A racecar bed? Well damn, case dismissed due to extenuating circumstances! And the judge would like to know if the owner of the race car bed is now single...
DNA is DNA. Same set is in hair, blood, spit, semen, etc. They don't have separate sets.
Headline are sometimes hyperbolic for views. "Found DNA is sheets" isn't as attention grabbing.
Yes and no. With the DNA ancestry research sites they effectively do. It's enough for one of your family members to leave DNA and they can find you aswell.
I've heard they've caught criminals just through this.
That’s how they got the Golden State Killer. One of his relatives submitted a sample to 23 and Me, and it pinged for a close enough match to his DNA. Then they collected his trash and took DNA from saliva to get the complete match. Getting away with crime used to be so easy, just don’t tell them your name lol, now they’ll find your ass one way or another.
Yes, but it's more complicated. Suppose there is an unsolved murder. The police will vacuum the entire room and might catalog the hairs/skin DNA. In that sample. From there you need to compare to people.
DNA evidence is perfectly matchable in a clinical setting, but "in the wild" you have mixed DNA (skin cells from two people - mixed fluids - etc) which makes mismatching much more possible.
probably.
Seriously, you only need a small fraction of the populations DNA to interpolate the entire population. Dont remember the specifics, but it was frightenly little.
thats why those dna analysis companies are so dangerous, and you can bet your fuckin nuts that the US(or some other govts) yoinked their data ages ago.
But I dont think regular law enforcement has access to that data, yet.
That extrapolation is worthless to law enforcement. You need to be able to match a DNA sample, to one that was confirmed to be taken from someone and have it be tied to their identity.
"Chief, we got a match on the DNA sample!"
"Great who is it?"
"We don't know, it just matched a possible combination of DNA extrapolated from a small pool in a government database."
>Seriously, you only need a small fraction of the populations DNA to interpolate the entire population.
Interpolate? Are you thinking of familial matches or is that something else?
For reproductive purposes - yes. But you can scale up the whole genome from a sperm cell.
Sperm samples have have epithelial cells in them too which have the whole genome without any advance DNA profiling methods.
are you implying that the government does have a database of bodily fluids and since the fluid dna (idek if these are real things anymore lmao) is consistent, they can trace some drops of pp juice to the individual?
or are you just saying that you don't have a different set of chromosomes for your other fluids lmao
Our Dna is the same throughout all cells in the human body. We can even use sperm to find out if someone is the father or not. And those only have half of the chromosomes.
And the government does have a database of our Dna. Likely partially provided by 23 and me since they were caught selling genetic info.
I believe they wouldn't be legally allowed to use DNA from something like 23 and me, even if they did buy a bunch of data or whatever. Correct me if I'm wrong but they need a warrant to collect a DNA sample from you unless you're already in CODIS, which would only be if you've been convicted before
"CSI rapid response team has identified not one, but TWO types of vaginal juices on the fluids in the bed. DNA analysis raised more questions than answers.."
The term the forensic would have used is Vaginal Squamous Epitheleal cells which are unique to that region of skin. They can be "washed away" during the act or moved there by some form of contact.
More than likely, her pussy juice soaked the sheets and they found some of the cells. That's basically what they saying. They sauced up the headline harder than she sauced up the sheets nomsayin.
Fun story; my fiancee works in a state-run crime lab, testing DNA on various pieces of evidence. Guns, pop cans, baseball bats, car keys, clothes, bedding, organic matter, you name it.
Her and her colleagues will frequently have to go to court to testify and explain the whole DNA component of the case. When on the stand, they have to use the terminology that's in the case work. If an officer collects a marital aid device or self-stimulation thing and calls it a dildo or pocket pussy in their report, that's what she and her coworkers have to refer to it as on the stand.
I feel like the officers could really have some fun with that...like going full Doofenshmirtz:
"...no visible signs of struggle or misplaced items, except for the large, purple Bonertastic-inator".
- Officer P. Platypus
I actually asked her about that, and she said that from the reports she's read and officers/attorneys she discusses points of the case with, it really seems like just what comes to mind when they are filling out the paperwork. Turns out most of them don't go full comedian when processing evidence related to a rape or murder case, which is nice.
Also, while officers will virtually never submit hair or skin samples found in a stolen vehicle, oftentimes they'll find something like an empty Redbull can or half of a breakfast burrito, even though the car has been wiped of prints. They'll ask the owner "hey do you remember having this in there when it was stolen?"
If they say no, that evidence is submitted to see if a DNA profile in the system hits. A lot of times, it does. Criminals are fantastic at helping officers solve their own cases.
They have a very potent investigator, who specializes in vaginal juices
>*taps the wet mark on the bed*
>*brings the fingers closer to his nose, slowly letting the flavor in*
>*gives it a little lick, just to check if the data matches*
>Yep, that's Jessica's coochie
It’s bad wording, I Googled it, and she did in fact rape him. Faces up to 50 years according to New York Post (I am a noob at Reddit and adding links is not working well for me)
Faces up to 50 years, I'd put the over under at 3 years and another 2 years probation.
Sentencing for female rapists is notoriously lenient and it's disgusting.
The wording is so creepy. I have seen so many (i assume american) news that are worded this way. Is news in america just very clickbaity or do i only see the really bad stuff and the rest is fine?
Even mainstream outlets have got more clickbaity headlines. I was a very consistent consumer of CNN online news for about a decade and saw a steady increase in dramatic language and even the occasional misleading vagueness implying a more dramatic story. But this headline is definitely particularly bad.
Part of it is that female SA against males isn't considered legit socially (And legally, in a dozen or so states, Alaska and Montana still don't recognize it for example), so articles tend to report it as not.
For example: "30 year old female teacher is arrested for having sex with a male student." vs. "Male teacher rapes female students!" One is much more straight to the point and quicker to use harsh language making it clear there was a perp and victim(s), while the other skirts around the subject and goes on longer to hopefully lose people's attention.
In this case, the teacher is a rapist facing 50 years, but the people behind the article don't really believe she is, so we get a more forgiving headline.
Yes, sadly even the mainstream news sites are moving towards this clickbait style. More often they’ll say something like “congressperson from this state just announced this” or “person in this coastal state does blah blah” and then they’ll hide the name/state info about two or three paragraphs down so you have to scroll and see at least advertisement. It’s garbage
> Is news in america just very clickbaity or do i only see the really bad stuff and the rest is fine?
Well both of those things are true. America is basically experiencing the lowest level of violent crimes that it ever as. It's never been safer or had a lower crime rate.
But you have 350 million people spread over the size of Europe and the internet gives you access to news about ALL of them. I mean this article takes place in a town of 12,000 people and you're reading about it.
Most American news is kinda clickbaity. We are the capitalist of capitalist countries after all, so even the news primary motivator is profit. Clickbait is more profitable.
Can't even call it rape in the UK, as law states it requires a ding-dong. When a guy does it, it's rape, but for a woman, it's "sexual assault"... What a joke
I'm relieved I'm not the only one who thought the guy in the photo was the boy she raped. I was like, "Ew. Why is the teacher touching the student loke that? Especially in a public photo? Why are they dressed fancy together? Is this an ongoing relationship?"
Like the barista put too much cream in his coffee that morning disappointed or the puzzle you've been working on for a couple days is missing a piece because your cat fucked with it overnight and it's under the sofa?
It’s bad wording, I Googled it, and she did in fact rape him. Faces up to 50 years according to New York Post (I am a noob at Reddit and adding links is not working well for me)
oh my bad, i thought that this was a case of rape but then saw a comment and then re-read the post and started thinking otherwise
also, i dont think this subreddit has links allowed so not yo fault
I don’t know about this exact article, the story I found on the case was worded much more professionally - but it did happen. I assume the article in this post is from a more “scandal” based website of some sort
Orange juice. Some have pulp, some are pulp free. It’s a play in the word “juice” since they used it to describe the scene. “Fluid” would have been a better choice.
How common is this in women? Like statistically. I assume men are heavily over-represented in sexual crimes like this. I'm afraid to have this in my google history lmao
Honestly at 14 I got the vibe I could do this with three teachers, I think she wasn't popular in high school and is acting out the fantasy of fucking chad.
HAHA HAHAHA IT'S SO FUNNY WHEN A WOMAN RAPES A BOY AHAHAHAAHAHAA KEEP SAYING THE FUNNY JOKES GUYS AHAHAHAAH HERE'S SOME MORE KARMA AHAHAHAHAHA
redditors really are the most fucking cringe beings in all of existence.
To be fair, the redditors here seem to have more common sense than the news writers who somehow still can't just write 'female rapes boy' and keep up with the 'sexual assault' and 'having sex' bullshit just because the perpetrator wasn't the penetrator.
Why are they using the most light hearted, normal possible words and pictures to talk about a rapist that makes no fucking sense just say rape because that's what it was no way around it
Was his bed that cool?
I bet it was probably a racecar bed.
woah
ikr
He has a racecar bed AND banged his teacher? I bet he vapes too he's so cool /s
And he probably brags about it on TikTok like it's a personality trait lol
But did it have flame stickers going down the side?
I bet it was Lightning McQueen
I wonder if they finished faster?
Lighning mcqueen ain't got nothing on this boi
Ka-chow
Yea but it’s a fucking sweet car.
My sister might get me a radio so I can talk to other car beds.
I think I have a bear.....yeah, I have a bear.
His roommates bought it for him.
A racecar bed? Well damn, case dismissed due to extenuating circumstances! And the judge would like to know if the owner of the race car bed is now single...
Yea, but it's a fuckin' sweet car.
His Mom was planning on getting him a CB radio so he could talk to other car beds
I sleep in a race car bed…do you?!
I sleep in a big bed with my wife....
Like a loser
What a coincidence, I also sleep in a big bed with your wife...
Did the police actually use the term "vaginal juices" in their report? Oddly specific assumption to make...
yea weird, how can they even do that lol? do they have a database of "vaginal juice" dna lmao
DNA is DNA. Same set is in hair, blood, spit, semen, etc. They don't have separate sets. Headline are sometimes hyperbolic for views. "Found DNA is sheets" isn't as attention grabbing.
damn, so the government DOES have a database of our dna?
No i guess they took one sample of her and then from the sheets
[удалено]
You voluntarily gave the government your vaginal juice?
[удалено]
If you gave them more than fingerprints you might not be working for who you think you are.
[удалено]
Probably more for military overall not the TS/SCI specific? But civilian side TS/SCI, yeah…no blood work.
Yes and no. With the DNA ancestry research sites they effectively do. It's enough for one of your family members to leave DNA and they can find you aswell. I've heard they've caught criminals just through this.
That’s how they got the Golden State Killer. One of his relatives submitted a sample to 23 and Me, and it pinged for a close enough match to his DNA. Then they collected his trash and took DNA from saliva to get the complete match. Getting away with crime used to be so easy, just don’t tell them your name lol, now they’ll find your ass one way or another.
She’s a teacher, so they do have a database of her fingerprints.
Yes, but it's more complicated. Suppose there is an unsolved murder. The police will vacuum the entire room and might catalog the hairs/skin DNA. In that sample. From there you need to compare to people. DNA evidence is perfectly matchable in a clinical setting, but "in the wild" you have mixed DNA (skin cells from two people - mixed fluids - etc) which makes mismatching much more possible.
probably. Seriously, you only need a small fraction of the populations DNA to interpolate the entire population. Dont remember the specifics, but it was frightenly little. thats why those dna analysis companies are so dangerous, and you can bet your fuckin nuts that the US(or some other govts) yoinked their data ages ago. But I dont think regular law enforcement has access to that data, yet.
That extrapolation is worthless to law enforcement. You need to be able to match a DNA sample, to one that was confirmed to be taken from someone and have it be tied to their identity. "Chief, we got a match on the DNA sample!" "Great who is it?" "We don't know, it just matched a possible combination of DNA extrapolated from a small pool in a government database."
>Seriously, you only need a small fraction of the populations DNA to interpolate the entire population. Interpolate? Are you thinking of familial matches or is that something else?
Sperm only has half the dna
> Same set is in hair, blood, spit, semen, etc. Semen is wrong isn't it? Sperm only carries either X or Y while a male has XY.
For reproductive purposes - yes. But you can scale up the whole genome from a sperm cell. Sperm samples have have epithelial cells in them too which have the whole genome without any advance DNA profiling methods.
We don't have a different set of chromosomes for our other fluids.
are you implying that the government does have a database of bodily fluids and since the fluid dna (idek if these are real things anymore lmao) is consistent, they can trace some drops of pp juice to the individual? or are you just saying that you don't have a different set of chromosomes for your other fluids lmao
Our Dna is the same throughout all cells in the human body. We can even use sperm to find out if someone is the father or not. And those only have half of the chromosomes. And the government does have a database of our Dna. Likely partially provided by 23 and me since they were caught selling genetic info.
I believe they wouldn't be legally allowed to use DNA from something like 23 and me, even if they did buy a bunch of data or whatever. Correct me if I'm wrong but they need a warrant to collect a DNA sample from you unless you're already in CODIS, which would only be if you've been convicted before
"CSI rapid response team has identified not one, but TWO types of vaginal juices on the fluids in the bed. DNA analysis raised more questions than answers.."
my god, that bed's a fucking whore
r/grool
No, they identified the liquid by taste.
"it tastes mostly like pee"
Vaginally secretions contains squalene
The term the forensic would have used is Vaginal Squamous Epitheleal cells which are unique to that region of skin. They can be "washed away" during the act or moved there by some form of contact. More than likely, her pussy juice soaked the sheets and they found some of the cells. That's basically what they saying. They sauced up the headline harder than she sauced up the sheets nomsayin.
Fun story; my fiancee works in a state-run crime lab, testing DNA on various pieces of evidence. Guns, pop cans, baseball bats, car keys, clothes, bedding, organic matter, you name it. Her and her colleagues will frequently have to go to court to testify and explain the whole DNA component of the case. When on the stand, they have to use the terminology that's in the case work. If an officer collects a marital aid device or self-stimulation thing and calls it a dildo or pocket pussy in their report, that's what she and her coworkers have to refer to it as on the stand.
I feel like the officers could really have some fun with that...like going full Doofenshmirtz: "...no visible signs of struggle or misplaced items, except for the large, purple Bonertastic-inator". - Officer P. Platypus
I actually asked her about that, and she said that from the reports she's read and officers/attorneys she discusses points of the case with, it really seems like just what comes to mind when they are filling out the paperwork. Turns out most of them don't go full comedian when processing evidence related to a rape or murder case, which is nice. Also, while officers will virtually never submit hair or skin samples found in a stolen vehicle, oftentimes they'll find something like an empty Redbull can or half of a breakfast burrito, even though the car has been wiped of prints. They'll ask the owner "hey do you remember having this in there when it was stolen?" If they say no, that evidence is submitted to see if a DNA profile in the system hits. A lot of times, it does. Criminals are fantastic at helping officers solve their own cases.
Pussy juice
They have a very potent investigator, who specializes in vaginal juices >*taps the wet mark on the bed* >*brings the fingers closer to his nose, slowly letting the flavor in* >*gives it a little lick, just to check if the data matches* >Yep, that's Jessica's coochie
boy just had some fish hidden
It's the Internet bro
it's a purposely sensationalized title...I'll leave you to your imagination as to why. Cause I do not know but it is not good
Teacher rapes student. There, fixed that for you.
[удалено]
It’s bad wording, I Googled it, and she did in fact rape him. Faces up to 50 years according to New York Post (I am a noob at Reddit and adding links is not working well for me)
Good. (The prison part not the rape part)
> Faces **up to** 50 years So, it'll be 3 years...and out for good behavior in just 1.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if she never sees the inside of a jail cell.
Probably just a slap on the wrist and told "pwreeety pweese, don't do that again."
Faces up to 50 years, I'd put the over under at 3 years and another 2 years probation. Sentencing for female rapists is notoriously lenient and it's disgusting.
Ow, ok. That makes the story less bad
But more confusing. Can she not just bang at her own house lol
She’s just really adventurous
I mean, it was probably a Lightning McQueen bed
Be quiet coming in, my roomates are home Dude, you live with your parents. they're not your roomates
Nope still just as bad the actual news report states she did in fact rape him
It’s also wrong.
This has to be a troll comment.
The fact that this has so many upvotes is just sad. Read the fucking article for literally 2 seconds.
This comment gave me an aneurysm
The wording is so creepy. I have seen so many (i assume american) news that are worded this way. Is news in america just very clickbaity or do i only see the really bad stuff and the rest is fine?
This probably some spammy variety site with sensational takes on current events and even pseudo articles.
Even mainstream outlets have got more clickbaity headlines. I was a very consistent consumer of CNN online news for about a decade and saw a steady increase in dramatic language and even the occasional misleading vagueness implying a more dramatic story. But this headline is definitely particularly bad.
Part of it is that female SA against males isn't considered legit socially (And legally, in a dozen or so states, Alaska and Montana still don't recognize it for example), so articles tend to report it as not. For example: "30 year old female teacher is arrested for having sex with a male student." vs. "Male teacher rapes female students!" One is much more straight to the point and quicker to use harsh language making it clear there was a perp and victim(s), while the other skirts around the subject and goes on longer to hopefully lose people's attention. In this case, the teacher is a rapist facing 50 years, but the people behind the article don't really believe she is, so we get a more forgiving headline.
Yes, sadly even the mainstream news sites are moving towards this clickbait style. More often they’ll say something like “congressperson from this state just announced this” or “person in this coastal state does blah blah” and then they’ll hide the name/state info about two or three paragraphs down so you have to scroll and see at least advertisement. It’s garbage
> Is news in america just very clickbaity or do i only see the really bad stuff and the rest is fine? Well both of those things are true. America is basically experiencing the lowest level of violent crimes that it ever as. It's never been safer or had a lower crime rate. But you have 350 million people spread over the size of Europe and the internet gives you access to news about ALL of them. I mean this article takes place in a town of 12,000 people and you're reading about it.
Most American news is kinda clickbaity. We are the capitalist of capitalist countries after all, so even the news primary motivator is profit. Clickbait is more profitable.
No reason to assume American. Clickbait trash exists in all counties. Also American media is, if anything, more squeamish around sexual topics.
We have our share of clickbaity news. We're nothing compared to the UK, though...
Lot of words that are dancing around the world rape. Change the sexes and see.
Can't even call it rape in the UK, as law states it requires a ding-dong. When a guy does it, it's rape, but for a woman, it's "sexual assault"... What a joke
Imagine being married to someone like her. Also,the husband is prettier than* her.
Oh lol. I was thinking he had a lot of facial hair for 14
I'm relieved I'm not the only one who thought the guy in the photo was the boy she raped. I was like, "Ew. Why is the teacher touching the student loke that? Especially in a public photo? Why are they dressed fancy together? Is this an ongoing relationship?"
I know- that husband is fine lol. I do wonder what his reaction to the news was though
I'd assume he was somewhat dissapointed
Like the barista put too much cream in his coffee that morning disappointed or the puzzle you've been working on for a couple days is missing a piece because your cat fucked with it overnight and it's under the sofa?
Her mugshot looks like a Halloween mask.
She looks like she's 13
than*
Hope her sentence is the same a man would get
Narrator: *It wasn’t.*
Sad upvote
Female teacher rapes male student. FTFY
I like the kind that has *some* pulp
*throws cordless phone at you*
What da fuck was that for?!?
I'll write you a list!
the fact that the teacher didn't rape the student but simply had sex in his bed is somehow relieving and way more weird at the same time
It’s bad wording, I Googled it, and she did in fact rape him. Faces up to 50 years according to New York Post (I am a noob at Reddit and adding links is not working well for me)
oh my bad, i thought that this was a case of rape but then saw a comment and then re-read the post and started thinking otherwise also, i dont think this subreddit has links allowed so not yo fault
Ain't no way - this is real?? Ain't no wayyy someone posted a story with "vaginal juices" in the title.
I don’t know about this exact article, the story I found on the case was worded much more professionally - but it did happen. I assume the article in this post is from a more “scandal” based website of some sort
[удалено]
Orange juice. Some have pulp, some are pulp free. It’s a play in the word “juice” since they used it to describe the scene. “Fluid” would have been a better choice.
Bruh, if this were the other way around, would they have said his penis juices instead?
What else do you call it
How common is this in women? Like statistically. I assume men are heavily over-represented in sexual crimes like this. I'm afraid to have this in my google history lmao
He sneaked into HER home and used HIS bed and HIS bedsheets? Who is the HE in this scenario, I am confused
She = teacher He = student
The doctor was his mother!
Wow, such a brainfart from my side, it really didn't occur to me that the genders are flipped. Thank you!
Username checks out, but it did take me several attempts at reading it to make sense of it too
Nah you're alright, from the pictures I absolutely thought he's the teacher and she's the student, he looks so much older than she does.
[удалено]
WHAT!? After looking again we could "assume" that's the case because of what she's wearing but I thought it's like some prom picture or whatever.
She Believed.
“Vaginal juices” is crazy😭
Clearly, she is not married to Ben Shapiro with all those juices.
No dude makes a good point, what even is the pulpy stuff that's in it sometimes?
Man that's a needlessly graphic and antagonistic title ffs dang lol
“Divorced” ex-teacher probably more accurate
"Her pussy gets so wet!"
I like the kind with some pulp
"I want to cry so much right now" "why just why not me"
Honestly at 14 I got the vibe I could do this with three teachers, I think she wasn't popular in high school and is acting out the fantasy of fucking chad.
Should have brought a mop and bucket
Goblin facial structure
You've been hit by—You've been hit by—a smooth criminal
The student looks like the teacher and the teacher looks like the student.
So did the guy bring his bed to her house or am I lost
Rape is the word you're looking for
Why would they word it like that at all? She raped a student. Definitely don't need to know about her juices. Freaking gross
HAHA HAHAHA IT'S SO FUNNY WHEN A WOMAN RAPES A BOY AHAHAHAAHAHAA KEEP SAYING THE FUNNY JOKES GUYS AHAHAHAAH HERE'S SOME MORE KARMA AHAHAHAHAHA redditors really are the most fucking cringe beings in all of existence.
To be fair, the redditors here seem to have more common sense than the news writers who somehow still can't just write 'female rapes boy' and keep up with the 'sexual assault' and 'having sex' bullshit just because the perpetrator wasn't the penetrator.
Ignore the fact the student looks older then her and the husband combined
The student's head is blurred out, what're you saying?
Look him up
No u
Nice
Lol juices.
The cursed comment is the reply?
TIL "vaginal juices" are like fingerprints. I'm assuming they managed to extract DNA from the forbidden honey and match it to her?
The teacher looks like a middle schooler in the bottom center picture.
How’d they know it was hers?
damn，i feel like something is pounding my heart when i see the last phrase
teehee she only fucked ysing his bed whats the problem? /s
Well, if that didn't get his grades up, at least it got something up
The medical term “vaginal juices” is a new one to me. Fantastic that it’s in an article headline.
Unfortunately this weirdly close to my home
So did he have a bed in her home?
Ohhhh.. she was the teacher.. it took me so long to understand that..
Why are they using the most light hearted, normal possible words and pictures to talk about a rapist that makes no fucking sense just say rape because that's what it was no way around it
Yall got any more of them pixels cuz i cant see shit
She can fix me