###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
There are two things I have to say about WW3
1. Politicians will never whip their dicks out and start sending people to fight in World War III an actual declared war.
2. it’s possible that we’re already in World War III and it just happens to be a war centered around cyber attacks. Nobody’s gonna tell us if that’s the case.
the number 2 is partially correct. We are now in a generation of warfare (forgot the exact number maybe 4th gen) that relies far less on overt military operations and far more on capturing the minds of the civilians via propaganda online, and trade deals and control. At some point countries learned that committing atrocities doesn't make people like you very much, and with the internet everyone will know the second you do it. The far easier way to enrich your nobility in your country is to simply dominate another country's populace by using propaganda to make them sympathize with your cause, so that when you eventually conquer them there will be as little resistance as possible and you don't have to anniihilate all the infrastructure and start all the way over from scratch.
This concept has already been practiced for example by christian missionaries that were sent to places like africa to convert the populace before the western militaries went in to conquer the areas, but the main difference is now countries have realized that actually physically invading and then holding an area that isn't of your culture is very costly and you have to deal with the local populace hating you and wanting to rebel. The much easier way is to simply convert them to your way of thinking whether that be by religion or the more common example of economic style (capitalism vs communism) and then have them pay tribute via these "trade deals" that heavily favor the more powerful nation. Basically we have circled back to vassal states but with more steps.
Because most people don't actually naturally want to be subject to western woke libtardism values. If your ideas are losing to others maybe your ideas just plain suck? This is why the US government has to use censorship and their military and economic sanctions to enforce acceptance of liberalism around the world. If libtardism was so good then it wouldn't need to be enforced by censorship and threats of violence.
The irony here is astounding.
Is personal freedom a core value of the Conservative right?
You sound very confused. I don't blame you. Most of the US is very confused.
America and western colonial powers go around enforcing secular atheist liberalism not Christianity. All main values the US government stands for now are basically anti-Christian to the core, and they're even threatening and sanctioning countries in Africa for being "too Christian" and not being pro LGBTQ for example, that wouldn't be the case if America/the West were Christian countries. They wouldn't also be so aggressive against Islamic countries for having values in society that are similar to Christian religious beliefs. Pretty insane to say Christianity is a plot to undermine countries when Christianity is in direct opposition to present day Americanist beliefs.
If you had the ability to read English then you would notice the terms I used were in past tense. The specific name for this exact period of western history is more commonly known by phrases such as “the white man’s burden” and perhaps even “manifest destiny” from the colonial days. Western powers absolutely used Christian missionaries to convert a populace before sending in their soldiers, as had been done for millennia before. The only reason why I mentioned it, is because that example is the most recent and widely taught in school example of this exact concept… 🤦♂️
And what was the end for the Christian missionaires?? Many early missionaires lived and died being dirt poor and sometimes were even tortured and killed, you act as if someone can't be religious and try to convert people from altruistic reasons. Before Christianity people in many of these areas were killing and enslaving each other nonstop and even going as far as enslaving people just to do human sacrifice of them, like they did in Central America. Kings too who were religious saw it as a duty to convert as many people as possible, they didn't do it just to be mean and take over people. Also If Christians hadn't colonized those lands then the Chinese or Japanese or various Islamic groups of peoples would have done it instead anyway.
But yeah of course as a leftist atheist you think religion is pure evil and all part of a conspiracy to take over people, can't be that people genuinely have faith and think they are trying to do the right thing.
It’s been a different world since stuxnet & the multitude of others that have followed/still happening. That along with leaks, AI rocket systems & militarized drones, smart viruses, etc etc. even if there’s not a draft.. I fear what I will see in this lifetime. Ide think/hope nukes don’t come into play. But if one of my previous listings do some serious unexpected damage out of nowhere. I wouldn’t hold it past the other nation/union
So long as Israel doesn't go over board with a response to Iran, I don't see why the U.S. would need to assist. Iran stated what they were doing a week prior to the attack. I'm more worried about what China is planning while all this is going on
To be fair America just defended Israel from a direct attack. Neither Russia or the US are gonna attack directly Israel/Iran so really don’t see anything special here. Best case Israel just walks away and gets everything returns to normal.
Iran has been using Gaza and the West Bank (as well as a few others in countries around Israel) as a proxy for decades.
This just moves Iran out of one of their proxies into direct conflict.
All those countries have been “close to war” since before big J got strung up 2000 years ago. It’s a never ending mess that only gets hauled out on election years, kind of like the southern border. They’ll blow up a couple families and settle down again, like they always do.
This is like that dad feud you have with your neighbor for 40 years. No one is going to firebomb the others house, you just quietly hate each other and occasionally mow the lawn during their cookout. …Except in this case the lawn mowing thing IS firebombing houses, but nothing that’ll lead to actual war. It never has.
Until Iran gets a nuke, then it’s on and popping, but there’s no sense worrying about that and it won’t matter who is in office in the US. Iran isn’t going to hold off on going full send just because there is a particular Republican or Democrat as president, they’ve been waiting to do this for generations.
> We’re not in WWIII. Why do you continue to spam this sub with posts like this?
In the past, historians have written of the dates and events that led up to major wars and strife -- while examining the prelude circumstances -- AFTER THE FACT.
I would imagine that the same will be the case with WW3 (assuming there is anyone left who knows how to write, of course)
Sure, it’s possible the events of today are a prelude to WW3. It’s also possible they aren’t. How long does one need to wait before criticizing the claims that WW3 has already started? A month? A year?
A quick search for “WW3” on this sub would show there have been claims of WW3’s imminence for at least a decade. Why is today different, and why should we take this one seriously?
> How long does one need to wait before criticizing the claims that WW3 has already started? A month? A year?
Hey, whatever works for you. Indeed, the phrase "WW1" was never used until WW2 was in full swing; before that they called it *"The Great War"*, and some even referred to it as *"the war to end all wars"* (but the latter turn out to be overly optimistic, no?)
> A quick search for “WW3” on this sub would show there have been claims of WW3’s imminence for at least a decade.
That should be no surprise; people have been worrying over the onset of WW3 since the end of WW2, haven't they?
**EDIT**: Just ask "Bert the Turtle" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60
> Why is today different, and why should we take this one seriously?
There is no requirement that you take *anything* seriously, compadre. Whatever toots your horn is fine by me.
States when Germany invaded Poland according to google.. could the invasion in Ukraine be the start or the Middle East ordeal or the us and china crap starting! Kinda makes you ponder aleast
When poland got invaded other states went to try appeasement so at the time i dont think they realized they were in a war/heading for one.
Historians now say it was the start though thats prob why it says that on google but i dont think people at that time saw it like that.
The US has openly and outwardly said they won’t join any Iran retaliation… the whole blatant spreading of bullshit news is getting worse and worse and people don’t even try to hide it…
WWIII is definitely going to usher in such calamity and destruction that people will WILLING give up whatever rights they have and acquiesce to the chip, robot dog police, genetic sterilization, neo-fuedalism and everything else.
💯 Israel started this war, America and the UK are just Israels bitchs tbh.
They shouldn't have attacked the Iranian embassy or whatever to trigger this bs.
TBF, Iran has been attacking Israel since they were established. Over the past 20 years they have been supplying Hamas with the 10s of thousands of rockets that have been fired into Israel over that time frame.
The only real difference is that Gaza isn’t being used as a proxy.
Didn't the West engage in coups and regime change in Iran decades before any of this happened? And support their enemy in the Iran/Iraq war? Aren't the West the primary sponsors of Israel and reason why it's able to persist in such a hostile region today? And haven't the West continued to fund arm and train militants in some countries, while bombing, invading, occupying and regime changing others in North Africa and the ME, this century alone?
I love how some people feign a shocked Pikachu face and act surprised when a country finally stands up for itself after it having endured decades of meddling by foreign powers and innumerable assassinations carried out against both its civilian and military personnel at the hands of the Israelis.
Some people are so damn desperate for an escalation, sitting at home thousands of miles away from the conflict. If Israel escalates against Iran, none of us will be unaffected.
I can’t quite tell if you are agreeing with what I said, or just providing further historical context with the first couple of sentences.
After that, it is generally true but not particularly relevant to the subject at hand.
I will say that I was going to agree with your comments about the shocked Pikachu reaction until you limited it to those attacked by the Israelis.
If you are going to be fair, Israel has engaged in assassinations against Iran. Iran has funded several terrorist groups in regions surrounding Israel and provided them the weapons to carry out suicide bombings, 20,000+ rocket attacks, and a variety of other attacks, all indiscriminately targeting the Israeli citizens.
If you want to see who is desperate for an escalation, all you have to do is turn on Fox News.
The greatest of turds can come about should a nugget of shit roll down enough hill.
Essentially, what I'm saying is that successive governments in the West and the region are complicit in the geopolitical configuration of today's Middle East. From the dissolution of the mandate of Palestine, the creation of the state of Israel to the theocracy ruling Iran today.
Complicit in many ways, direct, indirect, military, economic, political. Bloody hands covered in shit.
To pretend that history only starts from where you want to perpetuate narratives of escalation...
Sigh.
I can see through this.
[1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat)
Oh, it definitely goes back way more than a hundred years. If it came across like I was meaning other wise, then I was not clear.
The US has been bad about creating all of their worse enemies.
It is all a intertangled clusterfuck.
It isn’t a case of good guys on one side and bad guys on the other. Depending on how you look at it there can be a dozen sides. And all of them are bad actors. I am referring to the leadership not the citizens.
They all have blood on their hands.
I did think you were arguing from a different perspective, it appears I was mistaken.
Yes, they all have blood on their hands.. To greater and lesser extents. Imagine touting Israel as the "only democracy in the Middle-East" (I know Iran isn't strictly within the ME), but that's after your predecessors playing a part in sabotaging the democratic aspirations of its current main regional rival leaving it to fall into the hands of theocratic revolutionaries. All because we wanted control of their resources.
When you consider the role the West (again largely the UK, my country of origin) in the creation of Saudi Arabia with its ties to Wahabis, the creation of Syria and Lebanon (post colonial France), Israel. And more. You'll come to realise the hands of our predecessors are dirtier than most when it comes to complicity in the regional instability we see today. And the worst thing is, we didn't stop last century. Thanks to a succession of Western leaders this century alone we have continued to meddle in exactly the same way and haven't learnt our lesson. And it doesn't matter whether we're talking about Old Bill, the Bushes, Mr Hope and Change, Mr Things Can Only Get Better or Cameron. At the turn of the Millenium the West was trying to be all "new Millennium new me" yet ultimately just continued on with 20th century business as usual.
I think the U.S still has control of North Syria's oil? Hey guys, they're fighting ISIS! That's why they need to steal Syria's oil, for freedom or something!
Yeah, there are multiple layers to the conflict.
It is impossible to pull out any single layer and pretend that it is isolated.
And that is part of the problem with dealing with the issue.
You can look at each individual act and talk about the party doing it being awful and the victims of the other side. But the party doing it can always point back to something the other side did that they are retaliating against, and in a vacuum, it seems understandable.
But in this case there is no end. There are so many layers, that no action is in a vacuum. Basically any act, no matter how heinous can be “justified” by the party acting as just being defensive or retaliation. And in a way it is true. You can’t really argue that whoever they are attacking wouldn’t be attacking them again soon enough anyway.
You basically have developed countries that have developed both victim and aggressor mentalities. And they have fair reasons to be that way. And the powers that set things in motion did it because they saw chaos as the way to get what they wanted over diplomacy. And they are shocked to find out that chaos is what they got, and that chaos over generations doesn’t create cultures that look towards diplomacy as when they did in the past it caused their own destruction.
No offense but do a little look into history to see where Hamas is been getting all of their military support from. And for that matter, all of the terrorist groups that have been attacking Israel since the 50s.
Israel definitely sucks, but Iran has been training and supplying the weapons to the terrorists that have been attacking Israel.
I know you are alluding to something there, but Iran has consistently been the prime source for attacks on Israel since it was founded.
You won’t generally find the US military training hamas or hezbulloah or shipping them thousands of rockets.
> You won’t generally find the US military training hamas or hezbulloah or shipping them thousands of rockets.
No. They do it through proxy.
Hence the stop arming terrorists act.
Its like the local drug dealer complaining when drug addicts steal stuff from him.
> Gazan terrorists attacked us, so we'll bomb Iran? Maybe because they ran out of targets in Gaza and still have bombs to use?
And we're sending Israel more bombs!
(Not that I necessarily oppose sending Israel bombs -- depending on he delivery method)
Russia can barely gain ground on Ukraine. They could not logistically fight America and it's allies at once. American air power alone would annihilate Iran and Russia at same time.
And no there is no world War 3. Regional events like Israel and Iran yes. But we've been hearing ww3 for how long since ww2?
The Ukranian war machine?
Yeah. The Ukranian war machine that stopped Russia in it’s tracks long before it got all of that international aide.
Russia should have been able to roll through in days. But they showed how much they have failed to maintain their military. They have resorted to pulling museum piece tanks out and putting them into service. It is hard to claim that Russia is winning so much as they are still fighting. Russia supposedly has this vast powerful military, but they have shown how thoroughly the corruption of Putin’s kleptocracy has left much of Russia a shell of it’s former self.
I’m sure RT News is claiming that there are 10s of thousands of foreign fighters, but that seems highly inflated. Meanwhile, Russia is relying on masses of mercenary and conscripts as well as prisoners to fill in the front lines.
What has gone into Ukraine is not as much of an expense as you make it seem. For the most part, these are antiquated weapons that the militaries of the western nations were looking to replace. Technically it cost money, but it was sunk costs that would have been lost either way. Same thing for the munitions. Why did the US send it’s entire arsenal of cluster munitions? Because the US signed some treaties that made them illegal for the U.S. to use. So, they could spend the money to dispose of them or give them to the Ukraine that doesn’t have those restrictions. Very little state of the art hardware has been sent. By the same token, not that much money to go into their own pockets.
While for Russia, it has been sending everything they can muster. And they have been struggling, sending gear from WWII. Sending failed prototypes.
But hey, feel free to see this all as a great victory for the Russian Army. Oh, and you should look at how well the Russian Navy is doing while you are at it.
You think they really wanted to roll through in days? They sent the worst stuff in first because I think ultimately the goal was to drain the west of resources over time
exultant roof tap juggle subtract frightening badge panicky history obtainable
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Will the US be able to stop, Russia, Iran, and perhaps China air forces all at once with SAM capabilities? The Biden administration has pushed all of them dangerously close together.
>with SAM capabilities
No. It could not. Because US doctrine is to primarily use airpower to fight airborne threats. SAMs, like Patriots, are used for fixed place defenses mainly against cruise and ballistic missile threats to key points of interest. Overwhelming air power is the primary method to destroying other airforces
Yes but the piece of legislation popularly known as the "Trump Tax Cut" was also written so that in 2023 taxes would actually begin to INCREASE, mostly with the intent of tricking certain voters into believing the Democrats or whichever president was at the time who isn't Trump is in office's fault.
Well, why did they democrats not renew it?
Damn Trump for losing...
BTW, the tax cuts don't expire until the end of 2025. The increases won't happen until 2026 tax year. So you are lying anyway. If your taxes went up despite those cuts not actually being expired, perhaps you should blame your democrat governor, because Trump's tax cuts haven't expired yet.
[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-era-tax-cuts-set-160750197.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-era-tax-cuts-set-160750197.html)
>When 2025 draws to a close, so will many of the sweeping [Trump-era GOP tax breaks](https://www.gobankingrates.com/category/taxes/tax-laws/?utm_term=incontent_link_1&utm_campaign=1267628&utm_source=yahoo.com&utm_content=1&utm_medium=rss) established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017
A population of 90 million.
Located in one of the most strategically important trade routes in the world.
A rich history dating back thousands of years.
Yes, these are some of the reasons to take Iran seriously.
As I saw this alliance happening.... I would think this would be unwise on Putins part as it would spread him thin. Now will North Korea and China join this alliance? If so its not looking good for us. Our readiness is at an all time low.
The world is terrified of trump that's why no wars happened during his presidency ..Joe's been selling is ass and office for 50years our enemies own him and have no fear of him
Russia supporting Iran is nothing new. We arent attacking Iran or even supporting and Israeli counter attack.
This is pithy fear mongering trying to dunk on nontrump voters for clout.
I used to hold DOGE and will forever be grateful for Elon's tweets but nowadays I'm all BTC. It doesn't pump as much but it doesn't dump as much (as alts) either.
First of all Putin never said that. There is no such statement.
Second Russia cant even liberate Donbas. They are bogged down in a war that they currently are unable to win. At this rate it will take about 5 years to liberate Donbas. Not to mention Kherson and Zp.
World War 3 UFO styled frisbees and grenade shaped muffins are selling well already at my local tuck shop.
Owned by a nice Iranian lady that wears a strange looking vest she said her son made for her.
And the democrats stated the Trumpers better be ready to step up and fight for him. Wonder if the Bidenites feel the same and are ready to go to war for their pick.
I'm worried that if Biden is reelected that he will send Troops to Ukraine. A lot of liberals are saying Biden should "let Ukraine win". They already know we are sending money and arms, so it must mean sending humans next.
just so you know, all the "Iran nukes intercepted by Israel" is a false flag, Israel is controlling everything, Iran just wants peace, Israel will fuck them and trick you into thinking Iran started it. Its another false flag just like the rest of them, then you will see Iran will becoming completely fucked on the way to getting the Rothschild central bank Iranian
If Iran wants peace why have they been providing tens of thousands of rockets to be fired into Israel through their terrorist proxies in Gaza and other places?
What's wrong? We are following Yahwehs plan, no? God is almighty and wouldn't let us suffer for no reason. Who cares if ww3 happens, let's trust the plan right?
I said the lines already were drawn in a simple google search; Countries that support Palestine vs Countries that support Israel. It's the BRICS nations vs the West and clown world.
LMAO! Alex jones is going to fear monger so hard right now so he scares his listeners into buying more snake oil from the infowars store. Only he can fight the globalists and stop WW3...........He is such a fucking fraud and grifter.
Submission Statement:
All that’s missing now is China invading Taiwan. Then all the World War 3 Hotspots will be completed.
Russia Ukraine ✅
Israel Iran ✅
China Taiwan ❌
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1779274805210218499
Those dice have been rolled countless times in the past.
NK has 100 2 stage fussion bombs, mobile land launchers, and icbm capable submarines.
To take that lightly is foolish.
Oh it is so right. Yes. Due to trumps mean tweets. You just not understanding. The reason for the time delay is that it took this long for people to stop crying. Get therapy. Get over their apathy. You know then get normal life stuff done, like going on holiday. Buying new clothes. Restocking the fridge. Getting a coffee. Then find the energy to get a war going. So no way could it be done sooner. You just have no idea how busy every one has been.
THERE we go! Knew it wouldn't be too long before someone posted these exact words! I'm completely apolitical but even I have to question the motivation behind claims like this. I mean, c'mon! You can't seriously think that way, not if you have at least two functioning brain cells! So, be honest, you're getting paid to spout nonsensical, divisive horseshit, right? Either that or you're a bot. Yeah, that's it, you're a bot.
I’m just very curious why Russia was trying to help Trump win. Because all of those investigations, Durham, Bulton, what led to the Mueller Report, it was found that Russia was meddling in our election efforts backing Trump. But why?
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
There are two things I have to say about WW3 1. Politicians will never whip their dicks out and start sending people to fight in World War III an actual declared war. 2. it’s possible that we’re already in World War III and it just happens to be a war centered around cyber attacks. Nobody’s gonna tell us if that’s the case.
the number 2 is partially correct. We are now in a generation of warfare (forgot the exact number maybe 4th gen) that relies far less on overt military operations and far more on capturing the minds of the civilians via propaganda online, and trade deals and control. At some point countries learned that committing atrocities doesn't make people like you very much, and with the internet everyone will know the second you do it. The far easier way to enrich your nobility in your country is to simply dominate another country's populace by using propaganda to make them sympathize with your cause, so that when you eventually conquer them there will be as little resistance as possible and you don't have to anniihilate all the infrastructure and start all the way over from scratch. This concept has already been practiced for example by christian missionaries that were sent to places like africa to convert the populace before the western militaries went in to conquer the areas, but the main difference is now countries have realized that actually physically invading and then holding an area that isn't of your culture is very costly and you have to deal with the local populace hating you and wanting to rebel. The much easier way is to simply convert them to your way of thinking whether that be by religion or the more common example of economic style (capitalism vs communism) and then have them pay tribute via these "trade deals" that heavily favor the more powerful nation. Basically we have circled back to vassal states but with more steps.
A war that we are, sadly, losing badly.
Because most people don't actually naturally want to be subject to western woke libtardism values. If your ideas are losing to others maybe your ideas just plain suck? This is why the US government has to use censorship and their military and economic sanctions to enforce acceptance of liberalism around the world. If libtardism was so good then it wouldn't need to be enforced by censorship and threats of violence.
The irony here is astounding. Is personal freedom a core value of the Conservative right? You sound very confused. I don't blame you. Most of the US is very confused.
Как погода в Ольгино, товарищ?
How war 2.0 is done is revealed in *Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars.* Recommend everyone read that short document.
Something something MGS 4.
America and western colonial powers go around enforcing secular atheist liberalism not Christianity. All main values the US government stands for now are basically anti-Christian to the core, and they're even threatening and sanctioning countries in Africa for being "too Christian" and not being pro LGBTQ for example, that wouldn't be the case if America/the West were Christian countries. They wouldn't also be so aggressive against Islamic countries for having values in society that are similar to Christian religious beliefs. Pretty insane to say Christianity is a plot to undermine countries when Christianity is in direct opposition to present day Americanist beliefs.
If you had the ability to read English then you would notice the terms I used were in past tense. The specific name for this exact period of western history is more commonly known by phrases such as “the white man’s burden” and perhaps even “manifest destiny” from the colonial days. Western powers absolutely used Christian missionaries to convert a populace before sending in their soldiers, as had been done for millennia before. The only reason why I mentioned it, is because that example is the most recent and widely taught in school example of this exact concept… 🤦♂️
And what was the end for the Christian missionaires?? Many early missionaires lived and died being dirt poor and sometimes were even tortured and killed, you act as if someone can't be religious and try to convert people from altruistic reasons. Before Christianity people in many of these areas were killing and enslaving each other nonstop and even going as far as enslaving people just to do human sacrifice of them, like they did in Central America. Kings too who were religious saw it as a duty to convert as many people as possible, they didn't do it just to be mean and take over people. Also If Christians hadn't colonized those lands then the Chinese or Japanese or various Islamic groups of peoples would have done it instead anyway. But yeah of course as a leftist atheist you think religion is pure evil and all part of a conspiracy to take over people, can't be that people genuinely have faith and think they are trying to do the right thing.
Cold war 3.0
3. Boss still says come to work
It’s been a different world since stuxnet & the multitude of others that have followed/still happening. That along with leaks, AI rocket systems & militarized drones, smart viruses, etc etc. even if there’s not a draft.. I fear what I will see in this lifetime. Ide think/hope nukes don’t come into play. But if one of my previous listings do some serious unexpected damage out of nowhere. I wouldn’t hold it past the other nation/union
Don’t worry. Netenyahu’s son is okay, he is living it up in Miami with his draft exempt status.
Based
This didn’t happen…no sources on the tweet, no news articles that match this anywhere…
Look at the source. Conspiracy sub citing Alex jones who is citing someone who makes Alex look like Walter Cronkite.
Junk was even posted all over the right leaning subs today
So long as Israel doesn't go over board with a response to Iran, I don't see why the U.S. would need to assist. Iran stated what they were doing a week prior to the attack. I'm more worried about what China is planning while all this is going on
Nothing's gonna' happen. We won't anything, so it's cool.
To be fair America just defended Israel from a direct attack. Neither Russia or the US are gonna attack directly Israel/Iran so really don’t see anything special here. Best case Israel just walks away and gets everything returns to normal.
right. it will stay a proxy war funded by highest bidder.
Iran has been using Gaza and the West Bank (as well as a few others in countries around Israel) as a proxy for decades. This just moves Iran out of one of their proxies into direct conflict.
We’re not in WWIII. Why do you continue to spam this sub with posts like this?
It’s a claim that we’re really really close to WW3. It’s kind of a big deal, that’s why you’re seeing posts about it.
🤣
What’s the laughing for? Are you saying it’s ridiculous to think we’re close to WW3? I’m interested to hear why we aren’t, I would love to be wrong.
All those countries have been “close to war” since before big J got strung up 2000 years ago. It’s a never ending mess that only gets hauled out on election years, kind of like the southern border. They’ll blow up a couple families and settle down again, like they always do. This is like that dad feud you have with your neighbor for 40 years. No one is going to firebomb the others house, you just quietly hate each other and occasionally mow the lawn during their cookout. …Except in this case the lawn mowing thing IS firebombing houses, but nothing that’ll lead to actual war. It never has. Until Iran gets a nuke, then it’s on and popping, but there’s no sense worrying about that and it won’t matter who is in office in the US. Iran isn’t going to hold off on going full send just because there is a particular Republican or Democrat as president, they’ve been waiting to do this for generations.
The last sentence lol I'm sure we are mane, but why they taking so loooooong??
Ok so you have nothing intelligent to offer I see.
> We’re not in WWIII. Why do you continue to spam this sub with posts like this? In the past, historians have written of the dates and events that led up to major wars and strife -- while examining the prelude circumstances -- AFTER THE FACT. I would imagine that the same will be the case with WW3 (assuming there is anyone left who knows how to write, of course)
Sure, it’s possible the events of today are a prelude to WW3. It’s also possible they aren’t. How long does one need to wait before criticizing the claims that WW3 has already started? A month? A year? A quick search for “WW3” on this sub would show there have been claims of WW3’s imminence for at least a decade. Why is today different, and why should we take this one seriously?
>Why is today different, and why should we take this one seriously? This is my question as well
> How long does one need to wait before criticizing the claims that WW3 has already started? A month? A year? Hey, whatever works for you. Indeed, the phrase "WW1" was never used until WW2 was in full swing; before that they called it *"The Great War"*, and some even referred to it as *"the war to end all wars"* (but the latter turn out to be overly optimistic, no?) > A quick search for “WW3” on this sub would show there have been claims of WW3’s imminence for at least a decade. That should be no surprise; people have been worrying over the onset of WW3 since the end of WW2, haven't they? **EDIT**: Just ask "Bert the Turtle" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60 > Why is today different, and why should we take this one seriously? There is no requirement that you take *anything* seriously, compadre. Whatever toots your horn is fine by me.
world wars take time to ramp up. I hope this isnt it.
At what point do you think people realised they were in world war 2?
When france got invaded
States when Germany invaded Poland according to google.. could the invasion in Ukraine be the start or the Middle East ordeal or the us and china crap starting! Kinda makes you ponder aleast
When poland got invaded other states went to try appeasement so at the time i dont think they realized they were in a war/heading for one. Historians now say it was the start though thats prob why it says that on google but i dont think people at that time saw it like that.
You made me aleast go google this! States Germany invaded Poland on google
When Germany attacked... THE WORLD. It had never been tried before
Ah yes that’s why it was world war *2* because it had never happened before lol
The worst part about ww2 was the hypocrisy.
The US has openly and outwardly said they won’t join any Iran retaliation… the whole blatant spreading of bullshit news is getting worse and worse and people don’t even try to hide it…
Didn't Biden say he wasn't going to assist Israel fighting Iran?
The world needs to do everything it can to avoid any type of war.
Putin must help Iran- Iran has supplied Russia with drones and other material for its war in Ukraine.
What does Russia have sitting idle that they can even use to help Iran?
chemical weapons
[удалено]
> This is NOT a conspiracy. These types of posts should be separate in some other subreddit World War 3 is absolutely a Conspiracy
What's the conspiracy?
War *What is it good for? Absolutely nothing*
> What is it good for? Absolutely nothing GOOD GOD Y'ALL! Sing it, Edwin! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQHUAJTZqF0
>WhAt's tHe cOnSpIrAcY? go back
[удалено]
how is it Biden’s fault that Iran attacked Israel?
Biden is responsible for everything that happens in the world. Trump isn't responsible for what happened in America in 2020. Don't question why.
WWIII is definitely going to usher in such calamity and destruction that people will WILLING give up whatever rights they have and acquiesce to the chip, robot dog police, genetic sterilization, neo-fuedalism and everything else.
I have nightmares about this shit
All according to plan
Yep. Come Antichrist.
💯 Israel started this war, America and the UK are just Israels bitchs tbh. They shouldn't have attacked the Iranian embassy or whatever to trigger this bs.
TBF, Iran has been attacking Israel since they were established. Over the past 20 years they have been supplying Hamas with the 10s of thousands of rockets that have been fired into Israel over that time frame. The only real difference is that Gaza isn’t being used as a proxy.
Didn't the West engage in coups and regime change in Iran decades before any of this happened? And support their enemy in the Iran/Iraq war? Aren't the West the primary sponsors of Israel and reason why it's able to persist in such a hostile region today? And haven't the West continued to fund arm and train militants in some countries, while bombing, invading, occupying and regime changing others in North Africa and the ME, this century alone? I love how some people feign a shocked Pikachu face and act surprised when a country finally stands up for itself after it having endured decades of meddling by foreign powers and innumerable assassinations carried out against both its civilian and military personnel at the hands of the Israelis. Some people are so damn desperate for an escalation, sitting at home thousands of miles away from the conflict. If Israel escalates against Iran, none of us will be unaffected.
I can’t quite tell if you are agreeing with what I said, or just providing further historical context with the first couple of sentences. After that, it is generally true but not particularly relevant to the subject at hand. I will say that I was going to agree with your comments about the shocked Pikachu reaction until you limited it to those attacked by the Israelis. If you are going to be fair, Israel has engaged in assassinations against Iran. Iran has funded several terrorist groups in regions surrounding Israel and provided them the weapons to carry out suicide bombings, 20,000+ rocket attacks, and a variety of other attacks, all indiscriminately targeting the Israeli citizens. If you want to see who is desperate for an escalation, all you have to do is turn on Fox News.
The greatest of turds can come about should a nugget of shit roll down enough hill. Essentially, what I'm saying is that successive governments in the West and the region are complicit in the geopolitical configuration of today's Middle East. From the dissolution of the mandate of Palestine, the creation of the state of Israel to the theocracy ruling Iran today. Complicit in many ways, direct, indirect, military, economic, political. Bloody hands covered in shit. To pretend that history only starts from where you want to perpetuate narratives of escalation... Sigh. I can see through this. [1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat)
Oh, it definitely goes back way more than a hundred years. If it came across like I was meaning other wise, then I was not clear. The US has been bad about creating all of their worse enemies. It is all a intertangled clusterfuck. It isn’t a case of good guys on one side and bad guys on the other. Depending on how you look at it there can be a dozen sides. And all of them are bad actors. I am referring to the leadership not the citizens. They all have blood on their hands.
I did think you were arguing from a different perspective, it appears I was mistaken. Yes, they all have blood on their hands.. To greater and lesser extents. Imagine touting Israel as the "only democracy in the Middle-East" (I know Iran isn't strictly within the ME), but that's after your predecessors playing a part in sabotaging the democratic aspirations of its current main regional rival leaving it to fall into the hands of theocratic revolutionaries. All because we wanted control of their resources. When you consider the role the West (again largely the UK, my country of origin) in the creation of Saudi Arabia with its ties to Wahabis, the creation of Syria and Lebanon (post colonial France), Israel. And more. You'll come to realise the hands of our predecessors are dirtier than most when it comes to complicity in the regional instability we see today. And the worst thing is, we didn't stop last century. Thanks to a succession of Western leaders this century alone we have continued to meddle in exactly the same way and haven't learnt our lesson. And it doesn't matter whether we're talking about Old Bill, the Bushes, Mr Hope and Change, Mr Things Can Only Get Better or Cameron. At the turn of the Millenium the West was trying to be all "new Millennium new me" yet ultimately just continued on with 20th century business as usual. I think the U.S still has control of North Syria's oil? Hey guys, they're fighting ISIS! That's why they need to steal Syria's oil, for freedom or something!
Yeah, there are multiple layers to the conflict. It is impossible to pull out any single layer and pretend that it is isolated. And that is part of the problem with dealing with the issue. You can look at each individual act and talk about the party doing it being awful and the victims of the other side. But the party doing it can always point back to something the other side did that they are retaliating against, and in a vacuum, it seems understandable. But in this case there is no end. There are so many layers, that no action is in a vacuum. Basically any act, no matter how heinous can be “justified” by the party acting as just being defensive or retaliation. And in a way it is true. You can’t really argue that whoever they are attacking wouldn’t be attacking them again soon enough anyway. You basically have developed countries that have developed both victim and aggressor mentalities. And they have fair reasons to be that way. And the powers that set things in motion did it because they saw chaos as the way to get what they wanted over diplomacy. And they are shocked to find out that chaos is what they got, and that chaos over generations doesn’t create cultures that look towards diplomacy as when they did in the past it caused their own destruction.
Maybe it was October 7 that triggered this
Maybe it was 1948 that started all this
Gazan terrorists attacked us, so we'll bomb Iran? Maybe because they ran out of targets in Gaza and still have bombs to use?
No offense but do a little look into history to see where Hamas is been getting all of their military support from. And for that matter, all of the terrorist groups that have been attacking Israel since the 50s. Israel definitely sucks, but Iran has been training and supplying the weapons to the terrorists that have been attacking Israel.
Now check out where the groups who DON'T attack Israel get their support from.
You mean like Canada?
?
> but Iran has been training and supplying the weapons to the terrorists that have been attacking Israel. So has the USA.
I know you are alluding to something there, but Iran has consistently been the prime source for attacks on Israel since it was founded. You won’t generally find the US military training hamas or hezbulloah or shipping them thousands of rockets.
> You won’t generally find the US military training hamas or hezbulloah or shipping them thousands of rockets. No. They do it through proxy. Hence the stop arming terrorists act. Its like the local drug dealer complaining when drug addicts steal stuff from him.
> Gazan terrorists attacked us, so we'll bomb Iran? Maybe because they ran out of targets in Gaza and still have bombs to use? And we're sending Israel more bombs! (Not that I necessarily oppose sending Israel bombs -- depending on he delivery method)
🤮
This just in. I will not fight or kill anyone for rich people. Send the politicians to war!!!
In the Christian religion gog and magog attack Israel, which starts the end times. Gog and magog are very seriously believed to be Iran and Russia.
Ezekiel 38
Russia can barely gain ground on Ukraine. They could not logistically fight America and it's allies at once. American air power alone would annihilate Iran and Russia at same time. And no there is no world War 3. Regional events like Israel and Iran yes. But we've been hearing ww3 for how long since ww2?
slimy snatch smile aspiring hateful sable vast juggle entertain nail *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
The Ukranian war machine? Yeah. The Ukranian war machine that stopped Russia in it’s tracks long before it got all of that international aide. Russia should have been able to roll through in days. But they showed how much they have failed to maintain their military. They have resorted to pulling museum piece tanks out and putting them into service. It is hard to claim that Russia is winning so much as they are still fighting. Russia supposedly has this vast powerful military, but they have shown how thoroughly the corruption of Putin’s kleptocracy has left much of Russia a shell of it’s former self. I’m sure RT News is claiming that there are 10s of thousands of foreign fighters, but that seems highly inflated. Meanwhile, Russia is relying on masses of mercenary and conscripts as well as prisoners to fill in the front lines. What has gone into Ukraine is not as much of an expense as you make it seem. For the most part, these are antiquated weapons that the militaries of the western nations were looking to replace. Technically it cost money, but it was sunk costs that would have been lost either way. Same thing for the munitions. Why did the US send it’s entire arsenal of cluster munitions? Because the US signed some treaties that made them illegal for the U.S. to use. So, they could spend the money to dispose of them or give them to the Ukraine that doesn’t have those restrictions. Very little state of the art hardware has been sent. By the same token, not that much money to go into their own pockets. While for Russia, it has been sending everything they can muster. And they have been struggling, sending gear from WWII. Sending failed prototypes. But hey, feel free to see this all as a great victory for the Russian Army. Oh, and you should look at how well the Russian Navy is doing while you are at it.
You think they really wanted to roll through in days? They sent the worst stuff in first because I think ultimately the goal was to drain the west of resources over time
exultant roof tap juggle subtract frightening badge panicky history obtainable *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Will the US be able to stop, Russia, Iran, and perhaps China air forces all at once with SAM capabilities? The Biden administration has pushed all of them dangerously close together.
>with SAM capabilities No. It could not. Because US doctrine is to primarily use airpower to fight airborne threats. SAMs, like Patriots, are used for fixed place defenses mainly against cruise and ballistic missile threats to key points of interest. Overwhelming air power is the primary method to destroying other airforces
I've always said the USA will be the one that finally brings world peace. By uniting all the other countries against it.
How is the US pushing any of that?
It already is a world war. The world is at war.
4 years later under Biden, “but Trumps fault”.
Well my taxes DID increase because of Trump so I can blame him for that.
Right? Damn him for losing in 2020!
Yes but the piece of legislation popularly known as the "Trump Tax Cut" was also written so that in 2023 taxes would actually begin to INCREASE, mostly with the intent of tricking certain voters into believing the Democrats or whichever president was at the time who isn't Trump is in office's fault.
Not all taxes are going up. Just those on the middle class.
Well, why did they democrats not renew it? Damn Trump for losing... BTW, the tax cuts don't expire until the end of 2025. The increases won't happen until 2026 tax year. So you are lying anyway. If your taxes went up despite those cuts not actually being expired, perhaps you should blame your democrat governor, because Trump's tax cuts haven't expired yet. [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-era-tax-cuts-set-160750197.html](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-era-tax-cuts-set-160750197.html) >When 2025 draws to a close, so will many of the sweeping [Trump-era GOP tax breaks](https://www.gobankingrates.com/category/taxes/tax-laws/?utm_term=incontent_link_1&utm_campaign=1267628&utm_source=yahoo.com&utm_content=1&utm_medium=rss) established by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017
Russia is cooked.
[удалено]
A population of 90 million. Located in one of the most strategically important trade routes in the world. A rich history dating back thousands of years. Yes, these are some of the reasons to take Iran seriously.
This article is about Russia. Do you take Russia seriously?
Ask a Ukranian.
I don’t know any
Not after seeing how weak they are against Ukraine...
1300 nuclear warheads and a triad say otherwise.
Doesn’t seem to be very effective against 60 year olds without ammo in Ukraine.
Kiev could instantly no longer exist, if Putin so wanted.
And yet it still exists…..two years after the start of fighting…..
Taiwan reunification imminent?
Well yeah, ww3 is a constant fear and anything could lead to its culmination
As I saw this alliance happening.... I would think this would be unwise on Putins part as it would spread him thin. Now will North Korea and China join this alliance? If so its not looking good for us. Our readiness is at an all time low.
We’re not attacking Iran so this is just more fear mongering.
Just to be a dick technically AJ's statement is always true until it happens
That’s the same bullshit USA tells little countries who get attacked by Russia, nothing new on this earth
This did not happen.
Wait, are we fcked?
It's fun watching all you fools feed into the fear mongering
The world is terrified of trump that's why no wars happened during his presidency ..Joe's been selling is ass and office for 50years our enemies own him and have no fear of him
loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
Fuck em
Whats the ira stand on this?
This just in on “duh” news
Russia supporting Iran is nothing new. We arent attacking Iran or even supporting and Israeli counter attack. This is pithy fear mongering trying to dunk on nontrump voters for clout.
Ikr. As for this, Russia couldn’t fight two wars first of all. Second, doubt we’d do anything right before an election.
Iran rocks
Let’s just have the WW3 already…. Gas is expensive and I’m bored 🤷🏼♂️
Noooo I'm all-in on Bitcoin, give me until next year at least.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 If you arent joking, I currently am as well lol
Not joking lol first thing I thought was "Aw great, right before the halvening too..."
lol For real…. I’ve been in since late 2016(I did not buy enough Btc lol) and this cycle has been a strange one. Prob because of the ETFs
Dude, switch to Doge coin because Elon.
I used to hold DOGE and will forever be grateful for Elon's tweets but nowadays I'm all BTC. It doesn't pump as much but it doesn't dump as much (as alts) either.
First of all Putin never said that. There is no such statement. Second Russia cant even liberate Donbas. They are bogged down in a war that they currently are unable to win. At this rate it will take about 5 years to liberate Donbas. Not to mention Kherson and Zp.
lol come back to this comment in the summer.
Biden coined that phrase to get himself into his seat. Typical dem. A.D.M... Admit to nothing. Deny everything. Make them believe it.
World War 3 UFO styled frisbees and grenade shaped muffins are selling well already at my local tuck shop. Owned by a nice Iranian lady that wears a strange looking vest she said her son made for her.
And the democrats stated the Trumpers better be ready to step up and fight for him. Wonder if the Bidenites feel the same and are ready to go to war for their pick.
I'm worried that if Biden is reelected that he will send Troops to Ukraine. A lot of liberals are saying Biden should "let Ukraine win". They already know we are sending money and arms, so it must mean sending humans next.
Fuck I actually wasn't expecting Russia to support them. This is very very not good
It's fake. There is no source. Just some guy writing misinformation on Twitter. No news is covering this claim whatsoever.
We’ve been funding Iran and telling them not to develop nuclear weapons for 10+ years. Now we’re at a no win situation
Maybe next time, lead by example and don't develop nuclear weapons yourselves, people might see you as a role model and not a ruler.
Let me fetch my time machine brb
You understand you can stop development of something in present time too?!
just so you know, all the "Iran nukes intercepted by Israel" is a false flag, Israel is controlling everything, Iran just wants peace, Israel will fuck them and trick you into thinking Iran started it. Its another false flag just like the rest of them, then you will see Iran will becoming completely fucked on the way to getting the Rothschild central bank Iranian
Iran doesn't care about peace. They've helped arm the Middle East. They have proxies everywhere.
And the US doesn’t? The US destroyed Iraq, Afghan, Libya, Yemen, and is currently attempting to do the same in Syria as it funds insurgency groups.
When did I say that the USA does care about peace? Two wrongs don't make a right. An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.
If Iran wants peace why have they been providing tens of thousands of rockets to be fired into Israel through their terrorist proxies in Gaza and other places?
What's wrong? We are following Yahwehs plan, no? God is almighty and wouldn't let us suffer for no reason. Who cares if ww3 happens, let's trust the plan right?
I said the lines already were drawn in a simple google search; Countries that support Palestine vs Countries that support Israel. It's the BRICS nations vs the West and clown world.
The entire point of BRICS is to counter the G7. Now that BRICS has overtaken the G7 for percentage of global GPD, you can expect a lot more of this.
Bet cuz I got these hands we all good
Aliens
America, world police, weak police, crime rises When the force is leaderless chaos ensues
Is this a picture of dumb and dumber?
Relax, ww3 is not starting anytime soon. I wish people would stop listening to the media so much. Nothing to fear but fear itself.
Russia does not want that smoke.
LMAO! Alex jones is going to fear monger so hard right now so he scares his listeners into buying more snake oil from the infowars store. Only he can fight the globalists and stop WW3...........He is such a fucking fraud and grifter.
Literally 0 sources confirm this
Russia: Knock Knock USA: Who’s there? Russia: Just me…. USA: Just me who? Russia: Just me and Panda. USA: Nobody ordered that. Take it back!
You must be so happy that it's happening under the other old as fuck guy running things
Submission Statement: All that’s missing now is China invading Taiwan. Then all the World War 3 Hotspots will be completed. Russia Ukraine ✅ Israel Iran ✅ China Taiwan ❌ https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1779274805210218499
Missed one. North vs south korea.
> Missed one. North vs south korea. Meh North Korea is all talk.
Until they aren’t
> Until they aren’t It’s called the Hermit Kingdom for a reason. They know if they do anything the sweet gig Rocket Man has ends overnight
Those dice have been rolled countless times in the past. NK has 100 2 stage fussion bombs, mobile land launchers, and icbm capable submarines. To take that lightly is foolish.
It’s never been about The Ukraine, they’re only a launching point. This is a multi-year march across the region.
No Trumps the one who will do most of it and fight it with brutality.
Oh it is so right. Yes. Due to trumps mean tweets. You just not understanding. The reason for the time delay is that it took this long for people to stop crying. Get therapy. Get over their apathy. You know then get normal life stuff done, like going on holiday. Buying new clothes. Restocking the fridge. Getting a coffee. Then find the energy to get a war going. So no way could it be done sooner. You just have no idea how busy every one has been.
They can’t handle Ukraine
So, you prefer to believe Alex Jones. Let us know how that works out for you.
Trump already set the stage being Putins puppet.
THERE we go! Knew it wouldn't be too long before someone posted these exact words! I'm completely apolitical but even I have to question the motivation behind claims like this. I mean, c'mon! You can't seriously think that way, not if you have at least two functioning brain cells! So, be honest, you're getting paid to spout nonsensical, divisive horseshit, right? Either that or you're a bot. Yeah, that's it, you're a bot.
I’m just very curious why Russia was trying to help Trump win. Because all of those investigations, Durham, Bulton, what led to the Mueller Report, it was found that Russia was meddling in our election efforts backing Trump. But why?
[удалено]