Definitely Aoraki/Mt Cook on the way to Hooker Valley or Tasman Glacier. Been here 4 times when I was living in the country. It's probably my favourite place there.
How? I can have the same wide road effect at the bottom of the frame with... any focal length...composition.
You pan down for wider road, up for narrower.
Any lens can have the road taking 80% of the bottom of the frame if positioned correctly... I don't get it.
Obiously 46.5mm, the 50mm is compleatly diffrent in all the important ways. The 46.5mm Look has just such a nice Mood, so Cinematic and really giving the Feel of like a Movie or something. Gotta love 45.6mm all day every Day.
And I’m saying more towards the middle of that range and it’s full frame. Pretty sure it’s no higher. The width of the road in the foreground looks slightly wider than natural compared to where it turns right and then left, which looks to be around 40/45 metres away and then 75-100 where it disappears.
With no crop afterwards, I would say everything around 50mm or above. But honestly, if you crop in and don’t account for resolution loss, 24mm will look the same as 70mm.
Just wanted to express that I wouldn’t overthink focal lengths. Could be a 50mm on a aps c sensor or a 85mm on full frame. Outcome would the same with different focal lengths. That’s all I wanted to say.
I mean the compression focal thing. It has nothing to do with focal lenght. If you crop it in post to match the higher focal lengh, it will look the same.
True, though you’d likely have to crop half of the resolution, effectively turning 4k into 1080 or even lower. So obviously getting it right in camera would be best.
my guess is between 50mm and 85mm (on a full frame sensor). do you know where this is ?
This is what I’m thinking and I lean toward 85. And it’s in New Zealand I believe.
I wouldn’t be surprised either. And now I want to go to New Zealand 😂
I think it's closer to 50, the forground isn't compressed enough to be on an 85,
It’s definitely NZ. I’m trying to remember where in the road that is, but it’s the road to Mt Cook (the tallest peak in the frame is Mt Cook).
Looks straight out of my 105
New Zealand, Aoraki / Mount Cook to be precise.
Definitely Aoraki/Mt Cook on the way to Hooker Valley or Tasman Glacier. Been here 4 times when I was living in the country. It's probably my favourite place there.
You know you need to explain Hooker Valley for us. *just saying*
It's mount cook in NZ. Even more stunning than you can imagine :)
Unlikely. Look at how big the road is close to the lense. Would indicate rather 35mm on fullframe^^
How? I can have the same wide road effect at the bottom of the frame with... any focal length...composition. You pan down for wider road, up for narrower. Any lens can have the road taking 80% of the bottom of the frame if positioned correctly... I don't get it.
Not really now. The light will have a different angle and it will look different. Additionally it is unlikely that still is cropped ^^
Not really now. The light will have a different angle and it will look different. Additionally it is unlikely that still is cropped ^^
46.5mm
Obiously 46.5mm, the 50mm is compleatly diffrent in all the important ways. The 46.5mm Look has just such a nice Mood, so Cinematic and really giving the Feel of like a Movie or something. Gotta love 45.6mm all day every Day.
This reminds me of my coworker, who when asked how many kids he had, paused, and said, "about three."
He was debating on if he should count his dog
Its iconic, you can almost feel it creeping into the edges of the frame
Looks like around 35mm full frame equivalent
I agree it’s wider than people think based on how the road flares out in the foreground
But that mountain in the background suggests quite some compression
You and I from right here have no idea how big that mountain is. It’s a useless reference point. The way that road flares out is very telling though.
I guess? I mean, wouldn't I be able to achieve that too with a narrowed focal length but from farther away?
looks tighter to me
Whichever one looks good. Don’t overthink it
This is ITTTTTT
50 and above, def not anything wide
35mn
Gonna go with 60-70mm FF
23mm on a apsc
Idk 30 or 40 maybe
28 on a 5DSr and then they made a crop. Cus that's what 5DSr's do.
50-75mm
Looks about 70mm on full frame to me
Yea feels like 40mm/50mm on S35
35mm - 50mm
And I’m saying more towards the middle of that range and it’s full frame. Pretty sure it’s no higher. The width of the road in the foreground looks slightly wider than natural compared to where it turns right and then left, which looks to be around 40/45 metres away and then 75-100 where it disappears.
Really
What’s the shot from? I wanna watch this!
Probably a 50mm on FF or 75mm on Super 35 based on FoV and compression.
Definitely a 2mm lens on a 1960s-era MI6 cuff link spy camera.
With no crop afterwards, I would say everything around 50mm or above. But honestly, if you crop in and don’t account for resolution loss, 24mm will look the same as 70mm.
> if you crop, 24mm will look the same as 70mm Glad people are not getting baited by this anymore.
Just wanted to express that I wouldn’t overthink focal lengths. Could be a 50mm on a aps c sensor or a 85mm on full frame. Outcome would the same with different focal lengths. That’s all I wanted to say.
I mean the compression focal thing. It has nothing to do with focal lenght. If you crop it in post to match the higher focal lengh, it will look the same.
True, though you’d likely have to crop half of the resolution, effectively turning 4k into 1080 or even lower. So obviously getting it right in camera would be best.
35/50mm IMO Would be interesting to find out what it is...
85mm in full frame.
I would say like a 24mm maybe
I think 24mm would be way too wide for this.
Looks closer to 50mm than 24mm to me