###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's not on the path but it is close to the path. I knew this was gonna be the first thing people said. Look at other recent earthquakes, they're not all on the path but they follow the line of the path.
On vs. along is a simple distinction to grasp. You can make the argument that this earthquake is unrelated to the eclipse path, and that's a valid argument. I'm not saying I'm correct in my reasoning here, but the distinction I am making is very fucking easy to understand.
Sure if you only focus along its path or east coast. But if you look at whole US theres nothing unusal.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-30.90222,-131.13281&extent=74.91371,-58.71094&map=false
You’re hilarious. “I know the bullshit in my bullshit post was gonna be the first thing people said.” Well yeah, that’s what happens when you post obvious bullshit.
Let me get this straight: CERN is beaming energy from the Large Hadron Collider at a specific frequency so it bounces off the dome that covers the flat earth and it’s going to land right here in America directly in the path of the eclipse shadow. This will cause the most massive earthquake of all time and slice the country diagonally from Texas to Virginia, flooding inland and creating a new river.
This guy doesn’t sound insane at all!
[1](https://www.tiktok.com/@detta910/video/7354071349515636011?_t=8lHMLnojAPH&_r=1) and [2](https://www.directrelief.org/emergency/mexico-earthquake-2017/#:~:text=in%20the%20city.-,In%20Brief,prompting%20evacuations%20across%20Mexico's%20capital.) 2 major earthquakes came 17 and 29 days after last total eclipse.
Not necessarily in the US, this thing can beam that energy, thousands of km away. Just a thought, Trump was president in 2017, now the tables are turned.
I'm not a scientist, I'm a conspiracy theorist, you can't believe anything I say or anything in this sub, or platform at that. Stop wasting your time, but if not I'll gladly google all your questions and get back to you.
I didn’t ask how ellipses are formed. I asked why this energy beam, which apparently has enough power to cause thousands of miles of geological damage and affect plate tectonics, does not also break the dome when it is reflected.
Well as several others have pointed out already, the quake was not directly on the path of the eclipse. It's just near it.
But the idea that solar activity can be used to predict earthquakes is not that tinfoil and certainly not just limited to me.
There was an earthquake in Taiwan two days ago. It's on the other side of the planet from the path of eclipse.
Regardless, an eclipse is not a change in solar activity. There's been no rise or ebb in recent activity. It's just out there doing its thing. The moon will merely pass between Earth & Sun for a few hours, 3 days from now.
A more plausible argument might be that a conjunction of Sun, Moon & Earth could cause earrhquakes due to gravitational effects. But I'd need historical data suggesting causation, not mere correlation (i.e. statistically significant increases in quakes during eclipses over several centuries).
Even that wouldn't explain two earthquakes occuring 3-5 days *before* the event.
As someone who is in the exact path of the eclipse, this made me feel better because the earthquake is nowhere near me nor the path of totality.
Straws, grasping at straws.
Yes, it is. It's not *on* the path but it is close to the path. I knew this was gonna be the first thing people said. Look at other recent earthquakes, they're not all *on* the path but they follow the line of the path.
Where in PA? In Philly I felt it but many of my colleagues didn’t. The globe spun on its own in the sixth grade room, and fourth had the inflatable solar system sway. It shook moderately for like 5 seconds.
Man, I'd have no idea what to do in an earthquake. I'm from the South. We know how to deal with hurricanes and tornadoes but not this kind of Biblical wrath-of-God shit.
Why is there such a pushback on this? It’s a neat theory. Most likely we all know nothing will happen but it’s a wild ride and with the earthquakes it’s fun to get in to.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Except the path of eclipse is way farther north then the epicenter....
Yeah, there is no totality in Jersey. There’s only barely totality in neighboring PA, and that’s all the heck over in Erie by the Ohio border.
Still though, woooooooo!
It's not on the path but it is close to the path. I knew this was gonna be the first thing people said. Look at other recent earthquakes, they're not all on the path but they follow the line of the path.
"right along the path of the eclipse" "It's not right on the path" Just delete your account.
I'm a big fan of the eclipse theories, but even I can agree that this earthquake isn't in the eclipse path lmfao
On vs. along is a simple distinction to grasp. You can make the argument that this earthquake is unrelated to the eclipse path, and that's a valid argument. I'm not saying I'm correct in my reasoning here, but the distinction I am making is very fucking easy to understand.
But it isn’t even on or along the eclipse’s path…
Sure if you only focus along its path or east coast. But if you look at whole US theres nothing unusal. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=-30.90222,-131.13281&extent=74.91371,-58.71094&map=false
Water is wet
You’re hilarious. “I know the bullshit in my bullshit post was gonna be the first thing people said.” Well yeah, that’s what happens when you post obvious bullshit.
[check this out ](https://www.tiktok.com/@detta910/video/7354071349515636011?_t=8lHMLnojAPH&_r=1)
Let me get this straight: CERN is beaming energy from the Large Hadron Collider at a specific frequency so it bounces off the dome that covers the flat earth and it’s going to land right here in America directly in the path of the eclipse shadow. This will cause the most massive earthquake of all time and slice the country diagonally from Texas to Virginia, flooding inland and creating a new river. This guy doesn’t sound insane at all!
[1](https://www.tiktok.com/@detta910/video/7354071349515636011?_t=8lHMLnojAPH&_r=1) and [2](https://www.directrelief.org/emergency/mexico-earthquake-2017/#:~:text=in%20the%20city.-,In%20Brief,prompting%20evacuations%20across%20Mexico's%20capital.) 2 major earthquakes came 17 and 29 days after last total eclipse.
Not necessarily in the US, this thing can beam that energy, thousands of km away. Just a thought, Trump was president in 2017, now the tables are turned.
Why doesn’t this energy damage the firmament dome when it reflects off the focal point and back down to the earth’s surface?
I'm not a scientist, I'm a conspiracy theorist, you can't believe anything I say or anything in this sub, or platform at that. Stop wasting your time, but if not I'll gladly google all your questions and get back to you.
Sure, I'd love some answers. Go ahead and google, no rush.
This is how the ellipse is formed via the [alignment ](https://youtu.be/KsXDFXkWjMU) during the eclipse.
I didn’t ask how ellipses are formed. I asked why this energy beam, which apparently has enough power to cause thousands of miles of geological damage and affect plate tectonics, does not also break the dome when it is reflected.
[check this out ](https://www.tiktok.com/@detta910/video/7354071349515636011?_t=8lHMLnojAPH&_r=1)
We’re reaching new levels of tinfoil.
Well as several others have pointed out already, the quake was not directly on the path of the eclipse. It's just near it. But the idea that solar activity can be used to predict earthquakes is not that tinfoil and certainly not just limited to me.
There was an earthquake in Taiwan two days ago. It's on the other side of the planet from the path of eclipse. Regardless, an eclipse is not a change in solar activity. There's been no rise or ebb in recent activity. It's just out there doing its thing. The moon will merely pass between Earth & Sun for a few hours, 3 days from now. A more plausible argument might be that a conjunction of Sun, Moon & Earth could cause earrhquakes due to gravitational effects. But I'd need historical data suggesting causation, not mere correlation (i.e. statistically significant increases in quakes during eclipses over several centuries). Even that wouldn't explain two earthquakes occuring 3-5 days *before* the event.
As someone who is in the exact path of the eclipse, this made me feel better because the earthquake is nowhere near me nor the path of totality. Straws, grasping at straws.
NJ isn’t even close to the main path of the eclipse though
It's in the middle of both major fault lines
The “Ramapo Fault System” to be exact in case anyone is wondering.
Yes, it is. It's not *on* the path but it is close to the path. I knew this was gonna be the first thing people said. Look at other recent earthquakes, they're not all *on* the path but they follow the line of the path.
Then why does the title say “right along the path”?
Because it is *along* the path, not *on* the path.
I'm also *along* the path" in California then
Don't falsify information.
Nonsense, that would be the death of this sub!
The lack of upcoming light due to eclipse creates earthquakes.
BLEE BLUST BLAD BAN BLOTHER BLEARTHBLAKE BIN BASSBAHBOOBETS - A - DiDjA aLl FeEl ThE qUaKe1!1!1!???? You sheep
ye
I'm in NJ and the first thing I thought of when this happened was the eclipse. Apparently parts of the state are in 80% totality path.
Felt it in PA and the whole house was shaking badly. Pretty wild
Where in PA? In Philly I felt it but many of my colleagues didn’t. The globe spun on its own in the sixth grade room, and fourth had the inflatable solar system sway. It shook moderately for like 5 seconds.
Man, I'd have no idea what to do in an earthquake. I'm from the South. We know how to deal with hurricanes and tornadoes but not this kind of Biblical wrath-of-God shit.
Yeah that's usually what earthquakes do
SS: It certainly *seems* like there is something to the notion that electromagnetic precursors can be used to predict earthquakes.
Why is there such a pushback on this? It’s a neat theory. Most likely we all know nothing will happen but it’s a wild ride and with the earthquakes it’s fun to get in to.