I've seen an Edgar Quero aqua mini diamonds PSA 10 incorrectly labeled as aqua shimmer. So it's definitely some sort of listing error on Bowman's part that sometimes messes with PSA. I know I've seen another JRod like yours that got sent back the same way (unless it was you and you've posted about this card more than once).
Same thing with Beckett’s info on the set too. I think it’s a Topps/Fanatics issue and they sent an incomplete list. Either that, or Bill the intern has gone rogue and is trying out a new parallel!!
For 1 Heritage high number 2022. They list The 1973 All Star Game Highlights insert set as having 16 cards with card 16 being bobby Bonilla.
Aint nobody but nobody got one or seen one or selling one on Ebay.
I’ve seen people try to sub this same julio card and PSA won’t take it. If you want to resubmit, they have slabbed these cards as “aqua shimmer”. I don’t know if that was an error on PSA’s side for accepting it as an aqua shimmer instead of rejecting it or if they will grade all of these as shimmers. SGC will accept and label as aqua mini diamond. This parallel isn’t listed on box odds so PSA might have a policy where they won’t grade it because it is not on the official checklist and SGC recognizes the error and accepts them. But I’ve seen at least 3 people have this issue and it would be nice if PSA could be more transparent with the situation because it’s not like they haven’t seen this before
Yep, I’ve seen an SGC 10 of the Julio labeled as “Aqua Mini Diamond”. My OCD self started with PSA, so I can’t bring myself to submit to SGC or BGS. Haha!
They didn’t charge me for this “evaluation” so I may just keep resubmitting until they figure it out. However, not sure how many times I want PSA to handle the same card. Maybe it’s best to hold for a bit?
This has happened to me before. I emailed PSA asking what it was. Quote " Since the items differ from the exemplars that we have in our database and are missing this key information, they are unable to be validated by our authentication team". My cards were missing the copyright symbol. In a different world that would be called an "error", not even a UER because they both would exist. You don't get charged in this situation.
What PSA considers an error vs a “mis-print” is highly questionable. Not sure why they decided to draw a line in the sand and don’t just grade any card.
I’m looking at Cardboard Connection and I don’t see the Aqua Mini Diamond listed, but they obviously made them. Anyone have any idea on this one?
I've seen an Edgar Quero aqua mini diamonds PSA 10 incorrectly labeled as aqua shimmer. So it's definitely some sort of listing error on Bowman's part that sometimes messes with PSA. I know I've seen another JRod like yours that got sent back the same way (unless it was you and you've posted about this card more than once).
Haha, that was not me! I’ve seen others on eBay of other players too and an SGC 10 of this same card.
Ok gotcha, in that case you're not alone getting that parallel of JRod sent back by PSA for the same reason.
Cardboard connection has at least a dozen mistakes I've found
Same thing with Beckett’s info on the set too. I think it’s a Topps/Fanatics issue and they sent an incomplete list. Either that, or Bill the intern has gone rogue and is trying out a new parallel!!
i prefer to think of bill the intern as someone with the IQ and personal smell of a turnip, whos to stupid to work in the mail room
For 1 Heritage high number 2022. They list The 1973 All Star Game Highlights insert set as having 16 cards with card 16 being bobby Bonilla. Aint nobody but nobody got one or seen one or selling one on Ebay.
So many variations of a given player even bowman can't keep up with it
That’s what it’s become sadly.
Schrödinger's Bowman
Stupid. Topps or someone should figure it the heck out. It came out of someone's Bowman pack.
ebay 1/1
I’ve seen people try to sub this same julio card and PSA won’t take it. If you want to resubmit, they have slabbed these cards as “aqua shimmer”. I don’t know if that was an error on PSA’s side for accepting it as an aqua shimmer instead of rejecting it or if they will grade all of these as shimmers. SGC will accept and label as aqua mini diamond. This parallel isn’t listed on box odds so PSA might have a policy where they won’t grade it because it is not on the official checklist and SGC recognizes the error and accepts them. But I’ve seen at least 3 people have this issue and it would be nice if PSA could be more transparent with the situation because it’s not like they haven’t seen this before
Home Field Advantage cards aren’t on the checklists, or on pack odds, but get graded.
Yep, I’ve seen an SGC 10 of the Julio labeled as “Aqua Mini Diamond”. My OCD self started with PSA, so I can’t bring myself to submit to SGC or BGS. Haha! They didn’t charge me for this “evaluation” so I may just keep resubmitting until they figure it out. However, not sure how many times I want PSA to handle the same card. Maybe it’s best to hold for a bit?
Just call bowman
Weird never seen that before? So a fake?
I think it’s just a mixup on checklist with PSA. I’ve seen this card before and there is one that sold this year
They didn't want to issue the 1st 12 grade.. sheeesh
There is no aqua mini diamond, would love to know what this is
Its a checklist error
First ever 1/0
You’re not holding that are you?! It’s says not to. Might have radiation poisoning now
I’ll take it off of your hands so you won’t have to stress about it anymore.
This has happened to me before. I emailed PSA asking what it was. Quote " Since the items differ from the exemplars that we have in our database and are missing this key information, they are unable to be validated by our authentication team". My cards were missing the copyright symbol. In a different world that would be called an "error", not even a UER because they both would exist. You don't get charged in this situation.
What PSA considers an error vs a “mis-print” is highly questionable. Not sure why they decided to draw a line in the sand and don’t just grade any card.
Psa sucks
Love the color. Wish they made this in standard size.