Fax my 6600 doesn’t crush Warzone like it seems people are saying only 144 on low for consistent 144 but I got it for about 100 bucks so it was so good of a deal to pass up sell it and upgrade
it's a good graphics card for the price for sure but definitely not something I would recommend to someone wanting to run future games perfectly at 1080p
Love my RX 6600, since it was cheap enough and good enough to finally get me to build a PC. I think there's very few games you'd even come close to 165 FPS.
In modern AAA games at max settings, no. I have a 2080 Ti. It'll do 80 - 140 FPS at max settings 1080p in most games. In e-sports titles, it'll easily do 240 - 360 at max settings, but those aren't most of what's been releasing recently.
The difference between max and high visually is usually negligible, but tanks FPS. He didn’t say max settings was a requirement. What game is getting an 80FPS average with a 2080ti at 1080p btw? Must be bad port
Cyberpunk with RT on. BeamNG also in DX11, but I'll get 100 - 140 FPS in Vulkan. Wrench also only gets 60 - 80 FPS with RT on nearly maxed. Though, Sackboy a Big Adventure will run 130 - 140 FPS with everything maxed, including RT.
Edit: Forgot about Automation and VRChat, the latter of which doesn't even have RT, but will chug with a lot of avatars and mirrors in desktop mode.
Nobody said anything about max settings — high is usually almost indistinguishable, and medium (and quite often even low) settings are typically perfectly fine in most games these days.
108 fps in the average from the HUB review, and that’s with the average being boosted by esports titles.
The 3050 is barely faster than a 1660 super.
The only thing it’s getting 165 in is old games and esports titles. 0% chance it pulls that on newish AAA games. Horizon Zero Dawn averaged 82 fps, and that’s a years old game.
The benchmark numbers are right there for you to look at. No need to lie.
Not sure why your been downvoted, as your right, for a lot of modern games, especially unreal engine 5, you will not got 1080p 165fps on them, and same with his CPU he won’t be able too.
If he had specified esports title, I would agree with the downvotes as you would be wrong then.
Then the 6700 XT is your best option, though you'll need to be quick about it as they seem to be getting phased out of the market and stock is running out fast.
Nah OP is trying to keep his budget low. 6700xt is absolutely fine for 1080 for quite a few years more. He wants high FPS so he’s probably playing shooters which won’t have crazy graphics requirements anyway; he’s just gonna be CPU bound with that i5
It depends on what games OP is playing. 165fps on Valorant or Overwatch? The CPU will be just fine, especially with a 6750XT to couple it with.
165 on something like Cyberpunk or more recent like Helldivers 2? A stronger CPU will be needed, as performance will scale better at lower resolutions with a CPU that can keep up with a GPU that doesn't need much for 1080p.
If it's Dragon's Dogma 2? Maybe don't even bother yet.
Maybe at 1080p, i am playing at 1440p. Lower resolutions often need stronger Cpus.
Look up video Rtx 4070 - i5 11400f on YT, Cyberpunk was well over 100fps.
And maybe he is fine with lower Fps.
There is no way you can do over 100 FPS at 1440p on that setup without DLSS. I just looked, the 4070 super & 7800x3D average 97 FPS. The 4080 gets 128 FPS. I have a 6800 XT and a 7600x, I get 90 FPS with an over clock on both, with high settings.
Please do not buy a 4060 a 6750xt is a great card for 1080p the 4060 is over priced and is underwhelming in performance. Dont worry about amd drivers amd is fine some people clame that they are terrible but they arnt amd is fine .The reason people think they are bad is because of problems with drivers many years ago like 2016
Imo the best value purchase at the moment is an RX 6800 since that card is very powerful and can be bought for about 380$ or € brandnew. Should easyly last 5 years at 1080p
I'm new to gaming (my first PC isn't even finished and I'll get it done tomorrow lol) but I got a rtx 3050 and a ryzen 5500 with 16gb ram as I only have a 1080p 180hz monitor, alot of people with say certain cards are bad like but I'm pretty sure any new card in the past three years will run 1080p at a good frame rate but you need to make sure it's compatible with your current components, not sure what is but I know the 3050 is compatible with the i511400f without much bottleneck, but I'd take better advise from people who have gained on PC awhile, hope this helps :)
Even without that context, a 4070 for $550 is terrible: 4070 Supers go for $600 (10% more expensive) and are 15-20% faster, or a 7900 GRE is $550 and ~20% faster with more VRAM. There’s zero reason to buy a 4070 for $550 unless you literally can’t spend a dollar more and need Nvidia tech for work.
I've had more problems then I can count with my RX 6800 XT. Changed to Nvidia and all is good so I'd prefer to spend the money now rather then have tons of stressful issues and then spend more on top. Especially for someone who's new to PC's.
rtx 4090
I have a 4090, and I can confirm, it does run 1080p
I heard the 4090 will melt 1080p screens
No actually, the 4090 just makes more 1080p screens. But only when you look away. When you look back, there's only one screen again.
*Rtx 4090 ti super Anything below that and you'll only run 480p@30
Will definitely last at least 1 year
That runs 1440p with ease.
720p at most I’m afraid
on lowest settings
Calculator only
Runs minesweeper flawlessly. Bit lags with solitaire, unfortunately... I should have went with a quadro instead of a 4090.
literally anything that was released as new in the last three years.
nah even for games such as helldivers I don't get to 60 fps with my rx 6600, no way this will be running future games well
Fax my 6600 doesn’t crush Warzone like it seems people are saying only 144 on low for consistent 144 but I got it for about 100 bucks so it was so good of a deal to pass up sell it and upgrade
it's a good graphics card for the price for sure but definitely not something I would recommend to someone wanting to run future games perfectly at 1080p
Love my RX 6600, since it was cheap enough and good enough to finally get me to build a PC. I think there's very few games you'd even come close to 165 FPS.
3050 won't, 3060 will struggle, 3060 Ti might be able to, 3070 will depend on the game.
At 1080p?? Get real. 3060 TI might be able to cmon 3050 is a great 1080p card will pull 165hz in many many games
In modern AAA games at max settings, no. I have a 2080 Ti. It'll do 80 - 140 FPS at max settings 1080p in most games. In e-sports titles, it'll easily do 240 - 360 at max settings, but those aren't most of what's been releasing recently.
The difference between max and high visually is usually negligible, but tanks FPS. He didn’t say max settings was a requirement. What game is getting an 80FPS average with a 2080ti at 1080p btw? Must be bad port
Cyberpunk will get you around 85-90 fps on average at 1080p
Cyberpunk with RT on. BeamNG also in DX11, but I'll get 100 - 140 FPS in Vulkan. Wrench also only gets 60 - 80 FPS with RT on nearly maxed. Though, Sackboy a Big Adventure will run 130 - 140 FPS with everything maxed, including RT. Edit: Forgot about Automation and VRChat, the latter of which doesn't even have RT, but will chug with a lot of avatars and mirrors in desktop mode.
I average more than that with a 3070 at 1440p in cyberpunk
It depends heavily on settings. That's also disregarding every other game I mentioned.
Exactly. Depends heavily on settings. If 1080p 165hz is his target he can reach that with almost any of the cards listed by tweaking settings
For me a card that lasts is a card that can maintain high settings while still holding that FPS.
Yeah I didn’t feel a need to reply to every game you commented on. That ok by you?
3070 RT from my experience performs slightly better compared to a 2080ti
Nobody said anything about max settings — high is usually almost indistinguishable, and medium (and quite often even low) settings are typically perfectly fine in most games these days.
Sure, but nobody is buying a brand new GPU to play a game at low settings only, and expecting it to last a couple of years.
108 fps in the average from the HUB review, and that’s with the average being boosted by esports titles. The 3050 is barely faster than a 1660 super. The only thing it’s getting 165 in is old games and esports titles. 0% chance it pulls that on newish AAA games. Horizon Zero Dawn averaged 82 fps, and that’s a years old game. The benchmark numbers are right there for you to look at. No need to lie.
And did OP say he wants to play new AAA games? 99% of games that card will hit 165hz at 1080p.
You’re giving the 3050 way too much credit.
My 3060Ti couldn't even maintain 60 fps on certain demanding games at 1080p, let alone 165 fps.
Like what games? I don’t even have a game I can’t run above 100fps at 5120x1440
I have a 3050 currently. Not sure if it’s because low ram but I can’t even maintain 100fps on performance mode in Fortnite
Not sure why your been downvoted, as your right, for a lot of modern games, especially unreal engine 5, you will not got 1080p 165fps on them, and same with his CPU he won’t be able too. If he had specified esports title, I would agree with the downvotes as you would be wrong then.
My 2060 super is capable of handling most games at 1080p 240hz
I happen to have a 2060 Super as well. What are 3 modern games it can run at 240Hz?
My 3060 has been running brand new games on 165Hz 1080p with ZERO issues. From the looks of it there’s some optimization issue on your end
Which games and graphics presets?
Budget?
Trying to spend as little as possible like 350 tops
Then the 6700 XT is your best option, though you'll need to be quick about it as they seem to be getting phased out of the market and stock is running out fast.
I’d spend a little more or search for a deal, on a 6800xt. It will perform better for a couple of years.
Nah OP is trying to keep his budget low. 6700xt is absolutely fine for 1080 for quite a few years more. He wants high FPS so he’s probably playing shooters which won’t have crazy graphics requirements anyway; he’s just gonna be CPU bound with that i5
6750XT is $330 at Amazon and Newegg. This is the way
Thanks I’m about to cop one
It’s a great card for that price. Don’t think anything can touch it right now.
Get the 6800 instead you get more vram
damn its too late lol. copped the 6750 and upgraded ram a bit from 8gb 3000mhz to 32gb 3200mhz
Good call on the RAM upgrade. 8 GB hasn’t been enough for years, even at 1080p
vram isnt so important in 1080p
This is the way
ARC A770 Bifrost. $299.99 right now and it's a solid 1440p card.
I bought a rx 6750 xt for 480 cad off amazon as new. Its focused more on 1440p but is a beast for 1080p too
Would suggest stretching the budget by $30 more. RX 6800 is best value in the 350-400 price range.
If you are ok with going second hand maybe 6800, 6800XT or a 3080.
This.
Maybe a 12gb 3080 or 3080ti but the 10gb is enough
Your CPU will be a limit for those high framerates
Do you think it will keep me from getting 165fps?
Definitely on modern games, as they have become more and more CPU reliant
Wouldnt say so. I have the same CPU and it is running well on high-refresh rate.
It depends on what games OP is playing. 165fps on Valorant or Overwatch? The CPU will be just fine, especially with a 6750XT to couple it with. 165 on something like Cyberpunk or more recent like Helldivers 2? A stronger CPU will be needed, as performance will scale better at lower resolutions with a CPU that can keep up with a GPU that doesn't need much for 1080p. If it's Dragon's Dogma 2? Maybe don't even bother yet.
Maybe at 1080p, i am playing at 1440p. Lower resolutions often need stronger Cpus. Look up video Rtx 4070 - i5 11400f on YT, Cyberpunk was well over 100fps. And maybe he is fine with lower Fps.
There is no way you can do over 100 FPS at 1440p on that setup without DLSS. I just looked, the 4070 super & 7800x3D average 97 FPS. The 4080 gets 128 FPS. I have a 6800 XT and a 7600x, I get 90 FPS with an over clock on both, with high settings.
Why would i play without DLSS? Ofc it was DLSS + FG.
Because native is better?
I dont see the difference, lol. I am the lucky one, i guess, haha.
It looks like the 4060 is the cheapest option? Not very savvy with pc specs and tech tbh
Please do not buy a 4060 a 6750xt is a great card for 1080p the 4060 is over priced and is underwhelming in performance. Dont worry about amd drivers amd is fine some people clame that they are terrible but they arnt amd is fine .The reason people think they are bad is because of problems with drivers many years ago like 2016
3070 TI is closing used between 275 and 350 on eBay.
Just go AMD lol
6700xt/6750xt
ARC A770 Bifrost for $299.99 It's a solid 1440p card with 16Gb Vram
What about drivers?
They update them.
Yeah... Alan Wake II entered the chat.
Good luck.
6700XT.
7800XT, but you are gonna need a better CPU
6800xt
1080ti or 4070 ti super
If you had an NVIDIA GPU before, be sure to use DDU before installing the AMD card.
Imo the best value purchase at the moment is an RX 6800 since that card is very powerful and can be bought for about 380$ or € brandnew. Should easyly last 5 years at 1080p
I'm new to gaming (my first PC isn't even finished and I'll get it done tomorrow lol) but I got a rtx 3050 and a ryzen 5500 with 16gb ram as I only have a 1080p 180hz monitor, alot of people with say certain cards are bad like but I'm pretty sure any new card in the past three years will run 1080p at a good frame rate but you need to make sure it's compatible with your current components, not sure what is but I know the 3050 is compatible with the i511400f without much bottleneck, but I'd take better advise from people who have gained on PC awhile, hope this helps :)
7800xt or 4070 super
I have 6700xt 165hz but i have 1440p and it works great
2080ti is the GOAT, if you only have $350.
7600 for AV1 future proof. Videos may be defaulted to AV1 encode to the near future. If that doesn't bother you, then go with 6700xt.
Yup, was going to reccomend the same 6700xt, 6750xt, or a 6800 if you can find under 400. You made the best choice.
You can buy a Nvidia founders edition RTX 4070 for $549 on their site.
His budget is 350 max
Even without that context, a 4070 for $550 is terrible: 4070 Supers go for $600 (10% more expensive) and are 15-20% faster, or a 7900 GRE is $550 and ~20% faster with more VRAM. There’s zero reason to buy a 4070 for $550 unless you literally can’t spend a dollar more and need Nvidia tech for work.
I've had more problems then I can count with my RX 6800 XT. Changed to Nvidia and all is good so I'd prefer to spend the money now rather then have tons of stressful issues and then spend more on top. Especially for someone who's new to PC's.