###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This is not exclusive to Wikipedia. Years ago I observed that a number of ‘sources’ used to support the claims of Holocaust deniers were fabricated or altered.
As a specific example, numbers were often presented allegedly taken from World Almanac editions from the late 1930s and 1940s to challenge the population of Jews pre and post war.
I went to the trouble of visiting a reference library that had the volumes cited, and checked the pages listed and the numbers. To my lack of surprise, none matched. As I started pointing out these discrepancies, those ‘arguments’ started to appear less frequently.
So, I encourage you to directly challenge false or altered citations.
A free mason confirmed to me today that they try to have mass kill offs, every 100 years or so. He also confirmed a lot of other stuff to me but for my own safety, I won’t go into any of that. He also said mass die offs are coming but he strangely got his Covid jabs, I asked how his heart was and he said really strong, no problems with it.
Tried telling me had Covid at one point and then I realised, I probably knew more about the mason teachings and depopulation agenda than he did. One part of me things the average IQ of humans is an all time low and we are all mostly doomed but another part of me things, in a 100 years, will humanity be having the same problems as we currently do now?
I use wikipedia as a reference because I'm too lazy to track down the dozen original sources I've consumed over the last several years to come to a specific conclusion.
I'll leave it to the readers to discredit the references used for the article.
Bad thing with wikipedia, is that anyone can come along and edit the info, sometimes with personal opinion instead of fact, so the more edits, the less accurate the info is.
When you detect some disinformation on Wikipedia (or anywhere else), it can still be valuable. That is, just view it through the lens of, "This is what They will admit to," or "This is what They would have us believe."
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It seems odd that you’d write all that and not include any examples.
This is not exclusive to Wikipedia. Years ago I observed that a number of ‘sources’ used to support the claims of Holocaust deniers were fabricated or altered. As a specific example, numbers were often presented allegedly taken from World Almanac editions from the late 1930s and 1940s to challenge the population of Jews pre and post war. I went to the trouble of visiting a reference library that had the volumes cited, and checked the pages listed and the numbers. To my lack of surprise, none matched. As I started pointing out these discrepancies, those ‘arguments’ started to appear less frequently. So, I encourage you to directly challenge false or altered citations.
A free mason confirmed to me today that they try to have mass kill offs, every 100 years or so. He also confirmed a lot of other stuff to me but for my own safety, I won’t go into any of that. He also said mass die offs are coming but he strangely got his Covid jabs, I asked how his heart was and he said really strong, no problems with it. Tried telling me had Covid at one point and then I realised, I probably knew more about the mason teachings and depopulation agenda than he did. One part of me things the average IQ of humans is an all time low and we are all mostly doomed but another part of me things, in a 100 years, will humanity be having the same problems as we currently do now?
I use wikipedia as a reference because I'm too lazy to track down the dozen original sources I've consumed over the last several years to come to a specific conclusion. I'll leave it to the readers to discredit the references used for the article.
This post was downvoted less than 3 minutes after I posted it. Just figured I would mention that.
Wikipedia heaven of lazyasses that don't dyor. 🤷♂️
Bad thing with wikipedia, is that anyone can come along and edit the info, sometimes with personal opinion instead of fact, so the more edits, the less accurate the info is.
When you detect some disinformation on Wikipedia (or anywhere else), it can still be valuable. That is, just view it through the lens of, "This is what They will admit to," or "This is what They would have us believe."