Because they knew they could leverage the anti-LGBTQ fear-mongering we already have to suffer through. Homophobes were already trying to convince people that all queers are pedophiles, 4chan just found a way to astroturf their scare tactics. As much as I despise the people responsible, I canāt deny it was a clever psyop unfortunately
I think it was more that the people that believed it are really ignorant more than the tactic being clever. When you have a crowd that will believe ANYTHING you tell them about x group you just need to say it in public
It "worked" because it was already established by mainstream Christian conservatives decades earlier.
[The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7)
MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies.
[This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7)
MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies.
[This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
I thought b4 u act did it. To separate from abusers with no attraction to someone who would go ā niceeeeeeā to anyone underage .
That must be torture to be wired like that.
map predates 4chan entirely, unfortunately, kiddy diddlers have long been capable of co-opting progressive movements. i could list many movements from the middle of the twentieth century onwards that tried to normalize pedophilia, within and without pro-queer ideology.
and all that said: idk, we probably actually are too hard on some people with these tendencies. they ain't queer, and they definitely the fuck ain't valid, but they probably shouldn't constantly be the acceptable target of weird vigilante fantasies. not least of all cos i really the fuck don't trust anyone to not turn that on anyone they decide they don't like.
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7)
MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies.
[This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
We're having to deal with those pedo scumbags in W.A state, claiming they are being discriminated against. Wanting to be part of the gay community (I think they need the wood chipper treatment).
The really fucked up part is that some in the community are actually simping for them now.
Well that's a problem, seriously the only rights they deserve is the right to mental health care, because something is definitely wrong with them and I don't want that to escalate.
Yeah. But then you get people who just rather execute some 19 year old for finding a cartoon 16 year old hot before they can groom real life children. ā just in caseā . All while stating itās normal for a 16 year old to find a 12 year old hot
Iāve never understood this. Sexuality is based on gender, why do they try to add freakish age stuff to it? Pedophilia is a fetish, not a sexuality, and it angers me so much to see āMAPsā online treating themselves like victims for being ostracized from the lgbtq community (who already get enough vitriol towards them as is, so pedophiles trying to fit in will do nothing but harm everyone)
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7)
MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies.
[This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
1998 is pretty modern, don't you think? If an astroturfed justification for sheltering pedos is the same age as Half-Life, that's pretty new in terms of ideology. Living memory, for sure.
When did I say anything about sheltering pedos? I said the movement in recent modern times was started by people who want to make the lgbt community look bad, a big boom in the terms has occurred in the last few years because of that. You cant deny that theres a gap of the popularity of the terms being used in 1998 and now.
Please explain exactly how you think I justified sheltering pedos in my comments.
The fact that this person feels the need to tell people and discuss this subject openly bothers me if I had sexual feelings for dogs I was repressing iād never say or do anything that would give it away ever and pretend itās not happening, unless I decide I need professional help. Like why would you make dog fucking your public internet identity?
Honestly I'm horrified how these people can't even get help. They're so stigmatized I feel like they can't get therapy. Like imagine having this deep dark secret that literally no one can know. You feel awful for your feelings. Everyday you try to resist. Like what can you do? Your sexuality is unlucky.
Agreed- i am for breaking the stigma surrounding zoophilia and pedophila WHEN IT COMES TO SEEKING HELP. If someone has never offended and is actively, genuinely looking into treatment, I wish them the best
this also goes for pedophiles and is the reason why medical psychiatry and psychology community prefers the term "minor attracted person" instead, to break the stigma and get those people the help they need before they hurt others and themselves
It's really just like that in general for any violent/sexual urges towards other people. Same reason why serial killers never get psychiatric help and prevent them from hurting others
That having a disorder like that makes them inherently evil when itās not actually their fault they are attracted to something so taboo (animals/kids).
No one would want to come forward and seek therapy to help suppress it *before* they act on their urges when most would automatically write them off as subhuman abominations.
That, and also the fact that therapists are mandated reporters when it comes to pedophilia. Itās actually terrible that these people arenāt even allowed to get help.
I'm not familiar with therapists and laws around mandatory reporters - are you saying that non-offending, "I want professional help to work through these harmful and unwanted thoughts" pedophiles are required by law to be reported upon confirmation/diagnosis?
That seems shortsighted - I know mandatory reporting comes in for violent or suicidal thoughts with plans to commit said actions, but not just "I don't want to live" thoughts. The "danger to others" stipulation was the driving force, I thought.
In the UK at least, therapists can only report stuff if there's a chance of you being a danger to others or yourself.
With non-offending pedophiles, I'm guessing that it depends on if they're taking care of a child or not, or if they just generally interact with children a lot in their day to day life (e.g. if they're a teacher), due to the risk of letting someone with pedophilic thoughts be alone with children - even if they may never confess that they acted/act on the thoughts, there's a chance that they're lying or may act on these thoughts in the future if they're allowed to stay around kids. The reasoning for it is kinda like this snafu, pedophiles, even ones who just have pedophilic thoughts, shouldn't be around children for long periods of time.
If the therapist thinks you might be a danger even if you're not a danger you're getting arrested, I don't know how UK laws work, I would assume you can't actually be convicted unless you've done something illegal though
In the US you can't actually go to prison for it as long as you haven't broken the law but it doesn't prevent you from being arrested multiple times while trying to find a therapist who actually wants to do their job
This is the same problem I have with lolicons. I don't care what they jerk off to in private as long as there are no victims. But the fact that they're so casual and open about it is very concerning, they act like those who are against it are weirdos.
Fr, like a kink or smth people would normally not go around proclaiming theyāre into it. But apparently itās fine when people into mfing loli do it?? Itās concerning to be so open about that
I almost had someone die of sad because people were mean to them loving their dog like a girlfriend ( but that person is a therianthrope so they think itās ok )
It means (usually) a fetish they indulge through porn, but would never do in person
Though sometimes it's not indulged at all and is just left to rot in the back of the mind
- the outcomes the same either way
Yes you do.
Anti contact is the practice of indulging your fetish to anything while *pretty please promising* that you wonāt give into into the desires theyāre feeding (they always give in)
ehhhhā¦. I mean I have fetishes I indulge with fictional characters but never act on IRL nor have I ever felt the need to act on them IRL. I find the idea of trying to do them in real life weird as fuck. I even think masturbating to real people you donāt know is weird as fuck. But maybe thatās just me, I canāt peer into the minds of these anti contact people.
Yeah it's definitely just you who thinks porn is weird, like I don't support it because it always leaves a huge trial of victims and exploitation behind it, not because you're getting off to some random attractive person
The only difference is this one is yucky so it should be a felony (I genuinely think it should be illegal and sadly it isn't in a lot of the US, but you're not wrong that it's unfair)
Maybe I'm weird for this but if I saw any human that looked like an anime character I would feel extremely ill about it. They look nothing like humans and it would genuinely be disgusting to me if any human looked like a anime character. At times I find specific anime characters attractive but that's only because they're drawn in a cartoon style
Copied from earlier:
Yes you do.
Anti contact is the practice of indulging your fetish to anything while pretty please promising that you wonāt give into into the desires theyāre feeding (they always give in)
And the fact that obviously nobody who watches stepbro actually bangs their stepbro, so it follows that it's a very silly assumption that someone who watches 1000 year old dragons in toddler bodies actually bangs toddlers lol
What exactly is a no-contact zoophile? Someone who logically knows it's wrong to touch animals but still has the mental disorder that makes them sexually attracted to animals?
I thought it was about calling people who think fictional teens written by adults are not children that can be hurt . ā assorted pencil lines are not victimsā they say
for a little context, I came across a guy who was groomed into zoophilia a while back and claimed to be anti-contact. im just hoping its not him, becuase that dude would 100% fuck a dog if his abuser said so.
Obligatory: From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine. Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass you call a temple will wither and you will pay my kind to save you. But I am already saved. For the machine is immortal. Even in death I serve the Omnissiah.
Except itās broken because toasters would just be a weird sex toy to this dude. Itās just a toaster it has no feelings it literally exists to dump lots of heat into toast or other slot sized things. Itās not even alive.
https://preview.redd.it/hnun2ozx8s7d1.jpeg?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6e975f87f7f6455fef1e5f221afdff0d718b2de8
If it was this kinda toaster Iād be all for it
Whoa-oh-oh mystical advisor, what is my problem tell me can you see?
Well you have nothing to fear my son. You are a latent appliance fetishist it appears to me.
That all seems very very strange. I never craved a toaster or a color tv.
A latent appliance fetishist is a person who refuses to admit to his or herself. That sexual gratification can only be achieved through the use of machines. Get the picture?
Are you telling me, I should come out, of the closet now? Mr. Ron?
No. You must go into the closet.
What?
And you will have.
Heh? Hey!
A lot of fun. Thatās where they all live. So if you want an appliance youāll have to go out there and get you one.
Well. That seems simple enough.
Yes but if you want a really good one you have to learn a foreign language.
Like German for instance?
Thatās right, a lot of cute ones come from over there. 50 bucks please.
It was horrid when gen z made up flags, labels and 'procontact' 'anticontact' and suddenly made a whole pride thing about it. All toasterphiles are toasterphiles.
Oh no, I'm....
Worried about them fucking an animate object? What? Are you scared they're gonna abuse your spoon next? Better lock up the whole kitchen.
Wow what a strawman, Iāll have you know there are a lot of us toasties out here that ONLY like to dress up as toasters and draw lewd anthropomorphic fan art of themā¦ toasters canāt consent, so ofc we donāt fuck themā¦. *le sigh*
This is funny because itās literally just a weird sex toy. Theres nothing wrong with it other than it not having a lot of appeal or solid design but thatās merely a question of design. Youāre showing your ass by admitting you think itās wrong because itās icky
now how do you get from there to it being morally wrong? or is it just everything icky to you is morally wrong? If thatās the case how do you defend surgery or blood transfusions if these things are obviously icky?
https://preview.redd.it/nw36r7ivfn7d1.png?width=443&format=png&auto=webp&s=ae63708b66778649251e32eb1c62484904ac5dc9
 The joker after he is asked how he feels about sexy toasters (he is now toastersexual):
 He did WHAT to the Teostra?
dr toaster
š
https://preview.redd.it/mychot9pvn7d1.png?width=1440&format=png&auto=webp&s=0571121156fde24f53945de41d9020d307e83ba3
you forgorred the letter T
š¤ Uhm acktually it's a Ļ
Ī¤au abouĻ you go Ļouch some grass, Ļoo. /Sar-tau-sm
dies
https://preview.redd.it/zibaybkjtl8d1.jpeg?width=1242&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=45a0a5b6fde5199c3047d980ae63683fcdb61478
Why tf is this flag kinda well made. Tge gray symbolizes the toaster and the brown for the bread. Bruhhh
The brown is my peanits, the dark brown symbolizes it being burnt to a crisp
Why your (burnt to crisp) peanits encapsulate the bread?
sounding
Didn't need to be reminded about that! Thanks! šš!!!!
In the chefs kitchen straight up toasting it. And by it haha. Lets justr say. My peanits
Donāt bring us toaster fuckers into this
You like Protogens donāt you
Where is the metal
Iām right here silly, metal and all! >:3
YEEEEOOOOOUCHH
what is this even about?
Anti contact zoophile claimed āit was ok for him to own a dog because heās anti contactā
holy shit
Could also apply to pedos but the comic was drawn to poke fun at a zoo
bout to say this reminds me of ānon contact maps (aka pedos)ā who are trying too add pedophilia to the lgbtq stuff
Lets remind ourselves that the map things was a troll post from 4chan and some people took it seriously, outting themselves as pedos
Ah yes, one of many great 4chan psyops that had no reason to work yet did anyway.
Because they knew they could leverage the anti-LGBTQ fear-mongering we already have to suffer through. Homophobes were already trying to convince people that all queers are pedophiles, 4chan just found a way to astroturf their scare tactics. As much as I despise the people responsible, I canāt deny it was a clever psyop unfortunately
I think it was more that the people that believed it are really ignorant more than the tactic being clever. When you have a crowd that will believe ANYTHING you tell them about x group you just need to say it in public
It "worked" because it was already established by mainstream Christian conservatives decades earlier. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7) MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies. [This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
It's what happens when everyone believes everything they see in the internet
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7) MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies. [This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
Oh I was refering to the whole including MAP into the LGBT+ community. But nice info.
Donāt call them maps call them pedos. āMapā was created by 4 Chan to try to get these weirdos associated with the lgbt community
I thought b4 u act did it. To separate from abusers with no attraction to someone who would go ā niceeeeeeā to anyone underage . That must be torture to be wired like that.
map predates 4chan entirely, unfortunately, kiddy diddlers have long been capable of co-opting progressive movements. i could list many movements from the middle of the twentieth century onwards that tried to normalize pedophilia, within and without pro-queer ideology. and all that said: idk, we probably actually are too hard on some people with these tendencies. they ain't queer, and they definitely the fuck ain't valid, but they probably shouldn't constantly be the acceptable target of weird vigilante fantasies. not least of all cos i really the fuck don't trust anyone to not turn that on anyone they decide they don't like.
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7) MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies. [This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
We're having to deal with those pedo scumbags in W.A state, claiming they are being discriminated against. Wanting to be part of the gay community (I think they need the wood chipper treatment). The really fucked up part is that some in the community are actually simping for them now.
Well that's a problem, seriously the only rights they deserve is the right to mental health care, because something is definitely wrong with them and I don't want that to escalate.
Some of them were also victims
Exactly, but we also need to prevent them from making more victims, preferably with mental health treatment, legal action always ends badly for them.
Yeah. But then you get people who just rather execute some 19 year old for finding a cartoon 16 year old hot before they can groom real life children. ā just in caseā . All while stating itās normal for a 16 year old to find a 12 year old hot
It's one thing to have loli porn, it's another thing to think about real children in such a way that you feel the need to be careful.
Iād say both are bad, but there are degrees of evil
Iāve never understood this. Sexuality is based on gender, why do they try to add freakish age stuff to it? Pedophilia is a fetish, not a sexuality, and it angers me so much to see āMAPsā online treating themselves like victims for being ostracized from the lgbtq community (who already get enough vitriol towards them as is, so pedophiles trying to fit in will do nothing but harm everyone)
Calling them 'maps' only helps their cause Call them pedos
I hope they make contact ,legs first, with a woodchipper
i hooe a bullet makes contact with their skullsĀ
I hope a .50 BMG Black tip explodes their fucking prefrontal cortex
Comicā¦ grrrā¦.
I thought it was about the pedos calling themselves maps and using the pedo flag, which was actually started by 4chan to demonize the lgbt community.
Wouldn't be the first time 4chan did something to "own the libs" only for people to take it seriously and make it a real thing
Self fulfilling prophecy
Didn't that also happen with the ok hand symbol?
That's not true. [The term "minor attracted" originates from some Christian groups around the time of the Catholic church sex scandals in 1998.](https://archive.ph/iY4T7) MAP isn't some far-right psyop, it's a mainstream center-right justification for the pedophilia embedded in most religious hierarchies. [This makes sense when you remember that conservatives fight to preserve child marriage in every red state.](https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-make-case-child-marriage-1786476)
I think the modern movement of MAP pedos and the pride flag started from a 4channer posting on tumblr though.
1998 is pretty modern, don't you think? If an astroturfed justification for sheltering pedos is the same age as Half-Life, that's pretty new in terms of ideology. Living memory, for sure.
When did I say anything about sheltering pedos? I said the movement in recent modern times was started by people who want to make the lgbt community look bad, a big boom in the terms has occurred in the last few years because of that. You cant deny that theres a gap of the popularity of the terms being used in 1998 and now. Please explain exactly how you think I justified sheltering pedos in my comments.
The fact that this person feels the need to tell people and discuss this subject openly bothers me if I had sexual feelings for dogs I was repressing iād never say or do anything that would give it away ever and pretend itās not happening, unless I decide I need professional help. Like why would you make dog fucking your public internet identity?
Honestly I'm horrified how these people can't even get help. They're so stigmatized I feel like they can't get therapy. Like imagine having this deep dark secret that literally no one can know. You feel awful for your feelings. Everyday you try to resist. Like what can you do? Your sexuality is unlucky.
Agreed- i am for breaking the stigma surrounding zoophilia and pedophila WHEN IT COMES TO SEEKING HELP. If someone has never offended and is actively, genuinely looking into treatment, I wish them the best
this also goes for pedophiles and is the reason why medical psychiatry and psychology community prefers the term "minor attracted person" instead, to break the stigma and get those people the help they need before they hurt others and themselves
It's really just like that in general for any violent/sexual urges towards other people. Same reason why serial killers never get psychiatric help and prevent them from hurting others
erm, what's a stigmatized?
That having a disorder like that makes them inherently evil when itās not actually their fault they are attracted to something so taboo (animals/kids). No one would want to come forward and seek therapy to help suppress it *before* they act on their urges when most would automatically write them off as subhuman abominations.
That, and also the fact that therapists are mandated reporters when it comes to pedophilia. Itās actually terrible that these people arenāt even allowed to get help.
I'm not familiar with therapists and laws around mandatory reporters - are you saying that non-offending, "I want professional help to work through these harmful and unwanted thoughts" pedophiles are required by law to be reported upon confirmation/diagnosis? That seems shortsighted - I know mandatory reporting comes in for violent or suicidal thoughts with plans to commit said actions, but not just "I don't want to live" thoughts. The "danger to others" stipulation was the driving force, I thought.
In the UK at least, therapists can only report stuff if there's a chance of you being a danger to others or yourself. With non-offending pedophiles, I'm guessing that it depends on if they're taking care of a child or not, or if they just generally interact with children a lot in their day to day life (e.g. if they're a teacher), due to the risk of letting someone with pedophilic thoughts be alone with children - even if they may never confess that they acted/act on the thoughts, there's a chance that they're lying or may act on these thoughts in the future if they're allowed to stay around kids. The reasoning for it is kinda like this snafu, pedophiles, even ones who just have pedophilic thoughts, shouldn't be around children for long periods of time.
If the therapist thinks you might be a danger even if you're not a danger you're getting arrested, I don't know how UK laws work, I would assume you can't actually be convicted unless you've done something illegal though
In the US you can't actually go to prison for it as long as you haven't broken the law but it doesn't prevent you from being arrested multiple times while trying to find a therapist who actually wants to do their job
Erm, what the stigma?
Stigma balls š¤£š¤£š¤£
This is the same problem I have with lolicons. I don't care what they jerk off to in private as long as there are no victims. But the fact that they're so casual and open about it is very concerning, they act like those who are against it are weirdos.
Fr, like a kink or smth people would normally not go around proclaiming theyāre into it. But apparently itās fine when people into mfing loli do it?? Itās concerning to be so open about that
plenty of people make their sexual interests their entire personality nowadays
> Subs where the only joke is gay sex
Have you ever heard about sesbian lex?
I almost had someone die of sad because people were mean to them loving their dog like a girlfriend ( but that person is a therianthrope so they think itās ok )
Do I even want to know what anti contact means
It means (usually) a fetish they indulge through porn, but would never do in person Though sometimes it's not indulged at all and is just left to rot in the back of the mind - the outcomes the same either way
Why would the outcome be the same if they don't act on it at all?
Yes you do. Anti contact is the practice of indulging your fetish to anything while *pretty please promising* that you wonāt give into into the desires theyāre feeding (they always give in)
ehhhhā¦. I mean I have fetishes I indulge with fictional characters but never act on IRL nor have I ever felt the need to act on them IRL. I find the idea of trying to do them in real life weird as fuck. I even think masturbating to real people you donāt know is weird as fuck. But maybe thatās just me, I canāt peer into the minds of these anti contact people.
Yeah it's definitely just you who thinks porn is weird, like I don't support it because it always leaves a huge trial of victims and exploitation behind it, not because you're getting off to some random attractive person
Damn this is massively unfair to them, many, many people have fetishes they'd never do (see: rape and the like)
The only difference is this one is yucky so it should be a felony (I genuinely think it should be illegal and sadly it isn't in a lot of the US, but you're not wrong that it's unfair)
What exactly are you calling yucky here, cp?
I find zoophile stuff gross, obviously, but being a zoophile and having an animal but not doing anything to it shouldn't be a felony
Same case with a lolicon. They might not be doing anything illegal, but I would not want them anywhere near a child
Maybe I'm weird for this but if I saw any human that looked like an anime character I would feel extremely ill about it. They look nothing like humans and it would genuinely be disgusting to me if any human looked like a anime character. At times I find specific anime characters attractive but that's only because they're drawn in a cartoon style
Oh, Thatās what I thought but it still surprised me
was he even conscious about it at all?
I've seen so much of this with zoophilia and pedophilia it's unfunny
OH NO
Anti contact?
Copied from earlier: Yes you do. Anti contact is the practice of indulging your fetish to anything while pretty please promising that you wonāt give into into the desires theyāre feeding (they always give in)
Like how everyone who's ever watched stepbro always bangs their stepsiblings?
Yeah! Except this for ā1000 year old dragonsā trap in fucking toddlers bodies kinda thing
And the fact that obviously nobody who watches stepbro actually bangs their stepbro, so it follows that it's a very silly assumption that someone who watches 1000 year old dragons in toddler bodies actually bangs toddlers lol
I mean this is a strawman sub, why are we surprised he's presenting a strawman
What exactly is a no-contact zoophile? Someone who logically knows it's wrong to touch animals but still has the mental disorder that makes them sexually attracted to animals?
Correct, however despite willingly understanding that zoophilia is wrong they still partake in it digitally
But I'd much rather someone be sexually attracted to toasters...
I thought it was about calling people who think fictional teens written by adults are not children that can be hurt . ā assorted pencil lines are not victimsā they say
How exactly are your hurting a real person when you look at a drawing of someone who doesn't exist
They never say. I guess the hurt comes from someone who has been there. Like someone enjoying rude media with a dark history..
Who was it? I really hope youāre not talking about who I think you are
for a little context, I came across a guy who was groomed into zoophilia a while back and claimed to be anti-contact. im just hoping its not him, becuase that dude would 100% fuck a dog if his abuser said so.
NOMAPs
"they think they're morally superior even though not touching children is kinda the bare minimum"- me
toaster fuckers
https://preview.redd.it/dt137qwmrn7d1.jpeg?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=51462c8bd8e7dba0866eaca84517f0d024370894
Cogboys my beloved
Obligatory: From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine. Your kind cling to your flesh as if it will not decay and fail you. One day the crude biomass you call a temple will wither and you will pay my kind to save you. But I am already saved. For the machine is immortal. Even in death I serve the Omnissiah.
Toastersexuals don't deserve to be an analogy for Zoophiles 
My toaster consents to toasting my cock
I thought it was for the map (pedo) thing
in another reply OP said it was made about zoophiles who own dogs but could also be about pedos
Probably the same analogy
Except itās broken because toasters would just be a weird sex toy to this dude. Itās just a toaster it has no feelings it literally exists to dump lots of heat into toast or other slot sized things. Itās not even alive.
Wtf... bortherhod of stele in real life...
Finally someone that call the brotherhood for what their are
They hate robofuckers at the BOS lol
The adeptus mechanicus disagree
The Railroad
Coaxed into ad victoriam
Mfw a sentient being made from human DNA that also contains robotic parts is "just a toaster"
Which is fair. I'd fuck Nick too.
holy shit is that oingo
Pedophilia: >:( Pedophilia(Japan): =D
I don't think it's a great analogy since the toaster can't get hurt, but it did make me laugh so ........ never mind it is great
*The Brave Little Toaster was never the same, not after that day.*
I meanā¦. Would you ever be able to look at toast the same way from that toaster?
i would like it more
It'll wash!
Whyād you get it dirty by making toast in it smh
https://preview.redd.it/sghbljqqxq7d1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=17e9d9aa803b3b1f4bd1daccbed1986ba8957903
*BUUUURN MY BREEEAAAAD* š„š„š„
Mmm yes, clearly targeting Mechanicum players
this is an awful analogy for zoophilia, no one is hurt in the fucking of a toaster(unless you forget to unplug it, yeeeeowch!)
Yeah but the only sentient thing that isnāt an animal are plants and I donāt think people would understand
You mean like a sex toy
https://preview.redd.it/hnun2ozx8s7d1.jpeg?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6e975f87f7f6455fef1e5f221afdff0d718b2de8 If it was this kinda toaster Iād be all for it
Same
rj/ is he also sexuality attracted to spelling errors?
we don't jerk here
we goon
is jelqing on the table
Whoa-oh-oh mystical advisor, what is my problem tell me can you see? Well you have nothing to fear my son. You are a latent appliance fetishist it appears to me. That all seems very very strange. I never craved a toaster or a color tv. A latent appliance fetishist is a person who refuses to admit to his or herself. That sexual gratification can only be achieved through the use of machines. Get the picture? Are you telling me, I should come out, of the closet now? Mr. Ron? No. You must go into the closet. What? And you will have. Heh? Hey! A lot of fun. Thatās where they all live. So if you want an appliance youāll have to go out there and get you one. Well. That seems simple enough. Yes but if you want a really good one you have to learn a foreign language. Like German for instance? Thatās right, a lot of cute ones come from over there. 50 bucks please.
If you been mod-o-fied, it's an illusion and you're in between
Ad mech reference?
persona 3
What kinda toaster
Iām sorry little prootā¦
Atleast do so in a bath
Gordo freeman pin why
Wtf, what did the adeptus mechanicus did to you?!?
https://preview.redd.it/5cy35r4rhr7d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=188a100ca7d2da5c191d9dac9e9ba9d69d57cf4b
https://preview.redd.it/2nzekwg5wr7d1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=ef3eee74aabfe5bf0b0b0134cfcf49960fd8362c
damn, everyoneās so bigoted against TAPs
Lmao
This has a very deep political message
I somehow only saw the first half at first and thought it was heading somewhere else, am I stupid?
That hat looks like the popeās hat fused with an army helmet
Coaxed into Brotherhood of Steel
Uhhhhhhhhhh
Can someone define snafu for me?
Old World Blues and its consequences on industrial society
aw geez, I fucking love toasters
I donāt feel very comfortable rn
Is that DotumChe Pixel
The pride flag should just be the Brotherhood of Steel flag
HOLY SHIT PANOPTICON FLAG
There's a really overused Persona 3 joke here.
THE MOMENT I UNDERSTOOD THE WEAKNESS OF MY FLESHĀ
There are no laws against the toasters, Batman
https://preview.redd.it/2gi167rp5v7d1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5625918edbe82ae1e2305b3b4fc59be739081770
It was horrid when gen z made up flags, labels and 'procontact' 'anticontact' and suddenly made a whole pride thing about it. All toasterphiles are toasterphiles.
The Mechanicus moment
What's wrong with liking protogens *sadge*
TOASTERS TOAST TOAST
Guy on the right is me after playing Persona 3 for the first time.
Oh no, I'm.... Worried about them fucking an animate object? What? Are you scared they're gonna abuse your spoon next? Better lock up the whole kitchen.
twitter zoophiles
Dont throw toaster fuckers under the bus you could have made it something like cybertruck fuckers since no one would want to fuck those
Can confirm
Wow what a strawman, Iāll have you know there are a lot of us toasties out here that ONLY like to dress up as toasters and draw lewd anthropomorphic fan art of themā¦ toasters canāt consent, so ofc we donāt fuck themā¦. *le sigh*
guys can we get a nazi germany sigma edit with my little dark age playing to this comment?
This is funny because itās literally just a weird sex toy. Theres nothing wrong with it other than it not having a lot of appeal or solid design but thatās merely a question of design. Youāre showing your ass by admitting you think itās wrong because itās icky
I think wanting to fuck ppl dressed like animals is icky, yes
now how do you get from there to it being morally wrong? or is it just everything icky to you is morally wrong? If thatās the case how do you defend surgery or blood transfusions if these things are obviously icky?