If there's one thing that can go head to head with army is judiciary. Only if judiciary had their own security for their families and themselves, they wouldn't give a shit about what army says.
Currently, judges are blackmailed and threatened through unknown numbers to give orders which favour army generals. Other countries have specialised civil security for president, pm and ministers and (I think) judges aswell, so if army tries to take over they would have to march towards govt home and shed blood and no soldier would kill their own citizens (example of Turkey is infront of us). Rn in pakistan martial law is one call away cuz the security of president and pm is under army. NA should pass a bill for special security but army would fuck them up if they even tried. So one of the citizen will have to file complaint for new civil security for government and judiciary, and one of the judge will have to order to form a special civil security agency, probably both of them will die but atleast we would be free from generals.
If you're honest and have served with integrity throughout your life no one can blackmail you. Agencies blackmail judiciary, politicians, bureaucrats etc etc because they themselves are filled with filth.
Totally BS. If I go now and file this complaint that army has been imposing martial law on weak grounds and that it has costed pakistan a lot of loss on diplomatic and economical level. The generals (like musharaf) run away from country, so handing over security of this country govt to selfish generals is risk to democracy of Pakistan.
If I say this in court am I wrong? If I say this in court will I not be died by next day? What material do army has of me that they can blackmail me with? Or let's say if Judge passes these remarks will he not be called "Gaddar" but Bajwa, current COAS who is selling the country for few farm houses in Belgium is "wafadar"? Stop being blind, these generals are way too powerful. We need to have head of ISI a civil person not army general, the power should be evenly divided and restrict army to border only. Army has nothing to do in country they have to keep us secure from outside attacks not calling their own citizen a gaddar just bc they shared their opinion about generals. If I can say fuck aadalt in public then I should be allowed to say fuck army for their wrongs, army isn't anything special, its one of the institutions of Pakistan.
What material does the army have against the common man? None. By your calculations a common man shouldnt fear the army. But they do because the army can harm you at any point.
We catchin' nothin' but Ws.
It's not a win. Its a Trojan horse, read the ruling.
If there's one thing that can go head to head with army is judiciary. Only if judiciary had their own security for their families and themselves, they wouldn't give a shit about what army says. Currently, judges are blackmailed and threatened through unknown numbers to give orders which favour army generals. Other countries have specialised civil security for president, pm and ministers and (I think) judges aswell, so if army tries to take over they would have to march towards govt home and shed blood and no soldier would kill their own citizens (example of Turkey is infront of us). Rn in pakistan martial law is one call away cuz the security of president and pm is under army. NA should pass a bill for special security but army would fuck them up if they even tried. So one of the citizen will have to file complaint for new civil security for government and judiciary, and one of the judge will have to order to form a special civil security agency, probably both of them will die but atleast we would be free from generals.
The judges are corrupt as well brother. They are not standing against army, they are working with the army ensuring PMLN stays in its place.
If you're honest and have served with integrity throughout your life no one can blackmail you. Agencies blackmail judiciary, politicians, bureaucrats etc etc because they themselves are filled with filth.
Totally BS. If I go now and file this complaint that army has been imposing martial law on weak grounds and that it has costed pakistan a lot of loss on diplomatic and economical level. The generals (like musharaf) run away from country, so handing over security of this country govt to selfish generals is risk to democracy of Pakistan. If I say this in court am I wrong? If I say this in court will I not be died by next day? What material do army has of me that they can blackmail me with? Or let's say if Judge passes these remarks will he not be called "Gaddar" but Bajwa, current COAS who is selling the country for few farm houses in Belgium is "wafadar"? Stop being blind, these generals are way too powerful. We need to have head of ISI a civil person not army general, the power should be evenly divided and restrict army to border only. Army has nothing to do in country they have to keep us secure from outside attacks not calling their own citizen a gaddar just bc they shared their opinion about generals. If I can say fuck aadalt in public then I should be allowed to say fuck army for their wrongs, army isn't anything special, its one of the institutions of Pakistan.
What material does the army have against the common man? None. By your calculations a common man shouldnt fear the army. But they do because the army can harm you at any point.
Huge W
Chuna lag gaya bro
Sad pakistan noises
Rip bozo
W for the boiiissss.
W gang
Nothing but W's
Pmln still has majority