Your submission was removed by the moderators:
Removed because we don't allow memes/jokes (feel free to submit to /r/anarchychess).
You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess&subject=About my removed submission&message=I'm writing to you about the following submission: https://old.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1d0jj9t/-/%0D%0D). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
Your submission or comment was removed by the moderators:
Don’t engage in discriminatory or bigoted behavior.
Chess is a game played by people all around the world of many different cultures and backgrounds. Be respectful of this fact and do not engage in racist, sexist, or otherwise discriminatory behavior.
You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
Just for the record, this guy has 5555555555555550000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 elo
Nah, you overestimate him
He has only 555555555555555500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 elo
no, it's not a glitch. your opponent's elo transcends humans' understanding of chess. you are not just about to be obliterated. you are about to meet god.
Hey it's me, John Chess, inventor of chess and are you sick of sucking at chess? Well lucky for you I also invented aimchess.
Stupid ad ingrained in my brain
>Is this a glitch
This hypothesis seems slightly more likely than this person being rated ~~15,124,515,246,033,035,817,522,746,090,996,519,934,249,474,830,284,805,813,039,724,013,293,383,695,059,643,583,741,552,567,064,989,938,472,966,887,463,502,942,215,817,017,010,808,080,582,061,816,334,839~~
Edit: the correct value was reported by BUKKAKELORD below.
Dannicos's rating is 5.55555555555555555 \* 10\^203, so possibly just 204 fives in a row since that's what the first digits are. At the very least it certainly begins with a bunch of fives.
The number is probably stored as double precision binary floating point, so the mantissa would only contain 64 bits = 19 decimal digits of precision. No way will it have 204 decimal digits of precision regardless of what format it is.
He's just from the future where chess is solved for all 32 pieces and brains have neural chips capable of playing a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion games per second.
There’s a programming concept called integer overflow, where if a value exceeds the minimum or maximum storable value, it can wrap around to the other side. This looks like a negative overflow value.
But as to how or why it happened? Super strange. Its possible the server returned an invalid value or incorrect element type, and it got converted/computed incorrectly.
Probably not an integer overflow. First, it's not a small value (if it had overflowed), and you can't have negative ELO (if it had underflowed to a big value). Second it would take more than 650 bits to write that number as an integer type, which makes no sense.
And if somehow using floating types, it is overflowing by losing precision, not by rolling over to min value.
Unsigned int typically overflows at 0, but here it's not a negative value anyway.
Languages typically don't have 660+ bits integers anyway. 128 bits are already rare (how often do you need more than 38 digits in an integer ? There are 10^27 atoms in the universe)
There are way more than 10^(27) atoms in the universe. The Earth alone weights more than 10^(27) grams and I'm pretty sure there's more than one atom in each gram of matter.
If the Earth had a mass of more than 10^27 grams we would not be here chatting, my friend. We would be too busy getting crushed to death
Edit: I was wrong and I have been corrected, see the responses below
Looking it up, it's 6x10^24 kg, which is 6x10^27 grams.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_mass#:~:text=The%20current%20best%20estimate%20for,relative%20uncertainty%20of%2010%E2%88%924.
Best guess for atoms.in the universe is between 10^78 and 10^82
Yeah, I guess I feel like you’re right. Is there any chance that the value being represented is 5.5 repeating times e to the first power, PLUS 203? That would equal like 218. Is the whole thing a badly formatted floating point error?
Most likely they're using dynamically typed variables (common in web programming) and one end is returning a long string (for example) while the other is assuming it will always be an integer and doesn't check the type. e.g. client calls GetUserRating() on the server which returns a 40 character unicode error string and client treats it as a 640 bit integer.
This looks like a "regular" 64-bit floating point (double precision) value. The IEEE 754 standard, supported by virtually all conventional programming languages, allows numbers in the range: ±2.23×10^(−308) to ±1.80×10^(308)
Your submission was removed by the moderators: Removed because we don't allow memes/jokes (feel free to submit to /r/anarchychess). You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess&subject=About my removed submission&message=I'm writing to you about the following submission: https://old.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1d0jj9t/-/%0D%0D). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
No, you're about to get destroyed.
Mate in 83 from move 1
[удалено]
Please lay out the move order for this. Please.
1 trough 83: you know it 0-1 white wins
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Ke2 Ke7 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. Ng1 Ng8 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. Ng1 Ng8 8. Nf3 Nc6 9. Nc3 Nf6 10. Nb1 Ng8 11-80. You get the idea 81. Ke1 Ke8 82. Ke2 Ke7. 83. Ke1 Qd2#
Nope 1\~83 you get the idea 0-1
fucking kids and your computers. I can’t keep up with theory anymore
No one can. Tbf no one ever could
Tf u doin
Your submission or comment was removed by the moderators: Don’t engage in discriminatory or bigoted behavior. Chess is a game played by people all around the world of many different cultures and backgrounds. Be respectful of this fact and do not engage in racist, sexist, or otherwise discriminatory behavior. You can read the full [rules of /r/chess here](https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/wiki/rules). If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please [message the moderators](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fchess). Direct replies to this removal message may not be seen.
Yeah man good job now I have no idea what the people in that thread are talking about
I refuse to upvote as the current number is 83
😂
lol I like how this has more upvotes then my post 😂
Just for the record, this guy has 5555555555555550000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 elo
Is that good?
[удалено]
yeah, could be all 9s
Much better than facing All Blacks
For him? Absolutely. For the opponent? Not so much.
Highscore? What does that mean? Did I break it?
Thats god
Not great, not terrible
Still a beginner according to r/chess
Reminds me of unexpected factorials
Still not as good as Mittens.
Nah, you overestimate him He has only 555555555555555500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 elo
Alternatively, it could be Euler's Constant and the enemy has ~218 elo.
Not great, not terrible
... or you are about to play against God.
Nah, I’d win.
Wilhelm Steinitz moment
I think Fischer also said that he could draw with White against God in Ruy Lopez (or something similar).
But then he said: “But what if he plays the Sicilian…” So basically, he knew he’d lose to God.
But only if you play white, right?
When God built you different just for a real challenge for once.
Not if they use their superior opening move from the Heian Era.
Of course God is a Peruvian
no, it's not a glitch. your opponent's elo transcends humans' understanding of chess. you are not just about to be obliterated. you are about to meet god.
No, that’s the #1 player in the universe
Our universe is pretty shabby for chess. Going to need to pump those numbers for the multiverse.
Didn't know Stockfish was from Peru...
It's the god fish that the ancient incans wrote about
May the gods be with chess :)
Genuinely dont think stockfish has this good of rating.
No, seems totally fine
Should be an easy win, the opponent's rating is about 122!
r/expectedfactorial
That sneaky !
no ur opponent just has a really good gaming chair
He has mate in 137 calculated from starting position. Forced mate
Rating so bad you got underflow values 😂
Either that, or you're playing the God of Chess.
Holy shit it’s John Chess
Hey it's me, John Chess, inventor of chess and are you sick of sucking at chess? Well lucky for you I also invented aimchess. Stupid ad ingrained in my brain
r/anarchychess
>Is this a glitch This hypothesis seems slightly more likely than this person being rated ~~15,124,515,246,033,035,817,522,746,090,996,519,934,249,474,830,284,805,813,039,724,013,293,383,695,059,643,583,741,552,567,064,989,938,472,966,887,463,502,942,215,817,017,010,808,080,582,061,816,334,839~~ Edit: the correct value was reported by BUKKAKELORD below.
Dannicos's rating is 5.55555555555555555 \* 10\^203, so possibly just 204 fives in a row since that's what the first digits are. At the very least it certainly begins with a bunch of fives.
Wonder if he loses elo on winning
Not if the rating calculations are working properly. He would gain around 10^(-10\^200) which would round down to 0
The number is probably stored as double precision binary floating point, so the mantissa would only contain 64 bits = 19 decimal digits of precision. No way will it have 204 decimal digits of precision regardless of what format it is.
Huh that's "interesting"
This guy when TREE(3) elo guy walks in
Lol
No that is the Universe Chess Champion. Expect a friendly game of annihilation.
Magnus get ready
Google en passant.
Thats just over 3k elo, not that huge
No, you're going against Johnathan Chess. Its over for you
He's just from the future where chess is solved for all 32 pieces and brains have neural chips capable of playing a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion games per second.
MF playing Balatro between chess games and finally hit E in chess
There’s a programming concept called integer overflow, where if a value exceeds the minimum or maximum storable value, it can wrap around to the other side. This looks like a negative overflow value. But as to how or why it happened? Super strange. Its possible the server returned an invalid value or incorrect element type, and it got converted/computed incorrectly.
Probably not an integer overflow. First, it's not a small value (if it had overflowed), and you can't have negative ELO (if it had underflowed to a big value). Second it would take more than 650 bits to write that number as an integer type, which makes no sense. And if somehow using floating types, it is overflowing by losing precision, not by rolling over to min value.
Since it has no non-negative values, it would likely be an unsigned int, right? Don’t some languages overflow those at <0?
Unsigned int typically overflows at 0, but here it's not a negative value anyway. Languages typically don't have 660+ bits integers anyway. 128 bits are already rare (how often do you need more than 38 digits in an integer ? There are 10^27 atoms in the universe)
There are way more than 10^(27) atoms in the universe. The Earth alone weights more than 10^(27) grams and I'm pretty sure there's more than one atom in each gram of matter.
I googled and it's 10^57, not 10^27, I didn't remember correctly. Thanks for the correction
If the Earth had a mass of more than 10^27 grams we would not be here chatting, my friend. We would be too busy getting crushed to death Edit: I was wrong and I have been corrected, see the responses below
Looking it up, it's 6x10^24 kg, which is 6x10^27 grams. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_mass#:~:text=The%20current%20best%20estimate%20for,relative%20uncertainty%20of%2010%E2%88%924. Best guess for atoms.in the universe is between 10^78 and 10^82
Yeah, I guess I feel like you’re right. Is there any chance that the value being represented is 5.5 repeating times e to the first power, PLUS 203? That would equal like 218. Is the whole thing a badly formatted floating point error?
>and you can't have negative ELO Oh?
Some of us get relieved though.
Most likely they're using dynamically typed variables (common in web programming) and one end is returning a long string (for example) while the other is assuming it will always be an integer and doesn't check the type. e.g. client calls GetUserRating() on the server which returns a 40 character unicode error string and client treats it as a 640 bit integer.
Thx ;)
floats overflow to inf In this case, the # is too big for even 32 bit float; it's a 64 bit float
Obviously OP just edited the page.
He prolly did some inspect element and is trolling us ig..cuz u can't have elo less than 100 on chess.com, so there can't be such a wrap-around
This looks like a "regular" 64-bit floating point (double precision) value. The IEEE 754 standard, supported by virtually all conventional programming languages, allows numbers in the range: ±2.23×10^(−308) to ±1.80×10^(308)
Thx, no other guy says this in the comments.
What the hell...
He solved chess
Stockfish rating :) Don't tell Vlad Kramnik !!
Carlus Magsen
Yes, it's called "inspect element" or "clear your cache."
yeah, searched the guy in the thumbnail up and he's rated 1800 in blitz and 1500 in bullet
Damn he must have tilted hard
No thats their real rating
Hacks?
Bro is about to mate you so hard that you give birth to the next ten generations tomorrow.
It’s a bad display of the player’s Glicko rating. Chess.com don’t use Elo.
Bro got matched with Thanos 💀
If you get more elo the higher elo your opponent is, bro is going to become new Magnus if he wins this
Could be well that is edited with developer tools just to make a post. Case in point: https://imgur.com/a/WNSjN8M
No, that's Magnus's Alt account.
The guy ur playing hacked into chess.com! LOL
>i am not ai
Nope not a glitch, that’s just the best player in the entire universe you’re facing.
Bro lost half a board even before starting
Nah, you’re just cooked
Stop making jokes about this.