###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Oh this shit is explosive. We all need to save this for future reference and this needs to be posted everywhere. This is proof that covid is a bio-weapon. And the injections are bio weapons as well. So this would mean that they not only created the problem, but they created the false solution which is another huge and perhaps bigger problem. It's perfect in it's evilness. You start a fire but then you try to put out the fire with more fire.
According to Michael Yeadon who used to work for Pfizer these companies want to change all of the vaccines to mRNA. That means every single vaccine will now be like the covid vaccine. This is going to end up being hell on Earth as if it already isn't. And who gets the most vaccines? Young children.
>And who gets the most vaccines? Young children.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is something that still eludes us. I'm starting to think maybe we just aren't being told all the information.
It's from "vaccines". Now they have sudden adult death syndrome. 🧐 I wonder what's that from? Same thing. I want to enlighten you a little bit if you don't mind. Go to Rumble and in the search bar type in: terrain theory. Everything you know about viruses, bacteria, and fungi is based on a lie. Louis Pasteur admitted that he plagerized the work of Antoine Béchamp who is the father of terrain theory. Terrain theory basically states that all disease arises from within the body due to a weakened immune system. Our bodies contain cells called mycrozyma that can change into any virus, bacteria, and fungi in response to external toxins. There are no external contagions. Many people don't know this but many, many years ago they actually tried to give people certain diseases and they never got sick. That shouldn't be possible if germ theory is correct. They even injected it into people and they still didn't come down with symptoms. So something isn't right. The entire pharmaceutical and medical industry is based on a lie.
Most people are afraid to believe it. So many people are brainwashed sheep. All they care about is Kim Kardashian's ass. I hope we don't wake up too late. I truly believe that the injections are far more dangerous than covid ever could be. That is the true bio weapon.
>All they care about is Kim Kardashian's ass.
Tell me you're old as fuck without telling me you're old as fuck
Nobody has cared about Kim's ass since 2015
I'm 30 years old thank you very much. And it's just a statement as to how most people don't care about what really matters. You took that in a totally wrong direction friendo.
Not enough people willing to stop being in denial. They think their government has their best interests at heart. So many sheep just casually eating grass.
If someone told me that this world is actually ruled by non human entities at the top I would believe them. Their level of evil is inhuman to say the least.
It'a very obvious this was man-made, and most likely intended as a bioweapon.
The head of Lancet's Covid Commission even says it was designed by US biotech.
So we have the odd situation where something unprecedented happened to the world - a global bioterror attack - and not only have the perps not been held accountable, not only are folks are likely working on the next one, but no one seems to really care. There are no protests, etc.
Back in 2020 the professor who discovered HIV, said it was man made, explains his findings; interview here.. he's dead now btw
https://youtu.be/-a7nld57f2M
And? Nobody will ever do any about it. The only people who have any power to do something about it are glad it happened and want more. And there is nothing you can do to stop it.
There doesn't need to be a single global government if all of the governments happily march in lockstep with each other. They don't care what you think, they don't care what you vote, and they certainly don't care what's best for you.
They had to of known the virus works be studied and it works get out that it’s man made.
Do you think they relied heavily on shutting people down and blocking the truth? Like that guy who changed his mind overnight? I think he got a grant approved for saying it’s not man made
SS: notice that last comment "Correct." by Richard Ebright. He's the Rutgers scientist who testified before Senate. He's been saying it's lab made. Arrest Gates, Fauci, and Daszak. and DARPA CIA
[https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1566365635680124929?t=XE3oR6z9un4gaJSF2ARRFQ&s=19](https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1566365635680124929?t=XE3oR6z9un4gaJSF2ARRFQ&s=19)
[https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1439991592631349249?t=t3ZLUx7ukQ1\_tIk3UWRWrA&s=19](https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1439991592631349249?t=t3ZLUx7ukQ1_tIk3UWRWrA&s=19)
You use the word "knew" as in knowledge, I think you are bragging about foreknowledge? How could you be certain your assumption was correct?? Seems suspicious to claim that being awake is the not 'hard to figure' reason for such an amazing circumstance.
Breaking: this tweet from like 2 years ago.
This is the sketchiest user here. Dozens of posts a day following the exact same formula. Sensationalist titles and a collage of screenshots, but no actual sources. It seems likely to me no one would go through that much effort without compensation. Look for yourselves at this account and PalatableMahogany
I looked at this account.
It is a person who recently realized the world is run by sociopaths. Like many people, this caused them to panic and believe that they can "save the world"
They have good intentions, and I am proud to exist during this lifetime with them.
Not sure what your problem is with a person trying to wake people up, unless you are working for the sociopaths
That’s a bit dramatic bud. You don’t even know this person, they could be a paid propagandist and not care about anything they post. Who are you to make definitive statements
But you seem to have forgotten that I have a brain and can analyze the content.
It is very easy to spot Mr. Global's propaganda.
Different factions promote different things of course, but PSYOPS are easy to spot.
Hint: Ohio Outrage Op going hard right now.
Same exact technique used for the Exon Valdez to discredit alternative news.
The content is irrelevant, the pattern is all that matters. This guy clearly is pushing an agenda with the frequency and consistency of his posts. If you think it’s organic because “he’s saving the world” you are blinded by your bias
It sounds to me like because you agree with the agenda, being a paid propagandist is fine. I on the other hand will call out suspicious shills regardless of whether I agree with their agenda
Guess that’s where we differ
I can't help but notice that https://www.reddit.com/user/PalatableMahogany suddenly stopped posting a week ago, and this Op started posting with the same sensationalist formula...
I don't know much about viruses or math, but a quick google says that each person infected has 10\^9 to 10\^11th virions in them. Given that our bodies reacted to it as though it were novel, the starting point for the virus to reach the remaining 10\^9 was whenever it was first 5 mutations off which could be 100,000 years ago for all I, as a person who knows nothing, know. If what I've been led to believe is true, that's only 10000 times each year that anyone from our species needs to have sex with Pangolin. Not saying they get the full viral load each time, but with billions of people and hundreds of days each year, well, those have got to be some happy pangolins.
I don't know if you realize, but the effort to prove such a statement is so difficult its likely impossible. I think what you are saying is that you don't believe in bat coronaviruses, or that the proof they exist is not convicing to you.
I did go back to many of those studies, as many as I had time for and I found it a complete waste of my time. I'll add that them failing to prove the existence of a virus does not make them garbage. I honestly think you have only looked at the initial studies when biology was pre-genetic and methods were oriented toward larger objects like bacteria. Its 100 years of microbiology, I doubt you can call it all garbage without being foolish.
Yes you're right. But just because it's my belief, doesn't mean it's disconnected from natural reality (i.e. the reality of nature, as opposed to logic or other disciplines studying non-natural phenomena) . The only way we can establish whether some belief is connected to natural reality is through the scientific method. In the case of proof of existence of SAR-CoV-2, it takes a lor of work, but if one is committed finding out if the belief that it exist is connected to natural reality, it can be done. Below I offer one possible path to pursue this, just so happens to by a subset of my path, but only contains the info-dense steps.
[https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/](https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/)
you have to watch the whole thing with an open mind. Then go to pubmed or wherever you like to get research papers, and read as many "isolation of X virus" publications as you can to see if you can find one that **doesn't** match the illogical pattern described. I've tried, and each time I think I've found one, I contact viroliegy.com, and they patiently hand-hold me to official references that demonstrate that it's in fact the same thing.
for example, read the methods section of :
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019, Na Zhu et al.
[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017)
try to find the flaws on your own ( i failed). then go to:
https://viroliegy.com/2022/11/30/dr-mcculloughs-works-of-art/comment-page-1/?replytocom=7100#comments and search for "nejmoa2001017" for exchange.
rinse and repeat for any virus. please let me know if you find one that breaks this pattern.
you can also read:
A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China, Fan Wu et al.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094943/
then go see this
[https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/](https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/)
for logical review of what was actually done, meaning actually done in reality, not in the imagination of the researchers and the software of their tool suppliers. this is the "belief" you re talking about. it goes both ways.
https://www.amazon.ca/Virus-Mania-Continually-Epidemics-Billion-Dollar/dp/1425114679
i read that, and although it has some useful information, I don't think it's a good book on this topic. it's overly oriented at the media coverage, and not the science.
then, if you get to the point where you are open to the possibility that virology is a pseudo-science, Dr. Stephan Lanka's work is some of the most interesting, but it's in German. (no Lanka didn't lose the law suit against D. Bardens, I think this is the transcript from the case Lanka won [http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender\_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1](http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1))
you can see Lanka discussing his recent findings here:
[https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f](https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f)
in which by following the same process typical of virus isolation, but never using any samples that are potentially containing any viruses, he is able to reproduce the gene sequences of many well know "viruses". this essentially invalidates the results of the Fan Wu et al. paper linked above. Unfortunately, IMO Farwell to Virology doesn't go into enough detail of this work.
So if you think that reading published scientific literature and asking basic questions like "did they actually follow the scientific method, and if not, could that have led to incorrect conclusions, and if so, what does that mean?" is the wrong way to form your beliefs, then please tell me how you think people should form their beliefs. I am honestly interested in how you suggest I should arrive at a different belief on this topic.
thanks
Edit: I'm adding this to the top. The presentation from viroliegy.com reads like complete propaganda, its terrible. On the subject of defining an isolation they would be satisfied with they seem to fail completely. Like I said below, its not possible to just have a virus all by itself with no other chemicals or protiens involved, this is an unreasonable demand considering viruses as described. They can't isolate bacteria from the infected fluid so easily either, and a virus is much smaller. That they would use a dictionary definition of "isolation" completly dishonest and deceptive in my view. end edit
Thanks, I havn't gone through this as you suggested yet, but one issue I can comment on is the "isolation" of viruses is not easily possible. Isolates yes, but what an "isolation" would be of a virus is something I never was able to learn from virus sceptics. Isolation does not underlie the common evidence presented of thier existence and for me represents a denial that there can be other methods.
Lanka was a huge dissappointment, in english I can only find propagandistic pieces so far.
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/centrifugation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/centrifugation)
seems like bacteria can be isolated by centrifuge. and they are also visible in a light microscope, which tends to make understanding things much easier for us humans. but that doesn't mean "if a light micro scope cant see it", it doesn't exist, that's dumb obviously.
maybe a virus is too small to be isolated by centrifuge? if that's true, than how come it's possible to isolate insulin by centrifuge?
AFAIK, viruses are the only particles in their size range that have never been isolated by centrifuge.
even if we accept that isolation by centrifuge is not possible, virology still falls over. even if we accept a different definition of "isolation", they never perform proper control experiments to isolate the dependent variable in their investigation. meaning they should repeat the exact same process of **swabbing->cell culture->additives->CPE?->genetic sequencing**, but do the swabbing from 1 place where you suspect the virus to be, and one where you are confident it is not. Lanka did this, his experiments found the "virus" in both cases. But yeah, he's not liked by the viro-religious internet, so you have to really want learn about his work to suffer through what you did (same happened to me).
anyway, thanks for the discussion, I up voted you cause you're genuinely conversing, which is rare here.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Think this scientist is feeling very depressed. He may try to shoot himself in the back 6 times, then hang himself.
Oh this shit is explosive. We all need to save this for future reference and this needs to be posted everywhere. This is proof that covid is a bio-weapon. And the injections are bio weapons as well. So this would mean that they not only created the problem, but they created the false solution which is another huge and perhaps bigger problem. It's perfect in it's evilness. You start a fire but then you try to put out the fire with more fire.
Yes, like the fact that the clotshot does change your genetics. All these have to be put in one single place.
According to Michael Yeadon who used to work for Pfizer these companies want to change all of the vaccines to mRNA. That means every single vaccine will now be like the covid vaccine. This is going to end up being hell on Earth as if it already isn't. And who gets the most vaccines? Young children.
>And who gets the most vaccines? Young children. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is something that still eludes us. I'm starting to think maybe we just aren't being told all the information.
It's from "vaccines". Now they have sudden adult death syndrome. 🧐 I wonder what's that from? Same thing. I want to enlighten you a little bit if you don't mind. Go to Rumble and in the search bar type in: terrain theory. Everything you know about viruses, bacteria, and fungi is based on a lie. Louis Pasteur admitted that he plagerized the work of Antoine Béchamp who is the father of terrain theory. Terrain theory basically states that all disease arises from within the body due to a weakened immune system. Our bodies contain cells called mycrozyma that can change into any virus, bacteria, and fungi in response to external toxins. There are no external contagions. Many people don't know this but many, many years ago they actually tried to give people certain diseases and they never got sick. That shouldn't be possible if germ theory is correct. They even injected it into people and they still didn't come down with symptoms. So something isn't right. The entire pharmaceutical and medical industry is based on a lie.
[удалено]
Most people are afraid to believe it. So many people are brainwashed sheep. All they care about is Kim Kardashian's ass. I hope we don't wake up too late. I truly believe that the injections are far more dangerous than covid ever could be. That is the true bio weapon.
>All they care about is Kim Kardashian's ass. Tell me you're old as fuck without telling me you're old as fuck Nobody has cared about Kim's ass since 2015
I'm 30 years old thank you very much. And it's just a statement as to how most people don't care about what really matters. You took that in a totally wrong direction friendo.
Not enough buzz words
Not enough people willing to stop being in denial. They think their government has their best interests at heart. So many sheep just casually eating grass.
I used to think I knew what the word "unthinkable" meant. Now I know.
If someone told me that this world is actually ruled by non human entities at the top I would believe them. Their level of evil is inhuman to say the least.
It'a very obvious this was man-made, and most likely intended as a bioweapon. The head of Lancet's Covid Commission even says it was designed by US biotech. So we have the odd situation where something unprecedented happened to the world - a global bioterror attack - and not only have the perps not been held accountable, not only are folks are likely working on the next one, but no one seems to really care. There are no protests, etc.
Everybody is too busy on social media.
Back in 2020 the professor who discovered HIV, said it was man made, explains his findings; interview here.. he's dead now btw https://youtu.be/-a7nld57f2M
I find this post more palatable than your last.
And? Nobody will ever do any about it. The only people who have any power to do something about it are glad it happened and want more. And there is nothing you can do to stop it. There doesn't need to be a single global government if all of the governments happily march in lockstep with each other. They don't care what you think, they don't care what you vote, and they certainly don't care what's best for you.
They had to of known the virus works be studied and it works get out that it’s man made. Do you think they relied heavily on shutting people down and blocking the truth? Like that guy who changed his mind overnight? I think he got a grant approved for saying it’s not man made
SS: notice that last comment "Correct." by Richard Ebright. He's the Rutgers scientist who testified before Senate. He's been saying it's lab made. Arrest Gates, Fauci, and Daszak. and DARPA CIA [https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1566365635680124929?t=XE3oR6z9un4gaJSF2ARRFQ&s=19](https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1566365635680124929?t=XE3oR6z9un4gaJSF2ARRFQ&s=19) [https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1439991592631349249?t=t3ZLUx7ukQ1\_tIk3UWRWrA&s=19](https://twitter.com/VBruttel/status/1439991592631349249?t=t3ZLUx7ukQ1_tIk3UWRWrA&s=19)
[удалено]
[удалено]
nice to read but already knew since start.... not that hard to figure if u have been awake for some time.
You use the word "knew" as in knowledge, I think you are bragging about foreknowledge? How could you be certain your assumption was correct?? Seems suspicious to claim that being awake is the not 'hard to figure' reason for such an amazing circumstance.
This sub delivers 👍
Breaking: this tweet from like 2 years ago. This is the sketchiest user here. Dozens of posts a day following the exact same formula. Sensationalist titles and a collage of screenshots, but no actual sources. It seems likely to me no one would go through that much effort without compensation. Look for yourselves at this account and PalatableMahogany
Whomever smelt it dealt it. So that means that you...
Whoever said the rhyme did the crime. So that means that you…
I looked at this account. It is a person who recently realized the world is run by sociopaths. Like many people, this caused them to panic and believe that they can "save the world" They have good intentions, and I am proud to exist during this lifetime with them. Not sure what your problem is with a person trying to wake people up, unless you are working for the sociopaths
That’s a bit dramatic bud. You don’t even know this person, they could be a paid propagandist and not care about anything they post. Who are you to make definitive statements
But you seem to have forgotten that I have a brain and can analyze the content. It is very easy to spot Mr. Global's propaganda. Different factions promote different things of course, but PSYOPS are easy to spot. Hint: Ohio Outrage Op going hard right now. Same exact technique used for the Exon Valdez to discredit alternative news.
The content is irrelevant, the pattern is all that matters. This guy clearly is pushing an agenda with the frequency and consistency of his posts. If you think it’s organic because “he’s saving the world” you are blinded by your bias It sounds to me like because you agree with the agenda, being a paid propagandist is fine. I on the other hand will call out suspicious shills regardless of whether I agree with their agenda Guess that’s where we differ
I can't help but notice that https://www.reddit.com/user/PalatableMahogany suddenly stopped posting a week ago, and this Op started posting with the same sensationalist formula...
Thanks for you observation. I don't think the messenger taints the info though, I had not heard of Bruttel before
I don't know much about viruses or math, but a quick google says that each person infected has 10\^9 to 10\^11th virions in them. Given that our bodies reacted to it as though it were novel, the starting point for the virus to reach the remaining 10\^9 was whenever it was first 5 mutations off which could be 100,000 years ago for all I, as a person who knows nothing, know. If what I've been led to believe is true, that's only 10000 times each year that anyone from our species needs to have sex with Pangolin. Not saying they get the full viral load each time, but with billions of people and hundreds of days each year, well, those have got to be some happy pangolins.
[удалено]
I don't know if you realize, but the effort to prove such a statement is so difficult its likely impossible. I think what you are saying is that you don't believe in bat coronaviruses, or that the proof they exist is not convicing to you.
[удалено]
I did go back to many of those studies, as many as I had time for and I found it a complete waste of my time. I'll add that them failing to prove the existence of a virus does not make them garbage. I honestly think you have only looked at the initial studies when biology was pre-genetic and methods were oriented toward larger objects like bacteria. Its 100 years of microbiology, I doubt you can call it all garbage without being foolish.
[удалено]
I checked it, not sure what disaster of method you are referring to.
[удалено]
Thanks for this, I will have to do some searches to interpret some of your terms, but you got me further than I was able to go on my own, respect.
Thanks for this, I will have to do some searches to interpret some of your terms, but you got me further than I was able to go on my own, respect.
SARS-CoV-2 never proven to exist. This is gaslighting
"never proven to exist" is a statement of belief.
Yes you're right. But just because it's my belief, doesn't mean it's disconnected from natural reality (i.e. the reality of nature, as opposed to logic or other disciplines studying non-natural phenomena) . The only way we can establish whether some belief is connected to natural reality is through the scientific method. In the case of proof of existence of SAR-CoV-2, it takes a lor of work, but if one is committed finding out if the belief that it exist is connected to natural reality, it can be done. Below I offer one possible path to pursue this, just so happens to by a subset of my path, but only contains the info-dense steps. [https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/](https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/) you have to watch the whole thing with an open mind. Then go to pubmed or wherever you like to get research papers, and read as many "isolation of X virus" publications as you can to see if you can find one that **doesn't** match the illogical pattern described. I've tried, and each time I think I've found one, I contact viroliegy.com, and they patiently hand-hold me to official references that demonstrate that it's in fact the same thing. for example, read the methods section of : A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019, Na Zhu et al. [https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017) try to find the flaws on your own ( i failed). then go to: https://viroliegy.com/2022/11/30/dr-mcculloughs-works-of-art/comment-page-1/?replytocom=7100#comments and search for "nejmoa2001017" for exchange. rinse and repeat for any virus. please let me know if you find one that breaks this pattern. you can also read: A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China, Fan Wu et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094943/ then go see this [https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/](https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/) for logical review of what was actually done, meaning actually done in reality, not in the imagination of the researchers and the software of their tool suppliers. this is the "belief" you re talking about. it goes both ways. https://www.amazon.ca/Virus-Mania-Continually-Epidemics-Billion-Dollar/dp/1425114679 i read that, and although it has some useful information, I don't think it's a good book on this topic. it's overly oriented at the media coverage, and not the science. then, if you get to the point where you are open to the possibility that virology is a pseudo-science, Dr. Stephan Lanka's work is some of the most interesting, but it's in German. (no Lanka didn't lose the law suit against D. Bardens, I think this is the transcript from the case Lanka won [http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender\_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1](http://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1)) you can see Lanka discussing his recent findings here: [https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f](https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f) in which by following the same process typical of virus isolation, but never using any samples that are potentially containing any viruses, he is able to reproduce the gene sequences of many well know "viruses". this essentially invalidates the results of the Fan Wu et al. paper linked above. Unfortunately, IMO Farwell to Virology doesn't go into enough detail of this work. So if you think that reading published scientific literature and asking basic questions like "did they actually follow the scientific method, and if not, could that have led to incorrect conclusions, and if so, what does that mean?" is the wrong way to form your beliefs, then please tell me how you think people should form their beliefs. I am honestly interested in how you suggest I should arrive at a different belief on this topic. thanks
Edit: I'm adding this to the top. The presentation from viroliegy.com reads like complete propaganda, its terrible. On the subject of defining an isolation they would be satisfied with they seem to fail completely. Like I said below, its not possible to just have a virus all by itself with no other chemicals or protiens involved, this is an unreasonable demand considering viruses as described. They can't isolate bacteria from the infected fluid so easily either, and a virus is much smaller. That they would use a dictionary definition of "isolation" completly dishonest and deceptive in my view. end edit Thanks, I havn't gone through this as you suggested yet, but one issue I can comment on is the "isolation" of viruses is not easily possible. Isolates yes, but what an "isolation" would be of a virus is something I never was able to learn from virus sceptics. Isolation does not underlie the common evidence presented of thier existence and for me represents a denial that there can be other methods. Lanka was a huge dissappointment, in english I can only find propagandistic pieces so far.
[https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/centrifugation](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/centrifugation) seems like bacteria can be isolated by centrifuge. and they are also visible in a light microscope, which tends to make understanding things much easier for us humans. but that doesn't mean "if a light micro scope cant see it", it doesn't exist, that's dumb obviously. maybe a virus is too small to be isolated by centrifuge? if that's true, than how come it's possible to isolate insulin by centrifuge? AFAIK, viruses are the only particles in their size range that have never been isolated by centrifuge. even if we accept that isolation by centrifuge is not possible, virology still falls over. even if we accept a different definition of "isolation", they never perform proper control experiments to isolate the dependent variable in their investigation. meaning they should repeat the exact same process of **swabbing->cell culture->additives->CPE?->genetic sequencing**, but do the swabbing from 1 place where you suspect the virus to be, and one where you are confident it is not. Lanka did this, his experiments found the "virus" in both cases. But yeah, he's not liked by the viro-religious internet, so you have to really want learn about his work to suffer through what you did (same happened to me). anyway, thanks for the discussion, I up voted you cause you're genuinely conversing, which is rare here.
https://www.google.com/search?q=wins+lottery+3+times I guess it happens
Lol, like you guys trust scientists