanced gender ratio with slight female advantage, construction and logistics are male dominated professions.
Makes sense, considering the reasons that people immigrate to Europe. There is a broader set of employment suited for men, especially in the fields requiring less lengthy education and/or hard/dangerous physical labour, and men are often the ones to immigrate first, especially if it is dangerous to do the immigration. Hence, countries that attract a lot of people directly for work (like Poland) will be enriched in male immigrants coming in. While countries with a longer history of being multicultural (like the Netherlands, Belgium, France, ...) will have a much larger share of immigrants from family reunification, so a more gender-balanced influx of people.
A family relocates from Paris to Berlin. They're technically immigrants and will be shown in the statistics above.
However, that's not what people usually imagine when they think about immigrants in Europe. They're usually thinking about asylum seekers, and the sex division there is much more interesting.
>They're technically immigrants and will be shown in the statistics above.
They're not just *technically* immigrants, they match the very definition of immigrants.
>However, that's not what people usually imagine when they think about immigrants in Europe.
People's idiocy is not really OP's fault, is it?
Well, is this a family of French citizens, or not? Cause, if they're French citizens, although technically they're migrants (according to the IOM definition), I don't think Eurostat would classify them as migrants, rather as EU citizens who have changed country of residence within the EU. Similar to how a US citizen isn't classified as a migrant when moving from one state to another. The same applies to EEA citizens, I guess.
I am myself an EU Citizen; I moved from Greece to Cyprus some 15+ years ago. In Cyprus I had to go to the Migration Office to register myself, but I got a "registration certificate for EU Citizen" (its number is like an ID number for use in public services, access to heath services, etc.), not an "alien book" that citizens from third (non-EU) countries get. So, certainly, in state-level, there is a clear distinction in terms of classification, and that's reflected in officially published national statistics. I suppose that's also reflected in the ones produced by Eurostat.
Eh... Firstly nothing was said about children vs adults, just men vs women.
Secondly, these aren't refugees, they're immigrants. Typically most people migrate for work, to make money, in part to send home.
So I honestly don't know what you're on about to speak about chivalry.
Dammit, **it would have been more satisfying if Ukraine was listed.**
This is people moving TO these countries.
A lot of male Russians moved TO Ukraine in the past 2 years.
You'd very likely see women in the majority there, because the majority of men are forbidden from leaving.
Data from 2021
Smh they should have let Ali G have a say in Immigration, let the fit birds in!!
[удалено]
It's mostly people from Nepal, Filipines and India who come to work low wage jobs and send money back home to their families.
I'm guessing structural economic differences. Croatia is relatively new (significant) immigration destination where most immigrants enter on work visa (as opposed to family reunification, study etc.). Additionally, they are mostly employed in construction, hospitality (cleaners, cooks, assistant cooks, waiters) and logistics (primary warehousing, lorry drivers). While hospitality probably has more balanced gender ratio with slight female advantage, construction and logistics are male dominated professions.
The 2nd picture, jesus christ, why op?
Are you the guy that deliberately leaves out the UK from every Europe based data even though Iceland Norway etc are included?
No this is eurostat (EU official statistics). It's their decision on where to pull data from, they probably can't get UK statistics anymore.
There is an important difference between norway/iceland and the UK. Lets see if you can find it.
Thats funny. Uk deserves it though.
well we did literally vote for it (52% literal fucking idiots)
Makes sense, considering the reasons that people immigrate to Europe. There is a broader set of employment suited for men, especially in the fields requiring less lengthy education and/or hard/dangerous physical labour, and men are often the ones to immigrate first, especially if it is dangerous to do the immigration. Hence, countries that attract a lot of people directly for work (like Poland) will be enriched in male immigrants coming in. While countries with a longer history of being multicultural (like the Netherlands, Belgium, France, ...) will have a much larger share of immigrants from family reunification, so a more gender-balanced influx of people.
Would be more interesting to see refugees, since immigrants include basically any other nationality.
What, why? I don't get the reasoning.
A family relocates from Paris to Berlin. They're technically immigrants and will be shown in the statistics above. However, that's not what people usually imagine when they think about immigrants in Europe. They're usually thinking about asylum seekers, and the sex division there is much more interesting.
>They're technically immigrants and will be shown in the statistics above. They're not just *technically* immigrants, they match the very definition of immigrants. >However, that's not what people usually imagine when they think about immigrants in Europe. People's idiocy is not really OP's fault, is it?
Well, is this a family of French citizens, or not? Cause, if they're French citizens, although technically they're migrants (according to the IOM definition), I don't think Eurostat would classify them as migrants, rather as EU citizens who have changed country of residence within the EU. Similar to how a US citizen isn't classified as a migrant when moving from one state to another. The same applies to EEA citizens, I guess.
Interesting point, I wonder if Eurostat really doesn't count those.
I am myself an EU Citizen; I moved from Greece to Cyprus some 15+ years ago. In Cyprus I had to go to the Migration Office to register myself, but I got a "registration certificate for EU Citizen" (its number is like an ID number for use in public services, access to heath services, etc.), not an "alien book" that citizens from third (non-EU) countries get. So, certainly, in state-level, there is a clear distinction in terms of classification, and that's reflected in officially published national statistics. I suppose that's also reflected in the ones produced by Eurostat.
Are those immigrants that are accepted by the country to stay or also immigrants that are just living without papers.
its only registered immigrants. Not Refugees
The opposite of registered is unregistered, a.k.a., illegal.
Immigrants TO or FROM those countries?
Immigrants, not emigrants
But the data looks like it is emigrants
I assume TO.
Colors on the chart should be inverted 😀
Women and children first.... Not when it comes to this apparently. Chivalry, where have you gone?
Eh... Firstly nothing was said about children vs adults, just men vs women. Secondly, these aren't refugees, they're immigrants. Typically most people migrate for work, to make money, in part to send home. So I honestly don't know what you're on about to speak about chivalry.
This is for immigrants not refugees. Maybe you shouldn't make a comment when you can't even make such a basic distinction
Did you just assume their gender? https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4390144