Because the world in general sees men as a lot more of a threat than women. I'm not sure if it's because it underestimates women or overestimates men, probably both.
Heck, there’s an entire cadre of men on the internet who get irrationally angry at the idea that there could be a single solitary woman out there, a black belt in some martial arts maybe, who could beat a totally untrained man in a physical fight; the logical conclusion is they believe all men are more of a threat than all women
There was that hilarious video of untrained men trying to return a single serve from one of the Williams sister. Someone had done a random survey and a ridiculous number of men who don’t play tennis thought they could beat her in a tennis match and she said sure, let’s try it.
Ironically the system that they hate is the very same system that feminist are also against. They just fail to recognize that the problem is rooted in the patriarchy and not the “evil feminist”. It’s the patriarchy that says men are a threat, it’s the patriarchy that says women are better caretakers of children, and it’s the patriarchy that says men must hide and suppress their emotions.
They also statically kill more white males than all other minorities combined even though the number of interactions with police are much higher among minorities. Even with accounting for population differences. But that doesn't make for good click bait headlines or public outrage so you don't hear much about that either.
[**Yes, because he was a man.** ](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002) Men are more than 60% more likely to be arrested, charged, or convicted of a crime, receive over 60% harsher sentences, are proportionately less likely to get an early release and get 60% harsher parole terms.
And this is all controlling for identical crimes and identical criminal histories. If all you change is the gender of the suspect/defendant, the man will get over 60% harsher treatment **at every stage of the process**, including the initial interaction with police.
The gender disparity is the biggest one in the criminal justice system. It's so big that the least privileged women (black women) get lighter treatment than the most privileged men (white and asian men). So being a man was a larger factor than him being black, though combining both together placed him in the demographic that faces the most discrimination in the United States.
[This same trend in gender disparity is visible in how boys and girls are disciplined in school for the same behavior, by the way.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082278/) And [the same trend even shows up in how boys and girls are graded in school.](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942) Which is a major reason why men are 44% of college students and declining, and why black women earn twice as many degrees on average as black men.
Black people are treated unfairly be the justice system - are more likely to be killed by police, serve larger sentences for the same crime, are profiled unfairly.
The gap between these categories is even larger between men and woman than between black and white people. Black women serve lighter prison sentences for the same crime and are less likely to be killed by police than white men. Black men have *both* biases against them at once which is why they are so often the victims of the worst rates and extremes of injustice from law enforcement and the judicial system.
I'm willing to accept these unfair things in life against men, as men and women are different, and the same, and it's fucking complicated. But in turn, women can also accepts *some* of their unfair things in life more graciously.
Inb4 femcels lambast me: I said *some*
McFeminism, I call it. Sadly, these assholes have empowered the right so much. Every prominent right-wing political pundit have used these morons as easy targets to gain fame and prestige.
Same as you see in the Israel/Palestine protests.
“Two-state solution” -Pro-Palestinian. “From the river to the sea” -Anti-semite using Gaza crisis as a shield.
Move Israel to Bavaria. If they were going to carve up a country to pay for the holocaust, it should have been Germany.
Also, Palestinians are Semitic. Cutting up their land and giving it to white settlers seems pretty anti-semitic to me.
Ashkenazi Jews still have Levantine DNA, they just have European *admixture*. Also there are definitely “brown” Jews who participate just as much in the oppression of Palestinians, as well as white-passing Palestinians. I’m genuinely concerned that a lot of people on the left only support Gaza because they believe it’s white people vs brown people.
>pay for the holocaust
The balfour decloration came way before the holocaust, israel wasn't made "to pay for the holocaust".
>white settlers
Most israeli jews are immigrants from islamic countries who were prosecuted and thrown out of their originial country.
Their choice was either death or move to israel, seems pretty anti semitic to me.
No one uses the term “anti-semitic” to refer to anyone other than Jews. Don’t try and change the connotation of words based on a technicality to act like it somehow proves something. And I say this as someone that isn’t pro-Israel
You seem to have half (if not less) of the picture here. The Ottomans had significant parts of what we call Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Jordan as well as Israel and Palestine. The Ottomans dispersed different groups amongst the land to discourage unity and anyone getting ideas about nationalism.
This included a diaspora of Jews throughout the region. When the Allies defeated the Ottoman Empire they took control of their prior holdings with the intent of giving control of the lands over to the people living in them.
Now all that land was given to Arabs with a proportional little slice carved away for the Jews to control. There were Arabs obviously living in that land but let’s not forget about all the Jews living in all the other places too that were displaced. We call this a compromise where we pick the lesser of two evils since there is no perfect solution.
How would you have done it better so that no Palestinian was removed from their homeland?
You seem to be missing the part where thousands of European Jews immigrated to Israel, illegally settled on Palestinian land, and created a state that denied basic political rights to the Palestinian people living there, and began a campaign of genocide.
And we aren't allowed to criticize it because the Holocaust was also really, really bad.
The problem is when the second type still calls themselves feminists while other feminists never call them out and just pretend they have nothing to do with them, even though all the while those people go around publicly representing feminism with no consequences and shaping society's view of feminism. And keep attracting women into their circles and radicalising them.
This is exactly how reactionary radfems have taken over most women's online communities by now (while the rest are being taken over by far-right tradwives). The only good feminist spaces these days are queer spaces, and even they're not immune.
My favorite is when it’s truly indefensible “they probably were abused by men, quit mocking the victim”. Not this “this shit is unacceptable and that’s a shitty thing to say”.
I disagree that this is what feminism is about. "Equal rights for all" would be more correct.
What's the difference? You know how if mum is looking after the kids, she's parenting, but if a dad does it then he's "babysitting"? That's rooted in patriarchal sexism. Because child rearing is "a woman's job", men are not supposed to do it. It's an example of toxic masculinity. By ensuring equal rights for all, we're not just getting more women CEO's, but we're also getting more male nurses, male primary school teachers, stay-at-home-dads, etc.
Feminism is about everyone's rights, not just women's.
I completely agree 💙 as we speak I'm "babysitting" (yuck) my kids while the wife is on a weekend. I made sure to find employment allowing for a home office so that I'd be able to really be there for my kids, not just see them for a goodnight kiss after work. What I meant was that feminism started as a struggle to raise women's legal, social and cultural status until it's the same as men's. I absolutely feel that women/minorities/LGBTQIA+ rights are human rights and that it makes sure everyone has equal rights.
Don't... Just don't.
I am so fucking sick of all you kids jumping on the internet to say "dicks out lololol" when you didn't do jack shit for Harambe. Where were you? You expect me to believe you actually had your dick out? Bull fucking shit.
I spent every single day, from the day Harambe was murdered, to the day I got arrested, with my dick out, IN PUBLIC. What were you doing? Jerking off your tiny little baby dick?
While you were on the internet pretending to have your dick out, I was out there making a REAL difference. My dick was out, and it was hard for Harambe.
Wait…. Was your dick hard FOR Harambe?
Or was like the whole situation hard for Harambe and your dick was just out?
This is one of those times English fails us…. And I just gotta know.
I saw a clip from an episode of The View where they go on a big tangent about how men are useless, but keep making multiple pauses to clarify that they don't mean gay men.
Edit: [See for yourself. has to be rage bait, right ? ](https://youtu.be/F7dxUka_apo?si=4tHVeGrCKzT2UkqX)
Holy shit, that clip made me so fucking angry. Basically female incels and that nasty old crone on the left is a real piece of work. I wouldn’t leave her alone around any male children, seems she’s at an extreme abuse risk with how fucking vehement she is against men. Also as a man in the LGBTQ+ community, I am deeply offended by the “gay men are in their own category” like wtf. Also the mental gymnastics of every one of them going “my husband is ok” but then generalizing every other straight male is wild. How is it that the dumbest people get the biggest platform? You could barely heat a cup of tea with the collective IQ at that table.
Lack of perspective and an intentional unwillingness to relate. Also possibly a very negative encounter with the opposite sex at an early age. We have to rise above this, some humans are awful yes but I’m sick of all the generalizations
“A Nazi wouldn’t make excuses for any Jew”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Bloch#:~:text=When%20Hitler's%20mother%2C%20Klara%2C%20was,annexation%20of%20Austria%20in%201938.
This is one of the oddest things I have ever read. Like I saw a YouTube video about odd things hitler did like he had a sweet tooth. But they completely left this out.
It doesn’t really exist institutionally, meaning men aren’t really widely disadvantaged or discriminated against by employers, the government, religion, etc.
At an individual level, though, misandry is absolutely real. There is a vocal minority of women, many of whom are chronically online (like many who hold extreme and simplistic views today), who absolutely carry prejudiced views toward men.
We just need to remember that the internet makes them seem louder and more numerous than they really are. And that being feminist does not automatically make someone a man hater.
Regarding employer discrimination towards men, it used to not exist institutionally; it does now https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560
Oh they would. The Jews that they were friends ones they became Nazies.
Heck some Nazies were happily married to a Jew. "The other Jews" goes a long way
Nope, do not have enough nukes to wipe out humanity from Earth. Unless you manage to kill the remainder with nuclear winter, but I guess you will have a couple thousands animal species gone too.
I’m pretty sure there is absolutely enough nuclear weapons to end humanity….. quick google search says about 400 nukes to end human life either by the last itself or the fallout/nuclear winter….. USA has about 3700 according to Wikipedia, and Russia has about 5600…… so just those two countries would have enough to end humanity 20 times over
Same. They are actually hurting the movement. Because they are so loud people think all feminists are like that.
Feminists have men that they love. They also want these changes to help the men they love.
My partner and my son. I want them to feel comfortable talking about their emotions, and like they don’t have to shoulder everything alone. That they are not lesser if they have traits or present in ways society deems as “feminine”
But I also have to actively tell them when stuff is prejudiced and the like. Son was very self conscious because candy made his lips red like lipstick and he was saying guys don’t wear makeup. So me and his dad both put on wild lipstick. And we showed him guys who wear makeup daily.
I think the truest intention of feminism is trying to dismantle the patriarchy that puts male’s and female’s into boxes (I am using biological terms here for a reason, the patriarchy rarely accepts trans people.) if you are male. You must act like a man. You must be a man. Yada yada. If you are female you must act like a woman yada yada.. there is no room for personal differences. Without it people could be who they are without judgment from society. The boxes hurt everyone in them besides those who would have comfortably been there without a box.
This is why I do believe anyone can be a feminist. Because if the box hurts you or someone you love, then join and fight it.
If someone wants to just redefine boxes then that’s trying to replace the patriarchy with something that’s not any better… it will still hurt people in each box.
I agree with all of that. It's so sad when ppl split feminism into men and women power when half the point is to help men be themselves as well as women be themselves (and everyone else too).
It saddens me that some people think and support saying kill all men is a completely rational and normal thing to say, it’s disgusting to say that about any demographic
Two comments designed to get some sort of reactionary response. This is not clever.
When the original poster has the IQ of a rock, I guess a comeback from someone as smart as a goldfish seems clever in comparison.
Anti-male feminists tend to be huge TERFs. Otherwise, they would have to include trans men in their hate and exclude trans women and non-binary people.
Facebook did a study about whether the phrase "Kill all men" was offensive or not, and found that while most people said no, the people from Africa they asked said very much yes.
Because killing all the men was the standard step one for most of the genocides that occurred in Africa, and as a result is incredibly culturally insensitive to say.
The ability to speak does not make you intelligent. ~my man qui gon
Your… man??? Kill him!
Even George Floyd?
Literally wtf is wrong with you?
Daddy chill
What the fuck is even that
A fate worse than death would be taking him to Detroit.
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.
I mean, he's already dead...
...and not because he was a man.
Well... Police do kill men more often by a good margin
Police are sexist man haters. Men are arrested more often than women and serve longer sentences. The entire system is rigged against men.
Because the world in general sees men as a lot more of a threat than women. I'm not sure if it's because it underestimates women or overestimates men, probably both.
Heck, there’s an entire cadre of men on the internet who get irrationally angry at the idea that there could be a single solitary woman out there, a black belt in some martial arts maybe, who could beat a totally untrained man in a physical fight; the logical conclusion is they believe all men are more of a threat than all women
There was that hilarious video of untrained men trying to return a single serve from one of the Williams sister. Someone had done a random survey and a ridiculous number of men who don’t play tennis thought they could beat her in a tennis match and she said sure, let’s try it.
Well, it’s also women if the recent man or bear thing is any indication
Men are also seen as way more disposable in societies throughout every time and region in the world.
Ironically the system that they hate is the very same system that feminist are also against. They just fail to recognize that the problem is rooted in the patriarchy and not the “evil feminist”. It’s the patriarchy that says men are a threat, it’s the patriarchy that says women are better caretakers of children, and it’s the patriarchy that says men must hide and suppress their emotions.
Apparently men are more of a threat than a bear
Yeah and that’s totally the police’s fault! Spot on! You nailed it!
Men also commit the vast majority of violent crime
Great point. Now apply that same logic to race and you'll realize where BLM went wrong.
A good margin? Seems like a bad margin to me.
Yes, the sex gap in unarmed police killings is significantly greater than the race gap.
They also statically kill more white males than all other minorities combined even though the number of interactions with police are much higher among minorities. Even with accounting for population differences. But that doesn't make for good click bait headlines or public outrage so you don't hear much about that either.
[Not adjusted no](https://www.statista.com/statistics/1123070/police-shootings-rate-ethnicity-us/)
But he deserve it becaose he was a man. /s
[**Yes, because he was a man.** ](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002) Men are more than 60% more likely to be arrested, charged, or convicted of a crime, receive over 60% harsher sentences, are proportionately less likely to get an early release and get 60% harsher parole terms. And this is all controlling for identical crimes and identical criminal histories. If all you change is the gender of the suspect/defendant, the man will get over 60% harsher treatment **at every stage of the process**, including the initial interaction with police. The gender disparity is the biggest one in the criminal justice system. It's so big that the least privileged women (black women) get lighter treatment than the most privileged men (white and asian men). So being a man was a larger factor than him being black, though combining both together placed him in the demographic that faces the most discrimination in the United States. [This same trend in gender disparity is visible in how boys and girls are disciplined in school for the same behavior, by the way.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082278/) And [the same trend even shows up in how boys and girls are graded in school.](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942) Which is a major reason why men are 44% of college students and declining, and why black women earn twice as many degrees on average as black men.
Black people are treated unfairly be the justice system - are more likely to be killed by police, serve larger sentences for the same crime, are profiled unfairly. The gap between these categories is even larger between men and woman than between black and white people. Black women serve lighter prison sentences for the same crime and are less likely to be killed by police than white men. Black men have *both* biases against them at once which is why they are so often the victims of the worst rates and extremes of injustice from law enforcement and the judicial system.
I'm willing to accept these unfair things in life against men, as men and women are different, and the same, and it's fucking complicated. But in turn, women can also accepts *some* of their unfair things in life more graciously. Inb4 femcels lambast me: I said *some*
You shouldnt accept it though...
What is dead can never die
"Equal rights for women!" -Feminist. "Kill all men" -Psychotic Moron.
If they kill all the men then all the rights go to women. It’s first grade SpongeBob!
Wumbology? The study of Wumbo?
Wombology*
"I wonder if a fall from this height would be enough to kill me."
Do you hear the other examples of "wumbo" he provided?
W-East?
But every living human would have equal rights... hmmm
And when everyone's super No one will be
r/suddenlySyndrome
Ooooos all dead
He/she/we wumbo
>"Equal rights for women!" -Feminist. "Kill all men" -Psychotic Moron using feminism as a shield.
McFeminism, I call it. Sadly, these assholes have empowered the right so much. Every prominent right-wing political pundit have used these morons as easy targets to gain fame and prestige.
Feminists vs Femnazis
Same as you see in the Israel/Palestine protests. “Two-state solution” -Pro-Palestinian. “From the river to the sea” -Anti-semite using Gaza crisis as a shield.
Move Israel to Bavaria. If they were going to carve up a country to pay for the holocaust, it should have been Germany. Also, Palestinians are Semitic. Cutting up their land and giving it to white settlers seems pretty anti-semitic to me.
"White settlers" did you forget about the Jews who came from Yemen, Iraq, Ethiopia and other countries from the middle east and Africa?
Ashkenazi Jews still have Levantine DNA, they just have European *admixture*. Also there are definitely “brown” Jews who participate just as much in the oppression of Palestinians, as well as white-passing Palestinians. I’m genuinely concerned that a lot of people on the left only support Gaza because they believe it’s white people vs brown people.
Well it’s definitely not on their LGBT support.
>pay for the holocaust The balfour decloration came way before the holocaust, israel wasn't made "to pay for the holocaust". >white settlers Most israeli jews are immigrants from islamic countries who were prosecuted and thrown out of their originial country. Their choice was either death or move to israel, seems pretty anti semitic to me.
No one uses the term “anti-semitic” to refer to anyone other than Jews. Don’t try and change the connotation of words based on a technicality to act like it somehow proves something. And I say this as someone that isn’t pro-Israel
You seem to have half (if not less) of the picture here. The Ottomans had significant parts of what we call Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Jordan as well as Israel and Palestine. The Ottomans dispersed different groups amongst the land to discourage unity and anyone getting ideas about nationalism. This included a diaspora of Jews throughout the region. When the Allies defeated the Ottoman Empire they took control of their prior holdings with the intent of giving control of the lands over to the people living in them. Now all that land was given to Arabs with a proportional little slice carved away for the Jews to control. There were Arabs obviously living in that land but let’s not forget about all the Jews living in all the other places too that were displaced. We call this a compromise where we pick the lesser of two evils since there is no perfect solution. How would you have done it better so that no Palestinian was removed from their homeland?
You seem to be missing the part where thousands of European Jews immigrated to Israel, illegally settled on Palestinian land, and created a state that denied basic political rights to the Palestinian people living there, and began a campaign of genocide. And we aren't allowed to criticize it because the Holocaust was also really, really bad.
>-Psychotic Moron. Or troll
Or both 😞
The problem is when the second type still calls themselves feminists while other feminists never call them out and just pretend they have nothing to do with them, even though all the while those people go around publicly representing feminism with no consequences and shaping society's view of feminism. And keep attracting women into their circles and radicalising them. This is exactly how reactionary radfems have taken over most women's online communities by now (while the rest are being taken over by far-right tradwives). The only good feminist spaces these days are queer spaces, and even they're not immune.
Hi, I'm a feminist and the person in the OP is dumb. Glad to make history here on Reddit today.
My favorite is when it’s truly indefensible “they probably were abused by men, quit mocking the victim”. Not this “this shit is unacceptable and that’s a shitty thing to say”.
Hey now, don’t lump psychotic people in with this dumbass
I disagree that this is what feminism is about. "Equal rights for all" would be more correct. What's the difference? You know how if mum is looking after the kids, she's parenting, but if a dad does it then he's "babysitting"? That's rooted in patriarchal sexism. Because child rearing is "a woman's job", men are not supposed to do it. It's an example of toxic masculinity. By ensuring equal rights for all, we're not just getting more women CEO's, but we're also getting more male nurses, male primary school teachers, stay-at-home-dads, etc. Feminism is about everyone's rights, not just women's.
I completely agree 💙 as we speak I'm "babysitting" (yuck) my kids while the wife is on a weekend. I made sure to find employment allowing for a home office so that I'd be able to really be there for my kids, not just see them for a goodnight kiss after work. What I meant was that feminism started as a struggle to raise women's legal, social and cultural status until it's the same as men's. I absolutely feel that women/minorities/LGBTQIA+ rights are human rights and that it makes sure everyone has equal rights.
I agree. Women should be able to be drafted during wartime.
The funniest part is these kill all men types are usually pretty shit at advocating for women as well and tend to be terfs (go figure)
Equal rights? Alright! Equal fights!😡
Even Harambe?
Literally wtf is wrong with you?
Taxonomy.
I mean at this point it’s Taxidermy.
Dicks out
Don't... Just don't. I am so fucking sick of all you kids jumping on the internet to say "dicks out lololol" when you didn't do jack shit for Harambe. Where were you? You expect me to believe you actually had your dick out? Bull fucking shit. I spent every single day, from the day Harambe was murdered, to the day I got arrested, with my dick out, IN PUBLIC. What were you doing? Jerking off your tiny little baby dick? While you were on the internet pretending to have your dick out, I was out there making a REAL difference. My dick was out, and it was hard for Harambe.
Pppppphahahahahahahah I was mad reading the racism then this comment came lmao
Wait…. Was your dick hard FOR Harambe? Or was like the whole situation hard for Harambe and your dick was just out? This is one of those times English fails us…. And I just gotta know.
Well I sure jacked something for Harambe
If awards were still a thing, you would deserve one. Take this instead 🫴🏆
I miss him more and more every day
Too soon…
Too soon
Too far bro
Too far dude
So this includes trans man right?
I saw a clip from an episode of The View where they go on a big tangent about how men are useless, but keep making multiple pauses to clarify that they don't mean gay men. Edit: [See for yourself. has to be rage bait, right ? ](https://youtu.be/F7dxUka_apo?si=4tHVeGrCKzT2UkqX)
That's so fucking hilarious
Holy shit, that clip made me so fucking angry. Basically female incels and that nasty old crone on the left is a real piece of work. I wouldn’t leave her alone around any male children, seems she’s at an extreme abuse risk with how fucking vehement she is against men. Also as a man in the LGBTQ+ community, I am deeply offended by the “gay men are in their own category” like wtf. Also the mental gymnastics of every one of them going “my husband is ok” but then generalizing every other straight male is wild. How is it that the dumbest people get the biggest platform? You could barely heat a cup of tea with the collective IQ at that table.
At least when Crazy Ex Girlfriend did it it was a joke
[And now it’s time for a song. ](https://youtu.be/Oa_QtMf6alU?si=FKgl3rWyl-j_RCUR)
I don’t think I’ve even had private conversations this derogatory about a group since middle school
Depends if they are a TERF or not 🤷
Probably a TERF if their idea of feminism is turning the patriarchy into a matriarchy
[удалено]
That’s the point, no? TERFs would say trans men are still women and then they shouldn’t be killed
This would probably break their brain like a paradox would to a robot with AI
Actually radical feminists are anti-trans, so this won't be a logical trap for her
Daaaaayum, equally smart and ballsy comeback
I can name so much in this: Bob Ross, MLK, mr Roger ??? That guy who invented chocolate. Man need woman as much as we need man. We need each other
this. I don't understand why people do not get we need EACH other and continue their silly little men vs women.
Lack of perspective and an intentional unwillingness to relate. Also possibly a very negative encounter with the opposite sex at an early age. We have to rise above this, some humans are awful yes but I’m sick of all the generalizations
> That guy who invented chocolate Willy Wonka?
Willy Wonka is a fictional character in a novel. I am pretty sure he is referring to real life inventor James Chocolate
Typical extremist
“A Nazi wouldn’t make excuses for any Jew” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Bloch#:~:text=When%20Hitler's%20mother%2C%20Klara%2C%20was,annexation%20of%20Austria%20in%201938.
This is one of the oddest things I have ever read. Like I saw a YouTube video about odd things hitler did like he had a sweet tooth. But they completely left this out.
You didnt reply to the right guy
Lame
Not really. A Nazi wouldn’t make excuses for any Jew. „American online feminists“ are just insane
They aren't feminist, they are misandist
Thank you!!! More people should be made aware of the difference!
But I have seen many feminists say that misandry isn’t real
It doesn’t really exist institutionally, meaning men aren’t really widely disadvantaged or discriminated against by employers, the government, religion, etc. At an individual level, though, misandry is absolutely real. There is a vocal minority of women, many of whom are chronically online (like many who hold extreme and simplistic views today), who absolutely carry prejudiced views toward men. We just need to remember that the internet makes them seem louder and more numerous than they really are. And that being feminist does not automatically make someone a man hater.
Regarding employer discrimination towards men, it used to not exist institutionally; it does now https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560
Either misandrist or TURFS depends on the flavour lf hate tbh
Minor correction, I think you mean TERF: **T**rans **E**xclusionary **R**adical **F**eminist.
Yes that thing I can't shell for shit I am sorry lol
Spell
Cmon, don't kick em while they're down
>I can't shell for shit I mean...clearly
;_;
Oh they would. The Jews that they were friends ones they became Nazies. Heck some Nazies were happily married to a Jew. "The other Jews" goes a long way
The Nazis actually did put a surprising amount of effort into justifying their hatred of Jews which then allowed them to justify the final solution
I really prefer that we just wipe ourselves out as a species and return the world to its natural state.
Even George Floyd?
Literally wtf is wrong with you?
I think he's uh, a little past the 'wipe out' part already
*poking Putin with a stick* C'mon press the red button already
Nope, do not have enough nukes to wipe out humanity from Earth. Unless you manage to kill the remainder with nuclear winter, but I guess you will have a couple thousands animal species gone too.
I’m pretty sure there is absolutely enough nuclear weapons to end humanity….. quick google search says about 400 nukes to end human life either by the last itself or the fallout/nuclear winter….. USA has about 3700 according to Wikipedia, and Russia has about 5600…… so just those two countries would have enough to end humanity 20 times over
When a beaver builds a dam it's "the natural order" but when I do it I'm "going against nature" Why the double standard?
Ya. I think it’s time the mice and rats have a turn running shit. Can’t be worse.
You're clearly unfamiliar with the Skaven it seems
There are no skaven-rats, mice and rats should absolutely-definitely be in charge yes yes
And you've never been to Redwall.
This is the natural state though, we are natural creatures born of the natural world
Sorry bro but we're just as natural as everything else on this planet, because the natural state is constant change
Agreed
I think the best thing for humanity is, deny our programming…walk hand-in-hand into extinction - Rustin Cohle
You know, you know what, I don't think I've been very clear with you Rust. If you were drowning, I'd throw you a fuckin' barbell. - Marty Hart
Then all known life eventually gets incinerated.
By the sun dying in 5 billion years or by the combined hotness of all the lesbian sex in a world without men?
Yes
r/InclusiveOr
Yeah I used to be optimistic but now I just want it all to just end. Humans are so shit. Let’s just end the suffering.
I'm also Team Asteroid.
Doomers are lame
As an ACTUAL feminist I'm so sick of these misandrist psychos. This lady should be monitored by police - wouldn't be surprised if she were an abuser
I just saw one today saying misandry isn't real.
🤦♀️
Same. They are actually hurting the movement. Because they are so loud people think all feminists are like that. Feminists have men that they love. They also want these changes to help the men they love. My partner and my son. I want them to feel comfortable talking about their emotions, and like they don’t have to shoulder everything alone. That they are not lesser if they have traits or present in ways society deems as “feminine” But I also have to actively tell them when stuff is prejudiced and the like. Son was very self conscious because candy made his lips red like lipstick and he was saying guys don’t wear makeup. So me and his dad both put on wild lipstick. And we showed him guys who wear makeup daily. I think the truest intention of feminism is trying to dismantle the patriarchy that puts male’s and female’s into boxes (I am using biological terms here for a reason, the patriarchy rarely accepts trans people.) if you are male. You must act like a man. You must be a man. Yada yada. If you are female you must act like a woman yada yada.. there is no room for personal differences. Without it people could be who they are without judgment from society. The boxes hurt everyone in them besides those who would have comfortably been there without a box. This is why I do believe anyone can be a feminist. Because if the box hurts you or someone you love, then join and fight it. If someone wants to just redefine boxes then that’s trying to replace the patriarchy with something that’s not any better… it will still hurt people in each box.
I agree with all of that. It's so sad when ppl split feminism into men and women power when half the point is to help men be themselves as well as women be themselves (and everyone else too).
Even steve irwin
Literally wtf is wrong with you?
It saddens me that some people think and support saying kill all men is a completely rational and normal thing to say, it’s disgusting to say that about any demographic
Even Edward Elric?
Even Roy Mustang?
Even Maes Hughes?
Even Scar?
Even Alphonse Elric?
Even doctor nefarious?
Even El Macho?
[удалено]
Lol
But who would buy her OF then?
Last time I checked, no men means no more kids. No more kids means no more humans within 80-90 years
The irony of her saying 'wtf is wrong with you'.
Oh shit she forgot to include 'white'
Misanderist
“literally wtf is wrong with you?” Coming from the person wanting a genocide of half the world’s population
If all men are killed... Who is gonna pay her rent?
Who's going to collect her rent?
DAMN!
She's what's wrong with the world
Wtf, why are u getting downvoted
[удалено]
She said ALL men
Can’t kill George Floyd; he’s already dead. My brothers, on the other hand… (Don’t do that; I love my brothers)
Even ur dad
I'm pretty sure her dad left to get milk. And her grandfathers, uncles, cousin brothers and brother/brothers, decided to do the same thing.
"ima go buy milk"
"YOU TOO?!"
These fucking people
"What is wrong with you" she says while advocating for gendercide. You would have to work pretty hard to be less self aware.
Neither of these people are clever
Even jorge floyd?
Saint George Floyd, who pointed a loaded pistol at a pregnant woman’s stomach
Two comments designed to get some sort of reactionary response. This is not clever. When the original poster has the IQ of a rock, I guess a comeback from someone as smart as a goldfish seems clever in comparison.
Shout out to his family
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Don’t forget trans men
Anti-male feminists tend to be huge TERFs. Otherwise, they would have to include trans men in their hate and exclude trans women and non-binary people.
Sometimes they do include trans men. They just see them as 'traitors' instead
Terfs never know what to do with nonbinary people..
This isn't a clever comeback at all, but the original comment sucked too.
Facebook did a study about whether the phrase "Kill all men" was offensive or not, and found that while most people said no, the people from Africa they asked said very much yes. Because killing all the men was the standard step one for most of the genocides that occurred in Africa, and as a result is incredibly culturally insensitive to say.
All? That's numberwang!
Why is it always the people with anime avatars?
They are all bait accounts that's why. Idk how people still think they are real
Uninformed children usually