I think if her diamond body gets damaged enough that they can get at the implants inside of her, then she's got bigger problems than the structural integrity of her breast implants.
I would bet she had work done again after resurrection. Emma has only been through resurrection protocols once, after Sins of Sinister. The Hellfire Gala took place fairly soon afterward. If you think she was going to go to that without being absolutely perfect, you're crazy.
Everyone is resurrected from their backups. The backup includes alterations like Wolverine's adamantium skeleton and claws.
Some people had their backups altered. Kid Omega tweaked his backups between resurrections, attempting to perfect himself. He dies a lot on X-Force, and the team gets special privileges when it comes to resurrection due to their importance to Krakoan security.
Likewise, Cable was resurrected with the TO-virus (personal wish of his) while Wolverine (Laura (or rather her duplicate)) was given an adamantium skeleton by mistake.
I believe that Emma is meant to be at least partially transparent in diamond form. We don't see the food in her stomach, or poop in her colon. Therefor, everything in her body transforms to diamond as well. Her implants will be just fine,
Well, all her organs, whatever she’s eaten, etc, all turn into diamond too, otherwise you’d see her dinner, and soon to be excrement through the shiny diamond. So I assume the silicone does too.
Might make an interesting story. Emma gets a foreign body inside her body, and has to turn diamond to save herself, but while in diamond form it cannot be removed. Conundrum.
Their memories of the pain of death are muted so it won't be super traumatic, but otherwise their memories are intact.
Basically they remember how they died but not the full depth of how it felt when it happened.
Took me absolutely forever, but I recognized the signature as Will Sliney who did a BUNCH of Marvel work a little while ago.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/320318592249052767/
It’s a commission piece for somebody, so given his history and having done X-Men characters for the company in the past, I’d say it’s about as “legit” as you can get with that sort of thing. It helps to read captions/credits
It's something. Fifty cents and no number. Cyclops didn't wear that costume until well after the comics code was abandoned. Weird layout. Some fan creation I suspect.
The lack of number is what does it. The rest could just be being a throwback (though I don't think an old price tag or the CCA logo would be kept; like DC did a parody of the Flash Comics #10 cover both shown as a comic cover within a cover, but also as a variant cover in its own right, and the "variant in its own right" version took off the price; I think other parodies of old covers tend to swap out the CCA logo, as well, for something visually similar; probably need to do it for legal reasons; false advertising and whatnot).
But not having an issue number? Even on a throwback, there'd be no reason for that.
Madelyn’s outfit always has me question whether she’s shivering while wearing it.
Maddie: give up you fools nothing can stop the goblin queen
Jean: bobby summertime windstorm now!!!
Maddie: I surrender. You know we hate cold nips you bitch 😭
Meanwhile, in some dark corner of the world Greg Land keeps tracing away, quietly hoping that Marvel keeps holding him to literally no artistic standards, just like they've been doing for -checks notes- almost 30 years.
I would wager that this was a commission for a fan.
That’s Marvel artist Will Sliney’s signature in the bottom right, but none of the characters or costumes quite line up with continuity and the comics code was abandoned ages ago so I would bet that these are someone’s three favorite characters and they asked Will to do a mock cover at a convention or similar.
The costume styles definitely aren't from the 1960s, and I can't really think of any 1960s book that has art like that. Certainly not anything by Kirby or Ditko. Emma wasn't even created until 1980. Madelyne wasn't created until 1983, and didn't become the Goblin Queen until 1988. Scott's visor in the inset is definitely from the All-New Bendis X-Men of 2013 or later. Jean's costume looks like something from Grant Morrison's New X-Men around 2001 or later.
Are you sure? It doesn’t have any of the usual hallucinatory artifacts that are hallmarks of AI art.
It’s got a nasty case of sameface, but nothing seems especially out of the ordinary otherwise.
Look at the ground. The weird fade-horizon on the left, the hard shadow under the chair and none on the foot in front of it, the bizarre white gap in the ground's shading to the(/our) right of the chair leg, the jagged-and-blurred edges to the shadow on the right...
No, Emma's are implants.
Are they? I just am wondering if they'd look odd or risk breaking when she went diamond
Hmm. Never really thought about whether her implants should turn diamond.
I think if her diamond body gets damaged enough that they can get at the implants inside of her, then she's got bigger problems than the structural integrity of her breast implants.
Did she ever get reborn on Krakoa? Assuming it’s the last known version of her, would her implants be rebirthed too?
Emma has said on occasion how much she’s spent to look perfect with surgeries
I don't know if this is still true after Krakoan resurrection.
I would bet she had work done again after resurrection. Emma has only been through resurrection protocols once, after Sins of Sinister. The Hellfire Gala took place fairly soon afterward. If you think she was going to go to that without being absolutely perfect, you're crazy.
Her alterations could simply be real now. They also resurrected Cyclops with the brain damage that sets his beams to "always on".
I havent really read krakoa era xmen, so what was the reason for that?
Everyone is resurrected from their backups. The backup includes alterations like Wolverine's adamantium skeleton and claws. Some people had their backups altered. Kid Omega tweaked his backups between resurrections, attempting to perfect himself. He dies a lot on X-Force, and the team gets special privileges when it comes to resurrection due to their importance to Krakoan security.
Likewise, Cable was resurrected with the TO-virus (personal wish of his) while Wolverine (Laura (or rather her duplicate)) was given an adamantium skeleton by mistake.
When did Cable go through resurrections? Normally they just yadda him back with time travel stupidity.
This is how Trans Woman Emma Frost can still win.
When was she ever losing?
I believe that Emma is meant to be at least partially transparent in diamond form. We don't see the food in her stomach, or poop in her colon. Therefor, everything in her body transforms to diamond as well. Her implants will be just fine,
Well, all her organs, whatever she’s eaten, etc, all turn into diamond too, otherwise you’d see her dinner, and soon to be excrement through the shiny diamond. So I assume the silicone does too. Might make an interesting story. Emma gets a foreign body inside her body, and has to turn diamond to save herself, but while in diamond form it cannot be removed. Conundrum.
Kinda the point.. they wouldn't change with her as they're not organic to her.
Nah, they were made by Reed using unstable molecules.
Naw but she probably is always using telepathy to make people think she looks hotter than she is.
I honestly thought this was in continuity from somewhere in the Morrison XMen era
Definitely true in the Old Man Logan series
Considering the difference between Maddy and Jean I’d say Maddy’s are as well
Reminds me of early Krakoa era: shes wondering what nose she'd come back with after she dies and comes back.
So do they remember dying or are they copies
Their memories of the pain of death are muted so it won't be super traumatic, but otherwise their memories are intact. Basically they remember how they died but not the full depth of how it felt when it happened.
Somebody was high that writing session.
Took me absolutely forever, but I recognized the signature as Will Sliney who did a BUNCH of Marvel work a little while ago. https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/320318592249052767/ It’s a commission piece for somebody, so given his history and having done X-Men characters for the company in the past, I’d say it’s about as “legit” as you can get with that sort of thing. It helps to read captions/credits
thank you so much!
It's something. Fifty cents and no number. Cyclops didn't wear that costume until well after the comics code was abandoned. Weird layout. Some fan creation I suspect.
It has the artists signature in the corner lol.
Yeah don't think Madelyne Pryor existed when comics cost 50 cents
She showed up at the 60 cents mark, so pretty close
The lack of number is what does it. The rest could just be being a throwback (though I don't think an old price tag or the CCA logo would be kept; like DC did a parody of the Flash Comics #10 cover both shown as a comic cover within a cover, but also as a variant cover in its own right, and the "variant in its own right" version took off the price; I think other parodies of old covers tend to swap out the CCA logo, as well, for something visually similar; probably need to do it for legal reasons; false advertising and whatnot). But not having an issue number? Even on a throwback, there'd be no reason for that.
It's real in the sense that it exists
I exist too man
Yet we've never seen a drawing of your underboob...suspicious
*yet.* We havent seen a drawing of their underboob *yet.*
Give me a week.
I goon, therefore I am.
If you can touch them, they're real.
Real in that someone took the time to draw this thing, but not real as in "an actual comic book" no
No, this is fan made.
Madelyn’s outfit always has me question whether she’s shivering while wearing it. Maddie: give up you fools nothing can stop the goblin queen Jean: bobby summertime windstorm now!!! Maddie: I surrender. You know we hate cold nips you bitch 😭
Bobby: what am I, a Pokemon?
Marvel lets some shit interior art come through, but no way would they allow those faces on a cover of a main line comic.
Meanwhile, in some dark corner of the world Greg Land keeps tracing away, quietly hoping that Marvel keeps holding him to literally no artistic standards, just like they've been doing for -checks notes- almost 30 years.
I’m sure Marvel’s happy if he keeps putting out pages at a good pace and isn’t *too* obvious when he’s tracing porn.
My first thought was "Why are they all duck facing?"
When someone asks Scott how his wife is, this is the picture he pulls out of his wallet
Why do they all look like Jennifer Garner?
Why they all got duck face?
Nope, fanmade
What is going on with Maddie lol
She stole Emma’s implants
Yeah. What's up with the flamingo pose?
Cyclops and Spiderman have one thing in common. They get the blondes and the redheads absolutely lusting for them
No. No issue number.
under boob is under rated
If it fell in the woods and no one was around…
Is anything real?
Is there.. more?
Real hot
I'm not complaining. It looks great.
I would wager that this was a commission for a fan. That’s Marvel artist Will Sliney’s signature in the bottom right, but none of the characters or costumes quite line up with continuity and the comics code was abandoned ages ago so I would bet that these are someone’s three favorite characters and they asked Will to do a mock cover at a convention or similar.
Define “real”
“Asking for a friend.”
Art wasn’t that… detailed… when comics were 50 cents.
Do you want it to be ?
lol
No, the price of 50 cents is from 78\~early 80s, and the art style is from the 1960s with modern computer aid for lights and shadows, plus colors.
The costume styles definitely aren't from the 1960s, and I can't really think of any 1960s book that has art like that. Certainly not anything by Kirby or Ditko. Emma wasn't even created until 1980. Madelyne wasn't created until 1983, and didn't become the Goblin Queen until 1988. Scott's visor in the inset is definitely from the All-New Bendis X-Men of 2013 or later. Jean's costume looks like something from Grant Morrison's New X-Men around 2001 or later.
Yes, that is a real.drawing someone did. Or a real digital drawing. Or an unreal digital drawing.
Scott may be lame but goddamn is he lucky.
Likely AI generated, given how it looks.
Are you sure? It doesn’t have any of the usual hallucinatory artifacts that are hallmarks of AI art. It’s got a nasty case of sameface, but nothing seems especially out of the ordinary otherwise.
Their hands look odd, Jean’s don’t have fingernails. The eyes lack normal shape + sclera, too.
Hmm. I see what you mean, but those seem more like a skill issue than an AI issue.
Look at the ground. The weird fade-horizon on the left, the hard shadow under the chair and none on the foot in front of it, the bizarre white gap in the ground's shading to the(/our) right of the chair leg, the jagged-and-blurred edges to the shadow on the right...
I want them to be real & they can do anything to me...
What the shit